SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 2003, 29 (1), 68-74

SA Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde, 2003, 29 (1), 68-74

THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS

AND JOB PERFORMANCE

S ROTHMANN
E P COETZER
Research Programme “Human Resource Management for Development” Research Unit “Decision-
making and Management for Economic Development” PU for CHE

ABSTRACT
The objective of this research was to determine the relationship between personality dimensions and job
performance. A cross-sectional survey design was used. The study population consisted of 159 employees of a
pharmaceutical company. The NEO-Personality Inventory – Revised and Performance Appraisal Questionnaire
were used as measuring instruments. The results showed that Emotional Stability, Extraversion, Openness to
Experience and Conscientiousness were related to task performance and creativity. Three personality dimensions,
namely Emotional Stability, Openness to Experience and Agreeableness, explained 28% of the variance in
participants’ management performance.

OPSOMMING
Die doelstelling van hierdie navorsing was om die verband tussen persoonlikheidsdimensies en werksprestasie te
bepaal. ‘n Eenmalige dwarsdeursnee-ontwerp is gebruik. Die ondersoekgroep het bestaan uit 159 werknemers binne
‘n farmaseutiese organisasie. Die NEO-Personality Inventory – Revised en die Prestasiebeoordelingsvraelys is as meet-
instrumente gebruik. Die resultate het aangetoon dat Emosionele Stabiliteit, Ekstroversie en Konsensieusheid met
taakverrigting en kreatiwiteit verband hou. Drie persoonlikheidsdimensies, naamlik Emosionele Stabiliteit,
Openheid vir Ervaring en Inskiklikheid, het 28% van die variansie in bestuursprestasie (soos beoordeel deur
toesighouers) voorspel.

The relationship between personality and job performance has perspective, and more specifically the five-factor model of
been a frequently studied topic in industrial psychology in the personality dimensions as conceptualised by Costa and McCrae
past century (Barrick, Mount & Judge, 2001). Job performance is (1992). The five-factor model of personality represents a
a multi-dimensional construct which indicates how well structure of traits, developed and elaborated over the last five
employees perform their tasks, the initiative they take and the decades. Factors are defined by groups of intercorrelated traits,
resourcefulness they show in solving problems. Furthermore, it which are referred to as facets (McCrae & Costa, 1997). The five-
indicates the extent to which they complete tasks, the way they factor model of personality as measured by the Neo-Personality
utilise their available resources and the time and energy they Inventory Revised (NEO-PI-R) includes Neuroticism,
spend on their tasks (Boshoff & Arnolds, 1995; Schepers, 1994). Extraversion, Openness, Agreeableness and Conscientiousness
(McCrae & Costa, 1997). The reason for deciding on this
Job performance could be affected by situational factors, such as conceptualisation is because the validity of broad personality
the characteristics of the job, the organisation and co-workers dimensions is superior too narrowly defined dimensions
(Hackman & Oldham, 1980; Strümpfer, Danana, Gouws & (Ashton, 1998).
Viviers, 1998), and by dispositional factors. Dispositional
variables can be described as personality characteristics, needs, The results of various studies and meta-analyses (Barrick &
attitudes, preferences and motives that result in a tendency to Mount, 1991; Hough, Eaton, Dunnette, Kamp & McCloy, 1990;
react to situations in a predetermined (predisposed) manner Salgado, 1997; Tett, Jackson & Rothstein, 1991; Vinchur,
(House, Shane & Herrold, 1996). Job performance is influenced Schippmann, Sweizer & Roth, 1998) showed that various big
by aptitude, need for achievement, self-regard, locus of control, five personality dimensions are related to job performance.
affective temperament and the interaction between these Barrick and Mount (1991) and Salgado (1997) found that
constructs (Boshoff & Arnolds, 1995, Wright, Kacmar, McMahan conscientiousness is one of the best predictors of job
& DeLeeuw, 1995). performance in the United States of America and Europe. De
Fruyt and Mervielde (1999), Tokar and Subich (1997),
Traditionally industrial psychologists have questioned the Schneider (1999) and Vinchur et al. (1998) concluded that
usefulness of personality measures in predicting job-related Extraversion and Conscientiousness predict job performance
criteria (such as job performance), because of pessimistic in various occupations. However, these studies have all been
conclusions of early reviews of the topic (e.g. Guion & Gottier, carried out elsewhere in the world and in other contexts. In
1965) and concerns that most personality measures are faked South Africa, the use of psychometric tests in studies of job
(Reilly & Warech, 1993). However, evidence has suggested that performance is still a controversial issue. Research regarding
personality measures are valid predictors of diverse job-related the relationship between personality dimensions and job
criteria (Goldberg, 1993). Unlike many measures of cognitive performance is therefore necessary. If relationships between
ability, personality measures typically do not have an adverse personality dimensions and job performance are found, the
impact on disadvantaged employees (Hogan, Hogan & Roberts, results could be used for recruitment, selection and career
1996) and thus can enhance fairness in personnel decisions. development purposes.
Recent research showed that personality dimensions are related
to job performance (Rosse, Stecher, Miller & Levin, 1998; Wright The objective of this research was to determine the relationship
et al., 1995). between personality dimensions and job performance of
employees in a pharmaceutical group.
In this research the relationship between personality
dispositions and job performance is studied from a trait The role of personality dimensions in job performance
Requests for copies should be addressed to: S Rothmann, Programme in Industrial Researchers agree that almost all personality measures could be
Psychology, PU for CHE, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom, 2520 categorised according to the five-factor model of personality

68
 THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS 69

(also referred to as the “big five” personality dimensions) contradictory results regarding the relationship between
(Goldberg, 1990; Hogan et al., 1996). The five personality Openness to Experience and job performance is that
dimensions seem to be relevant to different cultures (McCrae & different jobs have different requirements.
Costa, 1997) and have been recovered consistently in factor
Agreeableness. An agreeable person is fundamentally
analyses of peer- and self-ratings of trait descriptors involving altruistic, sympathetic to others and eager to help them, and
diverse conditions, samples, and factor extraction and rotation in return believes that others will be equally helpful. The
methods (Costa & McCrae, 1988). Research also showed that the disagreeable/antagonistic person is egocentric, sceptical of
five personality factors have a genetic basis (Digman, 1989) and others’ intentions, and competitive rather than co-operative.
that they are probably inherited (Jang, Livesley & Vernon, 1996). According to Tett et al. (1991), Agreeableness is a significant
The five dimensions of the five-factor model of personality are predictor of job performance. Salgado (1997) found that
Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness is related to training success. The co-operative
Agreeableness and Conscientiousness. nature of agreeable individuals may lead to success in

Neuroticism. Neuroticism is a dimension of normal occupations where teamwork and customer service are
personality indicating the general tendency to experience relevant (Judge et al., 1999).
negative affects such as fear, sadness, embarrassment,
Conscientiousness. Conscientiousness refers to self-control
anger, guilt and disgust. High scorers may be at risk of and the active process of planning, organising and carrying
some kinds of psychiatric problems. A high Neuroticism out tasks (Barrick & Mount, 1993). The conscientious person
score indicates that a person is prone to having irrational is purposeful, strong-willed and determined.
ideas, being less able to control impulses, and coping Conscientiousness is manifested in achievement orientation
poorly with stress. A low Neuroticism score is indicative (hardworking and persistent), dependability (responsible
of emotional stability. These people are usually calm, and careful) and orderliness (planful and organised). On the
even-tempered, relaxed and able to face stressful negative side, high Conscientiousness may lead to annoying
situations without becoming upset (Hough et al., 1990). fastidiousness, compulsive neatness or workaholic
Hörmann and Maschke (1996) found that Neuroticism is behaviour. Low scorers may not necessarily lack moral
a predictor of performance in various occupations. principles, but they are less exacting in applying them.
Dunn, Mount, Barrick and Ones (1995) showed that Borman, White, Pulakos and Oppler (1991) and Hough et al.
emotional stability (the opposite of Neuroticism) is the (1990) found a correlation of 0,80 between reliability (an
second most important characteristic that affects the aspect of Conscientiousness) and job performance. Various
employability of candidates. In a recent study Judge, researchers (Barrick & Mount, 1991; Barrick, Mount &
Higgins, Thoresen and Barrick (1999) found that Strauss, 1993; Frink & Ferris, 1999; Ones & Viswesvaran,
Neuroticism is inversely related to job performance. 1997; Sackett & Wannek, 1996) reported significant
However, according to Salgado (1997), Neuroticism predicts correlations between Conscientiousness and job
job performance in certain circumstances. performance. According to Sackett and Wannek (1996), the

Extraversion. Extraversion includes traits such as sociability, relationship between Conscientiousness and job
assertiveness, activity and talkativeness. Extraverts are performance could be attributed to the conceptual
energetic and optimistic. Introverts are reserved rather than relationship between Conscientiousness and integrity.
unfriendly, independent rather than followers, even-paced Furthermore, autonomy and goal setting influence the
rather than sluggish. Extraversion is characterised by positive relationship between Conscientiousness and job
feelings and experiences and is therefore seen as a positive performance (Barrick & Mount, 1993; Barrick et al., 1993).
affect (Clark & Watson, 1991). It was found that Extraversion
is a valid predictor of performance in jobs characterised by To the lay person it is a self-evident fact that personality factors
social interaction, such as sales personnel and managers play an important part in job performance. Yet the psychological
(Barrick & Mount, 1991; Bing & Lounsbury, 2000; Lowery & literature in this regard is equivocal. Schmitt, Gooding, Noe and
Krilowicz, 1994; Vinchur et al., 1998). Johnson (1997) found a Kirsch (1984) found in a meta-analysis of validation studies of
positive relationship between Extraversion and job personality measures an average validity coefficient of r = 0,21.
performance of police personnel, and explained this However, Barrick and Mount (1991) concluded that there are
relationship in terms of the high level of interaction in the grounds for optimism concerning the use of standard
police service. personality tests to predict performance of employees.

Openness to Experience. Openness to Experience includes
active imagination, aesthetic sensitivity, attentiveness to Hayes et al. (1994) found that supervisor ratings of specific
inner feelings, a preference for variety, intellectual curiosity performance criteria and overall job effectiveness were related
and independence of judgement. People scoring low on positively to Conscientiousness and inversely to Openness
Openness tend to be conventional in behaviour and and Extraversion in a sample of automobile machine
conservative in outlook. They prefer the familiar to the operators. In a sample of sewing machine operators, Krilowicz
novel, and their emotional responses are somewhat muted. and Lowerey (1996) found significant positive relations
People scoring high on Openness tend to be between operator productivity and traits corresponding
unconventional, willing to question authority and prepared closely with Conscientiousness and Extraversion. Hörmann
to entertain new ethical, social and political ideas. Open and Maschke (1996) found that personalit y variables,
individuals are curious about both inner and outer worlds, especially those reflecting Neuroticism, predicted variance
and their lives are experientially richer. They are willing to in pilot performance beyond that explained by flying
entertain novel ideas and unconventional values, and they experience, age and grade in a simulator check flight.
experience both positive and negative emotions more Substandard pilots were more neurotic than successful
keenly than do closed individuals. Research has shown that pilots. In a sample of nursing service employees, Day and
Openness to Experience is related to success in consulting Bedeian (1995) found that the more similar in Agreeableness
(Hamilton, 1988), training (Barrick & Mount, 1991; Vinchur employees were to their co-workers, the more positive
et al., 1998) and adapting to change (Horton, 1992; supervisors’ ratings of performance were.
Raudsepp, 1990). In contrast, Johnson (1997) and Hayes,
Salgado (1997) conducted a meta-analysis of the five-factor
Roehm and Castellano (1994) found that successful
personality dimensions in relation to performance for three
employees (compared with unsuccessful employees)
criteria (i.e., supervisory ratings, training ratings and
obtained significantly lower scores on Openness. Tett et al.
personnel data) and for five occupational groups using 36
(1991) reported that Openness to Experience is not a valid
validity studies conducted in Europe. Results indicated that
predictor of job performance. A possible explanation for the
Conscientiousness and Emotional Stability were valid
70 ROTHMANN, COETZER

predictors for all performance criteria and for most The Performance Appraisal Questionnaire (PAQ) (Schepers,
occupational groups. Extraversion predicted manager and 1994) was used to measure pharmacists’ job performance. The
police performance, and Openness to Experience predicted PAQ consists of 30 items which measure three scales, namely
police and skilled labour performance. Performance, Creativity and Management skills. Acceptable
Cronbach alpha coefficients were found for the questionnaire.
Because items on many personalit y inventories are Supervisor ratings (on a 9-point scale) of the performance of
transparent, and thus easily faked, researchers are often employees were used. All supervisors had undergone a half-
concerned about the potential effect of response distortion on day intensive rater-training course to ensure that they were
the prediction of performance from personality measures. aware of and able to avoid common pitfalls. The scales of the
However, Ones, Viswesvaran and Reiss (1996) found that social PAQ have acceptable alpha coefficients (Schepers, 1994).
desirability had no effect on the predictive validity of the big Construct validity of the PAQ is demonstrated by the fact that
five personality dimensions. Furthermore, Barrick and Mount factor loadings bet ween 0,41 and 0,98 were obtained
(1996) reported that Conscientiousness and Emotional (Schepers, 1994).
Stabilit y (i.e. low Neuroticism) positively predicted
supervisor performance ratings for truck drivers and that, Statistical analysis
when adjusted for social desirability, the validity coefficients The statistical analysis was carried out by means of the SAS
were not attenuated significantly. program (SAS Institute, 1996). Descriptive statistics (means,
standard deviations, skewness and kurtosis) were used to analyse
Several studies reported research evidence suggesting that
the results. Cronbach alpha coefficients and inter-item
personality is related differently to different dimensions of job
correlations were used to assess the internal consistency of the
performance. Using a sample of hotel workers, Stewart and
measuring instruments (Clark & Watson, 1995). Coefficient
Carson (1995) related Conscientiousness, Extraversion and
alpha conveys important information regarding the proportion
Agreeableness to three different performance variables (i.e.
of error variance contained in a scale. According to Clark and
citizenship, dependability and work output) and found
Watson (1995), the average inter-item correlation coefficient
significant validity coefficients for Conscientiousness and
(which is a straightforward measure of internal consistency) is a
Extraversion, but for different sets of criteria. Conscientiousness
useful index to supplement information supplied by coefficient
positively predicted dependability and work output, and
alpha. However, unidimensionality of a scale cannot be ensured
Extraversion inversely predicted citizenship and dependability.
simply by focusing on the mean inter-item correlation – it is
necessary to examine the range and distribution of these
correlations as well.
METHOD
Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients were used to
Research design specify the relationships between the variables. Because a non-
A survey design was used to achieve the research objectives. The probability sample was used in this research, effect sizes (rather
specific design was the cross-sectional design, by means of than inferential statistics) were used to decide on the
which a sample is drawn from a population at a particular point significance of the findings. A cut-off point of 0,30 (medium
in time (Shaughnessy & Zechmeister, 1997). effect, Cohen, 1988) was set for the practical significance of
correlation coefficients. Canonical correlation was used to
Sample determine the relationships between the dimensions of burnout,
The sample includes employees of a corporate pharmacy group personality traits and coping strategies. The goal of canonical
with 14 retail and 16 hospital pharmacies in the North West correlation is to analyse the relationship between two sets of
Province, Free State, Mpumalanga and Gauteng, as well as a variables (Tabachnick & Fidell, 2001). Canonical correlation is
head office (N = 159). The total population of pharmacists (n = considered a descriptive technique rather than a hypothesis-
59) and non-pharmacists (n = 100) was included in the testing procedure.
empirical study. All pharmacists had a B.Pharm. degree or a
Diploma in Pharmacy, while the qualifications of non- A stepwise multiple regression analysis was conducted to
pharmacists varied from Grade 10 to a master’s degree. About determine the proportion of variance in Management
57% of the sample had some form of post-school education. Performance that is predicted by personality dimensions. The
The total population of employees participated in the research. effect size (which indicates practical significance) in the case of
Approximately 83% of the sample consisted of females. The multiple regression is represented by the following formula
ages of the participants varied between 18 and 58 years, with (Steyn, 1999):
53% in the age group between 21 and 30. A total of 57,2% of 2
the participants were married. f = R2 / (1 – R2)

A cut-off point of 0,35 (large effect, Steyn, 1999) was set for the
Measuring instruments practical significance of f2.
The NEO Personality Inventory Revised (NEO-PI-R) (Costa &
McCrae, 1992) was used to measure the personality of
individuals, based on the five-factor model of personality, which RESULTS
includes the dimensions of Extraversion, Neuroticism,
Agreeableness, Openness to experience and Conscientiousness. The descriptive statistics of the PAQ for the sample are given in
The five personality dimensions are each divided into six facets. Table 1.
The NEO-PI-R has 240 items (Costa & McCrae, 1992). The
Cronbach alpha coefficients of the personality dimensions vary TABLE 1
from 0,86 (Openness) to 0,92 (Neuroticism), and those of the DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS OF THE PAQ
personality facets from 0,56 (Tender-minded) to 0,81
(Depression). Costa and McCrae (1992) report test-retest
reliability coefficients (over six years) for Extraversion, Item Mean SD Skewness Kurtosis r (Mean) a
Neuroticism and Openness varying from 0,68 to 0,83 and for
Task Performance 59,05 9,87 -1,03 1,70 0,48 0,88
Agreeableness and Conscientiousness (over three years) of 0,63
and 0,79 respectively. Costa and McCrae (1992) showed Creativity 57,30 13,58 -0,48 0,15 0,71 0,96
construct validity for the NEO-PI-R for different gender, race and Management 58,84 13,67 -0,50 -0,45 0,70 0,96
age groups.
 THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS 71

Table 1 shows that above average scores were obtained on the Task Performance and Creativity, using SAS CANCORR. Shown
three dimensions of the PAQ. Regarding skewness and in the tables are correlations between the variables and
kurtosis, it is clear that the results were somewhat skew canonical variates, standardised canonical variate coefficients,
regarding Task Performance. This skewness may be attributed within-set variance accounted for by the canonical variate
to the fact that poor performers on this dimension probably (percent of variance), redundancies and the canonical
left the organisation. Scores on the other dimensions seem to correlations. The results of the canonical analysis are shown in
be normally distributed. Table 1 shows that high Cronbach Table 4. The set of personality traits included Neuroticism,
alpha coefficients were obtained for all the factors (Nunnally Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness and
& Bernstein, 1994). The correlation coefficients between the Conscientiousness. The performance set included Task
items of scales (0,48 £ r £ 0,70) indicate that the items Performance and Creativity.
correlate too highly (Clark & Watson, 1995). However, this
should be seen in the context of the specificity of the TABLE 4
constructs that are measured. RESULTS OF THE CANONICAL ANALYSIS: PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS
AND PERFORMANCE
Table 2 shows the descriptive statistics, Cronbach alpha
coefficients and inter-item correlation coefficients of the
First Canonical Variate
NEO-PI-R.
Correlation Coefficient
TABLE 2
DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS OF THE NEO PI-R Personality dimensions set
Neuroticism -0,65 -0,73
Extraversion 0,51 -0,06
Item Mean SD Skewness Kurtosis r (Mean) a
Openness to Experience 0,75 0,78
Neuroticism 88,73 24,34 0,08 0,10 0,49 0,86 Agreeableness 0,23 -0,05
Extraversion 115,53 22,53 0,23 0,28 0,46 0,83 Conscientiousness 0,35 -0,04
Openness 111,82 16,65 0,43 -0,06 0,36 0,77 Percent of variance 0,28
Agreeableness 127,20 18,45 0,07 0,26 0,36 0,76 Redundancy 0,04
Conscientiousness 132,68 17,48 -0,31 0,13 0,38 0,78
Performance set
Task performance 0,42 -0,76
Table 2 shows that the participants (compared with American Creativity 0,89 1,49
norms) measured average on the five personality dimensions. Percent of variance 0,48
Regarding skewness and kurtosis, the values in Table 2 show Redundancy 0,07
minor deviations from 0, an indication that the scores are
Canonical correlation 0,38
relatively normally distributed. The Cronbach alpha coefficients
for the five personality dimensions vary from 0,76
(Agreeableness) to 0,86 (Neuroticism). These alpha coefficients The first canonical correlation was 0,38 (15% overlapping
could be regarded as acceptable when they are compared with variance), and the second was 0,13 (2% overlapping
the cut-off point of 0,80 recommended by Nunnally and variance). With both canonical correlations included, F(10,
Bernstein (1994). The mean inter-item correlation coefficients of 298) = 2,76, p < 0,01. Subsequent F-tests were not statistically
the personality dimensions vary from 0,36 to 0,49, which significant. The first pair of canonical variates, therefore,
compare favourably with the range of 0,15 to 0,50 accounted for the significant relationships between the two
recommended by Clark and Watson (1995). sets of variables. Data on the first pair of canonical variates
appear in Table 4. Total percentage of variance and total
Table 3 shows the product moment correlation coefficients redundancy indicate that this pair of canonical variates
between the NEO-PI-R and job performance. was moderately related.
TABLE 3 With a cut-off correlation of 0,30 the variables in the
PRODUCT-MOMENT CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS BETWEEN
personality dimensions set that were correlated with the first
THE NEO-PI-R AND THE PAQ
canonical variate were Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to
Experience and Conscientiousness. Among the performance
Item Task Performance Creativity Management variables, Task Performance and Creativity correlated with the
first canonical variate. This pair of canonical variates indicate
Neuroticism -0,11 -0,22 -0,31 * that emotional stability (low Neuroticism) (-0,65), Extraversion
Extraversion 0,17 0,22 0,21 (0,51), Openness to Experience (0,75) and Conscientiousness
Openness 0,13 0,26 0,41 * (0,35) are associated with Task Performance (0,42) and
Agreeableness 0,07 0,10 0,31 * Creativity (0,89).
Conscientiousness 0,05 0,11 0,10
The results of a stepwise regression analysis with the Big Five
* Practically significant correlation (medium effect): d ³ 0,30 personality dimensions as independent variables and
Management (as measured by the PAQ) are shown in Table 5.

Table 3 shows practically significant correlation coefficients (of

medium effect) between Management Performance on the one
hand and Neuroticism (negative correlation), Openness to
Experience and Agreeableness (both positive correlations). No
practically significant correlation coefficients were found
between personality dimensions on the one hand and Task
Performance and Creativity on the other hand.

A canonical correlation was performed between a set of

personality dimensions and two aspects of job performance,
72 ROTHMANN, COETZER

TABLE 5 to perform better than those who measured lower on

MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS REGARDING PERSONALITY these dimensions. The negative relationship bet ween
DIMENSIONS AND MANAGEMENT Neuroticism and managerial performance may be explained
by the fact that managers who score high on Neuroticism
are prone to having irrational ideas, are less able to control
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
their impulses, and cope poorly with stress. The signifi-
R = 0,48 Source of Degrees of Sum of Mean square cant relationship between Openness to Experience and
variance freedom squares managerial performance could be explained by the fact that
managers in the pharmaceutical company continuously
R2 = 0,28 Regression 8 4068,75 813,75 have to adapt to changes (see Horton, 1992; Raudsepp,
F = 5,60 f2 = 0,38 Residual 73 10613,12 145,39 1990) because the company is relatively young and has
grown fast since it was established. The results show that
VARIABLES IN THE EQUATION personality dimensions predict 28% of the variance in
Independent variables Parameter Standard F p
managerial performance.
error
A possible explanation for the lack of relationships between
Intercept 32,98 21,67 1,52 0,1324 personality dimensions and task performance is that the
Neuroticism -0,16 0,08 -1,89 0,0622 tasks of employees in the pharmaceutical organisation are
Extraversion -0,05 0,08 -0,67 0,5069 well-defined, with relatively low autonomy allowed. Accord-
Openness 0,29 0,08 3,48 0,0008 ing to Barrick (2001), personality dimensions are most
Agreeableness 0,16 0,07 2,15 0,0352
likely to affect job performance in situations where autonomy
is high.
Conscientiousness -0,05 0,09 -0,60 0,5529
This study had various limitations. Firstly, a predictive
validity design was not used, which could have affected the
Table 5 shows that personality dimensions predict 28% of
magnit ude of the correlation coefficients obtained. A
the variance in Management (as measured by the PAQ).
disadvantage of this design is that poor performers have
The multiple correlation of 0,48 is practically significant
probably already resigned from the company. Secondly, the
(large effect) (f2 = 0,38). Table 6 shows that Openness to
sample consisted largely of females, which implies that the
Experience and Agreeableness are the best predictors of
results could not be generalised to males. Thirdly, the results
performance in Management.
cannot be generalised to other settings. Lastly, the research
design does not allow one to determine the direction of the
relationships obtained.
DISCUSSION
Analysis of the product-moment correlations between
personality dimensions, task performance and creativity RECOMMENDATIONS
showed that no practically significant relationships existed.
The results of this study confirm that the pharmaceutical
However, the results of the canonical analysis showed that a
company should consider the personality dimensions of
combination of emotional stability (i.e. low Neuroticism),
their employees when predicting creativity and managerial
Extraversion, Openness to Experience and Conscientiousness
performance during selection and career development.
explained about 15% of the variance in task performance
However, more research is needed before these results are
and creativity.
used to predict job performance because they were not
It seems that employees who tend towards Neuroticism (i.e. who obtained in a selection context. Furthermore, because
are prone to having irrational ideas, being less able to control relatively poor associations between personality dimensions
impulses, and coping poorly with stress) perform poorer and are and job performance were obtained, fut ure research
less creative than those who are emotionally stable. This result efforts should be directed at the effects of personality on
confirms the findings of Hörmann and Maschke (1996), Dunn et performance through motivation.
al. (1995) and Judge et al. (1999). Furthermore, Extraversion was
The relationship between personality dimensions and job
associated with task performance and creativity, probably
performance should be studied with larger samples and by using
because of the fact that extraverts tend to experience positive
predictive validity designs in various South African
affect (Clark & Watson, 1991).
organisations. The effects of cultural differences and language
The results of the canonical analysis confirmed that Openness on the relationship between personality dimensions and job
to Experience is related to task performance and creativity. performance should also be studied.
Employees who are open to experiences show an active
imagination, aesthetic sensitivity, attentiveness to inner
feelings and a preference for variety, all of which explain why REFERENCES
they are rated higher on their performance and creativity at Ashton, M.C. (1998). Personality and job performance: The
work. This result confirms the findings of researchers such as importance of narrow traits. Journal of Organizational
Horton (1992) and Raudsepp (1990). Conscientiousness was also Behavior, 19, 289-303.
associated with task performance and creativity, although the Barrick, M.R. & Mount, M.K. (1991). The big five personality
loading of Conscientiousness was relatively lower in the dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel
personality set. However, it makes sense that conscientious Psychology, 44, 1-26.
employees perform better compared to less conscientious Barrick, M.R. & Mount, M.K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator
employees (Barrick & Mount, 1991; Barrick et al., 1993; Borman of the relationship between the Big Five personality
et al., 1991; Hough et al, 1990). dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 78, 111-118.
Furthermore, personalit y dimensions were related to
Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K. & Strauss, J.P. (1993).
management performance. Emotional Stability, Openness to
Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives:
Experience and Agreeableness were practically significantly
Test for the mediating effect of goal setting. Journal of
related to management performance. Managers who are
Applied Psychology, 78, 715-722.
emotionally stable, open to experience and agreeable tend
 THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS 73

Barrick, M.R. & Mount, M.K. (1996). Effects of impression Hogan, R., Hogan, J. & Roberts, B.W. (1996). Personality
management and self-deception on the predictive validity measurement and employment decisions: Questions and
of personality constructs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, Answers. American Psychologist, 51, 469-477.
261-272. Hough, L.M., Eaton, N.K., Dunnette, M.D., Kamp, J.D. &
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality McCloy, R.A. (1990). Criterion-related validities of
and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: personality constructs and the effect of response
What do we know and where do we go next? International distortion on those validities. Journal of Applied Psychology,
Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9-30. 75, 581-595.
Bing, M.N. & Lounsbury, J.W. (2000). Openness and House, R.J., Shane, S.A., & Herold, D.M. (1996). Rumours of the
job performance in U.S.-based Japanese manufacturing death of dispositional research are vastly exaggerated.
companies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14, Academy of Management Review, 21, 203-224.
515-522. Hörmann, H. & Maschke, P. (1996). On the relation between
Borman, W.C., White, L.A., Pulkos, E.D. & Oppler, S.H. (1991). personality and job performance of airline pilots. The
Models of supervisor job performance ratings. Journal of International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 171-178.
Applied Psychology, 76, 863-872. Jang, K.L., Livesley, W.J. & Vernon, P.A. (1996). Hereditability of
Boshoff, C. & Arnolds, C. (1995). Some antecedents of the big five personality dimensions and their facets: A twin
employee commitment and their influence on job study. Journal of Personality, 64, 577-591.
performance. South African Journal of Business Management, Johnson, J.A. (1997). Seven social performance scales for
26 (4), 125-135. the California Psychological Inventory. Human Performance,
Clark, L.A. & Watson, D. (1991). General affective dispositions in 10, 1-30.
physical and psychological health. In C.R. Snyder & D.R. Judge. T.A., Higgins, C.A., Thoresen, C.J. & Barrick, M.R. (1999).
Forsyth (Eds.) Handbook of social and clinical psychology: The The big five personality traits, general mental ability,
health perspective. New York: Pergamon. and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology,
Clark, L.A. & Watson, D. (1995). Construct validity: Basic Issues 52, 621-652.
in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, Krilowicz, T.J. & Lowery, C.M. (1996). Evaluation of personality
309-319. measures for the selection of textile employees. Journal of
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural Business and Psychology, 11, 55-61.
sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Lowery, C.M. & Krilowicz, T.J. (1994). Relationship between
Associates nontask behaviours, rated performance and objective
Costa, P.T. & McCrae, R.R. (1988). Personality in adulthood: A performance measures. Psychological Reports, 74, 571-578.
six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings McCrae, R.R. & Costa, P.T. (1987). Validation of the five-
on the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality and factor model of personality across instruments and
Social Psychology, 54, 853-863. observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52,
Costa, P.T. & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality 81-90.
Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Model (NEO-FFI) McCrae, R.R. & Costa, P.T. (1997). Personality trait structure as
professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516.
Resources. Nunnally, J. & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd
Day, D.V. & Bedeian, A,G, (1995). Personality similarity and ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
work-related outcomes among African-American nursing Ones, D.S. & Viswesvaran, C. (1997, July). Empirical and
personnel: A test of the supplementary model of person- theoretical considerations in using conscientiousness measures
environment congruence. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, in personnel selection. Paper presented at the 5th European
46, 55-70. Congress of Psychology, Dublin, Ireland.
De Fruyt, F. & Mervielde, I. (1999). RIASEC types and Big Five Ones, D.S., Viswesvaran, C. & Reiss, A.D. (1996). Role of
traits as predictors of employment status and nature of social desirability in personality testing for personnel
employment. Personnel Psychology,52, 701-727. selection: The red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81,
Digman, J.M. (1989). Five robust trait dimensions: Development, 660-679.
stability, and utility. Journal of Personality, 57, 195-214. Raudsepp, E. (1990). Are you flexible enough to succeed?
Dunn, W.S., Mount, M.K., Barrick, M.R. & Ones, D.S. (1995). Manage, 42, 6-10.
Relative importance of personality and general mental Reilly, R.R. & Warech, M.A. (1993). The validity and fairness of
ability in managers’ judgements of applicant qualifications. alternatives to cognitive tests. In C.C. Wing & B.R. Gifford
Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 500-509. (Eds.), Policy issues in employment testing (pp. 131-224).
Frink, D.D. & Ferris, G.R. (1999). The moderating effects Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
of accountability on the conscientiousness-performance Rosse, J.G., Stecher, M.D., Miller, J.L. & Levin, R.A. (1998). The
relationship. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 515-524. impact of response distortion on pre-employment
Goldberg, L.R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality testing and hiring decisions. Journal of Applied
personality”: The big five factor structure. Journal of Psychology, 83, 634-644.
Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229. Sackett, P.R. & Wannek, J.E. (1996). New developments in
Goldberg, L.R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality the use of measures of honesty, integrity, conscientiousness,
traits: Authors’ reactions to the six comments. American dependability, trustworthiness and reliability of personnel
Psychologist, 48,1303-1304. selection. Personnel Psychology, 49, 787-830.
Guion, R.M. & Gottier, R.F. (1965). Validity of personality Salgado, J.F. (1997). The five-factor model of personality and job
measures in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 18, performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied
135-164. Psychology, 82, 30-43.
Hackman, J. & Oldham, G. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: SAS Institute. (1996). SAS Users Guide: Basics (6th ed.) Cary, NC:
Addison-Wesley. SAS Institute.
Hamilton, E.E. (1988). The facilitation of organisational Schepers, J.M. (1994). Die konstruksie en evaluering van ‘n
change. An empirical study of factors predicting change prestasiebeoordelingsvraelys vir nie-akademiese personeel.
agents’ effectiveness. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, Johannesburg: RAU.
24, 37-59. Schmitt, N., Gooding, R., Noe, R. & Kirsch M. (1984). Meta-
Hayes, T.L., Roehm, H.A. & Castellano, J.P. (1994). Personality analysis of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982
correlates of success in total quality manufacturing. Journal and the investigation of study characteristics. Personality
of Business and Psychology, 8, 397-411. Psychology, 37, 407-422.
74 ROTHMANN, COETZER

Schneider, M.H. (1999). The relationship of personality and Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (2001). Using multivariate
job settings to job satisfaction. Dissertation Abstracts statistics (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
International: Section B: Science and Engineering, 59, 6103. Tett, R.P., Jackson, D.N. & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality
Shaughnessy, J.J. & Zechmeister, E.B. (1997). Research methods in measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic
psychology (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703-742.
Stewart, G.L. & Carson, K.P. (1995). Personality dimensions and Tokar, D.M. & Subich, L.M. (1997). Relative contributions of
domains of service performance. A field investigation. congruence and personality dimensions to job satisfaction.
Journal of Business and Psychology, 9, 365-378. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 50, 482-491.
Steyn, H.S. (1999). Praktiese betekenisvolheid. Die gebruik Vinchur, A.J., Schippmann, J.S., Switzer, F.S. & Roth, P.L. (1998).
van effekgroottes. Wetenskaplike bydraes – reeks B: A meta-analytic review of predictors of job performance for
Natuurwetenskappe Nr. 117. Potchefstroom: PU vir CHO. salespeople. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 586-597.
Strümpfer, D.J.W., Danana, N., Gouws, J.F. & Viviers, M.R. Wright, P.M., Kacmar, K.M., McMahan, G.C. & Deleeuw, K.
(1998). Personality dispositions and job satisfaction. South (1995). Cognitive ability and job performance. Journal of
African Journal of Psychology, 28, 92-100. Management, 21, 1129-1139.