TDMbasicprinciples
TDMbasicprinciples
net/publication/259562432
CITATIONS READS
0 6,148
1 author:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Ahmed Shaker Ali on 13 April 2015.
1
Faculty of Medicine King Abdul-Aziz University, Saudi Arabia
2
Faculty of Pharmacy, TIBA University Saudi Arabia
3
Clinical Pharmacy Program, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University Sains Malaysia
Abstract: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a tool that can guide the clinician to provide effective and safe drug
therapy in the individual patient. It is a team work service; the clinical pharmacist plays an important role to guide the
team. TDM involves not only measuring drug concentrations, but also the clinical interpretation of the result. This
requires knowledge of the pharmacokinetics, sampling time, drug history; the patient's clinical condition and specific
laboratory results. The following chapter summarize the criteria to insure optimal TDM service.
Drug with an established relationship between its SDC and therapeutic response and/or toxicity
Drug with a narrow therapeutic index. Example: Lithium, phenytoin, and digoxin
Drug with large individual variability at steady state SDC in any given dose
Drug with poor relationship between its SDC and dosage
Drug with saturable metabolism. Example: phenytoin
Drug with poorly defined end point or difficult to clinically predict the response. Example: immunosuppressant drugs
Drug whose toxicity is difficult to distinguish from a patient's underlying disease. Example: Theophylline in patients with chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease
Drug whose efficacy is difficult to establish clinically. Example: Phenytoin
With wide availability of TDM services in hospitals Sampling After Achievement of Steady-State
nowadays, there is a tendency that the service is being Condition
misused or overused. Like other clinical services, In most cases blood samples should not be
appropriate measures need to be taken to optimize its collected until a steady-state condition has been
use thus, ensuring the best clinical outcomes. There reached. This occurs when the rate of drug
are a number of criteria that need to be considered to administration and drug elimination are equal, for most
make TDM a cost-effective service [5-7]. drugs this is achieved after 4 to 5 half-lives. If a loading
dose has been administered, the desired drug
There are clear clinical indications for the
concentration may be achieved earlier. However, drug
measurement of SDC (e.g. no response to treatment;
concentrations may be determined earlier if toxicity is
suspected non-compliance; suspected toxicity).
suspected. It is important to wait for steady-state both
The specimen (i.e. blood, serum or plasma) is taken at initiation and following any dosage change [1]. In
at an appropriate time and with identifiable patient certain situations A loading dose(an initial higher dose)
information. may be given at the beginning of a course of treatment
before for rabid achievement of steady state A loading
Appropriate analytical techniques are available to dose is most useful for drugs that are eliminated from
determine the SDC of the drug and/or its metabolites. the body relatively slowly, i.e. have a long systemic
half-life. Drugs which may be started with an initial
Adequate clinical information is available to allow
loading dose include digoxin, and Phenytoin for acute
the interpretation of SDC.
status epilepticus [12].
2.1. Clear Indication for the Drug Level
Determination Sampling at the Appropriate Time in Relation to
Last Dose
TDM data supports the clinician to make When a drug is administered, it goes through the
appropriate clinical decision but it should not be used stages of absorption, distribution, metabolism and
as a routine laboratory test. A rational indication of elimination. An essential requirement for some drugs is
SDC determination includes assessment of patient to take the sample at the appropriate specified time
compliance. For example, when a patient fails to following the last dose [12, 13]. Errors in the timing of
respond to a usual therapeutic dose, measurement of sampling will produce abnormal or unexpected results.
SDC can help to distinguish between a noncompliant Nurses and clinical pharmacists should always be
patient and a patient who is a true non-responder. With aware of correct sampling times to avoid
antibiotic therapy, TDM helps to determine whether misinterpretation of results.
therapy failure is due to inadequate SDC or due to
bacterial resistance. TDM also provides early indicators Accurate sampling time is critical for some drugs as
regarding toxicity or non-reversible adverse effects shown in the following examples:
before clinical symptoms are being observed. For
example, progressively high trough gentamicin Drugs with short half lives e.g. aminoglycosides (Figure
concentrations may provide early warning of potential 2);
renal damage. TDM can also be used to confirm a
suspected drug interaction. For example, co- Good correlation with AUC and hence efficacy e.g.
administration of an enzyme inducer or inhibitor is likely Cyclosporine A (2 hours post dose);
to affect the SDC and pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine
Avoid sampling during the distributive phase e.g.
A, thus affecting its efficacy. Patients who have
Digoxin (at least 6 hours post dose);
impaired clearance of a drug with a narrow therapeutic
index will benefit from SDC monitoring. For example, Specific sampling time based on a nomogram e.g.
patients with renal failure have decreased clearance of Acetaminophen toxicity (at least 4 hours post dose);
digoxin and therefore are at a higher risk of toxicity.
Providing TDM of digoxin in such patients will help Specific sampling time e.g. Methotrexate (at various
clinicians to adjust dose regimens accordingly [8-11]. time intervals according to institutional guidelines).
4 Journal of Applied Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics, 2013, Vol. 1, No. 1 Ali et al.
Investigation Comment
Renal function tests (e.g. SCr) Aminoglycosides and Vancomycin Indication of nephrotoxicity or reduced
elimination
Liver function tests (e.g. AST, ALT) Valproic acid and Acetaminophen Marker for liver toxicity
+
Serum electrolytes (e.g. K ) Digoxin Enhance cardiac toxicity of digoxin
Complete blood count (e.g. abnormal progressive Carbamazepine Marker for aplastic anemia
low RBC)
Thyroid function tests (e.g. T3 and T4) Digoxin Altered response in hypothyroidism
or hyperthyroidism
6 Journal of Applied Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics, 2013, Vol. 1, No. 1 Ali et al.
Information required on TDM request form [5] (a) Recognize the Flexible Nature of the Reference
Range
Patient demography
Reference ranges for commonly monitored drugs
Name of patient- are available in many TDM handbooks. They must be
used as a guide rather than absolute values. The
Patient hospital number (registration number) following points are provided to illustrate this fact.
Information on drug requested Many adverse effects are dose-independent (or not
related to SDC). For example, gum hyperplasia
Name of drug requested for TDM associated with phenytoin and aplastic anemia
produced by carbamazepine.
Date started
Many factors alter the effect of a drug concentration
Dose regimen (including dose, frequency and route) at the site of action. For example, SDC of phenytoin
that is within the reference range may be associated
Date and time last dose given/taken
with dose-related adverse effects in patients with very
low albumin level.
Basic Principles of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Journal of Applied Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics, 2013, Vol. 1, No. 1 7
required, taking into account patient-specific factors [5] Kang JS, Lee MH. Overview of therapeutic drug monitoring.
Korean J Intern Med 2009; 24: 1-10.
such as age, gender, weight, interacting drugs, and http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2009.24.1.1
major organ functions. Various pharmacokinetic [6] Hiemke C. Clinical utility of drug measurement and
software are available in the market. These algorithms pharmacokinetics: Therapeutic drug monitoring in psychiatry.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2008; 64: 159-66.
can also suggest monitoring of drugs at appropriate http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-007-0430-1
times. Computerization allows the availability of clinical [7] Schumacher GE, Barr JT. Economic and outcome issues for
data at an instant. Data such as drug regimen, dosing therapeutic drug monitoring in medicine. Ther Drug Monit
1998; 20: 539-42.
times, and sampling times would be available when http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007691-199810000-00016
requested. When the system is integrated with other [8] Gross AS. Best practice in therapeutic drug monitoring. Br J
laboratory services, the clinical pharmacist/ Clin Pharmacol 2001; 52(Suppl 1): 5S-10S.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2125.2001.00770.x
pharmacologist can use these biochemical data to help
[9] Ried LD, Horn JR, McKenna DA. Therapeutic drug
make a decision. monitoring reduces toxic drug reactions: A meta-analysis.
Ther Drug Monit 1990; 12: 72-8.
3. SUMMARY http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007691-199001000-00013
[10] Shaw LM, Kaplan B, Brayman KL. Prospective investigations
Measurement of serum drug concentration without of concentration-clinical response for immunosuppressive
drugs provide the scientific basis for therapeutic drug
appropriate interpretation is useless or even monitoring. Clin Chem 1998; 44: 381-7.
misleading. [11] Streetman DS, Nafziger AN, Destache CJ, Bertino AS Jr.
Individualized pharmacokinetic monitoring results in less
Efforts should be implemented to insure cost- aminoglycoside-associated nephrotoxicity and fewer
associated costs. Pharmacotherapy 2001; 21: 443-51.
effective service. The following criteria are suggested: http://dx.doi.org/10.1592/phco.21.5.443.34490
[12] Winter ME. Basic clinical pharmacokinetics. 4th ed.
Clear indication for the drug level determination Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 2004.
[13] Armstrong VW, Oellerich M. Critical evaluation of methods
Insure optimal sampling time; for therapeutic drug monitroing, In Applied pharmacokinetics
and pharmacodynamics: Principles of therapeutic drug
monitoring (Burton ME, Shaw LM, Schentag JJ, Evans WE,
appropriate analytical techniques; Eds.), Baltimore, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 2006; pp.
30-39.
appropriate interpretation of results. in view of relevant [14] Hicks JM, Brett EM. Falsely increased digoxin concentrations
biochemical and hematological parameters and clinical in samples from neonates and infants. Ther Drug Monit
1984; 6: 461-4.
observations. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007691-198412000-00015
[15] Patel JA, Clayton LT, LeBel CP, McClatchey KD. Abnormal
Reference range is considered as guide rather than theophylline levels in plasma by fluorescence polarization
an absolute value, i.e. some patients may require and immunoassay in patients with renal disease. Ther Drug Monit
1984; 6: 458-60.
tolerate higher level while others show good clinical http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007691-198412000-00014
response with lower level. [16] Steimer W, Muller C, Eber B. Digoxin assays: Frequent,
substantial, and potentially dangerous interference by
TDM specialist should be aware of appropriate spironolactone, canrenone, and other steroids. Clin Chem
2002; 48: 507-16.
procedure for management of overdose and toxicity.
[17] Sym D, Smith C, Meenan G, Lehrer M. Fluorescence
polarization immunoassay: Can it result in an overestimation
Continues education for patients and staff as well as of vancomycin in patients not suffering from renal failure?
research are also important tools to develop the TDM Ther Drug Monit 2001; 23: 441-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007691-200108000-00020
practice.
[18] Brodtkorb E, Reimers A. Seizure control and
pharmacokinetics of antiepileptic drugs in pregnant women
REFERENCES with epilepsy. Seizure 2008; 17: 160-65.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2007.11.015
[1] Hallworth M, Capps N. Therapeutic drug monitoring and [19] Harrison JH, Jr, Rainey PM. Identification of patients for
clinical biochemistry, ACB Venture, London 1993. pharmacologic review by computer analysis of clinical
[2] Reynolds DJ, Aronson JK. Abc of monitoring drug therapy. laboratory drug concentration data. Am J Clin Pathol 1995;
Making the most of plasma drug concentration 103: 710-7.
measurements. BMJ 1993; 306: 48-51. [20] Bates DW, Soldin SJ, Rainey PM, Micelli JN. Strategies for
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.306.6869.48 physician education in therapeutic drug monitoring. Clin
[3] Thomson A. Why do therapeutic drug monitoring. Pharm J Chem 1998; 44: 401-7.
2004; 273: 153-55. [21] Samani K. Therapeutic drug monitoring: An e-learning
[4] Schumacher GE. Therapeutic drug monitoring, Norwalk, CT, resource. Bioscience Horizons 2009; 2: 113-24.
Appleton and Lange 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biohorizons/hzp013
Basic Principles of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Journal of Applied Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics, 2013, Vol. 1, No. 1 9
[22] Filler G. Optimization of immunosuppressive drug monitoring and biochemical profile in renal transplant patients. Int J Clin
in children. Transplant Proc 2007; 39: 1241-3. Pharmacol Ther 1995; 33: 315-21.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.03.049 [25] Mogayzel PJ, Jr., Pierce E, Mills J, McNeil A, et al. Accuracy
[23] Islam SI, Ali AS, Sheikh AA, Fida NM. Pharmacokinetics of of tobramycin levels obtained from central venous access
theophylline in preterm neonates during the first month of life. devices in patients with cystic fibrosis is technique
Saudi Med J 2004; 25: 459-65. dependent. Pediatr Nurs 2008; 34: 464-8; quiz 468-9.
[24] Islam SI, Ezeamuzie CI, Shaheen FA, Sheikh IA, et al. The
impact of long-term cyclosporin-a therapy on hematological