Organizational Analysis Report Rubric
Organizational Analysis Report Rubric
Criteria Ratings
Embark and clarify
Respond to or initiate research
Define the problem and specify Advanced and Self- Advanced (D) Competent (CR) Satisfactory (PA) Unsatisfactory (NN)
Define purpose Developing (HD)
In addition to demonstrating the Respond to questions/tasks Evidence of selection of Adequate response to the task but is Inadequate response to the task
Advanced level of competence, required by and implicit in a information for the task but it is limited in expression of ideas and and limited in expression of ideas
the work shows evidence of close inquiry. Competence in not always relevant or fully selection of information. Shows and selection of information.
highly original or insightful choosing from several provided discussed. Has understood and some understanding of the task but Shows inadequate understanding
selection of information. The structures to clarify questions, addressed the task requirements. may not have addressed all of the task and may not have
work demonstrates curiosity in terms, requirements, Able to work independently from requirements. Demonstrates ability addressed all requirements.
approach to enquiry and critical expectations, and ethical, highly structured directions and to improve after structured Demonstrates inability to improve
analysis. social, cultural, and individual modelling from educator- directions and modelling from after structured directions and
(ESCT) issues. Evidence of prompted research. educator- prompted research. modelling from educator-
selection of information for prompted research. Neglecting to
relevance and appropriateness follow submission processes,
to the task. neglecting to submit final report
to Turnitin.
Analysis of context, problem, In addition to demonstrating the A wide variety of source types Locates and records Locates and records Fails to locate and record
and solutions: Find and reflect Advanced level of competence, a has been selected to critically data/information from more than data/information from a prescribed data/information from a
on research wide variety of source types has improve the response to the the prescribed number of number of sources across a specified prescribed number of sources
been selected to critically task. Developed competence in sources. A variety of source types range. Able to demonstrate across a specified range. Unable
improve the response to the task collecting and recording has been selected to improve the satisfactory reflection on the to demonstrate satisfactory
that demonstrates a critical appropriate research from self- response to the task. research process. original reflection on the research
awareness of research selected sources where Demonstrates a satisfactory process, including neglecting to
concentrations and contributions. information is not obvious. ability to collect and records submit final report to Turnitin.
Reflects insightfully on the appropriate research from self-
research process. Illustrates selected sources. Satisfactory
clarity in the enquiry approach. ability to reflect on the research
process.
Identification of contextual and Demonstrate an ability to Uses appropriate academic Uses mostly academic Some use of academic Inability to demonstrate use of
solution themes: Generate and reflect insightfully and to methodologies to search for and methodologies to search for and methodologies to search for academic methodologies to search
evaluate improve own processes used. select a range of reliable and select a range of sources. Some sources. Credibility and for sources. Does not demonstrate
Evidence of extremely solid, credible sources. Critically evidence of self-determined reliability of selected material satisfactory credibility nor
thorough, comprehensive evaluates selected criteria in addition to specified may be inconsistent. Evaluates reliability of selected materials.
written work. High level of information/data according to criteria. selected information/data using Does not evaluate selected
academic integrity. specified criteria. Evidence of specified criteria. Able to information/data using specified
Demonstrates the result of self- determined criteria demonstrate satisfactory criteria. Unable to demonstrate
consistent hard work, use of directly relevant to aims of the reflection on the research satisfactory reflection on the
sources and/or independent task. Demonstrates a capacity process. research process, including
scholarship. to be discerning about the way neglecting to submit final report
Provides evidence of substantive in which information is to Turnitin.
self- determined criteria directly presented.
relevant to aims of the task.
Development and organization The work is clearly structured and Structure and organization used Structure and organization Structure and organization largely Inappropriate structure and
of research structure and convincingly supported by to enhance comprehension and appropriate to task requirements appropriate and information is organization and information not
content: Organize and manage appropriate evidence, argument, convey information coherently and information mostly coherent and integrated. Alignment always coherent nor integrated.
information; Individual task or illustration. The work and logically. Alignment of the integrated and relevant. Some of the key idea with the topic and Alignment of the key idea with
processes and functions
demonstrates a process to key idea with the topic and all individual self- determination main ideas generally outlined the topic and main ideas not
development that follow a main ideas outlined logically processes evident. clearly. Satisfactory evidence of outlined clearly. Limited evidence
transparent pattern. and clearly. Evidence of self- self- determination. of self- determination. Unable to
determination in individual follow final submission processes,
processes: negotiation, including neglecting to submit
delegation, and cooperation. final report to Turnitin.
Making the case for the solution Advanced ability to ask emergent, Competent in interpreting Demonstrates critical analysis Attempts analysis and limited Unsatisfactory attempts at
AND Justification and relevant, and researchable several sources of and synthesis through the synthesis through the selection of analysis and limited synthesis
identification of advantages and questions. Material is deployed in information/data and selection and integration of a sources of information/data. Able to through the selection of sources of
disadvantages; Analyze and a disciplined way and synthesizing to integrate range of information/data. use given theory and evidence to information/data. Unable to use
synthesize, and critically
analyses and using evidence demonstrates a sophisticated knowledge into standard Competent use of theory and demonstrate individual given theory and evidence to
comprehension of key issues of formats. Demonstrates a high generally credible evidence to understanding. Able to use some demonstrate individual
debate and is advanced in ability level of critical analysis and support arguments and conceptual skills to express ideas understanding. Unsatisfactory
to critically review, analyses, synthesis through the selection, demonstrate individual and offer limited perspectives. attempt to use some conceptual
synthesize and apply theoretical interpretation, and integration understanding. Uses conceptual skills to express ideas and offer
and technical body of knowledge of multiple sources of skills to express ideas and offer limited perspectives. Inability to
in a broad and creative way to a information/data. some perspectives. demonstrate original justification
range of areas and diverse of solution, including neglecting
contexts. to submit final report to Turnitin.
Presentation of the solution Demonstrated knowledge and Students used discipline- Students communicate with each Mostly general vocabulary with Mostly general vocabulary with
o Communicate and apply understanding of key discipline- specific language and other and relate their ability to use discipline- specific and an inability to use discipline-
o Use of discipline specific language and scholarly prescribed genre to demonstrate understanding throughout set academic language although with an specific and academic language.
specific language and application. Students used understanding from a stated task. Use prescribed genre to acceptable level of errors. Able to Unable to act as a team (e.g., in-
genre
o Grammar and spelling prescribed genre to develop & perspective and for a specified develop and demonstrate discuss, listen and perform class activity): unsatisfactory
o ESCT processes demonstrate understanding to a audience. Developed clear understanding to a prescribed satisfactorily. attempts to discuss, listen and
o APA 7th referencing pre- specified audience. understanding of organizational audience. Demonstrated Showed limited understanding of perform. Did not consider ethical,
Provide constructive and problem and specified ECST knowledge of discipline-specific ethical, social, cultural and team social, cultural and in- class issues
supportive discussions with peers issues. language evident, but not fully issues (ESCT), (ESCT). Inability to demonstrate
and educator to account for utilized to support scholarly e.g., in-class participation. the originality of the solution,
ethical, social, cultural and discussion. Showed some including neglecting to submit the
individual issues (ESCT). understanding of ethical, social, final report to Turnitin.
cultural, and individual issues
(ESCT).