Findex-2021-Executive-Summary
Findex-2021-Executive-Summary
Executive Summary
Financial services such as payments, savings accounts, and credit are a cornerstone of development. Accounts—
whether they are with a bank or regulated institution such as a credit union, microfinance institution, or a
mobile money service provider—allow their owners to safely and affordably store, send, and receive money
for everyday needs, plan for emergencies, and make productive investments for the future, such as in health,
education, and businesses. People without an account, by contrast, must manage their money using informal
mechanisms, including cash, that may be less safe, less reliable, and more expensive than formal methods.
Evidence shows that households and businesses that have access to financial services are better able to withstand
financial shocks than those that do not.1 In Chile low-income women who were members of microfinance
institutions and received free savings accounts were able to reduce their reliance on debt and improve their ability
to make ends meet during an economic emergency.2 Digital financial services such as mobile money let users
safely and inexpensively store funds and transfer them quickly and affordably across long distances, which lead
to higher remittances and consumption and more investments. In Kenya, for example, mobile money users who
experienced an unexpected drop in income were able to receive money from a more geographically disbursed
social network of family and friends and so did not have to reduce household spending.3 In Bangladesh, very
poor rural households with family members who had migrated to the city received higher remittance payments
when they had a mobile money account, and so spent more on food and other items, were able to reduce
borrowing, and were less likely to experience extreme poverty.4
For women, accounts can enable financial independence and strengthen economic empowerment. In the
Philippines, women who used commitment savings products that encouraged regular deposits into a personal
bank account increased their household decision-making power and shifted their spending to household goods
relevant to their needs, such as washing machines.5 In India, a government workfare program that reached over
100 million people showed that paying women their benefits directly into their own account (and not into the
account of a male household head) increased women’s financial control, influenced gender norms preventing
women from working, and incentivized women to find employment, compared with those paid in cash.6 In
another study in Kenya, women-headed households spent 15 percent more on nutritious foods after receiving
free savings accounts.7
Executive Summary 1
The receipt of payments such as wages and government support directly into an account can help achieve
development goals. For example, studies have found that workers who received their wages through direct deposit
had higher savings than workers who were paid in cash.8 In Bangladesh, factory workers who received their
wages directly into an account also learned to use their account without assistance and avoid illicit withdrawal
fees.9 Moreover, digitalizing government payments can reduce administrative costs and leakage (payments that
do not reach the intended beneficiaries).10
Such evidence on the benefits of financial inclusion has spurred efforts to expand account ownership and
productive usage. Since 2011, the Global Findex survey has documented growth—at times incremental and
at times dramatic—in account ownership across more than 140 economies. The Global Findex 2021 survey
was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic—a crisis that further mobilized financial inclusion efforts
across the world through several mechanisms, including the emergency relief payments that governments sent
to accounts.11 This and other factors have contributed to the following key findings:
Receiving payments into an account is a catalyst for using other financial services, such
as relying on an account to save, borrow, and store money for cash management.
In developing economies, the share of adults making or receiving digital payments grew from 35 percent in 2014
to 57 percent in 2021. In high-income economies, the share of adults making or receiving digital payments is
nearly universal (95 percent). Receiving a payment directly into an account is a gateway to using other financial
services. Indeed, 83 percent of adults in developing economies who received a digital payment also made a digital
payment, up from 66 percent in 2014 and 70 percent in 2017. Almost two-thirds of digital payment recipients
also used their account to store money for cash management; about 40 percent used their account for saving;
and 40 percent of payment recipients borrowed formally.
Payments may pave the way for wider adoption of financial services when it is easier to leave transferred money
in an account until it is needed and then make a payment directly. Similarly, once money is in an account it is
relatively easier to keep it there for savings. Receiving a payment into an account—especially if the payment can
be used to document a regular income stream over time—can also ease the process of borrowing money formally.
Despite promising growth in account ownership and use, only about half of adults
in developing economies could access extra funds within 30 days if faced with an
unexpected expense, and about two-thirds of adults were very worried about at least
one area of financial stress.
Only 55 percent of adults in developing economies could access extra funds within 30 days without much
difficulty. Friends and family were the first-line source of extra funds for 30 percent of adults in developing
economies, but nearly half of those said the money would be hard to get. Furthermore, women and the poor
were less likely than men and richer individuals to successfully raise extra funds and more likely to rely on
friends and family as their go-to source.
About 50 percent of adults in developing economies were very worried, in particular, about covering health
expenses in the event of a major illness or accident, and 36 percent said health care costs were their biggest
worry. In Sub-Saharan Africa, worry over school fees was more common than in other regions; 54 percent of
adults worry about them and for 29 percent it is their biggest worry. Eighty-two percent of adults in developing
economies were very worried (52 percent) or somewhat worried (30 percent) about the continued financial toll
of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Executive Summary 3
Governments, private employers, and financial service providers—including fintechs—
could help expand financial access and usage among the unbanked by lowering
barriers and improving infrastructure.
Lack of money, distance to the nearest financial institution, and insufficient documentation were consistently
cited by the 1.4 billion unbanked adults as some of the primary reasons they did not have an account. Yet there
are clear opportunities to address some of these barriers. Enabling infrastructure has an important role to play.
For example, global efforts to increase inclusive access to trusted identification systems and mobile phones could
be leveraged to increase account ownership for hard-to-reach populations. The chief actors in this effort, such
as governments, telecommunications providers, and financial services providers, must also invest in regulations
and governance to ensure that safe, affordable, and convenient products and functionality are available and
accessible to all adults in their economies.
Findings from the Global Findex 2021 survey likewise reveal new opportunities to drive financial inclusion by
increasing account ownership among the unbanked and expanding the use of financial services among those
who already have accounts—in particular, by leveraging digital payments. For example, hundreds of millions of
unbanked adults received payments in cash—such as for wages, government transfers, or the sale of agricultural
goods. Digitalizing some of these payments is a proven way to increase account ownership. In developing
economies, 39 percent of adults—or 57 percent of those with a financial institution account (excluding mobile
money)—opened their first account (excluding mobile money) at a financial institution, specifically to receive a
wage payment or receive money from the government.
Financially inexperienced users may not be able to benefit from account ownership if
they do not understand how to use financial services in a way that optimizes benefits
and avoids consumer protection risks.
About two-thirds of unbanked adults said that if they opened an account (excluding mobile money) at a
financial institution, they could not use it without help. One-third of mobile money account holders in Sub-
Saharan Africa say they could not use their mobile money account without help from a family member or an
agent. Women are 5 percentage points more likely than men to need help using their mobile money account.
Inexperienced account owners who must ask a family member or a banking agent for help using an account
may be more vulnerable to financial abuse. Also, 1-in-5 adults in developing economies who receive a wage
payment into an account paid unexpected fees on the transaction. Together, these issues point to the fact that
less experienced financial customers may be more vulnerable to fraud. Thus investments are needed in numeracy
and financial literacy skills, product design that takes into account customer usage patterns and capabilities, as
well as strong consumer safeguards to ensure that customers benefit from financial access and to build public
trust in the financial system.
Aker, Jenny, Rachid Boumnijel, Amanada McClelland, and Niall Tierney. 2016. “Payment Mechanisms and
Antipoverty Programs: Evidence from a Mobile Money Cash Transfer Experiment in Niger.” Economic
Development and Cultural Change 65 (1): 1-–7.
Ashraf, Nava, Dean Karlan, and Wesley Yin. 2010. “Female Empowerment: Further Evidence from a Commitment
Savings Product in the Philippines.” World Development 38 (3): 333–44.
Blumenstock, Joshua, Michael Callen, and Tarek Ghani. 2018. “Why Do Defaults Affect Behavior? Experimental
Evidence from Afghanistan.” American Economic Review 108 (10): 2868–901.
Breza, Emily, Martin Kanz, and Leora Klapper. 2020. “Learning to Navigate a New Financial Technology: Evidence
from Payroll Accounts.” NBER Working Paper 28249, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge,
MA.
Field, Erica, Rohini Pande, Natalia Rigo, Simone Schaner, and Charity Troyer Moore. 2021. “On Her Own Account:
How Strengthening Women’s Financial Control Impacts Labor Supply and Gender Norms.” American
Economic Review 11 (7): 2342–75.
Gentilini, Ugo, Mohamed Almenfi, Ian Orton, and Pamela Dale. 2020. Social Protection and Jobs Responses to
COVID-19: A Real-Time Review of Country Measures. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://socialprotection
.org/discover/publications/social-protection-and-jobs -responses-covid-19-real-time-review-country.
GPFI (Global Partnership for Financial Inclusion) and World Bank. 2021. “The Impact of COVID-19 on Digital
Financial Inclusion.”
https://www.gpfi.org/sites/gpfi/files/sites/default/files/5_WB%20Report_The%20impact%20of%20
COVID-19%20on%20digital%20financial%20inclusion.pdf.
Jack, William, and Tavneet Suri. 2014. “Risk Sharing and Transactions Costs: Evidence from Kenya’s Mobile
Money Revolution.” American Economic Review 104 (1): 183–223.
Kast, Felipe, and Dina Pomeranz. 2022. “Saving More to Borrow Less: Experimental Evidence from Chile.”
Journal of Human Resources 57 (2).
Lee, Jean N., Jonathan Morduch, Saravana Ravindran, Abu Shonchoy, and Hassan Zaman. 2021. “Poverty and
Migration in the Digital Age: Experimental Evidence on Mobile Banking in Bangladesh.” American Economic
Journal: Applied Economics 13 (1): 38–71.
Moore, Danielle, Zahra Niazi, Rebecca Rouse, and Berber Kramer. 2019. “Building Resilience through Financial
Inclusion: A Review of Existing Evidence and Knowledge Gaps.” Financial Inclusion Program, Innovations for
Poverty Action, Washington, DC.
https://www.poverty -action.org/publication/building-resilience-through -financial-inclusion-review
existing-evidence-and -knowledge.
Muralidharan, Karthik, Paul Niehaus, and Sandip Sukhtankar. 2016. “Building State Capacity: Evidence from
Biometric Smartcards in India.” American Economic Review 106 (10): 2895–929.
Prina, Silvia. 2015. “Banking the Poor via Savings Accounts: Evidence from a Field Experiment.” Journal of
Development Economics 115 (July): 16–31.
Executive Summary 5