Operation SINDOOR: India’s Strategic Clarity and Calculated Force

Introduction:

On April 22, terror struck Pahalgam. Pakistan-backed attackers stormed a village, asked people their religion,
and killed them, resulting in 26 deaths. A clear attempt to incite communal violence, this marked a shift, from
cross-border attacks to dividing India from within. In response, India launched Operation SINDOOR to
destroy the terror bases behind the attack. But Pakistan hit back harder. Over the next week, it used drones and
shelling to target religious sites. The Shambhu Temple in Jammu, the Gurdwara in Poonch, and Christian
convents were attacked. These were not random strikes. They were part of a plan to break India’s unity.

During the first press briefing on May 7, India clarified its response as focused, measured and non-escalatory.
It was specifically mentioned that Pakistani military establishments had not been targeted. It was also reiterated
that any attack on military targets in India will invite a suitable response. Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri,
across multiple press briefings on May 8, 9, and 10, laid bare India’s plan of action and the full extent of
Pakistan’s designs.

Being in the digital age, warfare transcends traditional battlegrounds. Alongside military operations, a fierce
information war has been ongoing online. Following the commencement of Operation SINDOOR, India found
itself targeted by an aggressive campaign launched by Pakistan- full of lies and misinformation. The aim was
to distort the truth, mislead the global public and reclaim lost narrative ground through a storm of
misinformation. However, India has been proactively responding and dissipating misinformation with facts,
transparency, showcasing strong digital vigilance. Rather than reacting emotionally, a composed and
methodical approach to information warfare was undertaken:

• Highlighting operational success: Operation SINDOOR’s effectiveness was communicated with

precision, focusing on strategic outcomes rather than sensationalism.
• Discrediting sources: Indian authorities have exposed the manipulation tactics used by Pakistan-based
accounts, many of which are now under scrutiny by international social media platforms.
• Promoting media literacy: Campaigns to educate citizens on how to identify fake news have helped
create a more resilient digital environment.

Pakistan Punished Through Military and Non-Military Means

Operation SINDOOR was a significant demonstration of India’s military and strategic power, executed
through a combination of military and non-military means. This multi-dimensional operation effectively
neutralized terrorist threats, deterred Pakistani aggression, and firmly enforced India’s zero-tolerance policy
towards terrorism. The operation maintained strategic restraint while gaining international support.
Non-Military Measures undertaken:

• India’s non-kinetic efforts played a crucial role in shaping the strategic environment and ensuring
public and international support. Through strategic policymaking, information dominance, and
psychological operations, India diplomatically and economically isolated Pakistan while
strengthening domestic preparedness and global backing.

• A decisive move under Operation SINDOOR was India’s termination of the Indus Waters Treaty.
This had far-reaching consequences for Pakistan, a country heavily dependent on the Indus river system
for 80% of its 16 million hectares of agricultural land and 93% of its total water use. This system
supports 237 million people and contributes one-fourth of Pakistan’s GDP through crops like wheat,
rice, and cotton.

• With Mangla and Tarbela dams having only 10% live storage capacity (14.4 MAF), any disruption
in water flow could cause catastrophic agricultural losses, food shortages, water rationing in major
cities, and rolling blackouts. Industries such as textiles and fertilizers could become paralyzed. These
shocks would severely impact Pakistan’s already fragile economy, pushing it toward fiscal and foreign
exchange crises.

• For India, the Indus Waters Treaty had long hampered infrastructure development in Jammu &
Kashmir, restricting projects to run-of-the-river designs. Suspension of the treaty gave India full control
over western rivers like Jhelum and Chenab, enabling construction of new reservoirs in Jammu &
Kashmir, Ladakh, Punjab, and Haryana. This boosted irrigation and hydroelectric power generation
and transformed a diplomatic instrument into a developmental asset. By suspending the treaty, India
sent a decisive message- “Blood and water cannot flow together.”

• India closed the Attari-Wagah border and suspended all bilateral trade with Pakistan. It halted
exports of key goods like onions and banned imports of cement and textiles. This action severed the
primary land-based trade route between the two nations, causing major disruption in economic ties.

• This suspension imposed immediate economic pressure on Pakistan, which was already battling
inflation and debt crises. By cutting off these economic lifelines without escalating direct military
conflict, India reinforced its zero-tolerance stance.

• Demonstrating firm resolve against terrorism, India revoked visas of all Pakistanis residing in the
country and deported them immediately after the Pahalgam terrorist attack.

• A total ban was imposed on Pakistani artists, suspending all performances, screenings, music
releases, and cultural exchanges. This restriction extended to streaming platforms, effectively erasing
Pakistan’s cultural influence in India.
• On the global stage, India exposed Pakistan’s terror infrastructure and diplomatically isolated it.

• Collectively, these actions inflicted severe economic and diplomatic damage on Pakistan. They
deepened its international isolation while powerfully affirming India’s commitment to a zero-tolerance
policy against terrorism.

Demonstrating leadership at a global level:

In the wake of this situation, a moment of national crisis demanded not just resolve but remarkable
leadership. Rising to this challenge was Prime Minister Narendra Modi, whose decisive role in Operation
SINDOOR marked one of India’s boldest military responses in recent history. Despite being overseas on a
pre-scheduled diplomatic visit, PM Modi swiftly assumed command, orchestrating a response that
balanced strategic restraint with assertive action. He displayed remarkable restraint under immense
pressure to react quickly and ensured that every step, from suspending the Indus Waters Treaty to military
action, was well-planned and precisely timed.

• Strategic planning and targeted response underlined the operation’s framework. Rather than rushing
into an emotional or reactive strike, Prime Minister Modi created strategic unpredictability to prevent
Pakistan or its terror proxies from preparing for retaliation. The strikes were meticulously focused on
terror infrastructure, and this clarity of objective was appreciated across party lines, including by
opposition leader P. Chidambaram, who praised PM Modi for targeting only high-value terror
installations, avoiding civilian areas entirely.
• Throughout the developments with Pakistan, the focused objective against terrorism remained
unchanged. PM Modi stayed focused on delivering a firm and clear response. His consistent efforts
against terrorism, viewed as a global threat helped India garner widespread international support.
Under his leadership, India firmly established the principle that terrorism and its sponsors will be
treated alike.
• With a measured, yet powerful response, it was ensured that no harm was inflicted upon on Pakistani
civilians, despite repeated provocations from Pakistan. India’s military actions were limited to terror
camps and specific military facilities aiding terrorism. This careful targeting showed both India’s
capability and its commitment to responsible warfare.
• Addressing long-standing concerns, PM Modi’s decision to suspend the Indus Waters Treaty was a
historic move, not only harming Pakistan’s interests but also benefiting India. He established a new
national security doctrine: any future terror attack will be treated as an act of war. This eliminated the
false distinction between terrorists and their state sponsors.
What Operation SINDOOR Achieved

The results of Operation SINDOOR speak volumes about its impact:

1. Nine Terror Camps Eliminated: India successfully

destroyed nine major terror launchpads in Pakistan and Pakistan-
occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK), targeting Lashkar-e-Taiba,
Jaish-e-Mohammed, and Hizbul Mujahideen facilities.

2. Cross-Border Precision Strikes: India redefined the

rules of engagement, striking deep into Pakistan’s heartland,
including Punjab province and Bahawalpur, once considered out
of bounds even for U.S. drones. India made it clear: neither the
LoC nor Pakistani territory will remain untouched if terror
originates from there.

3. A New Strategic Red Line: Operation SINDOOR drew

a new red line- if terror is state policy, it will be met with a visible and forceful response. This marked
a shift from deterrence to direct action.

4. Equal Punishment for Terrorists and Their Sponsors: India rejected the artificial separation
between terrorists and their backers, striking both simultaneously. This ended the impunity enjoyed by
many Pakistan-based actors.

5. Exposure of Pakistan’s Air Defense Weaknesses: Indian Air Force bypassed and jammed Pakistan’s
Chinese-supplied air defense systems, completing the mission in just 23 minutes using Rafale jets,
SCALP missiles, and HAMMER bombs, demonstrating India’s technological edge.

6. India’s Air Defense Superiority Displayed: India’s multi-layered air defense, including the
indigenous Akashteer system, shot down hundreds of drones and missiles. This also showcased India’s
growing capabilities in exporting advanced defense systems.

7. Precision Without Escalation: India avoided civilian or non-terror military targets, showcasing its
zero-tolerance for terror while containing the situation from escalating into full-scale war.

8. Elimination of Key Terror Commanders: Multiple high-profile terrorists on India’s most wanted list
were neutralized in a single night, crippling key operational modules.

9. Airstrikes on Pakistani Military Installations: On May 9–10, India became the first country to strike
11 airbases of a nuclear-armed nation in a single operation, destroying 20% of Pakistan’s air force
 assets. High casualties were inflicted at Bhoolari Airbase, including the death of Squadron Leader
Usman Yusuf and destruction of key fighter jets.

10. Coordinated Tri-Service Action – The Indian Army, Navy, and Air Force worked in full coordination,
demonstrating India’s growing joint military prowess.

11. A Global Message Delivered – India showed the world that it does not require anyone’s permission
to defend its people. It reinforced the idea that terrorists and their masterminds can’t hide anywhere,
and if Pakistan retaliates, India is prepared for a decisive counterstrike.

12. Widespread Global Support – Unlike in previous conflicts, this time multiple global leaders backed
India, rather than calling for restraint. The shift showed India’s improved global standing and narrative
control.

13. Kashmir Narrative Reframed – For the first time, India’s actions were seen purely through the lens
of counter-terrorism, with the Kashmir issue completely decoupled from the strike narrative. This was
made possible by the precision and clarity of Operation SINDOOR.

Conclusion:

India’s response to the Pahalgam attack stood firmly on legal and moral grounds. History will remember it as
a principled and calibrated retaliation, shaped by leadership, ethics, and strategic precision. Operation
SINDOOR has reshaped both the geopolitical and strategic landscape of South Asia. It was not merely a
military campaign, but a multidimensional assertion of India’s sovereignty, resolve, and global standing. Under
Prime Minister Modi’s decisive leadership, India demonstrated a new paradigm, one that blends restraint with
strength, and precision with purpose. By targeting terror networks and their state sponsors with unprecedented
clarity, India sent an unambiguous message: terrorism will be met with a swift and proportionate response,
irrespective of borders or diplomatic complexities.