Journal of Artificial Intelligence General Science (JAIGS)

ISSN: 3006-4023 (Online), Volume 5, Issue 1, 2024 DOI: 10.60087

Home page https://ojs.boulibrary.com/index.php/JAIGS

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Data Security and Combat Cyber Attacks

Yijie Weng1,a, Jianhao Wu2,b,*

1
University of Maryland, MD, USA
2
Cornell University, NY, USA
a
jaweng333@gmail.com, bjohnwu2417@gmail.com
*
Corresponding author

ABSTRACT
This research paper examines the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in strengthening data
security and mitigating the growing threat of cyber-attacks. As digital threats continue to evolve
and pose significant risks to businesses, organizations, government agencies, and individual users,
there is an urgent need for more robust and adaptive security measures. This study explores how
AI can be leveraged to enhance network and data security, focusing on its applications in threat
detection, response automation, and predictive analysis. Through a comprehensive literature
review and analysis of current AI-driven security solutions, this research aims to provide insights
into the effectiveness of AI in cybersecurity and propose strategies for its implementation. The
findings suggest that AI has the potential to significantly improve cybersecurity measures, offering
faster threat detection, more accurate risk assessment, and enhanced response capabilities.
However, challenges related to AI implementation, data privacy, and the need for human oversight
are also addressed. This research contributes to the growing body of knowledge on AI applications
in cybersecurity and provides valuable recommendations for organizations seeking to strengthen
their security posture in an increasingly complex digital landscape.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, National Security, Data Security, Data Privacy,

Cybersecurity

ARTICLE INFO: Received: 01.08.2024 Accepted: 15.08.2024 Published: 29.08.2024

© The Author(s) 2024. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permitsuse,
sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the originalauthor(s) and the
source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other thirdparty material in this article
are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the mate-rial. If material is not included in the
article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation orexceeds the permitted use, you will need to
obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
ISSN: 3006-4023 (Online), Journal of Artificial Intelligence General Science (JAIGS) DOI: 10.60087 392

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Problem Statement and Purpose of Research

The worldwide digital infrastructure of corporations, organizations, and government institutions is

seriously threatened by the swift increase in cyberattacks. Cyber-attacks are becoming more frequent and
sophisticated at an alarming rate in a world where data is a vital asset, and connections are becoming more
and more widespread. Conventional security procedures, which have historically served as the mainstay of
cybersecurity efforts, are frequently insufficient to counteract complex and dynamic threats. Since
cybercriminals are always coming up with new ways to get beyond traditional defenses, it is critical that
businesses implement more sophisticated security measures.
The purpose of this study is to investigate and assess artificial intelligence's (AI) potential as a
weapon to prevent cyberattacks and improve data security. Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, with
their capacity to examine large volumes of data and spot trends, provide a potential method for instantly
identifying and reducing cyberthreats. Cybersecurity systems can be mainly trained to identify and react to
anomalies that might a point to a cyberattack by utilizing machine learning algorithms, neural networks,
and also other AI approaches.

1.2 Relevance and Significance

As cyber threats continue to grow in frequency and complexity, the need for more advanced and
adaptive security measures becomes increasingly crucial. AI offers promising capabilities in threat
detection, automated response, and predictive analysis, which could significantly enhance cybersecurity
efforts. This research is relevant to organizations seeking to strengthen their security posture and to the
broader field of cybersecurity, contributing to the ongoing dialogue about the role of emerging technologies
in protecting digital assets.

1.3 Research Questions

The primary research questions that will guide this study are as follows:
1. How can artificial intelligence be effectively leveraged to improve network and data security?
2. What are the current applications and limitations of AI in combating cyber-attacks?
3. What challenges and considerations should organizations be aware of when implementing AI-
driven security solutions?
4. How does the integration of AI in cybersecurity impact the overall security posture of an
organization?
5. What are the prospects and potential advancements in AI-driven cybersecurity?

2. LITERATURE REVIEW

The integration of artificial intelligence in cybersecurity has gained significant attention in recent
years. Numerous studies have explored the potential of AI in enhancing various aspects of data and network
security.
ISSN: 3006-4023 (Online) Yijie Weng, Jianhao Wu DOI: 10.60087 Page: 393

Threat Detection and Prevention:

Systems driven by AI have shown to be remarkably adept at spotting and stopping online threats.
Older rule-based systems frequently can't keep up with the advanced strategies used by cybercriminals due
to the growing complexity and volume of cyberattacks. On the other hand, AI and machine learning (ML)
algorithms are highly effective in analyzing large amounts of data in order to quickly identify anomalies
and possible security breaches. For this reason, they are essential components of contemporary
cybersecurity tactics.
Large-scale information, such as user activity logs, system events, and network traffic logs, can be
combed through by machine learning algorithms to find patterns suggestive of malicious behavior. Because
these algorithms can learn from past data, they can identify attack vectors that have never been observed
before in addition to known dangers. AI systems can continuously improve their accuracy and speed in
danger identification over time because to this adaptive learning process.
According to Buczak and Guven's research, AI and ML algorithms speed up danger identification
while simultaneously increasing threat detection accuracy. Conventional rule-based systems depend on pre-
established signatures and rules, which might be out of date very fast when new threats appear. ML
algorithms, on the other hand, could continuously learn from fresh data, which allows them to adapt to
developing threats and shorten the time needed to detect and handle security events.

Automated Response and Incident Management:

Artificial intelligence (AI) solutions can respond to security problems quickly and automatically,
cutting reaction times and potential damage. Automated reaction mechanisms play a critical role in
cybersecurity by reducing the impact of assaults that happen quickly during digital transactions. Manual
intervention is a common component of traditional incident response, but it can be laborious and error
prone. In contrast, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven systems could continually monitor network activity,
detect any attacks, and instantly launch pre-established reaction protocols, all of which improve an
organization's overall security posture.
Additionally, by integrating with different security platforms and technologies, AI can improve
incident management by offering a cohesive and well-coordinated defense system. This integration makes
sure that all the security infrastructure's parts, including firewalls, endpoint protection programs, and
intrusion detection systems, operate together flawlessly. As a result, the cybersecurity ecosystem has
become stronger and more resilient, able to ward against increasingly complex cyberattacks.

Predictive Analysis and Proactive Security:

Because AI can identify patterns and forecast trends, it is a powerful tool for preventive security
measures. Rather of only responding to problems after they happen, proactive security involves foreseeing
possible dangers and implementing countermeasures before an attack happens. This transition from reactive
to proactive security is essential in a world where malicious cyberattacks are getting more complex and
devastating.
ISSN: 3006-4023 (Online), Journal of Artificial Intelligence General Science (JAIGS) DOI: 10.60087 394

In their discussion of the difficulties and potential applications of machine learning for network
intrusion detection, Sommer and Paxson (2010) emphasized the significance of context-aware systems for
attack prediction and mitigation. Large-scale datasets can be used to train machine learning algorithms to
distinguish between typical and anomalous network behavior. AI systems can anticipate possible security
breaches by identifying these patterns, which notifies managers to take precautionary action.

Human-AI Collaboration:
Experts who are human offer a distinct set of advantages. They can evaluate complicated situations
and come to well-informed conclusions by applying creativity, critical thinking, and contextual knowledge.
Experts in cybersecurity can authenticate alarms, analyze the data produced by AI systems, and thoroughly
analyse occurrences. Based on their comprehension of new dangers and the larger security environment,
they can also create fresh plans and policies.
According to Hota and Shrivas (2019), cybersecurity efforts can be greatly boosted by a
collaborative strategy in which AI systems and human specialists work together. AI, for example, may take
care of repetitive chores like monitoring and early threat detection, freeing up human analysts to concentrate
on more intricate and strategic matters. Human specialists can examine and look into an alarm that an AI
system raises about a possible threat, then use their knowledge to decide on the best course of action. By
working together, it is ensured that the advantages of AI and human intellect are fully utilized.
Cybersecurity professionals must possess the necessary knowledge and abilities. This entails being
aware of how AI algorithms work, deciphering their results, and incorporating AI instruments into already-
in-use security procedures. Human specialists may remain ahead of changing dangers and technology
breakthroughs with the support of ongoing training and professional development.

Privacy and Ethical Considerations:

Concerns about privacy and ethics are also raised using AI in cybersecurity. It is critical to address
these issues as AI systems become more and more integrated into cybersecurity operations to make sure
that the advantages of AI do not outweigh societal values and individual rights.
In a thorough analysis of the ethical implications of artificial intelligence, Mittelstadt et al. (2016)
emphasized several crucial concerns about algorithmic bias and data privacy that are especially pertinent
to cybersecurity. The possibility of privacy violations by AI systems is one of the main worries. For AI-
driven cybersecurity solutions to work well, large volumes of data must frequently be accessible. Sensitive
personal data, conversations, and behavioral patterns may be included in this data. Although gathering,
storing, and analyzing this data presents serious privacy concerns, it is necessary for AI algorithms to be
trained and for the detection of abnormalities.

3 METHODOLOGIES

This research employs a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative analysis of existing

literature with quantitative data from case studies and industry reports. The methodology includes:
ISSN: 3006-4023 (Online) Yijie Weng, Jianhao Wu DOI: 10.60087 Page: 395

1. Comprehensive literature review of peer-reviewed articles, industry white papers, and technical
reports on AI applications in cybersecurity.
2. Analysis of case studies featuring organizations that have implemented AI-driven security
solutions.
3. Evaluation of current AI technologies and their effectiveness in addressing various types of cyber
threats.
4. Assessment of challenges and limitations associated with AI implementation in cybersecurity
contexts.
5. Synthesis of findings to develop recommendations for organizations considering AI-driven security
measures.

4 KEY FINDINGS

The research findings indicate that AI has significant potential to enhance cybersecurity measures
across various domains:

 Improved Threat Detection: AI algorithms demonstrate superior capability in identifying

complex and novel cyber threats, often outperforming traditional signature-based detection
methods.
 Enhanced Response Time: Automated AI-driven systems can significantly reduce the time
between threat detection and response, minimizing potential damage from attacks.
 Predictive Capabilities: AI's ability to analyze trends and patterns enables more accurate
prediction of future cyber threats, allowing for proactive security measures.
 Scalability: AI systems can handle and analyze vast amounts of data, making them well-suited for
large-scale security operations.
 Adaptive Defense: Machine learning algorithms can continuously learn and adapt to new threat
patterns, improving their effectiveness over time.

However, the research also identified several challenges:

 Data Quality and Quantity: The effectiveness of AI systems heavily depends on the quality and
quantity of training data available.
 False Positives: AI systems may generate false alarms, requiring careful tuning and human
oversight.
 Adversarial AI: The potential for attackers to use AI to create more sophisticated threats poses a
significant challenge.
 Privacy Concerns: The use of AI in security raises questions about data privacy and the ethical
use of information.
 Implementation Challenges: Organizations face difficulties in integrating AI systems with
existing security infrastructure and processes.

5 CONCLUSIONS

This research demonstrates that artificial intelligence has the potential to significantly enhance data
security and combat cyber-attacks. AI-driven solutions offer improved threat detection, faster response
times, and predictive capabilities that can strengthen an organization's overall security posture. However,
ISSN: 3006-4023 (Online), Journal of Artificial Intelligence General Science (JAIGS) DOI: 10.60087 396

the effective implementation of AI in cybersecurity requires careful consideration of technical, ethical, and
operational challenges.

Organizations looking to leverage AI for cybersecurity should focus on:

1. Developing comprehensive AI strategies that align with their overall security objectives.
2. Ensuring high-quality data collection and management to maximize AI effectiveness.
3. Maintaining a balance between AI automation and human expertise.
4. Addressing privacy and ethical concerns associated with AI implementation.
5. Continuously evaluating and adapting AI systems to keep pace with evolving threats.

Further research is needed to explore the long-term impacts of AI on cybersecurity, particularly in

areas such as AI-human collaboration, the development of more robust and explainable AI models, and
strategies to counter AI-powered cyber-attacks. As the digital threat landscape continues to evolve, the role
of AI in cybersecurity is likely to become increasingly crucial, necessitating ongoing research and
development in this field

REFERENCES
1. Buczak, A. L., & Guven, E. (2016). A survey of data mining and machine learning
methods for cyber security intrusion detection. IEEE Communications Surveys &
Tutorials, 18(2), 1153-1176.
2. Hota, H. S., & Shrivas, S. K. (2019). Integration of human intelligence and artificial
intelligence in cybersecurity. In Integration of Artificial Intelligence and Internet of
Things (pp. 139-161). Springer, Cham.
3. Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of
algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 2053951716679679.
4. Sommer, R., & Paxson, V. (2010). Outside the closed world: On using machine learning
for network intrusion detection. In 2010 IEEE symposium on security and privacy (pp.
305-316). IEEE.
5. Tosh, D. K., Sengupta, S., Kamhoua, C. A., Kwiat, K. A., & Martin, A. (2015). An
evolutionary game-theoretic framework for cyber-threat information sharing. In 2015
IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) (pp. 7341-7346). IEEE.
6. Weng, Y., & Wu, J. (2024). Fortifying the global data fortress: a multidimensional
examination of cyber security indexes and data protection measures across 193
nations. International Journal of Frontiers in Engineering Technology, 6(2), 13-28.
7. Dang, B., Zhao, W., Li, Y., Ma, D., Yu, Q., & Zhu, E. Y. (2024). Real-Time pill
identification for the visually impaired using deep learning. arXiv preprint
arXiv:2405.05983.
8. Lin, Z., Wang, C., Li, Z., Wang, Z., Liu, X., & Zhu, Y. (2024). Neural radiance fields
convert 2d to 3d texture. Applied Science and Biotechnology Journal for Advanced
Research, 3(3), 40-44.
9. Lyu, W., Zheng, S., Ma, T., & Chen, C. (2022). A study of the attention abnormality in
trojaned berts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.08305.
ISSN: 3006-4023 (Online) Yijie Weng, Jianhao Wu DOI: 10.60087 Page: 397

10. Zheng, Q., Yu, C., Cao, J., Xu, Y., Xing, Q., & Jin, Y. (2024). Advanced Payment
Security System: XGBoost, LightGBM and SMOTE Integrated. arXiv preprint
arXiv:2406.04658.
11. Song, X., Wu, D., Zhang, B., Peng, Z., Dang, B., Pan, F., & Wu, Z. (2023). Zeroprompt:
streaming acoustic encoders are zero-shot masked lms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10649.
12. Lyu, W., Zheng, S., Pang, L., Ling, H., & Chen, C. (2023). Attention-enhancing
backdoor attacks against bert-based models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.14480.
13. Yu, C., Jin, Y., Xing, Q., Zhang, Y., Guo, S., & Meng, S. (2024). Advanced User Credit
Risk Prediction Model using LightGBM, XGBoost and Tabnet with SMOTEENN. arXiv
preprint arXiv:2408.03497.
14. Peng, H., Xie, X., Shivdikar, K., Hasan, M. A., Zhao, J., Huang, S., ... & Ding, C. (2024,
April). Maxk-gnn: Extremely fast gpu kernel design for accelerating graph neural
networks training. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on
Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Volume 2
(pp. 683-698).
15. Lyu, W., Dong, X., Wong, R., Zheng, S., Abell-Hart, K., Wang, F., & Chen, C. (2022). A
multimodal transformer: Fusing clinical notes with structured EHR data for interpretable
in-hospital mortality prediction. In AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings (Vol. 2022, p.
719). American Medical Informatics Association.
16. Weng, Y., & Wu, J. (2024). Big data and machine learning in defence. International
Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 16(2), 25-35.
17. Yu, C., Xu, Y., Cao, J., Zhang, Y., Jin, Y., & Zhu, M. (2024). Credit card fraud detection
using advanced transformer model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.03733.
18. Jin, C., Peng, H., Zhao, S., Wang, Z., Xu, W., Han, L., ... & Metaxas, D. N. (2024).
APEER: Automatic Prompt Engineering Enhances Large Language Model Reranking.
arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.14449.
19. Lin, Z., Wang, Z., Zhu, Y., Li, Z., & Qin, H. (2024). Text Sentiment Detection and
Classification Based on Integrated Learning Algorithm. Applied Science and Engineering
Journal for Advanced Research, 3(3), 27-33.
20. Zhu, A., Li, J., & Lu, C. (2021). Pseudo view representation learning for monocular
RGB-D human pose and shape estimation. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 29, 712-716.
21. Liu, T., Cai, Q., Xu, C., Hong, B., Ni, F., Qiao, Y., & Yang, T. (2024). Rumor Detection
with A Novel Graph Neural Network Approach. Academic Journal of Science and
Technology, 10(1), 305-310.
22. Lipeng, L., Xu, L., Liu, J., Zhao, H., Jiang, T., & Zheng, T. (2024). Prioritized experience
replay-based DDQN for Unmanned Vehicle Path Planning. arXiv preprint
arXiv:2406.17286.
23. Luo, H., Wu, T., Han, C. F., & Yan, Z. (2022, December). IGN: Implicit Generative
Networks. In 2022 21st IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and
Applications (ICMLA) (pp. 560-566). IEEE.
24. Jin, C., Che, T., Peng, H., Li, Y., & Pavone, M. (2024). Learning from teaching
regularization: Generalizable correlations should be easy to imitate. arXiv preprint
arXiv:2402.02769.
25. Peng, H., Ran, R., Luo, Y., Zhao, J., Huang, S., Thorat, K., ... & Ding, C. (2024). Lingcn:
Structural linearized graph convolutional network for homomorphically encrypted
inference. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36.
ISSN: 3006-4023 (Online), Journal of Artificial Intelligence General Science (JAIGS) DOI: 10.60087 398

26. Yan, C., Weng, Y., Wang, J., Zhao, Y., Zou, Y., Li, Z., & Baltimore, U. S. Enhancing
Credit Card Fraud Detection Through Adaptive Model Optimization.
27. Liu, T., Cai, Q., Xu, C., Hong, B., Xiong, J., Qiao, Y., & Yang, T. (2024). Image
Captioning in News Report Scenario. Academic Journal of Science and Technology,
10(1), 284-289.
28. Deng, T., Shen, G., Qin, T., Wang, J., Zhao, W., Wang, J., ... & Chen, W. (2024).
Plgslam: Progressive neural scene represenation with local to global bundle adjustment.
In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition (pp. 19657-19666).
29. Sun, C., Li, S., Lin, Y., & Hu, W. (2022). From Visual Behavior to Signage Design: A
Wayfinding Experiment with Eye-Tracking in Satellite Terminal of PVG Airport. In
Proceedings of the 2021 DigitalFUTURES: The 3rd International Conference on
Computational Design and Robotic Fabrication (CDRF 2021) 3 (pp. 252-262). Springer
Singapore.
30. Deng, T., Wang, Y., Xie, H., Wang, H., Wang, J., Wang, D., & Chen, W. (2024).
Neslam: Neural implicit mapping and self-supervised feature tracking with depth
completion and denoising. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.20034.
31. Li, K., Zhu, A., Zhou, W., Zhao, P., Song, J., & Liu, J. (2024). Utilizing deep learning to
optimize software development processes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.13630.
32. Tan, Z., Beigi, A., Wang, S., Guo, R., Bhattacharjee, A., Jiang, B., ... & Liu, H. (2024).
Large language models for data annotation: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13446.
33. Tao, Y. (2023, October). SQBA: sequential query-based blackbox attack. In Fifth
International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science (AICS 2023)
(Vol. 12803, pp. 721-729). SPIE.
34. Liang, X., & Chen, H. (2019, August). HDSO: A High-Performance Dynamic Service
Orchestration Algorithm in Hybrid NFV Networks. In 2019 IEEE 21st International
Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE 17th
International Conference on Smart City; IEEE 5th International Conference on Data
Science and Systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS) (pp. 782-787). IEEE.
35. Liu, S., Yan, K., Qin, F., Wang, C., Ge, R., Zhang, K., ... & Cao, J. (2024). Infrared
Image Super-Resolution via Lightweight Information Split Network. arXiv preprint
arXiv:2405.10561.
36. Cao, Y., Weng, Y., Li, M., & Yang, X. The Application of Big Data and AI in Risk
Control Models: Safeguarding User Security. International Journal of Frontiers in
Engineering Technology, 6(3), 154-164.
37. Wang, J., Hong, S., Dong, Y., Li, Z., & Hu, J. (2024). Predicting Stock Market Trends
Using LSTM Networks: Overcoming RNN Limitations for Improved Financial
Forecasting. Journal of Computer Science and Software Applications, 4(3), 1-7.
38. Zhai, H., Gu, B., Zhu, K., & Huang, C. (2023). Feasibility analysis of achieving net-zero
emissions in China's power sector before 2050 based on ideal available pathways.
Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 98, 106948.
39. Gu, B., Zhai, H., An, Y., Khanh, N. Q., & Ding, Z. (2023). Low-carbon transition of
Southeast Asian power systems–A SWOT analysis. Sustainable Energy Technologies and
Assessments, 58, 103361.
ISSN: 3006-4023 (Online) Yijie Weng, Jianhao Wu DOI: 10.60087 Page: 399

40. Deng, T., Liu, S., Wang, X., Liu, Y., Wang, D., & Chen, W. (2023). Prosgnerf:
Progressive dynamic neural scene graph with frequency modulated auto-encoder in urban
scenes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.09076.
41. Wang, Y., Lin, Y. S., Huang, R., Wang, J., & Liu, S. (2024). Enhancing user experience
in large language models through human-centered design: Integrating theoretical insights
with an experimental study to meet diverse software learning needs with a single
document knowledge base. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.11505.
42. Zhao, P., Li, K., Hong, B., Zhu, A., Liu, J., & Dai, S. (2024). Task allocation planning
based on hierarchical task network for national economic mobilization. Journal of
Artificial Intelligence General science (JAIGS) ISSN: 3006-4023, 5(1), 22-31.
43. Tan, Z., Zhao, C., Moraffah, R., Li, Y., Kong, Y., Chen, T., & Liu, H. (2024). The Wolf
Within: Covert Injection of Malice into MLLM Societies via an MLLM Operative. arXiv
preprint arXiv:2402.14859.
44. Tao, Y. (2023, August). Meta Learning Enabled Adversarial Defense. In 2023 IEEE
International Conference on Sensors, Electronics and Computer Engineering (ICSECE)
(pp. 1326-1330). IEEE.
45. Cao, J., Ku, D., Du, J., Ng, V., Wang, Y., & Dong, W. (2017). A structurally enhanced,
ergonomically and human–computer interaction improved intelligent seat’s system.
Designs, 1(2), 11.
46. Sun, M., Feng, Z., Li, Z., Gu, W., & Gu, X. (2024). Enhancing Financial Risk
Management through LSTM and Extreme Value Theory: A High-Frequency Trading
Volume Approach. Journal of Computer Technology and Software, 3(3).
47. Fei, Y., He, Y., Chen, F., You, P., & Zhai, H. (2019). Optimal Planning and Design for
Sightseeing Offshore Island Microgrids. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 118, p.
02044). EDP Sciences.
48. Dai, S., Li, K., Luo, Z., Zhao, P., Hong, B., Zhu, A., & Liu, J. (2024). AI-based NLP
section discusses the application and effect of bag-of-words models and TF-IDF in NLP
tasks. Journal of Artificial Intelligence General science (JAIGS) ISSN: 3006-4023, 5(1),
13-21.
49. Tan, Z., Zhao, C., Moraffah, R., Li, Y., Wang, S., Li, J., ... & Liu, H. (2024). " Glue pizza
and eat rocks"--Exploiting Vulnerabilities in Retrieval-Augmented Generative Models.
arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.19417.
50. Xu, K., Wu, Y., Li, Z., Zhang, R., & Feng, Z. (2024). Investigating Financial Risk
Behavior Prediction Using Deep Learning and Big Data. International Journal of
Innovative Research in Engineering and Management, 11(3), 77-81.
51. Tan, Z., Chen, T., Zhang, Z., & Liu, H. (2024, March). Sparsity-guided holistic
explanation for llms with interpretable inference-time intervention. In Proceedings of the
AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 38, No. 19, pp. 21619-21627).
52. Li, K., Xirui, P., Song, J., Hong, B., & Wang, J. (2024). The application of augmented
reality (ar) in remote work and education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.10579.
53. Xu, Q., Feng, Z., Gong, C., Wu, X., Zhao, H., Ye, Z., ... & Wei, C. (2024). Applications
of Explainable AI in Natural Language Processing. Global Academic Frontiers, 2(3), 51-
64.