Standard Costing and Variance Analysis
Standard Costing and Variance Analysis
4
Variance Analysis
• Flexible budget variance
= Actual costs – Flexible budget cost
• Dichotomizing flexible budget variance
Total flexible budget variance =
Price variance + Usage/Quantity/Efficiency variance
= (AP – SP)AQ + (AQ – SQ)SP
= (AP x AQ) – (SP x AQ) + (SP x AQ) – (SQ x SP)
= (AP x AQ) – (SP x SQ)
Total flexible budget variance expressed in different ways and is
further broken down within Material, Labour and Overheads (variable
and fixed) cost categories.
5
Variance Analysis
• Variance analysis
▪ Identifies the general causes for the total
flexible budget variance by breaking it down
into separate price and quantity variances for
each production resource
▪ 2 possible reasons why actual cost may differ
from flexible budget cost for a given amount of
output produced:
– Difference between actual price and standard price
– Difference between actual quantity and standard quantity
6
Variance Analysis
• Unfavorable and favorable variances
▪ Unfavorable variances occur whenever the
actual prices or usage of inputs are greater
than standard prices or usages (variances are +
ve) AP > SP, AQ > SQ
Price Usage
Variance Variance
AQ x (AP - SP) SP x (AQ - SQ)
Budget
Variance
(AQ x AP) - (SQ x SP)
10
Variance Analysis: DM
• Possible causes for DM Price Variance
▪ Inaccurate or outdated price standards
▪ Quality of DM
▪ Quantity discounts
▪ Market price fluctuations
• Possible causes for DM Usage Variance
▪ Inaccurate or outdated usage standards
▪ Quality of DM
▪ Level of scrap, waste or rework
11
Variance Analysis: DL
Budget
Variance
(AH x AR) - (SH x SR)
12
Variance Analysis: DL
• Possible causes for DL Rate Variance
▪ Inaccurate or outdated labor rate standards
▪ Increase or decrease in the pay of workers
▪ Use of highly or lowly skilled workers in the
production
• Possible causes for DL Efficiency Variance
▪ Inaccurate or outdated quantity standards
▪ Training of employees
▪ Quality of machinery
▪ Quality of materials
▪ Level of supervision 13
Variance Analysis: VMOH
Spending Efficiency
Variance Variance
AH x (AVOR – SVOR) SVOR x (AH - SH)
Total Variance
(AVOR x AH) – (SVOR x SH)
14
Variance Analysis: VMOH
• Possible causes for VMOH Spending Variance
▪ Inaccurate or outdated VMOH rate standards
▪ Changes in the price of the variable overhead items
Efficiency in the use (in terms of quantity) of the
variable overhead items
• Possible causes for VMOH Efficiency Variance
▪ Inaccurate or outdated quantity standards for allocation
base
▪ Efficiency in the use of the cost allocation base
– If the cost allocation base is direct labor hours, the reasons for direct labor
efficiency variance will be the reason for VMOH efficiency variance
15
Variance Analysis: FMOH
Impt: Note that budgeted hours is used instead of actual hours because FMOH
does not vary with the number of units
Applied Fixed OH
Actual Fixed OH Budgeted Fixed OH
SH x SFOR for
AH x AFOR rate BH x SFOR
actual work done
Total Variance
[Note: Variance formulas for DM, DL and VMOH are not applicable for computing spending
variance and volume variance of FMOH] 16
Variance Analysis: FMOH
• Spending variance = Actual FMOH cost – Static FMOH
budget
[Note: Spending variance = Flexible budget variance = Static budget variance]
17
Variance Analysis: FMOH
• Possible causes for FMOH Spending Variance
▪ Inaccurate or outdated budgets for FMOH
▪ Changes in the price and quantity of the FMOH
items
▪ Note: Many FMOH items are not subject to
change in the short run, consequently fixed
overhead costs are often beyond the
immediate control of management
• Cause for FMOH Volume Variance
▪ Changes in the level of output
18
Variance Analysis: TR
Revenue
Variance
(AP x AQ) - (BP x BQ)
19
Variance Analysis: TR
FAS budget 2001 ticket sales at $70,000 per home game, which represent the sale
of an estimated 10,000 tickets at a selling price of $7. In July’s first game, actual
gate ticket revenue was $66,000, creating a total unfavorable revenue variance of
$4,000. The actual sales consisted of 12,000 tickets at $5.50.
20
Variance Analysis: TR
Revenue
Variance
(66,000) - (70,000)
4,000U
21
Variance Analysis: TR
• Possible causes for TR Price Variance
▪ Inaccurate or outdated price standards
▪ Changes in the market price of the product
• Possible causes for TR Volume Variance
▪ Inaccurate or outdated quantity standards
▪ Changes in the level of demand for the product
• Note: For TR variance only, variance favorable if
AP > SP, AQ > SQ
(In contrast with cost variances)
22