Industrial Revolution Summary
Industrial Revolution Summary
Revolution?
Understand the reasons for and impact of the agricultural revolution.
Simple structure
Fewer statuses and roles
Monarchy and aristocracy owned the land
No rights of ownership over land for lower classes and peasant population.
Limited production
Limited communication between communities / isolated
Absence or primitive level of schools. university, science etc.
Changes to agriculture
From the mid-eighteenth century until 1815, the agricultural sector changed
significantly.
Population growth boosted demand for food.
High prices due to war-time inflation (Napoleonic wars of 1793-1815) served
to encourage investment in agriculture as profits rose.
A more productive farming system, enclosure, started in the Middle Ages
increased rapidly between 1750 – 1850.
In that century, Parliament passed over 4000 Acts of Enclosure which led a
further 20 per cent of land being enclosed
The industrial changes that took place in the period from 1750 to 1850 would
not have been possible without capitalism.
This was essential if money was to be invested in the new machines and
technology.
At the start of the period this was less of a problem as industrial enterprises,
such as small-scale textile factories, were relatively cheap to establish as the
early machinery was relatively cheap.
Despite this, it still required sufficient funds to provide the buildings, the
machines and purchase the raw materials.
Steam power
By the 1740s silk was already being machine-made in factories in the north with
equipment based on pirated Italian designs. But silk was too delicate and
expensive for mass consumption.
Cotton, on the other hand, was hardwearing, comfortable and inexpensive.
Unlike wool, its production was not controlled by ancient practices because it
had only become widely available after the East India Company began exporting
it from India in the late 17th century.
Inventors therefore sought to create cotton-processing machines, and cotton
spearheaded the British industry into the factory system.
Development of roads
The inability to move goods quickly and cheaply was a major barrier to
industrialisation.
Local villages were expected to maintain their roads in the area. They often had
limited interest in doing this and did not have the money to do it anyway.
The solution, developed in the late 17th century, was a system called ‘Turnpike
trusts’. The company could be formed, which, backed by an act of parliament,
had substantial powers to acquire the land in question.
In return for radically improving and then maintaining a stretch of Rd, the trust
could charge a fee to all those who travelled on it.
Between 1750 and 1770 parliament passed her 500 acts creating Turnpike
trusts covering over 24,000 kilometres of road.
This was in response to major demand from both farming and manufacturing
businesses. The whole of England and Wales was now connected by a well-
maintained road.
Local citizens invested in these companies, which, in the period 1780, mainly
returned good dividends which encouraged investment in other major projects
and allowed considerable experimentation with different types of foundation
and construction of roads.
The projects were also a great stimulus to engineering, resulting in the
development of new types of bridge, drainage techniques and ways to deal with
gradient’s.
The system also helped commercial agriculture under developing retail trade, as
foodstuffs and goods could move around the country more easily.
Development of Canals
In the years immediately before the rapid industrialization process canals were
perhaps the most important improvement in transport. There was a great
demand for large quantities of coal by the middle of the 18th century. The car
was available, and there were mine owners willing to meet the demand, but it
was difficult to move it by carts or on horseback. Transport costs are extremely
high.
Between 1759 and 1774, 52 acts of parliament were passed to allow canals to
be built, mainly in the Midlands and the north. By 1800 comment nearly 3000
kilometres of canals have doubled the length of navigable rivers. Cities were
linked to factories and to ports.
Many of the early canal companies returned huge profits for their shareholders,
as well as providing substantial employment for builders and engineers.
Although inefficient, Newcomen engines were pumping water from mines all
over the country. In around 1764, Watt was given a model Newcomen engine to
repair. He realised that it was hopelessly inefficient and began to work to
improve the design. He designed a separate condensing chamber for the steam
engine that prevented enormous losses of steam. His first patent in 1769
covered this device and other improvements on Newcomen's engine.
Watt's partner and backer was the inventor, John Roebuck. In 1775, Roebuck's
interest was taken over by Matthew Boulton who owned an engineering works in
Birmingham. Together he and Watt began to manufacture steam engines.
Boulton & Watt became the most important engineering firm in the country,
meeting considerable demand. Initially this came from Cornish mine owners, but
extended to paper, flour, cotton and iron mills, as well as distilleries, canals and
waterworks. In 1785, Watt and Boulton were elected fellows of the Royal Society.
Steam power revolutionised both production and transportation. Arguably there
would have been no ‘revolution’ without steam power in the first place. Steam
power’s impact on the production process really was the key to the factory and
then mass production. This, of course, led to huge price drops and the creation
of consumer demand in areas like textiles.
While playing only a minor part in the building and operation of canals, steam
power revolutionised transport with the railway engine. Not only did this
stimulate the movement of raw materials and manufactured goods, but the
railway was an enormous stimulant to the manufacture of steel and the demand
for coal.
A large number of MPs invested in railways. Canals had led the way in showing
how capital could be raised and large scale projects managed. All recognised
the value of an efficient transport system which could move not only people, but
bulk cargo as well.
• Intelligent regulation, such as Peel’s Act, helped.
Factories could be sited where necessary, and not just where there was easy
access to energy supplies etc.
There had already been considerable technological development in metallurgy
and steam power, and canal building had led to much learning about huge
engineering and man management issues, as well as company management.
The absence of tariffs in Britain meant that inefficient producers were not
protected from competition while the consumer gained as prices were not kept
artificially high.
This policy known as free trade, was promoted by economists such as Adam
Smith and David Ricardo. Smith argued that industrial development and trading
should be left to develop naturally, without government intervention.
However, this idea clashed with the previous policy of mercantilism whereby
there were tariffs on some goods.
Context
Although Britain was heavily urbanised with some 15% of its population living in
towns by 1750, the period from 1750 to 1850 witnessed dramatic growth in
towns, particularly those associated with the industries of the industrial age.
By 1800, 25% of Britain’s population lived in urban settlements.
This figure had reached 54% by 1850 and 80% by 1880.
Most of this was because of the changing occupational structure of the country.
Despite some terrible living and working conditions that resulted from this rapid
growth, the standard of living rose with most workers able to earn several times
the subsistence level.
There was also an increase in the average height, which suggests an
improvement in nutrition and, perhaps surprisingly given some of the
conditions, in health.
Literacy also improved, as it paid to be able to read and write.
Urban conditions
The rapid population and industrial growth led to the typical industrial landscape of
mines, factories and mills set against a backdrop of rows of often poorly built terraced
houses. Unskilled labourers crowded into tenement buildings and sellers for which
they paid low rents. Back to back housing with little privacy sprang up in many of the
great industrial towns, with builders looking to cram in as many as 70 to 80 dwellings
per acre.
Building entrepreneurs, aiming for a quick profit, brought land near factories and plays
as many houses as possible on that land, often multi storied and extremely close
together. There was no civic planning and no control by any authority. The simple aim
was to get as many families as possible into as little space as possible. Virtually no
attention was paid to the need for adequate clean water supplies or sewage disposal.
Factors such as heating and ventilation were ignored. Whole families would live in a
single room.
The biggest drawback to the act was that it was permissive. Local governments did
not have to improve living conditions unless they wanted to. Few did. Many people
were reluctant to pay the increased taxes needed to improve living conditions of
others. The rich could simply move out of the squalid towns and build in the suburbs.
These were often to the West of the town as the prevailing winds in most areas came
from the West, so the smell and smoke of the new towns would not affect them.
Housing
The standard of housing in the towns was extremely poor. Builders were unscrupulous
and set out to capitalise on the unprecedented conditions by making huge profits. As
housing was in such great demand, small areas of land were given over to high-
density houses, which were built as quickly as possible.
Sanitation and street pollution
Most towns had totally inadequate systems of drainage and sewage disposal. Sewars
did exist, they were built a porous brick and were consequently incapable of dealing
with the large volume of effluent. The water closets at the wealthy would generally
not connected by pipe to the sewer and the waste was instead fed into the nearest
river or ditch; The outside privies shared by most working people usually drained into
a cesspit or an open ditch. In addition, slaughterhouses filled the open sewers with
awful and blood, whilst the factories pumped in waste products.
Learn about working conditions, e.g. child labour, hours, pay and safety.
Working conditions
And brought change the working life of many. Factories demanded that there
was discipline.
Factory owners had invested heavily in machinery and therefore wanted to keep
them working all the time. This required a shift system and workers who worked
regular and unvarying hours unlike the cottage system where they could work
what hours they pleased.
As mass production increased, factory owners increasingly demanded that
workers worked longer hours.
By 1833 women and children made up two-thirds of the workforce in the textile
industry.
Most of the work done by women and children was unskilled and wages were
usually between one-third and one-sixth those of men.
Child labour
For many owners the important traits were the ease with which children could
be disciplined and the low wages they could be paid.
Many children worked very long hours with harsh discipline, no education or
recreation time and inadequate food. As a result, many were unhealthy and
even deformed as a result of keeping their limbs in unnatural positions for long
periods.
They were the second wealthiest group and although their average real income
declined at the start of this period, they made considerable gains in the period
from 1800 onwards.
This group included people such as Sir Richard Arkwright.
These are the very men who made money from business enterprises and
provided most of the investment in the new industrial activities.
At the start of the period the lower middle class earned twice the amount of workers
but by the end of the period that gap had narrowed considerably so that people such
as shopkeepers and clerks when earning little more than a skilled Craftsman. Farmers
on the other hand did well increasing their income nearly threefold
Workers
The experience of different groups of work is varied during the period 1750 to
1850.
For much of the period the standard of living remained roughly static but this
ignores the considerable inequality among different groups of workers.
Those who worked in the expanding industrial sectors did much better than
those in the handicraft sectors.
The poor
The incomes of the poor did rise gradually during the 19th century.
New methods of production transformed the lives of many.
The destruction of the cottage industry meant that there was a massive change
for labourers.
Working conditions and hours, particularly those for children became a central
concern in the early nineteenth century.
Some attempts were made to control child labour before 1830, with parliament
passing acts in 1802 and 1819 to restrict the hours that children could work and
to stop those under the age of nine from being employed.
However no effective system of inspectors was created to ensure the rules were
obeyed, and attempts to prosecute law breakers proved difficult and expensive.
In 1832, voting rights were given to the property-owning middle classes in Britain.
However, many people wanted further political reform. Chartism was a working class
movement, which emerged in 1836 and was most active between 1838 and 1848. The
aim of the Chartists was to gain political rights and influence for the working classes.
Chartism got its name from the People’s Charter, that listed the six main aims of the
movement.
6 AIMS
Skilled workers in Britain began organising themselves into trade unions in the
17th century.
During the 18th century, when the industrial revolution prompted a wave of new
trade disputes, the government introduced measures to prevent collective
action on the part of workers.
The Combination Acts, passed in 1799 and 1800, during the Napoleonic wars,
made any sort of strike action illegal - and workmen could receive up to three
months' imprisonment or two months' hard labour if they broke these new laws.
Despite the Combination Acts, workers continued to press for better pay and
working conditions during the early part of the 19th century, and trade unions
grew rapidly in London and elsewhere.
Finally, after violent Luddite protests in 1811 and 1812, parliament repealed the
combination act in 1824 and 1825.
Trade unions could now no longer be ignored as a political force, their employers
remained reluctant to treat workers representatives as their equals.
During the 1830s labour unrest and trade union activity reached new levels.
For the first time men began to organise trade associations with nationwide
aims, such as Robert Owen's short lived Grand National Consolidated Trades
Union, formed in February 1834.
Agricultural workers were also adopting new forms of collective action a notable
example being the Swing Riots in 1830-31.
Hey March 1834, with the connivance of the Whig government six agricultural
labourers who had formed a trade union in the Dorset village of Tolpuddle were
arrested on trumped up charges and transported to Australia.
The unfair treatment of the Tolpuddle martyrs as they became known triggered
brief public protests throughout Britain.
But the harsh sentences discouraged other workers from joining trade unions
and many of the nationwide organisations, including the Grand National
Consolidated Trades Union, collapsed.