SD 2024 FR
SD 2024 FR
20X8 20X7
$'000 $'000
20X8 20X7
$'000 $'000
1,168,287 852,305
(c) Analyse the comparative performance and gearing of Clocking Co for the years ended 30
September 20X8 and 20X7 and comment on the limitations of the ratios based on the
consolidated financial statements.
Note: A maximum of 2 marks may be awarded for comments on the limitations of the ratio
analysis in part (c).
(10 marks)
(20 marks)
Solution:
(c)
Profitability
The gross and operating profit percentages across the two years have fallen which seems
reasonable given the view of management that the economic downturn has led to significant
discounts to maintain volume.
There has been an increase in sales, despite the economic downturn, showing that the
discounting strategy is working and that the extra financing raised through the loan notes is
being put to good use.
Operating profit margin has not fallen as much as gross profit margin, suggesting that the
companies have controlled operating expenses well; this is surprising as the group is likely to
have incurred fees because of the purchase of Stopping Co.
There are two key issues affecting the return on capital employed – the fall in the operating
margin and the reduction in net asset turnover across the two years. The group has suffered a
fall in operating profits and an issue of share capital (consideration) alongside the consolidation
of Stopping Co’s retained earnings.
Gearing
Non-current liabilities have increased by $283m ($387m – $104m), $25m of which relates to
the new loan notes issued to finance future operations. This means that there must be other
borrowing which Clocking Co has taken out and we are not aware of (perhaps in anticipation of
meeting the deferred consideration) on 1 April 20X9.
Some existing borrowing and associated finance costs could have been included in the accounts
of Stopping Co and is now being consolidated into Clocking Co’s consolidated financial
statements. Consequently, the gearing ratio has increased significantly from 12·2% to 33·1%.
There has also been an increase in the issued share capital, due to the share for share exchange
part funding the purchase of Stopping Co but the issue of shares is a small part of the total
consideration.
Clocking Co may have been better to have negotiated for more of the consideration to be in
the form of a share exchange as it now has a liability to fund a deferred payment on 1 April
20X9.
Limitations
The consolidated financial statements for the year ended 30 September 20X8 only include
Stopping Co from 1 April 20X8 and so results are not wholly comparable.
We do not have any information about company operations and, if the companies each sell
different products in different markets, an analysis of each company rather than the whole
group would be more appropriate.
Conclusion
If Stopping Co was acquired with the objective of having a bigger share of the market and
improving profitability, it has not yet achieved its objective. However, without reviewing the
individual financial statements of Stopping Co, it is not possible to explain why this might be the
case. The acquisition has increased the debt and gearing of the group with the inclusion of the
deferred consideration as a liability. A further analysis of the cash position of Clocking Co is
required to ensure that there is sufficient cash available to settle this debt when it falls due.
This scenario relates to two requirements.
Newcraighall Co
Trial balance (draft) as at 31 December 20X1
Dr Cr
$'000 $'000
Property – cost 32,500
Property – accumulated depreciation as at 1 January 20X1 9,200
Equipment – cost 16,200
Equipment – accumulated depreciation as at 1 January 20X1 8,420
Financial assets 3,500
Inventories 4,640
Trade receivables 2,810
Cash and cash equivalents 210
Retained earnings as at 1 January 20X1 12,620
Share capital 14,000
Loan payable 5,000
Trade and other payables 5,780
Draft profit before tax for the year ended 31 December 20X1 4,420
59,650 59,650
The $5m was used to fully fund the construction of a new building. The construction
(1)
cost has been correctly capitalized but no other accounting entries in respect of the
property or loan have been made since that date.
The financial assets are 3% bonds that were acquired for $3.5m on 1 January 20X1
and which Newcraighall Co intends to keep until maturity. Transaction costs of $0.5m
were incurred. The bonds were capitalized at $3.5m and transaction costs were
expensed.
(4)
The bonds have an effective interest rate of 7%. Newcraighall Co received the annual
receipt of $105,000 on 31 December 20X1 and recognized this as income.
Newcraighall Co will make five payments of $2.4m on 1 January each year, including
on the commencement date.
(5)
Using the implicit interest rate of 13%, present value of future lease payments after the
first payment was made was $7.139m.
The $2.4m paid on 1 January 20X1 was expensed and no other accounting was
performed.
In the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 20X1, Newcraighall Co
planned to disclose a contingent asset of $1.2m relating to a court case. On 30
(7)
December 20X1, a court ruled that Newcraighall Co would receive only $1m. No
accounting adjustments have been made in respect of this.
(a) Calculate, using the pre-formatted table provided, Newcraighall Co’s adjusted profit for
the year ended 31 December 20X1.
(7 marks)