5011 Notes
5011 Notes
Students
Level: M.SC. (Administrative Sciences)
Semester: (3rd) spring 2021
University: Allama Iqbal Open University
(AIOU)
Study Notes Course: (5011) TQM
Prepared By: Sardar Umer Chaudhary
Department: Dept. Of Business Administration,
Islamabad main campus of AIOU.
Unit.1: Introduction to Total Quality Management (TQM)
1.1 Defining Total Quality Management:
TQM is an integrated effort designed to improve quality performance at
every level of the organization.
Explanations:
Total: Quality involves everyone and all the activities performed in the
company.
Quality: Conformance to the requirements (meeting customer
requirements).
Management: Quality can and must be managed.
Therefore, TQM is a process for managing quality.
Simply, TQM is a continues improvement process and also managing this
process & quality.
TQM is defined as a management approach that tries to achieve and
sustain long-term organizational success by encouraging employee
feedback and participation, satisfying customer needs and expectations,
respecting societal values and beliefs and obeying governmental statutes
and regulations.
Pillars of TQM:
Product, process, system, people and leadership form the five pillars of
TQM.
TQM word derived by the misinterpretation of some scholars like koji
kobashi former CEO (Nippon Electric Company) received Deming prize
1974 and accidently used word TQM another theory say the American
naval use word Total Quality Control.
1.2 Basic Approaches of Total Quality Management:
David Garvin identified five major approaches to defining quality.
1 The five approaches are as follows:
The Transcendent Approach:
Quality is recognized through learning and experience defined in terms
of innate excellence. In this view “quality is synonymous with ‘innate
excellence’ and is absolute and universally recognizable.” This is the
approach which aligns most closely with Socrates’ question “What is the
fine?” from Greater Hippias. This approach implies that there is a
construct called quality that is universally applicable. This is the approach
that forms the basis for Bird’s-eye view: Quality is important to
businesses but can be quite hard to define. A good definition of quality
is: “Quality is about meeting the needs and expectations of customers.
The Product-based Approach:
Quality is precise and measurable; it can be ranked on various attributes
and is an inherent part of the product. In this regard, quality is “a precise
and measurable variable” which is a composite of all the attributes that
describe the degree of excellence of a product. This approach is
illustrated by a draft of the ISO 8402 standard which stated that “quality
is the degree to which a product possesses a specified set of attributes
necessary to fulfill a stated purpose.”
The User-based Approach:
This is an approach to assure that the customer’s voice is incorporated
during product design and is reflected in consumer demand curves.
While this approach has been practical in the design of products based
on incremental innovations, it is of limited value in designing products
based on radical innovations. Products based on radical innovation enter
a market that may not exist and where customers may not be able to
articulate their needs. In the case of radical innovation, the transcendent
approach may be of more than just philosophical interest.
The Manufacturing-based Approach:
Quality is defined as conformance to specifications; reduce costs by
reducing the number of deviations with a focus on engineering and
manufacturing practices. W. Edwards Deming criticizes this approach as
“the absurdity of meeting specifications.” “Specifications don’t tell you
what you need…Just to meet specifications—what you think the
customer requires—no. That won’t keep you in business.”
The Value-based Approach:
Quality is defined as performance or conformance at an acceptable cost.
In this approach, quality is defined in terms of costs and prices. A quality
product is one that provides performance at an acceptable price or
conformance at an acceptable cost. Philip Crosby also endorses this
approach. This blends the value-based approach with the manufacturing
based approach.
Walter Shewart:
Walter Shewart1 (1891–1967) was a statistician at Bell Labs and is
considered by many to be the founder of the modern quality movement,
and an innovator in the application of statistics to quality. His project
based on Bell Telephone laboratories & wrote two books; Economic
Control of Quality of Manufactured Product in 1931 and Statistical
Method from the Viewpoint of Quality Control in 1939. Shewart2 is often
referred to as the “grandfather of quality control.” He developed what
came to be known as the Shewart cycle; Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) or
Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) to manage the effects of variation.
W. Edwards Deming:
W. Edwards Deming (1900–1993) is often referred to as the “father of
quality control.” Deming is best known for initiating a transformation in
the Japanese manufacturing sector in the aftermath of World War II,
which enabled it to become a big player in the world market. The
Deming Prize, the highest award for quality in Japan, is named in his
honors. He is also known for his 14 Points (a new philosophy for
competing on the basis of quality), for the Deming Chain Reaction and
for the Theory of Profound Knowledge. He also modified the Shewhart
PDSA (Plan, Do, Study, Act) cycle to what is now referred to as the
Deming Cycle (Plan, Do, Check, Act).
Dr Genichi Taguchi
Dr Genichi Taguchi14 is a Japanese quality expert known for his work in the
area of product design. He estimated that as much as 80 per cent of all
defective items were caused by poor product design. Taguchi stressed that
companies needed to focus their quality efforts on the design stage, as it
was much cheaper and easier to make changes during this stage than later
in the production process.
Dr Shingo Shigeo
Was a Japanese industrial engineer and perhaps the greatest contributor to
modern manufacturing practices? He defined quality as the defects in a
process. He introduced the concept of poka-yoke (zero defects). The
greatest impact of Dr. Shingo Shigeo’s teachings can be classified into three
concepts—just in time (JIT), single minute exchange of dies (SMED) and zero
quality control (ZQC). The Shingo Prize for Operational Excellence is named
after him because he distinguished himself as one of the world’s leading
experts on improving manufacturing processes.
Masaaki Imai’s
Masaaki Imai, a quality management consultant, was born in Tokyo in 1930.
In 1955, he received his bachelor’s degree from the University of Tokyo,
where he also did graduate work in international relations. In 1962, he
founded Cambridge Corp., an international management and executive
recruiting firm based in Tokyo. As a consultant, he assisted more than 200
foreign and joint-venture companies in Japan in fields including recruiting,
executive development, personnel management and organizational studies.
From 1976 to 1986, Imai served as president of the Japan Federation of
Recruiting and Employment Agency Associations. In 1986, Imai established
the Kaizen Institute18 to help Western companies introduce Kaizen
concepts, systems and tools.
Benefits of TQM:
Creates a good corporate culture: Total quality management is an approach
where the customer is the focal point of the business rather than the
department.
Better reviews from customers: Another benefit of TQM is that customers
and clients are highly satisfied with the performance.
Better performance from employees: Through TQM, there is often more
attention placed on meeting the needs of the employees or internal
customers.
Historical Review:
Total quality management (TQM) is an approach to business that looks
critically not only at the products and services a company provides in
relation to the process it employs to create them, but also at the workforce,
to ensure that outputs fully satisfy customer requirements. This approach is
called “total” because it encompasses everything the company does—all its
processes and employees at every level in the company at all times. TQM is
a management philosophy that seeks to integrate all organizational
functions (marketing, finance, design, engineering, production and customer
service, etc.) to focus on meeting customer needs and organizational
objectives. TQM is a necessity. It is a journey that will never end. One theory
is that TQM was created as a result of a misinterpretation of the Japanese
words for “control” and “management” since no difference exists between
these words in Japanese. William Golimski, an American quality scholar and
consultant, refers to Koji Kobayashi, former CEO of Nippon Electrical
Company (NEC) as being the first to use the words TQM during a speech
when he received the Deming prize in 1974. The American Society for
Quality says that the term total quality management was used by the US
Naval Air Systems Command in 1984 to describe its Japanese-style
management approach to quality improvement since they did not like the
word “control” in the term total quality control. US Naval & japnese used
word SPC Statistical process control. And in last write definition TQM who is
placed in top of the notes.
TQM Framework:
Total Quality Management (TQM) is a management framework based
on the belief that an organization can build long-term success by
having all its members, from low-level workers to its highest
ranking executives, focus on improving quality and, thus,
delivering customer satisfaction. They work in development,
production, or fulfillment. The TQM framework was developed
by management consultant William Deming, who introduced it to the
Japanese manufacturing industry. Today, Toyota is perhaps the best
example of the TQM framework in action. The carmaker has a
“customer first” focus and a commitment to continuous improvement
through “total participation”.
Awareness about the improved quality:
Quality is an investment that leads towards continuous improvement.
Quality management research has produced consistent results based on
a well-established body of knowledge and widely practiced management
philosophy. Quality awareness is the way to promote quality activities
by emphasizing quality at all stages of the business, which can help
solving complex problems and denote excellence. Quality has become a
key concern to organizations, not only because of growing importance
of the quality system, but also because of the multitude challenges. The
aim of our study is to describe quality awareness components in order
to enforce quality practices in an organization.
Unit: 2 Leadership & Total quality Management:
2.1 Defining Leadership:
Leadership is a process by which a person influences others to accomplish
an objective and directs the organization in a way that makes it more
cohesive and coherent. Leaders carry out this process by applying their
leadership attributes such as beliefs, values, ethics, character, knowledge
and skills.
“Leadership is the capacity to translate vision into reality.”--- Warren Benis
“Leadership is the only thing that differentiates successful organizations
from others over the long run.”
2.8 Implementation:
The process of putting a decision or plan into effect; execution.
In TQM 1st is implement the plan and then measure performance with
customer surveys.
What is customer?
A customer is an individual or business that purchases another
company's goods or services.
Customer perception of Quality and feedback from customer:
#6: Be Flexible
#9: Follow Up
#10: Move On
Your best customers don’t just buy one product or use your service
once. They come back again and again for more. Customer
retention increases your customers’ lifetime value and boosts your
revenue.
Motivational theories:
• Need for power (nPow) is the need to make others behave in a way they
would not have otherwise.
• Need for affiliation (nAff) is the desire for friendly and close
interpersonal relationships.
Empowerment:
Recognition:
Performance appraisal:
Process:
The Juran Trilogy was developed by Dr. Joseph Juran, and it’s
something I learned about recently in my Total Quality
Management and Six Sigma course. The Juran Trilogy is an
improvement cycle that is meant to reduce the cost of poor quality
by planning quality into the product/process.
2. Quality Control
During the control phase, determine what you need to measure
(what data do you need to know if your process is working?), and
set a goal for your performance. Get feedback by measuring actual
performance, and act on the gap between your performance and
your goal. In Statistical Process Control (SPC), there are several
tools that could be used in the “control” phase of the Juran Trilogy:
Pareto Analysis, flow diagrams, fishbone diagram, and control
charts, to name a few.
3. Quality Improvement
There are four different “strategies” to improvement that could be
applied during this phase:
Improvement Strategies:
Process maps provide the foundation for how work gets done
and insights into what can be done to improve it. By defining
and deploying strong business processes, an organization
engages its employees in a valuable way, distributing
responsibility and accountability closer to the work itself.
3. Reduce Costs.
Types of problem:
Simple problem
Complicated problem
Complex problem
Chaotic problem (tsanumi,stock market crash they come
accidently)
Problem solving method:
Kaizen:
Kaizen is an approach to creating continuous improvement
based on the idea that small, ongoing positive changes can reap
significant improvements. It was developed in the manufacturing
sector to lower defects, eliminate waste, boost productivity,
encourage worker purpose and accountability and promote
innovation.
Kaizen cycle for continuous improvement
Kaizen can be implemented in a seven-step cycle to create an
environment based on continuous improvement. This systematic
method includes the following steps:
Reengineering:
This theory is developed the Fredrick Winslow tailor
Reengineering is most commonly defined as the redesign of
business processes—and the associated systems and
organizational structures—to achieve a dramatic improvement in
business performance. It is the examination and change of five
components of the business strategy, process, technology,
organization, and culture. Many companies continue to experiment
with reengineering, even if they have failed in previous attempts.
Process of BPR;
DMADV is a part of the Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) process used
to design or re-design different processes of product manufacturing
or service delivery. The five phases of DMADV are: D – Define, M
– Measure, A – Analyse, D – Design, V – Validate. DMADV is
employed when existing processes do not meet customer
conditions, even after optimization, or when it is required to
develop new methods. It is executed by Six Sigma Green Belts and
Six Sigma Black Belts and under the supervision of Six Sigma
Master Black Belts. We'll get to the belts later.
Appropriate Strategy:
Top management’s performance can usually be measured in
terms of sales volume, market share, cash flow, profit, ROI,
dividends and market value.
Presentation of Performance Measures:
Make simple presentations of performance measures and
include all stockholder and management for self-assessment,
control, continues improvement, management assessment.
Quality Costs:
Quality costs are the costs associated with preventing,
detecting, and remediating product issues related to quality.
Types of quality cost:
Prevention cost
Appraisal cost
Internal failure cost
External failure cost.
Malcolm Baidrige National Quality Award;
Manufacturing
Service Company
Small Business
Education
Healthcare
Non-profit.
Importance of Benchmarking:
5. Motivate employees
Definition of Benchmarking
Planning:
Collection of Information
Analysis of Data
Implementation
Monitoring
As with most projects, in order to reap the maximum benefits of
the benchmarking process, a systematic evaluation should be
carried out on a regular basis.
Deciding what to Benchmark:
Selecting the right benchmarks is essential to successful
benchmarking. For instance, if you apply the benchmarking
process to your customer service department and select time
spent on hold as one of your benchmarks, this has the potential to
be useful only if that really is a priority concern for your customers.
If the successful resolution of complaints is a higher priority for
most of your customers, time spent on hold may be a
counterproductive benchmark for you to study. Pricing is one
example of a useful benchmark. If your competitor is selling far
more of a similar product than you at a lower price, the difference
in price may well be the reason for the difference in sales. Where
you need benchmarking & what sector.
Benchmark Planning:
Benchmarking is a technique that enables better strategic
planning in business. Benchmarking involves looking at other
examples of best practices used by competitors or within other
industries. Benchmarking may be used to evaluate products,
services, processes or functions.
Actions to close the Gap between Benchmark:
Closing the Gap with Internal Benchmarks, When a company
uses benchmarking across the enterprise, it builds a more realistic
foundation for improvements. Even when products are somewhat
different from plant to plant, or among the various lines, the
company sets the stage for operational excellence.
Closing the Gap by Looking to Other Industries for Insight, It’s
natural to look to across the same industry for insight about
manufacturing performance.
Closing the Gap with Survey Data Survey-based benchmarks provide the
best estimation of performance “perception.”
Closing the Gap with Rich Real-Time Information Internal
benchmarking is an excellent place to begin a benchmarking effort.
Closing the Gap from Perception to Reality Performance
expectations for a production line, plant or industry are formed from past
performance and perceptions about what constitutes manufacturing
excellence.
Pitfalls and Criticisms of Benchmarking:
Pitfalls and Criticisms of Benchmarking The basic idea of
benchmarking can be summed up quite simply. Find someone who
executes a process better than you do and imitate what he or she
does. The most persistent criticism of benchmarking comes from
the idea of copying others. How can an organization be truly
superior if it does not innovate to get ahead of competitors? It is a
question, but one can also ask the reverse: How can an
organization even survive if it loses track of its external
environment? Benchmarking is not a strategy, nor is it intended to be
a business philosophy. It is an improvement tool and must be used
properly. Benchmarking isn't very helpful if it is used for processes
that don't offer much opportunity for improvement. It breaks down if
process owners and managers feel threatened or do not accept
and act on findings. Over time, things change and what was state-
of-the-art yesterday may not be today. Some processes may have