0546_s20_ms_43
0546_s20_ms_43
MALAY 0546/43
Paper 4 Writing May/June 2020
MARK SCHEME
Maximum Mark: 50
Published
Students did not sit exam papers in the June 2020 series due to the Covid-19 global pandemic.
This mark scheme is published to support teachers and students and should be read together with the
question paper. It shows the requirements of the exam. The answer column of the mark scheme shows the
proposed basis on which Examiners would award marks for this exam. Where appropriate, this column also
provides the most likely acceptable alternative responses expected from students. Examiners usually review
the mark scheme after they have seen student responses and update the mark scheme if appropriate. In the
June series, Examiners were unable to consider the acceptability of alternative responses, as there were no
student responses to consider.
Mark schemes should usually be read together with the Principal Examiner Report for Teachers. However,
because students did not sit exam papers, there is no Principal Examiner Report for Teachers for the June
2020 series.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the June 2020 series for most Cambridge
IGCSE™ and Cambridge International A & AS Level components, and some Cambridge O Level
components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers. They should be applied alongside the
specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these
marking principles.
• the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
• the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
• the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
• marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit is given for valid answers which go beyond
the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme, referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
• marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
• marks are not deducted for errors
• marks are not deducted for omissions
• answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these features are specifically assessed by the
question as indicated by the mark scheme. The meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed instructions or in the application of generic level
descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question (however; the use of the full mark range
may be limited according to the quality of the candidate responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should not be awarded with grade thresholds or
grade descriptors in mind.
Candidates are required to list 8 items in Malay. Read all the items the candidate has listed and award marks as follows:
• Select the most accurate items up to a maximum of 5. Award 1 mark for each, up to a maximum of 5.
NB the pictures provided on the question paper are only suggestions. Accept any 5 things one can see at a train station.
Answers should be marked for communication. Tolerate inaccuracies, provided the message is clear:
(a) ‘If in doubt, sound it out’: if you read aloud what the candidate has written, does it sound like the correct answer?
(b) Look-alike test: does what the candidate has written look like the correct answer?
Tiket keretapi
Kereta api
Beg / bagasi
Mesin tiket
Pegawai polis
Passport
Perhentian bas
1
Lampu isyarat
Question 2
(i) Place the appropriate ‘numbered’ tick as close as possible to each relevant communication point.
(ii) Award ticks flexibly across the tasks for each piece of relevant information conveyed, up to a maximum of 10.
HOWEVER, each of the 4 tasks must be covered to get the 10 communication marks:
• If 1 of the tasks is missing, the maximum communication mark is 9.
• If 2 of the tasks are missing, the maximum communication mark is 8 (and so on).
(v) LISTS = a maximum of 3 marks for communication: lists of 1–3 items = 1 mark; lists of 4 items = 2 marks; lists of 5–6
items = 3 marks.
2
TASK Accept Annotate
Award a mark out of 5 for Language, according to the Grade descriptors in the table below (see Note on using mark
schemes with Grade descriptors (Appendix 1)).
2 A few phrases or short sentences are accurate enough to be comprehensible. Very simple sentence structure.
1 Disjointed words or short phrases, one or two of them accurate enough to be comprehensible.
Question 3
Candidates answer 1 question from a choice of 3. Read the whole answer and award marks as follows:
(i) There are 5 relevant communication points per question, each worth a maximum of 2 marks.
(ii) For each relevant communication point, use the appropriate numbered tick and place up to 2 of these ticks as close as possible to each
relevant communication point (in the body of the answer).
2 ticks Message clearly communicated. Minor errors (adjective endings, use of prepositions etc.) are tolerated.
1 tick Communication of some meaning is achieved, but the message may be ambiguous or incomplete.
0 ticks Nothing of worth communicated.
9–10 Highly accurate including in the correct use of affixes and classifiers and more complex structures.
7–8 Accurate in the use of simple structures. Complex structures may contain occasional more serious errors/more frequent slips, which do
not change the meaning.
5–6 Displays some control of simple structures. Unsuccessful with more complex structures.
3.3 – award a mark out of 10 for Range, Variety and Appropriateness (RVA)
9–10 Apt use of a wide range of vocabulary. Able to use idiom appropriately. Confident use of a wide range of complex sentence patterns
and structures.
7–8 Good range of vocabulary with little repetition. A positive attempt to introduce variety. Ambitious in use of a variety of complex sentence
patterns.
5–6 Some attempt to extend range of vocabulary but still rather repetitive. Shows some ability to produce syntax and structures appropriate
to the task.
3–4 Narrow range of vocabulary. Frequent repetition of common words. Some attempt at more complex sentence patterns but errors occur
even in common structures.
1–2 Very limited vocabulary. Very limited range of structures. Only very simple sentence patterns.
3(a) 30
Task Accept Mark
Task 2 How was the environment/ambience at the theme park when you were there? 2
Allow anything sensible. Expect past. 2
Task 5 How can your feedback help the theme park in the future? 5
Allow anything sensible. Expect future. 5
3(b) 30
Task Accept Mark
Task 3 Why did you agree to help your brother with his business? 3
Allow anything sensible. Expect explanation. 3
Task 5 Give encouragement to your friends to be involved in a business in the next school holiday. 5
Allow anything sensible. Expect future. 5
3(c) 30
Task Accept Mark
Task 1 How did you feel when you heard the sound? 1
Allow anything sensible. Expect reaction. 1
Task 5 What can the school do to prevent such an incident happening in the future? 5
Allow anything sensible. Expect future. 5
Appendix I
It is important that you award marks positively. In order to ensure that you reward achievement rather than penalise failure or omissions, you should
start at the bottom of the mark scheme and work upwards through the descriptors when awarding marks.
You should adopt a ‘best fit’ approach. You must select the set of descriptors provided in the mark scheme that most closely describes the quality
of the work being marked. As you work upwards through the mark scheme, you will eventually arrive at a set of descriptors that fits the candidate’s
performance. When you reach this point, you should always then check the descriptors in the band above to confirm whether or not there is just
enough evidence to award a mark in the higher band.
For example, when marking Question 3 you may find that a candidate uses a variety of relevant vocabulary but has varied success with more
complex structures. In such cases, you will need to award a mark that takes into account both the strengths and weaknesses of the piece of work.
To select the most appropriate mark within each set of descriptors, use the following guidance:
• If most of the descriptors fit the piece (and after you have considered the band above), award the top mark in the band.
• If there is just enough evidence (and you had perhaps been considering the band below), award the lowest mark in the band.
In the case of a deliberately evasive answer which consists entirely of irrelevant material exploited in defiance of the rubric, a score of 0 is given.
This is extremely rare. The genuine attempt to answer the question which fails due to a misunderstanding of the rubric will normally lose
Communication marks but will score for Language. You should consult your Team Leader.
When part of an answer is clearly irrelevant, highlight it and do not consider it when deciding on the
Language mark. (e.g. Highlight and do not consider for Language an introduction to a question consisting of an unwanted self portrait on the lines
of: Hello, my name is X. I am 16. I live in Y or letter etiquette where a letter is not required.)