CRPC Course Notes
CRPC Course Notes
Unit-I: Introductory
1. Salient features of the Code
2. Important Definitions
3. Functionaries under the Code -The police, the prosecutors, the criminal courts, the defense
counsel, Prison authorities and their powers and functions
4. Classification of offences- Cognizable and Non-cognizable, Bailable and Non-Bailable,
Compoundable and Non-Compoundable.
5. The concept and component of Fair Trial and its importance
Unit - VII Reference and Revision (395-405) , Execution, Suspension, remission, and
Commutation of sentences
1. Reference to High Court ( S. 395)
2. Revisional Jurisdiction (Ss. 397-401) Revisional Conditions & Powers of Revisional Courts.
3. Execution of sentences ( S. 413- 424)
4. Suspension (S.432), Postponement ( S. 415, 416)
5. Remission and Commutation of sentences (S. 433-A)
BROAD QUESTIONS
Unit-I: Introductory
1. Salient features of the Code
2. Important Definitions
3. Functionaries under the Code -The police, the prosecutors, the criminal courts, the defense
counsel, Prison authorities and their powers and functions
4. Classification of offences- Cognizable and Non-cognizable, Bailable and Non-Bailable,
Compoundable and Non-Compoundable.
5. The concept and component of Fair Trial and its importance
Broad Question
1. Enumerate in brief the concept of Fair trial under Criminal Procedure Code.
2. Write a detail note on the classification of offences under the Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973.
3. Write a detail note on the various functionaries, who exercise powers and discharge
duties under the Code
Short notes
1. How the Magistrate of First Class can take cognizance of any offence
2. Magistrate's power to direct police officer to investigate cognizable offences
3. Cancellation of Bail
4. Bail
5. Right to be examined by Medical Practitioner
6. Discretion in granting bail
7. How Magistrate of the first class can take cognizance of any offence.
8. Alteration of Charges.
Broad Question
1. Write a detailed note on "Information in cognizable cases (F.I.R)". Explain in detail its
2. significance and evidentiary value.
3. When police may arrest without warrant? Explain in detail the procedure of arrest. What
4. are the duties of officer making arrest?
5. What is mean by "arrest"? What are the rights of arrested person?
6. Explain in detail process under the CR.P.C. to compel the appearance of accused before court
7. Explain in detail the procedure under the code to compel the production of things.
8. What is complaint to magistrate? Distinguish between complaint and FIR
Short notes
1. Plea Bargaining
2. Compounding of offences
3. Summary Trials.
4. Tender of pardon to accomplice.
5. Compounding of offences.
Broad Question
Broad Question
Broad Question
Broad Question
1. Explain in detail Reference and Revision and find out the points of difference between
Reference and Revision.
2. What is mean by appeal? When appeal can be made and when cannot be made?
Unit - VII Reference and Revision (395-405) , Execution, Suspension, remission, and
Commutation of sentences
1. Reference to High Court ( S. 395)
2. Revisional Jurisdiction (Ss. 397-401) Revisional Conditions & Powers of Revisional Courts.
3. Execution of sentences ( S. 413- 424)
4. Suspension (S.432), Postponement ( S. 415, 416)
5. Remission and Commutation of sentences (S. 433-A)
Broad Question
1. Explain in detail power of High Court relating to Reference and conditions of reference
2. procedure
3. How the High Court's exercises its power of revision under the code of criminal
procedure? Discuss in detail.
4. Discuss in detail the provisions under the code relating to Appeal, Reference and
Revision.
Short note
1. Appeal against acquittal and conviction
2. Appeal in petty cases maintainable or not?
Broad Question
1. Briefly explain the provisions under Code of Criminal Procedure 1973in respect of (a)
Preventive action of the Police and (b) Unlawful Assemblies
2. Briefly explain the provisions under Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 in respect of (a
Removal of public nuisance and (b) Unlawful Assemblies
3. Write in detail the provisions under Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, Maintenance of
wives, children and parents
4. What steps can be taken under Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, by the police under the
powers of "Preventive action of the Police"? Are the powers same as general powers of
arrest and detention?
Short note
1. Preventive action of the Police
2. Control and management of Unlawful Assemblies under Code of Criminal
Procedure1973
3. Removal of public nuisance
4. Maintenance of wives, children and parents
5. Limitation period under Code of Criminal Procedure
6. Public prosecutor
7. Police
8. Fair trial
9. Cognizable and non-Cognizable offences
Unit-I: Introductory
1. Salient features of the Code
2. Important Definitions
3. Functionaries under the Code -The police, the prosecutors, the criminal courts, the defense
counsel, Prison authorities and their powers and functions
4. Classification of offences- Cognizable and Non-cognizable, Bailable and Non-Bailable,
Compoundable and Non-Compoundable.
5. The concept and component of Fair Trial and its importance
Broad Question
1. Enumerate in brief the concept of Fair trial under Criminal Procedure Code.
2. Write a detail note on the classification of offences under the Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973.
3. Write a detail note on the various functionaries, who exercise powers and discharge
duties under the Code
4. Explain the salient features of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
5. What are the different courts exercising jurisdiction under the Code? What sentences
can they pass?
Short notes
1. How the Magistrate of First Class can take cognizance of any offence
2. Magistrate's power to direct police officer to investigate cognizable offences
3. Cancellation of Bail
4. Bail
5. Right to be examined by Medical Practitioner
6. Discretion in granting bail
7. How Magistrate of the first class can take cognizance of any offence.
8. Alteration of Charges.
c) Under the Code of Criminal Procedure every person is entitled to get fair trial. The
accused is presumed to be innocent until the charges are proved.
d) Under Code of Criminal Procedure special provisions have been made to protect the
interest of the accused person.
e) Under Code of Criminal Procedure all Judicial Magistrates shall work under the control
of High Courts of the respective states.
f) Under Code of Criminal Procedure the procedure for trial of summary cases shall be the
same as that of summary cases except otherwise provided.
g) The Code of Criminal Procedure does not affect any Special Law, Local Law.
h) It also mentions basic legal terms which are given under Code of Criminal Procedure.
i) The Code of Criminal Procedure also explains the Constitution of Criminal Courts and its
functionaries in India.
Amendments:
The Amendment Act come into force on the 21st day of April, 2018 may be called as “Criminal
Law (Amendment) Act, 2018.
3. Functionaries under the Code -The police, the prosecutors, the criminal courts, the
defense counsel, Prison authorities and their powers and functions
Introduction
There are various functionaries under the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 who help to regulate
the various provisions of the code. The functionaries are essential for the proper functioning of
the code. The various functionaries mentioned under the code are the Police, Public Prosecutors,
Assistant Public Prosecutors, Additional Prosecutors, Prison authorities and the Defence counsel.
The powers and functions of the functionaries are clearly mentioned in the code.
The Police
The Police Officer is an important authority who is the backbone of criminal law in India. They
are responsible for maintaining the law and order of the country. They are also responsible for
the enforcement of various laws and orders. The police officers have various powers and
functions that help to prevent various crimes happening in our country.
There is no definition of the term “Police” in the Code of Criminal Procedure but the term is
defined in the Police Act of 1861. According to the Police Act, 1861 all the persons who are
enrolled under the Act are known as the Police.
According to Section 154, the Police Officers have the power to record every information
provided orally if it relates to the commission of a cognizable offence.
Powers of police
1. Power to arrest:
The main powers of police include the arresting of accused upon the issue of warrant by
the magistrate. This power is inclusive of the power of preventive arrest, i.e., Arrest
without a warrant under Section 151of the code. Under this section, the police is
empowered to make a preventive arrest in case of cognizable offences.
2. Power to search and investigate:
The police is authorized to inspect an examine a cognizable offence without a warrant in
accordance with Section 156. However, the police is required to submit a report to
magistrate before commencing the investigation. With respect to non-cognizable
offences, investigation can be carried out once the magistrate passes an order for the
same.
3. Power to compelling attendance and examination:
The police also has the authority to require the witness, who has knowledge of facts of
the case, to appear before himself or any other person as per the provisions of Section
160(1)[6], the police can further examine them under section 161.
4. Assist prosecution:
The police is further required to provide any kind of assistance as may be necessary to
ensure the administration of justice.
Public Prosecutors
Section 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure deals with the Public Prosecutor. The main
function of the office of Public Prosecutor is to administer justice and to secure the public
purpose entrusted with him. The Public Prosecutor is an important officer of the State
Government and is appointed according to the provisions of this code. The Public Prosecutor is
an independent statutory authority and is not a part of any investigating agency.
It is mandatory to appoint a Public Prosecutor in all the cases when the prosecution is against the
State.
2. Power to withdraw:
Section 321 enumerates that the PP, With the permission of the Court, can drop a case
against anyone for reasons to be recorded.
Court
The Courts are another important functionary under the Code of Criminal Procedure. There are
various classes of Criminal Court like,
• Courts of Session;
• Judicial Magistrates of the first class and, in any metropolitan area, Metropolitan
Magistrates;
• Judicial Magistrates of the second class; and
• Executive Magistrates.
Powers of courts:
Chapter III of the code lays down provisions relating to the powers of courts, which are as
follows:
1. Power to try a case/offence:
Section 26 lays down the powers of the High Court, sessions court and other courts
mentioned in the 1st schedule to try any offence committed under IPC.
2. Power to pass sentences:
The power of different categories of courts to pass sentences differs based on the quantum of
punishment:
o High court: The HC is empowered to pass any sentence in accordance with the law as per
the provisions of Section 28 of the code.
In the case of Onkar Nath v. Emperor, it was observed that Section 28 does not entail that
the HC can impose any sentence; rather, its ability to impose any sentence exercising
appellate jurisdiction, must be judged by the power of the court from which the appeal has
been preferred.
o Sessions Court: they're established by virtue of section 9 of the code which requires the state
government to constitute a court for every session division. The sessions court is empowered
to award any punishment including death penalty which is subject to the approval of high
court. Further assistant sessions judge may also assume jurisdiction in a sessions court, if
appointed by the HC, and they have the authority to impose any sentence other than the death
penalty, life imprisonment or a term beyond 10 years.
o Chief Judicial Magistrate and Chief Metropolitan Magistrate: any JM of the 1st class
may be appointed by the HC to be the Chief judicial magistrate. The provisions for the
establishment of Chief metropolitan magistrate is contained under section 10 of the act. Their
powers include passing any sentence except capital punishment, life imprisonment and a
sentence of more than 7 years in prison.
o Judicial magistrate 1st and 2nd class and Metropolitan Magistrate: The code specifies
that Judicial Magistrate of 1st class is entitled to impose a sentence of imprisonment for a
term which shall not extend beyond 3 years including the power of imposing fine which shall
not exceed ₹10,000, and the Judicial Magistrate of the 2nd class is at the lowest level which
is entitled to try offences, if the same is punishable with fine or imprisonment not exceeding
₹5000 and 1 year respectively, the powers of a metropolitan magistrate is similar to that of
JM of 1st class.
o Executive Magistrate: The State Government has been entrusted with the authority to
appoint the required number of executive magistrates in every district and metropolitan
regions, among such executive magistrates, one of them may be appointed as District
Magistrate.
3. Power to confer powers:
The State Government and the HC are empowered to confer powers on the subordinate
officers by virtue of Section 32 and the same can be subject to withdrawal by the State
Government or the HC. In Prem Nath v. the State of Rajasthan, it was observed that the HC
or the State Government are entitled to confer additional powers upon any subordinate
authority.
4. Power to examine the defendant:
The court may pose such questions to the accused as the court deems fit and the court may
also frame questions with the aid of prosecutor and defense counsel in accordance with
Section 313.
5. Power to summon the attendance of persons and question them:
The court has the authority to require the attendance of witnesses to examine them and any
other person during the course of proceedings for collecting evidence as per the provisions of
section 311.
Classification of Offences
According to the Code of Criminal Procedure, the offences can be classified into the following
categories:
• Bailable and non-bailable offence
• Cognizable and non-cognizable offence
• Compoundable and non-compoundable offence
Non-Bailable Offence
• According to section 2(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, non-bailable offences are
the other offences which are shown as non-bailable in the First Schedule of CrPC.
• In non-bailable offences, bail is not a matter of right, but it is the court’s discretion. Only
Judicial Magistrate can grant bail.
• These are the offences which are punishable with imprisonment above three years.
• They are graver and more heinous in nature.
• Examples: Murder, rape, theft, robbery, criminal breach of trust, causing
miscarriage without a woman’s consent, etc.
The bail bond is a kind of surety bond ensured by a company through a bail bondsman or bail
agent who secures the release of a person (defendant) from jail. Typically there are two kinds of
bail bonds:
• Civil bail bond: This type of bail bond ( to study the difference between bail and bond) is
used in civil cases that guarantee payment of the debt in addition to costs and interest,
assessed against the defendant.
• Criminal bail bond: Whereas this type ( to study the difference between bail and bond) is
facilitated in criminal cases guaranteeing that the defendant appears trial called by the court.
Also, the payment for penalties or fines is ensured decided against the person.
Non-Cognizable Offence
• Non-cognizable offences are less serious in nature. The definition of non-cognizable
offence is provided under section 2(l) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
• Non-cognizable offences are offences in which a police officer cannot arrest a person
without a warrant or offences which are shown as non-cognizable offences under the First
Schedule of CrPC.
• These offences are punishable with imprisonment of less than three years or with a fine.
• Under non-cognizable offences, the police have neither the duty nor the power to
investigate such offences without the permission of the Magistrate.
• Examples: Voluntarily causing hurt, cheating, mischief, forgery, etc.
Non-Compoundable Offence
• Non-Compoundable offences are more serious in nature.
• These are those offences where the victim and the accused cannot resolve their dispute by
a settlement or a compromise.
• Such an offence can only be quashed by an order of the court because the gravity or the
heinousness of the offence is very high from compoundable offence, and the accused
cannot be allowed to run away from punishment.
• Other offences which are not mentioned under section 320 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure are classified as non-compoundable offences.
Broad Question
1. Write a detailed note on "Information in cognizable cases (F.I.R)". Explain in detail its
2. significance and evidentiary value.
3. When police may arrest without warrant? Explain in detail the procedure of arrest. What
4. are the duties of officer making arrest?
5. What is mean by "arrest"? What are the rights of arrested person?
6. Explain in detail process under the CR.P.C. to compel the appearance of accused before
court
7. Explain in detail the procedure under the code to compel the production of things.
8. What is complaint to magistrate? Distinguish between complaint and FIR
Short notes
1. Plea Bargaining
2. Compounding of offences
3. Summary Trials.
4. Tender of pardon to accomplice.
5. Compounding of offences.
1. First Information Report (Ss. 154-155)
The term FIR is not defined in the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC),
1973, or in any other law.
First Information Report (FIR) is a written document prepared by the police when they receive
information about the commission of a cognizable offence.
It is a report of information that reaches the police first in point of time and that is why it is
called the First Information Report.
Zero FIR
When a police station receives a complaint regarding an alleged offence that has been
committed in the jurisdiction of another police station, it registers an FIR, and then transfers it
to the concerned police station for further investigation.
This is called a Zero FIR.
Non -Cognizable offence and case have been defined in Section 2 (l) of the Code, wherein the
police cannot arrest without warrant. Punishment may be given not exceeding 3 years of
imprisonment. Example – Assault, Forgery, Defamation, etc.
Comparison Chart
BASIS FOR
COGNIZABLE OFFENCE NON-COGNIZABLE OFFENCE
COMPARISON
It deals with their powers related to Cognizable and Non-Cognizable offenses, Examination of
Witness, Medical Examination, Search, Enquiry and report on suicide, etc. These powers are
intrinsic and not given to them to intrude or encroach by any means.
Police officers are given different powers to investigate the crime.
Sections 154-176 of CrPC explain about the Investigation procedure and under which particular
sections police can investigate the crime. This research paper will be dealing with those sections.
The paper will be dealing with all the steps taken by police in the investigation and what is the
importance of those steps.
Any proceeding done by the police officer cannot be questioned at any stage on the ground that
the police officer is not empowered to investigate in such case.
Any Magistrate empowered under section 190, can give order to start the investigation without
taking cognizance of the offence.
Case Law: Sakiri Vasu vs State of UP And Others It was observed in this case that even if
FIR has been registered and the police has made the investigation or still making the
investigation, to which the aggrieved person is not satisfied, then he can approach the Magistrate
under Section 156(3) and if the Magistrate is satisfied then he can order a proper investigation
and take other suitable steps which he thinks is necessary for ensuring a proper investigation.
Section 157- Procedure for investigation Section 157 of the Code lays down the procedure of
investigation to be followed by the police, for collection of evidence.
The investigation of a cognizable case begins when a police officer in charge of a police station
has reason to suspect the commission of a cognizable offence on the basis of FIR or any other
information so received.
It requires that prompt intimation of the FIR be sent to the Magistrate. The officer shall then
proceed in person to the spot for investigation of facts and circumstances, or shall depute one of
his subordinate officers for the same, and if required, measures for the discovery and arrest of the
person shall be taken.
When the officer in charge has reason to believe that he has no sufficient grounds for entering in
on an investigation the he shall not investigate the case. And shall state in its report for not
complying with the requirements of this section, and notify the informant that he will not
investigate the case or cause it to be investigated.
instructions to the officer in charge regarding the investigation of the case as he thinks fit.
And after such instructions has been recorded in the report, the superior officer may
transit the report same day without any delay to the Magistrate.
The main objective of sending a report is to enable the Magistrate to control the investigation and
give directions if required under Section 159 of the Code.
which may expose him to a criminal charge or to a penalty or forfeiture. The police may reduce
the statement in writing taken in the examination and make a separate true record of the
statement of each witness he examines.
Provided that the statement may also be recorded through audio-video electronic means.
The statements made by the witness can be used in the court only to contradict him, and not
corroborate him.
Such statement can only be used to cross examine the witness as provided by section 145 of the
Indian Evidence Act, 1872, section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act and clause (1) of section 32 of
that act.
The accused can use such statement as evidence under above mentioned sections of the Indian
Evidence Act, with the permission of the court, and the prosecution may use the statement when
it is sufficiently proved.
The confession can be recorded during the investigation or afterwards before the commencement
of the inquiry or trial
The word 'Confession' has neither been defined in Cr.P.C. nor the Indian Evidence Act. But there
provisions in the Indian Evidence Act from section 24-30 related to Confession.
The confession can be recorded through audio-video electronic means in the presence of the
accused person's advocate.
Section 164A- Medical examination of the victim of rape
When the offence of committing rape or attempt to commit rape is under investigation, it is
proposed that the woman who is a rape victim or with whom attempt of rape has been committed
should be examined by a medical practitioner employed in the government hospital or local
authority. And in absence of such practitioner by any other registered medical practitioner. The
examination should be done with the consent of the victim, or any person who is competent to
give the consent on her behalf. And she shall be sent to the practitioner within twenty-four hours
from the time of receiving the information of commission of such offence.
When the woman is sent to the registered medical practitioner, he shall examine her person
without any delay and also prepare a report of his examination of the following particulars:
1. The name and address of the woman and of the person by whom she was brought
2. The age of the woman
3. The description of material taken from the person of the woman for DNA profiling
4. Marks or injury, if any, on the person of the woman
5. General mental condition of the woman, and
6. Other material particulars in reasonable details.
The report should also give reasons for each conclusion of every examination.
The report should also include the consent given by the woman or by someone who is competent
to give the consent on behalf of the victim.
And also include the time of the commencement and completion of the medical examination.
The registered medical practitioner shall forward the report to the investigating officer without
any delay and the investigating officer shall send it to the Magistrate.
If the medical examination is done without the consent of the victim then it will be considered as
Illegal.
The police officer shall do the search by himself and if he is unable to do so and there is not any
other person competent to do the search, then he can write his reasons and require any
subordinate officer to do the search. And also specify the place to be searched.
The object of the search is that if there is any object that is necessary for the case and the
investigation, and if the object is not found then it will be difficult to solve or understand the
case.
The general provisions in section 100 of Cr.P.C. may apply to the search being made in this
section.
Copies of the record shall be sent to the nearest Magistrate who is empowered to take cognizance
of the case and to the owner free of cost.
Section 166-When officer in charge of police station may require another to issue search
warrant
In this section, the officer in charge of the police station or the police officer who is doing the
investigation and who is not below the rank of sub-inspector can require an officer in charge of
any other police station or even any other district to make the search within the limits of his own
station.
Such officer will have to follow the provisions in section 165 relating to the search and
forwarding the object found to the officer who made the search request.
If the officer in charge has a reason to believe that delay in search might result in concealment or
destruction of the evidence, then that officer in charge may proceed the officer who was required
for the search and that officer in charge may do the search as if that place were within the limits
of his own police station.
The officer in charge who's making the search in another officer's local limits shall send him a
notice of the search before proceeding.
And shall also give a notice to the owner of the place that's going to be searched.
The object is to protect the accused from atrocities of the police and to give the opportunity to
the Magistrate to decide the question of further custody, to facilitate the investigation, and no
detention without trial. For this purpose, it has been provided that the accused or arrested person
cannot be detained for more than 24 hours. Section 167 is attracted in the following
circumstances:
1. When the accused is arrested without a warrant and is detained by the police officer in
his custody.
2. More than 24 hours needed for an investigation.
3. There are grounds to believe that accusation or information against him is well-
founded.
4. The officer in charge of a police station or the investigating officer not below the rank
of sub-inspector forwards the accused for remand before the Magistrate.
The judicial Magistrate to whom the accused is so forwarded may authorize the detention of such
person in such custody for a term not exceeding 15 days.
The Magistrate shall authorize the detention of the accused (but not in police custody) if he has
reasons and grounds to believe the necessity of doing so. But in any situation, the Magistrate
cannot order detention for a period exceeding:
1. 90 days, when the person is accused of an offence punishable with imprisonment for a
period not less than 10 years of imprisonment for life or death.
2. 60 days, when accused of any other offence. And on the expiry of the period of 60
days or 90 days, whatever the case may be, he shall be released on bail if he is able to
furnish sureties.
This period is to be calculated from the date of detention and not from the date of arrest.
Section 171-Complainant and witnesses not to be required to accompany police officer and
not to be subject to restraint
If any complainant or witness is on their way to court to secure their presence then they aren't
required to follow any police officer and the police officer may also not force the witness without
any valid reason.
In case of the complainant or witness refuses to attend or to execute the bond then he will be
forwarded to the Magistrate and will be kept in custody until he executes such bond or until the
hearing of the case is completed.
1
A bail bond is written document signed by an accused person and his friends or families (known as surety), to
ensure that the accused will appear before the court at the scheduled time and date, as ordered by the court.
If there is a superior officer appointed for the investigation then he shall forward the report to the
magistrate.
Superior police officer is given the power to give orders regarding further investigation pending
the orders of magistrate.
Magistrate can give order to investigation even without taking cognizance of the case when the
police officer is not investigating the case appropriately. (Under section 156(3))
If it appears to the magistrate that the accused is released on bond and he shall be again taken in
custody then the magistrate can give order to discharge the bond or any other instruction as he
finds appropriate.
With the report that is being forwarded to the magistrate, there are some other documents which
also must be forwarded by the investigating officer.
Including the documents or relevant extracts which are related to section 170.
Also the statements of witnesses recorded under 161.
If it appears to the police officer that there are some documents which aren't necessary or
relevant to be given to the accused the he shall append a note requesting the magistrate to
exclude all that part and also should state the reasons.
If the report has already been forwarded to the magistrate but then the officer in charge obtains
more evidence, oral or documentary, then he shall forward this to the magistrate and
investigation can be done again regarding the same case.
He shall proceed to the place where the body of deceased person is and will make the
investigation in the presence of two or more neighbourhood inhabitants. And draw up a report of
the apparent cause of death. Such as in what manner the person died, or by what weapon and
search for any marks.
After the investigation such report shall be forwarded to the district magistrate or the sub-
divisional magistrate.
Section 175-Power to summon persons
If the police officer thinks that there is a person who can give a statement regarding the
investigation in section 174, then such person shall get a summon order by the police officer and
he will be required in court.
In the case where any person dies or disappears or rape is alleged to have been committed on any
woman, while such person or woman is in the custody of police or any other custody, with this
the judicial magistrate and the metropolitan magistrate are given power to do inquiry if they have
the jurisdiction of that case.
All the evidence obtained in the inquiry shall be recorded by the magistrate.
During the investigation, if the magistrate or the investigating officer considers that examination
of the deceased person is necessary, and it may discover the reason of his death, then the
magistrate may cause the body to be examined.
The magistrate shall inform the relatives of the deceased person during the inquiry.
If the case is related to disappearance, death or rape then the judicial magistrate or executive
magistrate or the metropolitan magistrate considers that the dead body should be examined to
find the cause of death, then the dead body will be examined by the qualified medical examiner
or nearest civil surgeon. And if the magistrate considers that it is not necessary then they will not
do the examination.
• Bond, with or without sureties to appear before a court on a certain date., (D-chapter VI:
CrPC)
Chapter VI of the Code of Criminal Procedure deals with the processes to compel appearance of
the accused or witness in the court. The Court can compel the person to be present in the Court
using summons, warrant of arrest, or proclamation and attachment.
Process is defined as any means which is used by court to compel appearance of a defendant
before it. The different modes to compel appearance of a person in Court are by issuing:
• Summons
• Warrant of Arrest
• Proclamation and Attachment
The essentials of summons, issued by the court under Section 61 of The Code of Criminal
Procedure, are:
• It must be in writing;
• It must be in duplicate form;
• It must be signed and sealed by the presiding officer of the court or such other officer
authorized by the High Court;
• It must mention the time and place of the rule directed; and
• it must bear the seal of the court.
The forms of the summons to an accused person is given in Schedule II Form No. 1 of the Code.
FORM NO.1
SUMMONS TO AN ACCUSED PERSON
(See section 61)
Warrant
WARRANT OF ARREST (Section 70- 81)
The second method of securing attendance of a person is by means of a warrant of arrest.
The warrant is an order addressed to a certain person directing him to:
• arrest the accused and
• produce him before the court.
In order to arrest and detain an accused, a warrant is issued by a court.
In general, a warrant is an order that serves as a specific type of authorisation issued by a Court
or Magistrate directed to the police or any other authority to enable them to arrest, search a
premise etc.
Whenever a person fails to appear before the court on the said date after the issue of summons,
he may be issued a warrant of arrest directly.
Unless and until the court which issues such warrant cancels it or unless the warrant has been
executed the warrant of arrest shall remain in force.
If the accused seem to be avoiding the summons, the court, in the second instance issues a
bailable warrant. In the third instance, when the court is fully satisfied that the accused is
avoiding the court's proceeding intentionally, the process of issuance of the non-bailable warrant.
A Police Officer may execute a Warrant by arresting and producing the person or representatives
of the entity before the Court.
A warrant is a written document issued by the court to compel the appearance or arrest of
any person or search any place that the court requires.
The warrant of arrest has been dealt with under section 70 to 81 in the Criminal Procedure Code.
SECTION 70: FORM ON WARRANT OF ARREST AND DURATION
Section 70- The essential requirements of a valid warrant are:
• The warrant should be in a prescribed form and in writing.
• It should include the name and designation of the person who is executing it.
• It must provide the full name and description of the person to be arrested.
• It must include the offences that are charged against the person to whom the warrant is
issued.
• It must be sealed.
• It must be signed by the officer of the court.
FORM NO. 2
WARRANT OF ARREST
To… ... (name and designation of the person or persons who is or are to execute the warrant).
WHEREAS (name of accused) of…... (address) stands charged with the offence of……………..
. (state the offence), you are hereby directed to arrest the said… ........ produce him before me.
Herein fail not.
Dated, this. …....... day of....... 20..
(Seal of the Court). (Signature)
In a legal sense, the term ‘proclamation’ refers to an official announcement. Here, it is one of the
ways of compelling a person to present himself before the Court of law.
When a Court May Publish a Written Proclamation?
Section 82 of the CrPC has laid down the conditions when a person could be proclaimed as an
absconding offender.
If any court has a reason to believe that any person against whom a warrant has been issued;
1. has absconded, or
2. is concealing himself
Then a court may publish a written proclamation specifying the place and time (not less than 30
days from the date of such publication) for him to appear.
Essentials of Proclamation
Sub-section 2 of Section 82 of the CrPC specifies the manners in which a proclamation can be
made.
According to the Criminal Procedure Code, these are the four essentials of proclamation:
1. The proclamation shall be read publicly in the part of the town or village where such
person resides;
2. The written proclamation shall be affixed to some conspicuous (clearly visible) part of
the house in which such person resides;
3. A copy of such publication will also be affixed at the courthouse;
4. If the court thinks fit, it may order to publish such publication in a daily newspaper
circulating in the area where such person resides.
Attachment of Property
Anytime after the proclamation under section 82 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the court may
order attachment of property, whether movable or immovable belonging to the proclaimed
person. Reasons shall be recorded for such attachment.
The Court that issues the proclamation might attach any movable or immovable property of such
person under Section 83 of the CrPC.
Attachment may be ordered simultaneously with proclamation if the court has a reason to believe
that the person proclaimed is about to:
1. dispose of the whole or any part of the property,
2. remove the whole or part of the property from the local jurisdiction of the court.
The property attached will be at the disposal of the State Government.
Claims and Objections to Attached Property
Claims and objections can be made by the interested person other than the person proclaimed for
the attached property within six months from the date of attachment.
Such a claim or objection shall be inquired into and may be allowed or disallowed in whole or in
part.
Movable Property
On some occasions, the property to be attached might be a debt or a movable property. Section
83(3) has laid down the manner in which such properties could be attached:
• By seizing such property; or
• By appointing a receiver;
• By issuing an order which will obstruct such property from being delivered to the
proclaimed offender or someone who might receive it on his behalf; or
• In any way that the Court deems fit.
Immovable Property
If the property which has to be attached is immovable, it will be attached in the following
manner:
• The attachment will be made via Collector of the district where the property is
situated when the matter concerns land paying revenue to the State government.
Receiver
Section 83(6) of the Code states that the powers, duties and liabilities of the receiver shall remain
the same as specified under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC).
The receiver is defined under Order 40 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) as
an independent and impartial person, appointed by the Court to administer or manage a property
that is involved in a dispute.
Powers of Receiver
Rule 1(1)(d) empowers the receiver to bring and defend suits. The receiver is empowered with
the realization, management, protection, preservation, and improvement of the property. He can
collect rent and profits generated from the property, apply and dispose of them, and execute the
documents like the owner himself does, so far as the Court deems fit.
Duties of Receiver
The duties of a receiver are laid down under Rule 3 of Order XL. It states that every receiver is
required to:
• Furnish something the Court deems fit as security to account for the proceeds or benefits
that he shall receive out of the property;
• Submit his accounts whenever the Court directs, in the same manner as directed by the
Court;
• Make a payment of the outstanding amount as directed by the Court; and
• Be held responsible for any loss incurred to the property by the wilful default or gross
negligence on the part of the receiver.
Section 94 deals with the search carried out at places that are suspected to contain properties that
might be stolen or might also hold the forged documents. After the inquiry or the information, if
a District Magistrate, Sub-divisional Magistrate or a Magistrate of first-class is of an opinion that
a place would have been used for deposit or sale of stolen property or if it would have been used
for the production of objectionable articles as mentioned and prescribed in this section, he may
authorize the Police Officer (above the rank of a constable) by warrant to enter such place with
assistance if required.
The Police have to search the place in the manner specified in the given warrant, taking the
possession of property that could be objectionable or stolen. He has to convey a bout the same to
the Magistrate or has to guard the same until the offender is taken to the Magistrate. He may
dispose of the objectionable article in some safe place and If he finds any person who may be
involved in the deposit, sale, or production of the objectionable article or stolen property, he may
take the person in custody and later carry him before the Magistrate.
Section 95 gives the power to the Court to declare some publications forfeited. The Court can
issue search warrants for those publications and If the State Government finds that any article,
newspaper, document or book may contain some matter which is punishable under the following
sections that are 124A, 153A, 153B, 292, 293 or 295A of IPC, it can declare every copy of such
material to be forfeited to the Government. The Magistrate can authorize any Police Officer to
seize those documents.
Section 97 is regarding the search of a person whose confinement amounts to an offence. If any
District, Sub-Divisional, or a first-class Magistrate has a reason to believe the same, he may issue
a search warrant. The person to whom the search warrant is addressed has to search the confined
person and if he finds the confined person, he has to take him immediately before the Magistrate
for further proceedings.
Section 98 covers the aspects involved for the restoration of an abducted woman including a
female child under the age of 18.
Section 99 covers the directions for search warrants. The provisions of Sections 38, 70, 72, 74,
77, 78 and 79 are applied to all the search warrants issued.
If any place has to be searched or inspected is closed, the person residing or in charge of that
place has to grant entry to the Officer as mentioned in Section 100 and has to provide him with
all the facilities that are appropriate or essential for searching.
The Police Officer has to give a copy of seized items to the Occupant; Section 101 deals with the
disposal of things that are found in search beyond jurisdiction.
The power of Police Officers to seize certain property is given under Section 102 in The Code Of
Criminal Procedure, 1973. Any Police Officer can seize any property that may be known or
suspected to have been stolen or found in circumstances that raise suspicion of any crime being
committed.
103. Magistrate may direct search in his presence.
Any Magistrate may direct a search to be made in his presence of any place for the search of
which he is competent to issue a search warrant.
104. Power to impound document, etc, produced.
Any Court may, if it thinks fit, impound any document or thing produced before it under this
Code.
105. Reciprocal arrangements regarding processes.
(1) Where a Court in the territories to which this Code extends thereafter in this section referred
to as the said territories desires that-
(a) a summons to an accused person, or
(b) a warrant for the arrest of an accused person, or
(c) a summons to any person requiring him to attend and produce a document or other thing, or
to produce it, or
(d) a search-warrant, issued by it shall be served or executed at any place,-
(i) within the local jurisdiction of a Court in any State or area in India outside the said territories,
it may send such summons or warrant in duplicate by post or otherwise, to the presiding officer
of that Court to be served or executed; and where any summons referred to in clause (a) or clause
(c) has been so served, the provisions of Section 68 shall apply in relation to such summons as if
the presiding officer of the Court to whom it is sent were a Magistrate in the said territories;
(ii) in any country of place outside India in respect of which arrangements have been made by
the Central Government with the Government of such country or place for service or execution
of summons or warrant in relation to criminal matters (hereafter in this section referred to as the
contracting State), it may send such summons or warrant in duplicate in such form, directed to
such Court, Judge or Magistrate, and sent to such authority for transmission, as the Central
Government may, by notification, specify in this behalf.
(2) Where a Court in the said territories has received for service or execution-
(a) a summons to an accused person, or
(b) a warrant for the arrest of an accused person, or
(c) a summons to any person requiring him to attend and produce a document or other things or
to produce it, or
(d) a search-warrant, issued by-
(i) a Court in any State or are in India outside the said territories;
(ii) a Court, Judge or Magistrate in a contracting State, it shall cause the same to be served or
executed as if it were a summons or warrant received by it from another Court in the said
territories for service or execution within its local jurisdiction;
and where-
(i) a warrant of arrest has been executed, the person arrested shall, so far as possible, be dealt
with in accordance with the procedure prescribed by Sections 80 and 81;
(ii) a search warrant has been executed, the things found in the search shall, so far as possible, be
dealt with in accordance with the procedure prescribed by Section 101:
Provided that in a case where a summons or search warrant received from a contracting State has
been executed, the documents or things produced or things found in the search shall be
forwarded to the Court issuing the summons or search warrant through such authority as the
Central Government may, by notification, specify in this behalf.
Broad Question
1. Define Anticipatory bail. Under which circumstances it can be granted?
2. Differentiate between bailable & non-bailable offences. Under what circumstances bail
may be granted in non-bailable offences?
3. What is Bail? Under what circumstances bail may be can be granted? By which court the
bail granted?
4. Write provisions concerning bond under criminal procedure code.
1. Arrest of persons – with and without warrant- by whom and how - procedure and
circumstances
‘Arrest’ is the act of apprehending a person and taking him into custody. It is usually done by
police in India. The Code of Criminal Procedure governs the arrest of persons by the police,
private persons, and magistrates.
Types of Arrest: Two types of arrest
1. An arrest made in view of a warrant issued by a magistrate
2. An arrest made without such a warrant but in accordance with some legal provision
permitting such an arrest
Arrest by warrant
If a person commits an offence which is non-arrestable then a warrant is necessary to be issued.
The police cannot make such kind of arrest without a warrant.
The warrant is issued by a Judge or a Magistrate on behalf of the state.
An arrest warrant authorizes the arrest or detention of the person or capture or seizure of an
individual’s property.
Arrest by the police without a warrant (Section 41: CrPC)
Section 41 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (the Code from hereinafter) contains the law for
arrest by the police without a warrant. A long list has been provided. Following are some of the
items from the list:
1. When a person commits a cognizable offense in the presence of a police officer
The cognizable offense is defined in section 2(c) of the Code. When a particular offense is
designated as such in Schedule I of the Code as a cognizable offense, it is called a cognizable
offense. Cognizable offenses are usually offenses that are serious in nature.
2. When a reasonable complaint is made against a person or credible information has been
received, or a reasonable suspicion exists that such person has committed a cognizable offense
punishable with imprisonment for a term which may be less than seven years or which may
extend to seven years whether with or without fine if the following conditions are satisfied:
• the police officer has reason to believe based on such complaint, information, or
suspicion that such person has committed the said offense;
• the police officer who is arresting is satisfied that the following conditions have been
fulfilled-
a. To prevent such person from committing any additional crime; or
b. For proper facilitation of the investigation of the crime; or
c. To stop such person from causing the proof of the crime to disappear or tampering
with such evidence in any manner; or
d. To restrain such person from making any inducement, threat or promise to any person
acquainted with the facts of the case so as to stop him from disclosing such facts to the
Court or to the police officer; or as unless such person is arrested, his presence in the
Court whenever required cannot be ensured;
And the police officer shall record while making such arrest, his reasons in writing, and when the
police officer does not make an arrest, he shall also write the reasons for not making the arrest.
under trials and convicts. The treatment of such people has to be humane and in the manner
prescribed by law. Hence, the accused has been provided with certain rights under the law.
Right to be informed:
As Per Section 50 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Article 22 of the Indian Constitution
which provides certain rights to detained persons, the right to be informed about the grounds for
arrest is a basic right.
It is the police officer's responsibility to notify and tell the arrested person whether the offense is
bailable or not.
Essentials of a warrant:
In non-cognizable offenses, an arrest is made with a warrant, and the arrested person has the
right to read the warrant under Section 75 of the CrPC.
A warrant of arrest must satisfy specific conditions, including being in writing, signed by the
presiding officer, and bearing the seal of the court, as well as the accused's name and address and
the offense for which the arrest is made. If any of these are absent, the warrant is invalid and
illegal.
Memo of Arrest:
The police officer must wear a distinct and legible identification allowing for simple recognition.
At the moment of arrest, a memo of arrest must be written, which must be certified by at least
one witness, who might be a family member or a member of the local area where the arrest is
made and countersigned by the detained individual.
Right to choose an advocate:
Under section 41D and section 303 CrPC, the arrested person has been given a right to meet an
advocate of his choice during the course of interrogation.
The word bail has been coined from the French word ‘bailer‘, which means to deliver or give.
The tentative release of an accused from custody is termed as bail. In other words, bail is the
security for the accused person.
The Indian Constitution under Article 21 guarantees the right to life and personal liberty to every
individual. A person is assumed to be innocent unless proved guilty. Hence, an accused shall not
be deprived of personal liberty unless prescribed by a fair and just procedure.
The term ‘bail‘ is nowhere defined in the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. However, bail
provisions have been defined in CrPC under sections 436-450. The first schedule of CrPC also
defines which offences are bailable and which are not. Generally, non-bailable offences are more
heinous crimes.
Bail in Bailable Offence
Section 436 of CrPC deals with provisions for bail in bailable offences. This provision is
mandatory in nature, and the police or the court has no discretion over it.
The bailable offence is the type of offence in which an accused person is granted bail. This type
of offences is generally punishable by the court with less than three years of imprisonment. In
the case of bailable offence the chances of getting bail are much higher.
436. In what cases bail to be taken.
(1) When any person -
other than a person accused of a non- bailable offence is arrested or detained without warrant by
an officer in charge of a police station, or appears or is brought before a Court, and is prepared at
any time while in the custody of such officer or at any stage of the proceeding before such Court
to give bail, such person shall be released on bail:
Provided that such officer or Court, if he or it thinks fit, may, instead of taking bail from such
person, discharge him on his executing a bond without sureties for his appearance as hereinafter
provided:
Provided further that nothing in this section shall be deemed to affect the provisions of sub-
section (3) of section 116 or section 446A .
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub- section (1),
where a person has failed to comply with the conditions of the bail- bond as regards - the time
and place of attendance, the Court may refuse to release him on bail,
when on a subsequent occasion in the same case he appears before the Court or is brought in
custody and any such refusal shall be without prejudice to the powers of the Court to call upon
any person bound by such bond to pay the penalty thereof under section 446.
Section 436 CrPC : cases in which bail can be granted
Section 436 of the CrPC deals with bail provisions for bailable offences. This clause is
mandatory, and neither the police nor the courts have any discretion in the matter.
Section 436(1) CrPC
According to Section 436(1) of the CrPC, if the alleged crime is bailable, the accused is entitled
to bail as a matter of right, either before the police officer or before the Magistrate’s court (if the
case is forwarded to the Magistrate’s court). Bail for bailable offences is a right, not a favour. In
such cases, there is no room for discretion in providing bail.
Types of Bail
1. Anticipatory Bail
Anticipatory bail is filed before the arrest is made. In other terms, it is also known as pre-arrest
bail. The accused apprehending arrest can approach the High Court of the concerned state for
anticipatory bail application under section 438 of CrPC. Anticipatory bail is frequently in the
news, and politicians, prominent personalities, journalists, etc., often use this.
2. Bail on Arrest
This is filed after the arrest of the accused person. Under Section 437 of CrPC, the arrested
person can approach the court for bail.
3. Bail for Convict
This is filed post-conviction by the court, and an appeal lies against the same. When the accused
has been convicted by the court and has preferred an appeal, the accused can apply to the
appellant court for bail.
4. Default Bail
When the charge-sheet is not filed in the court within the prescribed time period or in other
words, the investigation remained incomplete within the stipulated time period; the accused is
entitled to default bail.
5. Interim Bail
Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh vs State of U.P. and Ors. (2009): Interim bail is nowhere defined in
CrPC. The concept of interim bail was started by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in 2009, stating
that interim bail be granted pending disposal of bail application because arrest and detention of a
person may cause irreparable loss.
4. Discretionary bail- Mandatory bail – circumstances
Default or statutory bail is a right, regardless of the nature of the crime. The stipulated period
within which the charge sheet has to be filed begins from the day the accused is remanded for the
first time. It includes days undergone in both police and judicial custody, but not days spent in
house-arrest.
Default Bail:
This kind of bail procedure differs from the Bail granted under the sections mentioned above.
Default bail is granted on the default of the police or investigating agency to file its
report/complaint within the prescribed period. For an offense where an arrest can be made
without a warrant, section 57 of the CrPC commands that the police officer shall not detain the
accused for more than 24 hours.
If the investigation is not concluded and the charge sheet is not filed within these 24 hours,
section 167 grants the accused the right to a statutory or default bail.
Definition FIR is not defined in the code. Complaint is defined u/s 2 (d),
However, it can be said to be an which means any allegation made
information given to the police orally or in writing to a
first in point of time relating to a magistrate, with a view to his
cognizable offence. taking action under the code, that
some person whether known or
unknown has committed an
offence. It, does not include a
police report
Who may First information report may be Whereas, Complaint can be filed
Apply? lodged by any person such as the by any person subject to certain
aggrieved party or an eye witness. exceptions.
Non-Cognizable Offence
Non-cognizable offences are less serious in nature. The definition of non-cognizable offence is
provided under section 2(l) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Non-cognizable offences are offences in which a police officer cannot arrest a person without a
warrant or offences which are shown as non-cognizable offences under the First Schedule of
CrPC.
Offences under laws other than the Indian • Those punishable with less than 3 yrs or
penal code which are punishable with 3 years with fine
imprisonment or more.
No refunding of any sort instead one pays to Money paid is refunded to you in -case you
be set free attend all your court appearances faithfully.
Once you pay you won’t be analised in the Appearance in court is mandatory and if one
cells but you have to appear in court or forget fails to appear then he or she is deprived the
the bail amount. item left as security.
Mode of payment is cash only. One may use other means eg car logbook or
documents of title.
No presence of a third party involved. A third party agrees to be responsible for the
debt and obligation of defendant.
Is an agreement in nature. Is an undertaking in nature.
Issuing a warrant of arrest. No issue of warrant of arrest.
“Summon case” means a case relating to an offence, not being a warrant case. The procedure to
deal with such matter provided in section 251 to 259 of Cr.P.C, 1973 which is not as
serious/formal as other trials (Session trial, warrant case instituted on the police report and
warrant cases instituted otherwise than on police report).
Summary Trial– Those trials in which cases are disposed of speedily with a simple procedure to
follow and recording of such trials are done summarily. In this trial only small cases are taken in
hand and complicated cases are reserved for summon and warrant trials. Legal Provisions for
summary trial are given under Section 260-265 of Cr.P.C, 1973.
mentioned sections of the IPC deals with offences related to documents given in evidence. The
court will not take cognizance in case of an attempt, conspiracy, abetment of offences relating to
documents given in evidence.
195A. Procedure for witnesses in case of threatening etc.
A witness or any other person may file a complaint in relation to an offence under section
195A of the Indian Penal Code.
196. Prosecution for offences against the State and for criminal conspiracy to commit such
offence.
According to Section 196(1), ‘‘Court will not take cognizance to those cases which punishable
under Chapter VI (Of Offences against the State) or under Section 153A, Section 153B, Section
295A or Section 505 of Indian Penal Code except with the consent of the Central Government or
of the State Government.” Above mentioned sections of IPC deal with offences against the state.
197. Prosecution of Judges and public servants.
According to Section 197(1), “Court will not take cognizance to offences done by Judges,
Magistrates or any Public Servants during the course of employment unless consent in writing is
given by the State
There is no consent requires for cognizance when Judges, Magistrate or Public Servants has done
offence which is punishable under Section: 161A, 161B, 354A to 354D, 370, 376, 376A, 376B,
376C and 509 of Indian Penal Code.
According to Section 197(2), “Court will not take cognizance to offences done by any member
of the Armed Forces of the Union during the course of employment unless consent given by the
Central Government.”
198. Prosecution for offences against marriage.
According to Section 198(1), “Court will not take cognizance to offences punishable under
Chapter XX (Of Offences related to Marriage) of Indian Penal Code unless complaint made by
the victim”.
Court will take cognizance -
1. With the consent of Court, the third person can also make a complaint on behalf of a victim
who is idiot, lunatic, minor, sick, women(who can’t appear in public).
2. Third-person who is authorised by husband (serving in the armed forces of union and unable
to get leave) can make a complaint on his behalf.
3. Father, mother, brother, sister, son or daughter or by her father’s or mother’s brother or sister
of the wife who is the victim under Section 494 of Indian Penal Code can make the complaint on
behalf of the wife.
199. Prosecution for defamation.
According to Section 199(1), “Court will not take cognizance to offences which are punishable
under Chapter XXI (Of Defamation) of the IPC unless the complaint is made by the victim
within six months ’’.
3. Complaint to Magistrates ( S. 200-203) , Commencement of proceedings before
Magistrates (S. 204- 207)
MEANING OF A COMPLAINT
Section 2(d) of CrPC, 1973 defines a complaint as “it is an allegation made verbally or in written
form before a Magistrate”.
In general, any person can file a complaint. But, in case of offences relating to marriage,
defamation and offences specified as per sections 195 to 197 of IPC, only the aggrieved party
can file a complaint. The person who lodges a complaint is known as a ‘complainant’.
NECESSARY CONDITIONS FOR A COMPLAINT
These are some necessary conditions for a complaint:
▪ A non-cognizable offence must be committed.
▪ There must be some allegation against a known or unknown person.
▪ Such allegation must be in verbal or written form.
▪ It must be made before a Magistrate.
▪ It must be made with the object that the Magistrate should take action.
(a) if a public servant acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duties or a Court
has made the complaint; or
(b) if the Magistrate makes over the case for inquiry or trial to another Magistrate under section
192:
Section 201 of CRPC "Procedure by Magistrate not competent to take cognizance of the
case"
As per Section 201, if a complaint is lodged before a Magistrate who has no jurisdiction to deal
with the case, then he can do any one of the following things:
1. Where the complaint is in written form, he is required to return it to the appropriate court
for presentation along with approval for such effect.
2. Where the complaint is not in written form, he should direct the complainant to the
appropriate court.
Meaning-
Issue of process means to compel the appearance of the person complained against or order the
police officer to investigate for deciding whether there is a satisfactory reason for proceedings.
Section 200(2) provides that if a Magistrate finds that the offence is specially triable by the
Sessions Court, then he can summon the complainant along with all the witnesses to take the
evidence on oath.
Section 202(3) limits the power of the person excluding a police officer investigating in that he is
not permitted to take someone into custody without a warrant.
▪ At this stage, the Magistrate shall not enter into a detailed discussion on the merits or
demerits of the case.
Opinion of the Magistrate
▪ The Magistrate has to merely form an opinion as to the sufficiency of grounds for
proceedings against the accused persons.
▪ At this stage, the accused defence against the charges levelled shall not be the concern of
the Court.
▪ The Magistrate is required to find out whether there is a prime facie case made out
against the accused.
▪ The Court is not required to go deep into the probative value of the material on record.
Filing of list of witnesses (Sub. Sec. 2)
▪ It is mandatory to file the list of witnesses along with the complaint.
▪ A separate list of witnesses may not be necessary, if the complainant incorporates the
name of the witnesses in the complaint itself.
Copy of Complaint (Sub. Sec. 3)
▪ A copy of the complaint shall be sent along with the warrant or summons issued to the
accused.
▪ In case such copy of complaint is not provided to the accused, it shall not vitiate the trial.
▪ Such copy can be provided even before the proceedings actually start.
Dismissal of Complaint (Sub. Sec. 4)
▪ A dismissal of the complaint u/s. 204(4) for failure to pay process fee is not a dismissal
on merits.
▪ The Court may dispense with the requirement of personal attendance of the accused if
after due consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case deems fit to do the
same.
▪ Following are some of the illustrative cases where the condition of personal attendance
may be dispensed with:
▪ Where no useful purpose will be solved by requiring personal attendance of the accused.
▪ Where the progress of the case is likely to be hampered.
▪ Where a delay is likely to be caused in the completion of the trial.
▪ Where the offence is not of a very serious nature.
▪ Where a person is merely involved in the case by virtue of his post/office.
▪ Where a person is suffering from some ailment.
Permit the accused to appear by his pleader.
▪ Pleader is defined under section 2(q) of the CrPC as a person authorised to practise in the
Court.
▪ Therefore, the only person who can appear in a case in which the personal attendance of
the accused is dispensed with is a pleader.
▪ Any person against whom proceedings have been initiated has a right to legal
representation i.e., the right to be defended by a pleader.
Rule of Personal exemption to a Woman accused
▪ In the case of Shakuntala v. Virupanna it was held that the grant of exemption from
personal appearance to a woman accused on bail in a criminal proceeding is a rule and its
refusal is an exception.
Other important factors u/s. 205
▪ The Court shall adopt a generous approach i.e., the power to grant exemption from
personal appearance is discretionary, facts and circumstances of each case have to be
seen.
▪ The Court may exercise its judicial discretion while granting such exemption.
Withdrawal of Exemption
▪ When the personal appearance of the accused is initially dispensed with on valid reasons,
there can be no ground to withdraw the exemption unless there is a reasonable
apprehension of possible abscondence of the accused.
▪ The Court may withdraw the exemption from personal hearing for reasons recorded in
writing.
Sec. 207 – supply to the accused of copy of police report and other documents.
Scope & Object
▪ This section only applies to cases, where proceeding has been instituted on a police report
and not to cases based on a private complaint.
▪ The object of this section is to provide the accused an opportunity to know the charge
brought against him and the materials by which the charge is going to be substantiated.
▪ In other words, it gives the accused adequate notice of the material which is going to be
used against him by the Prosecution.
▪ It ensures that the accused is not prejudiced by any way.
▪ The purpose of the provision is to ensure just and fair trial.
Documents that shall be forwarded to the accused
The copies of following documents shall be provided to the accused as contemplated under
section 207:
1. Police Report
2. FIR
Sec. 209 – Commitment of Case to Court of Session when the offence is triable exclusively
by it.
Scope
▪ When the accused appears before the Magistrate or his brought before him and it appears
that the offence committed by him is exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions, in such
circumstances Sec. 209 comes into operation.
▪ The moment the Magistrate commits the case to the Court of Sessions u/s. 209 he
becomes functus officio.
▪ Such committal proceedings are neither inquiry nor trial.
Object
The object of this section is twofold:
1. To prevent committal of cases where there is no reasonable ground for conviction.
2. To provide that no person shall be committed for trial without being acquainted with the
facts and circumstances of the offence impugned against him.
Presence of accused before the committal Court
▪ The presence of the accused before the committal Court is must when the committal
order is passed.
▪ Therefore, an order of committal shall not be passed when the accused is absconding or
has never been brought before the Court at all.
▪ However, the case may be committed if one of the several accused in custody has
absconded.
▪ S.209 does not envisage splitting up of cases of absconder and appearing accused.
Discretion of the Magistrate
▪ The Magistrate is not obliged mechanically to commit a case.
▪ This section gives him the discretionary power in this regard.
▪ Such discretion is limited to what is apparent on the face of record.
▪ The Magistrate cannot discharge the accused merely because it appears to him that the
offence is not exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions, in such case he shall take the
cognizance of offence himself.
Sec. 210 – Procedure when there is a complaint case and police investigation in respect of
the same offence.
Scope
▪ This section comes into operation when the following two things are simultaneously
going on:
▪ Private complaint is received by the Magistrate; and
▪ Police is also investigating the same case.
▪ In the aforementioned eventuality, the Magistrate who receives such private complaint
shall stay the proceedings before him until the Police investigation is over.
▪ The provisions of Sec. 210 are mandatory.
Power to stay proceedings
▪ The provision for staying the proceedings in the complaint case is not to stay
the complaint case indefinitely till the investigation in the police case is over or till the
filing of the final report in the case, more so when the concerned police officer does not
act expeditiously in the manner and/or does not submit his report to the Court at an early
date.
Condition precedent for application of S.210
▪ The condition precedent for applicability of this section is pendency of an inquiry or trial.
▪ When it does not appear from the record that an investigation by the Police is in process
in relation to the offence which was the subject matter of the enquiry or trial held by the
Magistrate, this section could not be made available.
Joint trial
▪ A case instituted on a police report and a complaint case cannot be tried together.
▪ Where offences are distinct and separate offences, joint trial was held impermissible.
▪ Where the Magistrate does not take cognizance of an offence on a Police report he can
proceed with the complaint case.
▪ For example, offence which do not have a specific name under the IPC, there definition
given under the Code shall be mentioned in the Charge
Provisions of Law – S.211(4)
▪ The law and the sections of law dealing with the offence shall be stated in the Charge.
▪ Along with the Section Number, the illustration given along with the section shall also be
stated.
Fulfillment of Legal Conditions – S.211(5)
▪ Once the accused is charged with the particular offence, such charge is equivalent to the
statement that other legal conditions required by the law to constitute the offence were
fulfilled.
▪ For example, if A is charged with murder, then such charge would be equivalent to the
statement that:
▪ A’s act fell within the definition of murder;
▪ A’s act did not fall within the general exceptions;
▪ A’s act did not fall within the five exceptions given under Section 300, IPC.
Language of Charge – S.211(6)
▪ The charge shall be written in the language of the Court.
▪ The State Government shall determine the language that is to be followed by the Court.
▪ Such power can only be used to determine language of all the Courts except the High
Court, as English is the only language permitted at the High Court.
Previous Conviction – S.211(7)
▪ If the previous conviction is to be used in order to enhance the punishment of the
accused; then
▪ The date and place of such previous conviction shall be stated in the Charge.
▪ The purpose of S.211(7) is to inform the accused adequately that the allegations of
previous convictions would expose him to enhanced punishment.
Sec. 212 – Particulars as to time, place and person
Particulars as to time and place of offence – S.212(1)
▪ The Charge shall cull out details about the time and date of the alleged offence.
▪ It helps in providing a reasonable notice to the accused of the details of the offence for
which he is charged.
▪ All the general rules as to framing of charges would also apply in case of alteration or
addition of charges.
Joinder of Charges
Basic rule regarding framing of Charges and Trial
▪ The initial requirement of a fair trial in criminal cases is a precise statement of the
accusation called the Charge.
▪ As a basic rule, there shall be a separate charge for every distinct offence otherwise it
may cause prejudice to the accused.
▪ However, there are certain exceptions laid down to the basic rule, whereby different
offences can be tried at one trial for the benefit of the accused and the Court.
Object of Joinder of Charges
▪ To avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
▪ To avoid harassment to the accused.
▪ To ensure that the mind of the Court is not prejudiced against the accused if was tried in
one trial, upon different charges resting on different evidence.
▪ However, there is a need for carving out exceptions to the said rule, as in some cases
strictly following the general rule of separate charge for distinct offence may cause
multiplicity of judicial proceedings.
Sec. 218 – Separate Charges for Distinct Offences
▪ As a general rule, there shall be a separate charge for every distinct offence committed by
the accused.
▪ However, if the accused himself gives his consent for joinder of charges, then the Court
may allow such joinder of charges.
▪ Provisions of S.218 are designed to benefit the accused.
Factors distinguishing ‘Distinct Offence’ from ‘Each Offence’ or ‘Every Offence’
1. Difference in the time of occurrence of different offences;
2. Difference in place of occurrence;
3. Different victims of crime;
4. Difference in the acts constituting the two or more offences.
EXCEPTION 3
Offences of Criminal Breach of Trust, Dishonest Misappropriation of Property and their
companion offences of Falsification of Accounts – S.220(2)
▪ Sub Sec. 2 of Sec. 220 applies when a person commits one or more offences pertaining
to:
▪ Criminal Breach of Trust;
▪ Dishonest Misappropriation of Property;
▪ Falsification of Accounts.
▪ The reasonable object behind trying all these offences together is that either one of the
abovementioned offence is carried out to give effect to other one.
▪ For example, in almost all the cases the offence of Criminal Breach of Trust is
accompanied with the offence of falsification of accounts for the purpose of concealing
the former offence.
EXCEPTION 4
Same act falling under different definitions of offence – S.220(3)
▪ There might be a case where a person is accused of committing an act which falls under
the definition two or more offences.
▪ Therefore, a single act of the accused would be an offence under two or more provisions
of IPC, Special Law or Local Laws.
▪ In such case all the offences shall be tried at one trial.
▪ For example, if a person kills a pedestrian by rash or negligent driving he can be held
liable u/s. 304-A for causing the death and u/s. 279 for rash driving or riding on a public
way.
EXCEPTION 5
Acts forming an offence, also constituting different offence when taken separately or in
groups – S.220(4)
▪ Several acts, each constituting an offence and in combination constituting a different or a
graver offence, may be tried at one trial.
▪ For example, hatching a criminal conspiracy to commit a murder would result in two
offences i.e., 120-B for Criminal Conspiracy and 302 for murder both acts constituting
separate offence, but when combined form a graver offence, can be tried at one trial.
▪ Section 220(5) provides that provisions of S.220 shall not effect S.71 IPC.
EXCEPTION 6
Where it is doubtful what offence has been committed – S.221
▪ It applies to cases where the facts are not doubtful but the application of the law to the
facts is doubtful.
▪ It applies when from the evidence led by the prosecution it is doubtful which of several
offences has been committed by the accused person.
▪ Section 221(2) gives wide powers to the Court to convict the accused of a crime not the
subject of the charge i.e., not mentioned in the charge provided the following conditions
are fulfilled:
▪ That the crime for which the accused was found guilty was established by the
evidence; and
▪ Having the provided information, it was doubtful which of one or more offences would
be established by the evidence.
▪ The section applies to cognate (similar) offences like criminal breach of trust and theft
and not offences of distinct character such as murder and theft.
EXCEPTION 7
Certain persons may be charged jointly – S.223
▪ This section permits a joint trial of several accused persons in specified cases.
▪ There must be a basic connection between the various offences committed by the several
accused persons.
▪ This section is enacted to benefit the accused.
▪ It also saves the time of the Court as it avoids the peril of multiplicity of proceedings.
▪ The following persons may be charged and tried together:
▪ Persons accused of same offence committed in the course of the same transaction;
▪ Persons accused of different offences committed in the course of same transaction;
▪ Persons accused of an offence and persons accused of abetment or attempt of such
offence;
▪ Persons accused of more than one offence, committed in span on one year as per S.219;
It is not available for all types of crime e.g. a person cannot claim plea bargaining after
committing heinous crimes or for the crimes which are punishable with death or life
imprisonment.
Section 265A to 265L, Chapter XXIA of the Criminal Procedure Code deals with the concept of
Plea Bargaining. It was inserted into the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2005. It allows plea
bargaining for cases:
1. Where the maximum punishment is imprisonment for 7 years;
2. Where the offenses don’t affect the socio-economic condition of the country;
3. When the offenses are not committed against a woman or a child below 14 are
excluded
Chapter XXIA Section 265A to 265L and brought the concept of plea bargaining in India. The
following are provisions which it added:-
• Section 265-A (Application of Chapter) the plea bargaining shall be available to the
accused who is charged with any offense other than offenses punishable with death or
imprisonment or for life or of an imprisonment for a term exceeding to seven years.
Section 265 A (2) of the Code gives the power to notify the offenses to the Central
Government.
The Central Government issued Notification No. SO1042 (II) dated 11-7/2006 specifying the
offenses affecting the socio-economic condition of the country.
Section 265-B (Application for Plea Bargaining)
1. A person accused of an offense may file the application of plea bargaining in trails which
are pending.
2. The application for plea bargaining is to be filed by the accused containing brief details
about the case relating to which such application is filed. It includes the offences to which
the case relates and shall be accompanied by an affidavit sworn by the accused stating
therein that he has voluntarily preferred the application, the plea bargaining the nature and
extent of the punishment provided under the law for the offence, the plea bargaining in his
case that he has not previously been convicted by a court in a case in which he had been
charged with the same offence.
3. The court will thereafter issue the notice to the public prosecutor concerned, investigating
officer of the case, the victim of the case and the accused of the date fixed for the plea
bargaining.
4. When the parties appear, the court shall examine the accused in-camera wherein the other
parties in the case shall not be present, with the motive to satisfy itself that the accused has
filed the application voluntarily.
• Section 265-C (Guidelines for Mutually satisfactory disposition) It lays down the
procedure to be followed by the court in mutually satisfactory disposition. In a case
instituted on a police report, the court shall issue the notice to the public prosecutor
concerned, investigating officer of the case, and the victim of the case and the accused to
participate in the meeting to work out a satisfactory disposition of the case. In a complaint
case, the Court shall issue a notice to the accused and the victim of the case.
• Section 265-D (Report of the mutually satisfactory disposition) This provision talks
about the preparation of the report of mutually satisfactory disposition and submission of
the same. Two situations may arise here namely
1. If in a meeting under section 265-C, a satisfactory disposition of the case has been worked
out, the report of such disposition is to be prepared by the court. It shall be signed by the
presiding officer of the Courts and all other persons who participated in the meeting.
2. If no such disposition has been worked out, the Court shall record such observation and
proceed further in accordance with the provisions of this Code from the stage the
application under sub-section (1) of section 265-B has been filed in such case.
o Section 265-E (Disposal of the case) prescribes the procedure to be followed in disposing
of the cases when a satisfactory disposition of the case is worked out. After completion of
proceedings under Section 265-D, by preparing a report signed by the presiding officer of
the Court and parties in the meeting, the Court has to hear the parties on the quantum of the
punishment or accused entitlement of release on probation of good conduct or after
admonition. Court can either release the accused on probation under the provisions of
Section 360 of the Code or under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 or under any other
legal provisions in force or punish the accused, passing the sentence. While punishing the
accused, the Court, at its discretion, can pass sentence of minimum punishment, if the law
provides such minimum punishment for the offenses committed by the accused or if such
minimum punishment is not provided, can pass a sentence of one-fourth of the punishment
provided for such offense. ”
o Section 265-F (Judgment of the Court) talks about the pronouncement of judgment in
terms of mutually satisfactory disposition.
o Section 265-G (Finality of Judgment) says that no appeal shall be against such judgment
but Special Leave Petition (Article 136) or writ petition (under Article 226 or 227) can be
filed.
o Section 265-H (Power of the Court in Plea Bargaining) talks about the powers of the
court in plea bargaining. These powers include powers in respect of bail, the trial of
offenses and other matters relating to the disposal of a case in such court under Criminal
Procedure Code.
• Section 265-I (Period of detention undergone by the accused to be set off against the
sentence of imprisonment) says that Section 428 of CrPC is applicable for setting off the
period of detention undergone by the accused against the sentence of imprisonment
imposed under this chapter.
• 265-J (Savings) talks about the provisions of the chapter which shall have effect
notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other provisions of the
Code and nothing in such other provisions shall be construed to contain the meaning of any
provision of chapter XXI-A
• Section 265-K (Statement of the accused to be used) specifies that the statements or facts
stated by the accused in an application under section 265-B shall not be used for any other
purpose except for the purpose as mentioned in the chapter.
• Section 265-L (Non-application of the chapter) makes it clear that this chapter will not
be applicable in case of any juvenile or child as defined in Section 2(k) of Juvenile Justice
(Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000.
Types of Plea Bargaining
Plea Bargaining is generally of three types namely:-
1. Sentence bargaining;
2. Charge bargaining;
3. Fact bargaining.
Type Meaning
This kind of plea bargaining happens for getting less severe charges.
This the most common form of plea bargaining in criminal cases.
Charge
Here the defendant agrees to plead guilty to a lesser charge in
bargaining
consideration of dismissing greater charges. E.g. Pleading for
manslaughter for dropping the charges of murder.
Compounding of offences-
section 320 of CrPC specifies a list of offences under IPC (Indian Penal Code) which can
be compounded by the victims of those offences.
Meaning-
In certain offences, the parties involved can effect a compromise while the case is under trial in
the court. This is called 'compounding', further action in trial is discontinued.
Cases in which this is permissible are called compoundable offences.
Offences such as rape, murder, dacoity are offences of serious nature and hence are non -
compoundable offences. This means that the list (Table 1 and Table 2) provided under
this section is exhaustive in nature. Any other offence mentioned in the IPC is a non-
compoundable offence. This is provided in subsection 9 of section 320.
COMPOUNDABLE NON-COMPOUNDABLE
Offences mentioned under 320 CrPC Every other offence except for those
mentioned in 320 CrPC
Compromise can happen with and without the No compromise can happen under
permission of the court. It depends on the any circumstance.
offence which is committed.
Trial stops after the compromise has been Trial continues till the end where the
reached at. judgement is passed.
Generally, the cases under this are filed by Cases are generally filed by the state
individuals. because of the involvement of many
people.
trial. And the Magistrate shall satisfy himself in complying with the provisions of Section 207.
This is to ensure that the accused are aware of the charges against him and can prepare for
defence under fair trial by law.
Discharge of accused if allegations against him are baseless
Once the Magistrate receives the police report and other relevant documents and provides them
to the accused, the Magistrate shall consider each report. A hearing shall be convened and a
reasonable opportunity shall be provided for both the accused prosecution to present their case.
The Magistrate examines the accused if necessary. If the charge against the accused is
discovered to be baseless and lacking in substance, the accused shall be discharged under Section
239.
Framing of charge
Section 240 of CrPC authorises the Magistrate to consider the police report and even to examine
the accused if he feels the need to. If the Magistrate feels the presence of valid grounds to
presume that the accused has committed the offence and is capable of committing such an
offence, and he is competent to try the offence to adequately punish the accused in his opinion.
Then the written charge is framed against the accused and the trial is conducted after the charge
is read and explained to the accused. Framing of the charge is a duty of the court and the matter
must be considered judiciously.
Explaining the charge to the accused
Clause 2 of Section 240 describes that the charge against the accused shall be read and explained
to the accused. Once the accused understands the charges against him, he shall be asked whether
he pleads guilty of the offence or wishes to challenge the charge by a fair trial under the law.
Conviction on a guilty plea
The accused can plead guilty to cut short the procedure of law and reduce the punishment for his
offence. The Magistrate records the guilty plea and convicts the accused on his discretion.
(Section 241)
Evidence for prosecution
Section 242 of CrPC defines the procedure with regards to the gathering of evidence against the
offender and recording the evidence after examination and cross-examination to acquit or convict
an accused individual. In a criminal trial, the case of the state is presented first. The burden of
proving the accused guilty is on the prosecution and the evidence must be beyond a reasonable
doubt.
The testimonies of witnesses and any evidence provided to prove the accused had committed the
offence by the prosecution is recorded by the Magistrate.
Evidence for the defence
Section 243 of CrPC describes the procedure with regards to collecting and presenting evidence
in the defence of the accused. After the prosecution is finished with the examination of the
witness, the accused may enter his defence in a written statement and the Magistrate shall file it
with the record.
Initial steps in the trial
The initial steps involve filing a complaint with a magistrate. Once the complaint is filed in the
Magistrate, the accused is brought before the Magistrate or appears voluntarily.
A hearing is conducted to determine the facts of the case. The prosecution begins the steps to
prove that the accused has committed the offence beyond a reasonable doubt. And the defence
can take the necessary steps to challenge the accusations and prove that the accused did not
commit the offence. The steps in warrant cases instituted otherwise than on a police report are:
1. The preliminary hearing of the prosecution’s case.
2. Discharge of accused if the accusation is baseless. (Section 245)
3. Framing of charge. (Section 246)
4. Explaining charge to the accused. (Section 246(2))
5. Conviction on a guilty plea. (Section 246(3))
6. Choice of the accused to recall prosecution’s witness. (Section 246(5))
7. Evidence for Prosecution. (Section 244)
8. Evidence for Defence. (Section 247)
If the Magistrate determines that no case has been made out as the accusations lack substance
and are groundless than the case will be dismissed and the accused shall be discharged.
Discharge of accused
Section 245 of CrPC states that the accused shall be discharged by the Magistrate if no case has
been made out against him by the prosecution, which if unchallenged would warrant his
conviction.
Framing of charge
Once all the evidence is presented to the Magistrate by the prosecution and after the examination
of said evidence is conducted by him, the Magistrate is of the opinion that there is a reasonable
ground for the accusations mentioned in the complaint and the accused is capable of committing
the offence; a charge is framed and a fair trial is conducted.
Explaining the charge to the accused
Section 246(2) states that the charge against the accused should be read and explained to him,
and he shall be asked whether he wishes to plead guilty to the charges or contest the said charges
by proceeding with a trial.
Conviction on a guilty plea
Section 246(3) gives the accused an opportunity to plead guilty and present himself in mercy of
the court. The Magistrate has the authority to record the guilty plea, convict and punish the
accused as he sees fit.
Evidence for prosecution
Section 244 states that in warrant cases instituted otherwise than a police report and filed directly
with the Magistrate, the accused is presented before the Magistrate who begins the hearing
process by summoning the witnesses named by the prosecution and taking all the pieces of
evidence produced as such. All evidence must be taken into consideration as under Section
138 of the Indian Evidence Act and filed with the record by the Magistrate.
Summoning witnesses
The application is made to the Magistrate by the prosecution to summon any witnesses and the
Magistrate issues the order to summon any witnesses or produce any document or thing in
relation to the case.
Absence of complainant
Section 249 states that when the proceedings have been instituted upon complaint directly with
the Magistrate, and the complainant is absent on the date and time of the proceedings set by the
Magistrate; and the offence may be compoundable and non-cognizable, the Magistrate may at
any time before the charges are framed against the accused, discharge him. It is the discretion of
the Magistrate to discharge the accused or proceed with the case.
Examination of witnesses
The Magistrates examines the witnesses after summoning them to the Court.
Conclusion of the trial
The trial can only end in either a conviction or acquittal of the accused. The decision of the Court
with regards to the conviction or acquittal of an accused is known as judgement.
Judgement of acquittal or conviction
Section 248 states that once the decision is made after the Magistrate examines the evidence, the
judgement is delivered. If the accused is not found guilty, an order of acquittal shall be recorded
by the Magistrate under as stated under Section 248(1). If the accused is found guilty, the
Magistrate after hearing the accused shall pass the sentence if he does not proceed in accordance
with the provisions of Section 325 or Section 360. And this order of conviction shall be recorded
as under Section 248(2).
Compensation for accusation without a reasonable cause.
Section 250 discusses the procedure related to cases where a case is instituted on complaint to a
magistrate or police officer and the Magistrate finds that there is no ground against the accused
person. The accused shall be discharged immediately. The complainant shall be summoned to
justify his complaint and explain why he should not pay compensation to the person against
whom the complaint was made.
case unable to convey the particulars than this will not vitiate the trial and it will not lead to the
prejudice with the accused as this irregularity is remediable under section 465 of the code. Under
section 251 courts shall ask the accused whether the accused pleads guilty, and section 252 and
253 needs to comply for conviction on such plea of guilty.
Conviction on plea of guilty
Section 252 and 253 provides conviction on the plea of guilty. Section 252 provides plea of
guilty in general and section 253 provides plea of guilty in case of the petty cases.
If not affirmative than the court needs to proceed further with Section 254.
After recording the evidence under 254 the magistrate will acquit the accused if he finds the
accused not guilty. If the accused is guilty than Magistrate shall proceed according to Section
360 or 325 otherwise, sentence him according to the law.
Non-appearance or the death of the complainant
According to section 256 on the date fixed for the appearance of the accused nonexistence of the
complainant will empower the court to acquit the accused unless the court has the reason to
adjourn the case to some other day.
There is no provision of discharge in summon cases instituted on complaint accused will be
either convicted or acquitted.
▪ The record and the judgment shall be prepare and signed by the Magistrate.
Commencement of Investigation
There are two ways to commence the investigation:
• The police officer in charge has the authority to investigate when the FIR is lodged.
• When the complaint has been made to the Magistrate then any person who has been
authorized by the Magistrate can investigate in this regard.
Malafide Investigation
If investigating agencies conduct mala fide investigation, then it is open to correction by
invoking the jurisdiction of the High Court.
Inquiry
An inquiry is done either by a Magistrate or it is done by the Court but not by a police official.
Investigation differs from inquiry.
According to Section 2(g) of The Code of Civil Procedure, Inquiry includes every inquiry except
for a trial conducted under this Code, that is done either by a Magistrate or by the Court. The
inquiry relates to the proceedings that are carried out by the Magistrate before a trial is done.
Section 159 of CrPC empowers the Magistrate on a receipt of a police report under Section 157
of CrPC, to hold a preliminary enquiry to ascertain whether an offence has been committed. If
the offence has been committed then, whether any person should be put upon trial.
Types of Inquiry
• Judicial Inquiry
• Non-Judicial Inquiry/ Administrative Inquiry
• Preliminary Inquiry
• Local Inquiry
• Inquiry into an offence
• Inquiry related to matters other than an offence
Under Section 159 of CrPC, the Magistrate is empowered to hold a preliminary inquiry on
receipt of the police report under Section 157 of CrPC, to ascertain whether an offence is
committed and if an offence has been committed then whether any person has to be put upon
trial.
appointed by the Magistrate on his behalf. The evidence under this subsection is to be recorded
by audio-video electronic.
Section 275(3)– This section permits the Magistrate to record evidence in question and answer
form.
Section 276– In Session Court, the recording should be done in a narrative form. The presiding
officer at his discretion can take down any part of the evidence in question and answer format
which has to be signed by him
Section 278– When the evidence of a witness is completed, it should be read over to the accused
or his pleader. This shouldn’t be done at the end of the day when all the witnesses have been
examined. The evidence if needed can be corrected by the accused.
Section 280– The presiding judge or magistrate is empowered to record the remarks.
Marking of Exhibits
Some evidence shall be submitted by the prosecution, this evidence has to be marked with the
number in the order in which they are submitted. The documents that are admitted on behalf of
defence shall be marked with capital letter alphabets. If in case neither party does not accept the
evidence then the evidence shall be marked as Ext C-I, C-II etc.
Where the genuineness of any document is not disputed, such document may be read in evidence
in inquiry, trial or other proceeding under this Code without proof of the signature of the person
to whom it purports to be signed.
S. 295 provides that if any application is made to any Court in the course of any inquiry, trial or
other proceeding under the Code, and allegations are made therein regarding any public servant,
the applicant may give evidence of the facts alleged in the application in the form of an affidavit.
S. 296 provides that the evidence of any person whose evidence is of a formal character can also
be given by affidavit, and subject to all just exceptions it can be read in evidence in any inquiry,
trial or other proceedings under the Code.
297. Authorities before whom affidavits may be sworn.—
Affidavits to be used before any Court under this Code may be sworn or affirmed before—
(a) any Judge or Judicial or Executive Magistrate, or
(b) any Commissioner of Oaths appointed by a High Court or Court of Session, or
(c) any notary appointed under the Notaries Act, 1952 (53 of 1952).
Accomplice
Accomplice is a witness to the crime, who is connected with the crime by any unlawful act or
omission, with his active or inactive participation to the crime some way or the other and he/she
admits his/her active involvement in the crime.
Section 133 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 talks about accomplice witness. According to it, an
accomplice is a competent witness against an accused person.
306. Tender of pardon to accomplice.—
(1) With a view to obtaining the evidence of any person supposed to have been directly or
indirectly concerned in or privy to an offence to which this section applies, the Chief Judicial
Magistrate or a Metropolitan Magistrate at any stage of the investigation or inquiry into, or the
trial of, the offence, and the Magistrate of the first class inquiring into or trying the offence, at
any stage of the inquiry or trial, may tender a pardon to such person on condition of his making a
full and true disclosure of the whole of the circumstances within his knowledge relative to the
CONTACT US ON – 9372393811 / nyayparisarlawacademy03@gmail.com
WEB:- nyayparisar-law-academy.business.site
Find us on Instagram @ /nyayparisar
offence and to every other person concerned, whether as principal or abettor, in the commission
thereof.
(2) This section applies to—
(a) any offence triable exclusively by the Court of Session or by the Court of a Special Judge
appointed under the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 (46 of 1952);
(b) any offence punishable with imprisonment which may extend to seven years or with a more
severe sentence.
(3) Every Magistrate who tenders a pardon under sub-section (1) shall record—
(a) his reasons for so doing;
(b) whether the tender was or was not accepted by the person to whom it was made, and shall, on
application made by the accused, furnish him with a copy of such record free of cost.
(4) Every person accepting a tender of pardon made under sub-section (1)—
(a) shall be examined as a witness in the Court of the Magistrate taking cognizance of the
offence and in the subsequent trial, if any;
(b) shall, unless he is already on bail, be detained in custody until the termination of the trial.
(5) Where a person has accepted a tender of pardon made under sub-section (1) and has been
examined under sub-section (4), the Magistrate taking cognizance of the offence shall, without
making any further inquiry in the case—
(a) commit it for trial—
(i) to the Court of Session if the offence is triable exclusively by that Court or if the Magistrate
taking cognizance is the Chief Judicial Magistrate;
(ii) to a Court of Special Judge appointed under the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 (46 of
1952), if the offence is triable exclusively by that Court;
(b) in any other case, make over the case to the Chief Judicial Magistrate who shall try the case
himself.
307. Power to direct tender of pardon.—
At any time after commitment of a case but before judgment is passed, the Court to which the
commitment is made may, with a view to obtaining at the trial the evidence of any person
supposed to have been directly or indirectly concerned in, or privy to, any such offence, tender a
pardon on the same condition to such person.
CONTACT US ON – 9372393811 / nyayparisarlawacademy03@gmail.com
WEB:- nyayparisar-law-academy.business.site
Find us on Instagram @ /nyayparisar
concisely and under distinct headings, the arguments in support of his case and every such
memorandum shall form part of the record. (2) A copy of every such memorandum shall be
simultaneously furnished to the opposite party. (3) No adjournment of the proceedings shall be
granted for the purpose of filing the written arguments unless the Court, for reasons to be
recorded in writing, considers it necessary to grant such adjournment. (4) The Court may, if it is
of opinion that the oral arguments are not concise or relevant, regulate such arguments.
• Shall contain the points of determination and the reason for the same.
• The offence should be specified and the reason for the same should be given for the
same. The offence so committed must be mentioned in the IPC or any other law under
which the crime is committed and the punishment is given.
• If the offender is acquitted, the offence for which he was acquitted, the reason for the
same and it must be specified that a person is now a free man.
victim itself. Instead of getting justice, the victim is trapped in the honeycomb of justice delivery
system.
Compensation for loss or injury to be recovered by the civil court
If the court is of the view that, the compensation sought is beyond the jurisdiction of the court,
the court itself orders the appropriate court to look into the matter.
374. Appeals from convictions.—(1) Any person convicted on a trial held by a High Court in its
extraordinary original criminal jurisdiction may appeal to the Supreme Court.
(2) Any person convicted on a trial held by a Sessions Judge or an Additional Sessions Judge or
on a trial held by any other court in which a sentence of imprisonment for more than seven
years [has been passed against him or against any other person convicted at the same trial], may
appeal to the High Court.
(3) any person convicted on a trial held by a Metropolitan Magistrate or Assistant Sessions Judge
or Magistrate of the first class, or of the second class, may appeal to the Court of Session.
No appeal can be filed - where an accused person has pleaded guilty and has been convicted by
High Court or by a Court of Session or Magistrate on such plea, there shall be no appeal.
Section 376. No appeal in petty cases.— There shall be no appeal by a convicted person in any
of the following cases, namely:
(a) where a High Court passes only a sentence of imprisonment for a term not exceeding six
months or of fine not exceeding one thousand rupees, or of both such imprisonment and fine;
(b) where a Court of Session or a Metropolitan Magistrate passes only a sentence of
imprisonment for a term not exceeding three months or of fine not exceeding two hundred
rupees, or of both such imprisonment and fine;
(c) where a Magistrate of the first class passes only a sentence of fine not exceeding one
hundred rupees; or
(d) where, in a case tried summarily, a Magistrate empowered to act under section 260 passes
only a sentence of fine not exceeding two hundred rupees.
(2) Before dismissing an appeal under this section, the Court may call for the record of the case.
(3) Where the Appellate Court dismissing an appeal under this section is a Court of Session or of
the Chief Judicial Magistrate, it shall record its reasons for doing so.
385. Procedure for hearing appeals not dismissed summarily.—
(1) If the Appellate Court does not dismiss the appeal summarily, it shall cause notice of the time
and place at which such appeal will be heard to be given—
(i) to the appellant or his pleader;
(ii) to such officer as the State Government may appoint in this behalf;
(iii) if the appeal is from a judgment of conviction in a case instituted upon complaint, to the
complainant;
(iv) if the appeal is under section 377 or section 378, to the accused, and shall also furnish such
officer, complainant and accused with a copy of the grounds of appeal
386. Powers of the Appellate Court.—After perusing such record and hearing the appellant or
his pleader, and the Public Prosecutor- if it considers that there is no sufficient ground for
interfering, dismiss the appeal, or may—
(a) in an appeal from an order or acquittal, reverse such order and direct that further inquiry be
made, or that the accused be re-tried or committed for trial, as the case may be, or find him guilty
and pass sentence on him according to law;
(b) in an appeal from a conviction—
(i) reverse the finding and sentence and acquit or discharge the accused, or order him to be re-
tried by a Court of competent jurisdiction subordinate to such Appellate Court or committed for
trial, or
(ii) alter the finding, maintaining the sentence, or
(iii) with or without altering the finding, alter the nature or the extent, or the nature and extent, of
the sentence, but not so as to enhance the same—
(c) in an appeal for enhancement of sentence—
(i) reverse the finding and sentence and acquit or discharge the accused or order him to be re-
tried by a Court competent to try the offence, or
(ii) alter the finding maintaining the sentence, or
(iii) with or without altering the finding, alter the nature or the extent, or, the nature and extent,
of the sentence, so as to enhance or reduce the same
(d) in an appeal from any other order, alter or reverse such order;
(e) make any amendment or any consequential or incidental order that may be just or proper:
388. Order of High Court on appeal to be certified to lower Court.—
(1) Whenever a case is decided on appeal by the High Court under this Chapter, it shall certify its
judgment or order to the Court by which the finding, sentence or order appealed against was
recorded or passed.
(2) The Court to which the High Court certifies its judgment or order shall thereupon make such
orders as are conformable to the judgment or order of the High Court; and if necessary, the
record shall be amended in accordance therewith.
389. Suspension of sentence pending the appeal; release of appellant on bail.—
(1) Pending any appeal by a convicted person, the Appellate Court may, for reasons to be
recorded by it in writing, order that the execution of the sentence or order appealed against be
suspended and, also, if he is in confinement, that he be released on bail, or on his own bond:
where a convicted person is released on bail it shall be open to the Public Prosecutor to file an
application for the cancellation of the bail.
390. Arrest of accused in appeal from acquittal.—
When an appeal is presented under section 378, the High Court may issue a warrant directing
that the accused be arrested and brought before it or may commit him to prison pending the
disposal of the appeal or admit him to bail.
391. Appellate Court may take further evidence or direct it to be taken.—
the Appellate Court, if it thinks additional evidence to be necessary, shall record its reasons and
may either take such evidence itself, or direct it to be taken by a Magistrate.
393. Finality of judgments and orders on appeal.—Judgments and orders passed by an Appellate
Court upon an appeal shall be final.
394. Abatement of appeals.—(1) Every other appeal under section 377 or section 378 shall
finally abate on the death of the accused.
Unit - VII Reference and Revision (395-405), Execution, Suspension, remission, and
Commutation of sentences
1. Reference to High Court ( S. 395)
2. Revisional Jurisdiction (Ss. 397-401) Revisional Conditions & Powers of Revisional Courts.
3. Execution of sentences ( S. 413- 424)
4. Suspension (S.432), Postponement ( S. 415, 416)
5. Remission and Commutation of sentences (S. 433-A)
Section 396 of Criminal Procedure Code: – Disposal of case according to the decision of the
High Court
When the question has been so referred, the High court shall pass such an order that it thinks fit
and also can send a copy of such an order to the lower court which shall dispose off the case
comfortably to the said order. The high court may also direct the cost of such reference which
has to be paid.
CONTACT US ON – 9372393811 / nyayparisarlawacademy03@gmail.com
WEB:- nyayparisar-law-academy.business.site
Find us on Instagram @ /nyayparisar
2
203. Dismissal of complaint- If the Magistrate is of opinion that there is no sufficient ground for proceeding, he
shall dismiss the complaint.
3
204. Issue of process- no process shall be issued until the fees are paid and, if such fees are not paid within a
reasonable time, the Magistrate may dismiss the complaint.
4
Sec. 368. Power of High Court to confirm sentence or annul conviction.
5
Sec. 366 - When the Court of Session passes a sentence of death, the proceedings shall be submitted to the High
Court, and the sentence shall not be executed unless it is confirmed by the High Court.
(b) suspend the execution of the sentence of imprisonment and release the offender, on the
execution by the offender of a bond, with or without sureties, as the Court thinks fit, conditioned
for his appearance before the Court on the date or dates on or before which payment of the fine is
to be made; and
if the amount of the fine or of any instalment, as the case may be, is not realised on or before the
latest date on which it is payable under the order, the Court may direct the sentence of
imprisonment to be carried into execution at once.
(c) a sentence of rigorous imprisonment, for simple imprisonment for any term to which that
person might have been sentenced, or for fine;
(d) a sentence of simple imprisonment, for fine
According to Section 153 of CrPC, any officer in charge of a police station is empowered to
conduct or initiate a search in any such place where he has the suspicion that a false weight or
measuring technique is being made or sold. Certain conditions have been laid down to exercise
these powers:
• The place to be searched must lie within the local jurisdiction of the police station;
persons involved as may be necessary. The Magistrate can have the members or part
of members of the unlawful assembly punished according to law.
3. Every such officer shall obey such order in a manner he deems fit, but while doing so
he shall use rational and minimum force. He shall do as little damage to person or
property, as may be required for dispersing the assembly and arresting and detaining
the involved persons.
• Section 131 of CRPC states the power of certain armed force officers to disperse
assembly with a condition added regarding executive magistrate.
Any commissioned or gazetted officer of the armed forces may-
1. Disperse any such assembly with the help of the armed forces under his command.
2. Arrest and confine any persons involved in such unlawful assembly.
Provided the public security is clearly endangered by any such assembly and any Executive
Magistrate cannot be communicated with.
However, as soon as it becomes practical for the gazetted or commissioned officer to
communicate with an Executive Manager, he shall do so, and shall thereafter obey the
instructions of the Magistrate and consider whether the Magistrate wants the action ongoing, to
be continued or not.
• Section 132 of CRPC states protection against prosecution for acts under preceding
sections.
• No prosecution shall be instituted in any Criminal Court against any person who has
done an action under section 129, 130 and 131.
These sections under the CRPC give powers to the Executive Magistrates as well as police
officers to disperse unlawful assemblies as such assemblies may disrupt or have the potential to
disrupt public order and peace of society. It may also cause harm to public property and injury to
the rest of the public.
• to desist from carrying on, or to remove or regulate in such manner as may be directed,
such trade or occupation, or to remove such goods or merchandise, or to regulate the
keeping thereof in such manner as may be directed; or
• to prevent or stop the construction of such building, or to alter the disposal of such
substance; or
• to remove, repair or support such building, tent or structure, or to remove or support such
trees; or
• to fence such tank, well or excavation; or
• to destroy, confine or dispose of such dangerous animal in the manner provided in the
said order; or, if he objects so to do, to appear before himself or some other Executive
Magistrate subordinate to him at a time and place to be fixed by the Order, and show
cause, in the manner hereinafter provided, why the order should not be made absolute.
136. Consequences of his failing to do so.—
If such person does not perform such act or appear and show cause, he shall be liable to the
penalty prescribed in that behalf in section 1886 of the Indian Penal Code, and the order shall be
made absolute.
144. Power to issue order in urgent cases of nuisance or apprehended danger .—
(1) In cases where, in the opinion of a District Magistrate, there is sufficient ground for
proceeding under this section and immediate prevention or speedy remedy is desirable, such
Magistrate may, by a written order stating the material facts of the case- direct any person to
abstain from a certain act or to take certain order with respect to certain property in his
possession or under his management,
if such Magistrate considers that such direction is likely to prevent, or tends to prevent,
obstruction, annoyance or injury to any person lawfully employed, or danger to human life,
health or safety or a disturbance of the public tranquillity, or a riot, or an affray.
(3) An order under this section may be directed to a particular individual, or to persons residing
in a particular place or area, or to the public generally.
6
188. Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant.
(4) No wife shall be entitled to receive an allowance if she is living in adultery, or if, without any
sufficient reason, she refuses to live with her husband, or if they are living separately by mutual
consent.
According to Section 125(1), the following persons can claim and get maintenance:
• Wife from his husband,
• Legitimate or illegitimate minor child from his father,
• Legitimate or illegitimate minor child (physical or mental abnormality) from his
father, and
• Father or mother from his son or daughter.
Wife
Strict proof of marriage should not be a precondition of maintenance under Section 125 of the
Cr.PC.
In the case of Chanmuniya v Virendra Singh, Supreme Court has defined ‘Wife’ and it includes
even those cases where a man and woman have been living together as husband and wife for a
reasonably long period of time.
Muslim wife can also claim maintenance under Cr.PC.
A wife cannot claim and get maintenance from her husband in the following conditions:
• Wife living in adultery, or
• Refuses to live with husband without any valid reasons, or
• Living separately by mutual consent.
Son
Minor Son below the age of 18 years (Legitimate or Illegitimate) is entitled to get maintenance
under Section 125 of Cr.PC.
Minor Daughter
If Minor Daughter (Legitimate or Illegitimate) is unmarried, then she is entitled to get
maintenance from her father.
If she is married, then she is also entitled to get maintenance from his father but the magistrate
has to be satisfied that her husband has not essential and sufficient means for the maintenance of
his minor wife.
CONTACT US ON – 9372393811 / nyayparisarlawacademy03@gmail.com
WEB:- nyayparisar-law-academy.business.site
Find us on Instagram @ /nyayparisar
Alteration in allowance
According to Section 127(1), if a magistrate ordered to give allowance for maintenance under
Section 125 according to the conditions of parties at that time, but if the present conditions of
parties have changed, then he can also order to alter the allowance.
Alteration in allowance means an order to increase, decrease or remove/cancel the allowance
which was ordered by the Magistrate under Section 125.
According to Section 127(2), Magistrate shall cancel or revoke any order given under Section
125 by him, if it appears that it should be cancelled in consequences of any decision of the
competent Civil Court.
According to Section 127(3), where an order has been made in favour of women under Section
125, then the magistrate can cancel the order in the following case:
1. If a woman is remarried after divorce.
2. If a woman has taken allowance under any personal laws after divorce.
3. If a woman has voluntary leave her right to maintenance.
According to Section 127(4), the Civil Court shall take into account the sum which has been paid
to such person as monthly allowance for maintenance and interim maintenance under Section
125 at the time of making any decree for the recovery of any maintenance or dowry.
Enforcement of order of maintenance
Section 128 deals with “Enforcement of order of maintenance”. According to this Section, the
following are the conditions for enforcement of the order of maintenance:
• Copy of order under Section 125 is given to that person free of cost in whose favour it
is made. In case the order is in favour of children, then the copy of the order will be
given to the guardian of children.
• If any Magistrate has made an order under Section 125, then any Magistrate of India
can enforce this order where that person lives who have to give maintenance.
• The Magistrate has to satisfy two conditions before enforcement of order:
1. Identity of parties, and
2. Proof of non-payment of allowances.
(c) three years, if the offence is punishable with imprisonment for a term exceeding one year but
not exceeding three years.
469. Commencement of the period of limitation.—
(1) The period of limitation, in relation to an offender, shall commence,—
(a) on the date of the offence; or
(b) where the commission of the offence was not known to the person aggrieved by the offence
or to any police officer, the first day on which such offence comes to the knowledge of such
person or to any police officer, whichever is earlier; or
(c) where it is not known by whom the offence was committed, the first day on which the
identity of the offender is known to the person aggrieved by the offence or to the police officer
making investigation into the offence, whichever is earlier.
Discretion of the Court
473. Extension of period of limitation in certain cases-
any Court may take cognizance of an offence after the expiry of the period of limitation, if it is
satisfied on the facts and in the circumstances of the case that the delay has been properly
explained or that it is necessary so to do in the interests of justice.
It is the discretion of the Court to extend the period of limitation. This section does not mandate
the court to extend the period of limitation.