march2021-engineeringpractice
march2021-engineeringpractice
SPECIAL EDITION
DISTILLATION & CATALAYS
: : : ,$ &3(&2 0
2
In This Issue
Volume 7 | Number 25
04
Texas Blizzards & Hydrates….Friend or
Foe? DIGITAL EDITOR
Ronald J. Cormier
Shauna Tysor
Q&A: Distillation Roundtable
05 Panelist : Andrew W Sloley, Mike Reseta-
rits, Karl Kolmetz, Henry Kister, Christian
REFINING CONTRIBUTING AUTHOR
Dr. Marcio Wagner da Silva
Geipel
PROCESS ENGINEERING CONTRIBUTING
Catalysts | Heart of Hydroprocessing AUTHOR
25 Units
Rajesh Sivadasan
Jayanthi Vijay Sarathy
35
How to...Downcomers | Part 5
All About Downcomers and Weirs
Dr. -Ing. Volker Engel
45
Cold Eye Review of Project Progress or
Any Situation
Lalit Mohan Nainwal
59
Pneumatic Dilute Phase Solids
Conveying
Joe Bonem
69
Test Your Process Knowledge with
These 20 Questions
Norm Lieberman
73
Adding Value to Natural Gas | Gas to
Liquids and Petrochemicals Technolo-
gies
Dr. Marcio Wagner da Silva
3
Welcome to March.
It has been particularly cold this year in the USA, so we are looking forward to spring and warmer
weather. As we look forward to the future we hope that travel can return and we can again speak
at some colleges later this year. We try to inspire students to continue their education by utilizing
IACPE Practical Design Modules to learn to utilize the fundamentals they acquired in Universities.
The IACPE Title and Certificate is only a symbol of the practical knowledge that you may gain
from the modules that will assist you for the rest of your career.
In the Magazine this month we again have great articles from our great contributors. We also
have a special Question and Answer Distillation Roundtable.
We hope our readers felt at least a bit heartened necessarily removed with the injection of meth-
after scanning The View from Rock Bottom in anol into the piping. Methanol is hygroscopic
January’s edition of Engineering Practice Maga- and can keep hydrates from forming. As the
zine. We had entered the dark tunnel that is the possible culprit, whether or not appropriate ap-
COVID-19 pandemic, and were globally am- plication of alcohol was at play in Texas’ gas
bushed without any existing anecdote for the vi- system this time may play a rather insignificant
rus. Hence, 2020/21 registered tremendous soci- role vs. the phenomena of how hydrate for-
etal stresses, strains, and fatalities. Also, a nev- mation might actually HELP us in the future.
er-before experienced period of huge uncertain-
ly, occurring simultaneously on a global scale. The Energy Information Administration esti-
We remain hopeful that as vaccines are now mates that hydrates contain more carbon than
spreading through regional populations, and that each petroleum product accessible on Earth
some sense of returning normalcy is shining its combined. Also, that these ice-like structures
light at the end of this horrible tunnel. Critical could hold somewhere in the range from 10,000
characteristics of petrochemical-based packag- trillion to in excess of 100,000 trillion cubic feet
ing, durable goods, and medical supplies contin- of flammable gas. By comparison, EIA said in
ue to help make this possible and should also 2013 that there are a little more than 7,000 tril-
bode well for hydrocarbon industry’s health. lion cubic feet of actually recoverable shale gas
stores throughout the world.
While we were still pondering the miracle of vac-
cine science, February’s arctic deep freeze rolled This potential isn't lost on federal organizations.
into Texas. Ten days of sub-freezing weather, DOE has been directing an investigation into
decimated electricity, running water, and home methane hydrates on and off since the 1980s,
heating. The disaster caused misery and death and as of late, has re-increased its promise to
across the state, and much of the southern US. understanding the substance. Earlier this year
The expected finger-pointing and blame game the DOE declared that it intends to direct ap-
ensued including ERCOT, various generators, proximately $5 million into subsidizing research
environmentalists-vs. fossil fuelers, state leaders, ventures investigating the potential fuel source
and the public. and how it very well may be developed and
commercialized.
Plenty of unplanned events were blamed for the
blackout, but one that continued to confuse me "We realize that methane hydrates hold im-
was the significant percentage of generating ca- mense potential as a future energy asset," said
pacity knocked offline, not due to frozen turbines, Ray Boswell, the DOE program chief on me-
generators, transformers, or iced distribution thane hydrates for the division's National Ener-
lines, but more upstream in the equation—frozen gy Technology Lab, . "We've moved beyond the
fuel gas delivery. Whaaaaat???…can the natural subject of ‘does this substance truly exist and is
gas system freeze? it accessible’….now we're truly attempting to
sort out its amount…[sic] to where we can rea-
YES it can. Unrefined natural gas has a bad hab- sonably think of it as a portion of our future en-
it of freezing, forming hydrates in pipes at any ergy save, and we're running after that.”
temperature below 60 F. Hydrates are a real
concern to O&G companies, in and above When inquired as to whether methane hydrates
ground at high pressure natural gas wells. Ex- remain a part in the Biden administration’s ener-
panding gas lowers the temperature (the princi- gy thesis, Boswell answered: "Indeed, totally.”
ple behind how your refrigerator and AC func- Friend or foe?: going forward, keep and eye on
tions) and hydrates can form in piping at points hydrates commercialization. Sometimes em-
where pressure drops exist. Hydrates can form in bracing a problem provides immense opportuni-
any weather but cold weather is most common. ty!
They can also form in unexpected places in the
lines. Hydrates can be prevented but not
5
Distillation Roundtable
Panelist : Andrew W Sloley, Mike Resetarits, Karl Kolmetz, Henry Kister, Christian Geipel
design. Installation and commissioning also Mike: If an existing column has been simulat-
have their challenges and failures can lead to ed with a wrong efficiency, a redesign can still
tremendous costs, but I would not say that work out okay as long as the same, wrong
these problems are typically “design related”. efficiency is employed again. A better path,
2. DESCRIBE THE CHALLENGES IN SIMU- of course, is to correctly determine the true
LATION AND CHOOSING THE CORRECT efficiency of the existing trays/packings espe-
EFFICIENCY. cially via the use of the correct thermo (VLE)
model and the use of good operating data,
Andrew: I will stick to tray efficiency, though wherein the masses balance.
many of the same general observations apply
to packing. Efficiency estimates have different Karl: The challenge of simulation is to have
approaches when evaluating an existing tower your simulation model what happens in the
versus designing a new tower. field. Taking a simulation to the field and
choosing the correct tray efficiency takes mul-
Nearly every time one evaluates an existing
tower, the best approach is to adjust the num- tiple years of experience. There are complex
ber of theoretical stages in the model until the models for Refinery Vacuum Towers and oth-
results match the unit performance in the field. er systems that have unusual behavior in the
The theoretical stages divided by actual trays field. Ensure that your simulation models ac-
gives a tray efficiency that is then applicable to tual field behavior.
an entire section of the tower. Only very rarely
does using partial tray efficiencies in simula- There is a large data base in the industry of
tion software give useful results. While they estimated tray efficiencies. Many are based
allow for different efficiencies for multiple com- on SRK VLE data. Be conservative when
ponents, they tend not to reflect what engi- choosing tray efficiency even when using
neers mean by efficiency. Additionally, using SRK.
the partial tray efficiencies option often leads
to solution instability and high execution times, 3. DESCRIBE THE CHALLENGES IN
even with modern software and computers. HARDWARE DESIGN.
When designing a new tower, the best starting Andrew: The two most challenging aspects of
point is to find demonstrated section efficiency hardware design are (1) fluid flow under low
in similar equipment being used in a similar or pressure drop conditions and (2) vapor-liquid
identical service. If such information is not mixing and separation on trays.
available, the most useful efficiency correla-
tions are the O’Connell correlation, Little pressure drop is available inside towers
to drive fluid flow. Outside of external feed
pumping to the tower, only gravity head is
or the more recent Taylor-Duss variation, available for liquid flow. Also, the pressure
drop inside the tower created by the vapor
flow increases liquid hold-up. These issues
. apply to both tray towers and packed towers
but has different implications for the different
Note that these equations only look at two fac-
tower types. Understanding how and where
tors: viscosity and relative volatility. No tray
pressure drop is created and where static
design parameters are included.
head accumulates is critical to understanding
Hundreds of papers have been written and equipment hydraulics.
many researchers have worked on developing
Vapor-liquid mixing issues apply much more
fundamental relationships for equipment effi-
to trays than packing. Trays mix liquid and
ciency. The reason so much work has been
vapor and then separate them. Phase me-
done is that most correlations do not produce
chanics can range from froth to unclearly de-
useful results—that’s why people keep trying.
fined intermediates to spray, depending upon
There are certainly general trends in how tray
flow rates and physical properties. The hy-
design and system properties affect efficiency.
draulics of a given system can cause entrain-
But the specifics of individual situations are
ment (jet flood) and downcomer filling.
especially important. If you can find published
Knowledge and understanding of these fac-
data on the system you are looking at, you are
tors are critical to successful tray design.
in luck. Otherwise, stick to the simpler correla-
tions. They are just as accurate as the more Mike: Hardware design methodologies are
7
by hardware companies. As a result, their de- engineer has a great responsibility to make
signs often cannot be checked by the purchas- sure the installation is performed correctly.
ers or selectors of the hardware. Purchasers of He or she also has the last opportunity to
such hardware should insist that the purveyors catch errors. Inspect with more than just the
prove that similar designs in similar applica- eyes. Yes, make sure that equipment is me-
tions have performed well subsequent to start- chanically installed as designed. But also look
ups. at the equipment and ask, “Does this installa-
tion make sense?” If it does not, do not arbi-
Karl: The hardware designer assumes that you trarily change things, but get an explanation
have put the design safety margin in the simu- of why it is the way it is, and make sure that
lation, so they rarely will add any additional specialists have checked the situation.
design margin. I was consulting on a refinery
crude tower revamp at the startup. I reviewed Mike: Welding inside towers “always” needs
the hydraulic design – and the jet flood was to be followed by heat treating. Large-
designed at 30%. I would normally like the diameter towers require large, and heavy,
design to be above 50%. This low jet flood parts that need to be able to fit through man-
leads to low tray pressure drop, and lower tray holes.
efficiency.
Karl: One of the challenges of installation is
Christian: The challenge in hardware design is that the rings are installed by the tower ven-
to combine/optimize mass transfer equipment dor, and they may or may not match the trays
(packing/tray) with corresponding tower inter- and tower vapor / liquid draws. In one instal-
nals (distributors, collecting trays, and droplet lation we did not install the bottom tray, so we
separators) to ensure optimum performance of could match the liquid to the correct side of
the whole system. the reboiler baffle. It required some field
modifications to the trays.
The challenges are in detail:
Christian: Depending on the size, installations
Maximum capacity, especially for Revamps can be huge and complex projects that re-
turn down ratio/flexibility, quire detailed planning and project manage-
ment. Manpower, equipment, and hardware
consideration of fouling, foaming, etc. need to be at the right place at the right time,
where applicable boxes need to be clearly labelled, etc.
Sounds easy, but often creates problems.
Minimization of droplet entrainment at high
capacity At the same time there is a trend to reduce
costs by using low-wage contract workers,
A topic that is often underestimated is the indi- vessels manufactured in low-cost countries,
vidual mechanical design of the hardware, es- etc.
pecially in revamp cases. A knowledgeable
mechanical design engineer can minimize in- This result, for example, in much larger than
stallation time with tailor-made, innovative me- usual column tolerances. In the last few
chanical designs. The use of existing weld-in years, we have developed (or had to develop)
parts and support rings and adapting the hard- a variety of “adapters” and modification solu-
ware design to the individual scenario can tions to adjust hardware to accommodate un-
avoid or at least reduce cutting and welding in level support rings and large deviations from
the column. roundness tolerances.
One trend we currently see in hardware design It has also proven very successful to include
is that higher investment is accepted if the op- us, your hardware supplier, in vessel inspec-
erating cost of the plant can be reduced, e.g., tions at the column manufacturer’s workshop
by installing more trays and reducing reflux. before delivery on site. We are able to make
detailed documentation of the real dimen-
4. DESCRIBE THE CHALLENGES IN IN- sions. This helps to reduce errors and instal-
STALLATION. lation time on site.
Andrew: The biggest challenge in installation is 5. DESCRIBE THE CHALLENGES IN COM-
attention to detail. Installation is often done by MISSIONING.
contract workers who may have little experi-
ence in the field. The company involved is of- Andrew: Specific services may create unique
ten the lowest-cost bidder. The inspecting problems at startup, but the biggest single
8
issue in many services is bottoms level control. (I was the day shift engineer who complained
The problem tends to be worse in towers with about the performance of the night shift engi-
trays. Level spans on tower bottoms are typi- neer, who was not my friend. The unit man-
cally set by operational control ranges or by ager took me outside of the control room
inventory requirements for downstream pro- where I honestly thought that he was going to
cesses or equipment (such as pumps). Rarely, punch me or tell me to shut up or both. In-
if ever, does liquid inventory in the level range stead, he told me that he had been afraid that
take into account the liquid inventory on trays the night shift senior engineer was going to
or packing. As vapor rates rise, liquid inventory lead the start-up astray. He thanked me for
builds up on trays, reducing the liquid flow to my future patience. He hinted that the night
the tower bottoms. Control response is to ei- shift engineer was soon going to be “a gon-
ther reduce bottoms product rate or to allow er.”)
liquid level to drop. If vapor rate drops during
startup, trays lose liquid to the bottoms. This Karl: One of the commissioning challenges is
creates a sudden increase in bottoms rate or that pumps need to run at least 60 to 70%
bottoms level, similar to inverse response. percent of design and many feed pumps do
not have minimum flow loops. Therefore, the
If the bottoms liquid level span is too small, the feed to the tower goes from 0 to 60% quickly.
sudden liquid level changes can cause the When I design a feed loop I consider this and
control range to drop to zero or rise to over try to plan for this start up issue. Having a
100 in noticeably short periods. I have seen larger feed pipe and feed internals might be a
some towers with many trays in which the con- good idea.
trol range on the bottoms liquid inventory was
as low as 25% of the tray liquid inventory. 6. DISCUSS YOUR MOST DIFFICULT
TOWER TROUBLESHOOTING.
Low liquid level has the potential to damage
downstream equipment such as pumps or fired Mike:
heaters. High liquid level can cause the reboil- A. Alongside other engineers, I visited a cer-
er return to massively entrain liquid up the tow- tain liquid-liquid extractor 6 times over a 2-
er. The massive entrainment can knock trays year period. Its capacity was lower-than-
out or cause other damage. expected by 20%. Our team could not figure
out what was wrong? Eventually, we provid-
Startup is a busy time. Many control loops are ed a new extractor that had 20% more cross-
set to manual, and operators cannot monitor sectional area than the original extractor.
everything closely all the time. They tend to That new extractor worked well.
keep liquid levels high to protect downstream
equipment. When an upset happens, a sudden In a liquid-liquid extractor, there is a down-
additional increase in liquid level damages the ward liquid velocity and an upward liquid ve-
internals of the tower. In my experience across locity. In reviewing the pilot data, the correla-
all distillation towers, this is one of the most tions were based on hole velocities and not
common causes of equipment damage during cross sectional tower area velocity, therefore
startup. the scale up was not correctly predicted. We
corrected the correlations.
Mike: Technician/engineer shift changes often
bring different start-up philosophies and com- B. I climbed the outside of a tower on a cold
munications between the shifts are often too and snowy night to read some gauges at the
incomplete. top of the tower. All of the vertical ladders
were surrounded by cages. I wore all appro-
There was a unit start-up where a senior engi- priate safety gear. When I shined my flash-
neer on the night shift had his own philosophy light at one particular pressure gauge, a
regarding how the new unit should operate. “black thing” came flying and screeching at
His instructions to the operators differed very my head. I fell several feet until my groin im-
significantly from those that were given to the pacted one of the cage’s horizontal support
day shift operators. The unit operation went struts. I did not know that during the previ-
very astray. Two days were lost getting the ous 24 hours, a crow had decided to build a
start-up back on track. Because of his actions, nest behind the subject pressure gauge. To
the senior engineer was fired after the unit fi- this day, I “hate” crows.
nally reached equilibrium.
9
In 1988, I was leading a team troubleshooting Just then, one of the Tru-Tec experts spoke.
a chemical tower that was revamped to “Looks like we have brainstormed for a few
achieve a small increase in capacity (0%-4%) hours and got nowhere. Maybe we are doing
by increasing the trays hole areas from 8.5% it all wrong. So, let me suggest another way”.
to 13% of the active area. In addition, radiuses Then he continued “Not far from here there is
were added at the bottom of the downcomers an excellent Mexican Restaurant called Don
to smoothen exit of liquid and reduce down- Key. They have fabulous food, but what is
comer backup. Strangely, instead of gaining more important, is they have an excellent
capacity, it lost 5% capacity. beverage called Donkarita. It is similar to
Margarita, except that it kicks like a donkey.
Before 1992, the mechanism of vapor cross After one or two of these, we may get more
flow channeling (VCFC, Kister, H. Z., K. F. Lar- creative and come up with a winning idea”.
son, and P. E. Madsen “Vapor Cross Flow His motion was unanimously and enthusiasti-
Channeling on Sieve Trays: Fact or Myth?” cally accepted. Not only did we enjoy a deli-
Chem. Eng. Prog., November 1992) on sieve cious meal and donkaritas, but we left with a
and valve trays was not recognized by the in- plan that everyone was happy with – and laid
dustry. I inquired around, and everyone was the foundations to the quantitative scanning
telling me that the capacity reduction should that is used to troubleshoot channeling until
not have happened. There was one lead, as today (Kister, H. Z., “Use Quantitative Gam-
yet considered unlikely, that suggested that ma Scans to Troubleshoot Maldistribution on
VCFC could be taking place, a mechanism Trays”, Chem. Eng. Progr., February 2013).
well-known in bubble-cap trays. Good trouble-
shooting investigations follow all leads, likely
or unlikely. So, I did.
10
Figure 1. Vapor cross flow channeling modifications were made to tower auxiliaries
that permitted raising tower pressure. With
The winning idea was to scan three different VCFC inducing a premature entrainment
chords along the flow path length both under flood, raising tower pressure reinstated the
flooded and unflooded conditions, and to apply lost capacity. Prior to the modifications, rais-
quantitative analysis to derive froth heights, ing the pressure did not improve capacity be-
froth densities, and liquid heads. From the liq- cause the trays were bottlenecked simultane-
uid heads hydraulic gradients can be inferred. ously by downcomer backup (which was
The details are described in the above refer- debottlenecked by adding the downcomer
ence. The results are shown on Figure 2. In radiuses) and by entrainment flood.
Figure 2, all the tray dimensions are drawn to
scale. Tray liquid head values derived from The takeaway, when dealing with a challeng-
quantitative analysis of gamma scans are plot- ing problem, a change of environment from a
ted so that a liquid head of half the tray spac- four-wall meeting room to a more pleasant
ing is plotted as a point on the tray above. Ze- surrounding may help usher in a creative so-
ro liquid head is plotted as a point on the tray lution.
floor.
Christian: In the beginning, it is often very dif-
In the unflooded scans (Figure 2a), hydraulic ficult to get a complete picture of the situa-
liquid gradients are flat or slight, sloping from tion, especially if you are not on site. If this is
tray inlet to outlet. Upon flood initiation (Figure not possible, a detailed discussion with engi-
2b), the hydraulic liquid gradients on the odd neers and operators is often very helpful to
trays become very steep, especially between get more insight. Photos can also be invalua-
the middle and outlet. The even trays (trays 2, ble.
4, and 6), show large uniform hydraulic gradi-
ents stretching from inlet to outlet at flood initi- Expect the unexpected. I have seen lost
ation. shoes and helmets inside columns, but also
undetected problems with measurements can
This intensification of the hydraulic gradients be challenging.
strongly supported VCFC as the root cause of
the observed premature flood. From an unlike-
ly hypothesis, VCFC became the leading theo-
ry. Based on this diagnosis, minor
11
A B
Figure 2. Clear liquid heights derived from in the late 1800s and early 1900s were built
three gamma scan chords along the flow path without reflux. They depended upon heat loss
length plotted on a to-scale column sketch. to provide the internal liquid in the tower. For
Tray liquid head values derived from quantita- an example, look at the Roger’s still in his
tive analysis of gamma scans are plotted so 1871 patent. The top section of the tower
that a liquid head of half the tray spacing is gets all its reflux from heat loss.)
plotted as a point on the tray above. Zero liq-
uid head is plotted as a point on the tray floor. The unit requiring troubleshooting was built in
Hydraulic gradients can be inferred from the the 1950s and converted to its current use in
diagram (a) Unflooded (b) Flooded. the 1980s. While it was older, it was not that
old. It should have had reflux.
7. DISCUSS YOUR MOST UNUSUAL TOW-
ER TROUBLESHOOTING FINDING? Adding a reflux line, modifying the internals in
the top of the tower to handle that reflux, and
Andrew: On one troubleshooting assignment, I adding flow control led to substantially im-
received P&IDs the day before the plant visit. proved separation, to the amazement (and
The service was a specialty product made in satisfaction) of the plant.
an exceptionally large batch distillation column
that operated at deep vacuum (<1 mmHg, Mike: In one troubleshoot in Asia, new hard-
<0.133 kPa). After some time looking at the ware was being employed in a tower to in-
P&IDs I was completely stunned. They were crease the tower’s capacity. Shortly after
so odd I took them to a colleague to verify I start-up, the Asian company complained that
was reading them correctly. The next day in the tower was not working. After flying imme-
the field I confirmed the P&IDs were accurate. diately to Asia and when I arrived at the plant,
The column had no reflux. In fact, the reflux I determined that the customer had never
line did not exist at all. even tried to increase the feed rate to the
new feed rate. With me present, they raised
(Years later I learned that some industrial units the feed rate and the tower performed well.
12
Karl: There are many great stories in the in- flowed over the cooling tower, the pump was
dustry of unusual tower troubleshooting. pumping with a discharge pressure close to
design. As the process side was not commis-
A. A new small packed column would not sioned yet, no heat was exchanged.
meet specifications. The tower was shut down
and an inspector was brought in to inspect the While taking a walk to closely watch the sys-
column. The small amount to random packing tem, I noticed the cooling water flowmeter
was delivered in kitchen sized garbage bags. (Figure 3, the flowmeter was in a horizontal
The installation team had carefully installed section of pipe, with ample pipe diameters
each garbage bag of packing inside the col- before and after to give a reliable reading)
umn. The inspector instructed the team to reading zero. The dial was actually hitting the
take out the garbage bags and just install the stop pin below the zero mark. I called the
packing in the column. The column then met plant instrument foreman, who checked the
specifications. transmitter.
B. A Low Pressure DeMethanizer was up- “This worthless transmitter is kaput.” He said
graded with a larger new stainless steel reboil- (using another word for “kaput”). All that Engi-
er. When welding stainless steel there is an neering have been giving us in this plant is
argon gas blanket requirement. The welders junk (again, using another word for “junk”).
will install plugs to reduce the amount of argon Why don’t you tell Engineering to provide us
gas required. Welding was completed and unit with instruments that work?”
commissioned but reboiler would not function
properly. This statement was true. Many of the instru-
ments that were supplied were inoperative. I
Tower was shut down and inspected. Welders passed the message to Alan, the Engineering
did not remove the plugs as required. Plugs instrument engineer.
were removed, tower recommissioned and
then functioned properly. “Again? Our apologies. Let me look into it”
condenser outlet. “I will shut the valve and I instructed removing the dirt that covered the
open the 1” vent valve (Figure 3). What you underground pipes. Sure enough, there was
will see is a water jet shooting up 30 ft in the an incorrect pipe connection underground
air, which will disprove your nonsense idea”. (Figure 4) that was overlooked by the con-
struction inspectors. As a result, the cooling
“Good deal” he said. water flowed backwards through the conden-
sers and the meter. Being underground, no
I shut the butterfly then opened the vent. A wa-
one suspected. Fortunately, this was identi-
ter jet shot up 30 feet in the air, just like I ex-
fied before hydrocarbons were introduced. It
pected. As I was getting ready to shut the
was the one flow meter and a top notch in-
valve the jet plunged, and plunged, until it
strument engineer that made all the differ-
stopped. I shook my head in disbelief.
ence.
“This is why the needle was hitting the stop
The takeaway, never disbelieve an instru-
pin. It was reading negative and tried to tell us
ment. It may be trying to tell you something.
something”, he said.
You do not need to trust it but listen to it. Al-
I reopened the butterfly, the repeated the test. ways thoroughly check out suspicious read-
Just in case I was dreaming. The same hap- ings.
pened again. It was not a dream.
Figure 4. Cooling water system in propylene the vendor will try to propose their highest
purification unit as installed. profit margin packing, when it is not the best
option for the application.
8. WE HAVE 1ST GENERATION, 2ND GEN-
ERATION AND NOW 3RD GENERATION 1st Generation
RANDOM PACKING. WHAT ARE THE
STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESS OF EACH? Typically, thicker metal of construction lead-
ing to higher crush strength and corrosion
Andrew: Cost drives the selection between resistance. For quench tower that are heat
these packing types. All work well; design and transfer limited, 1st Generation Cascade Mini
operating characteristics of all types are well Rings may be the best choice.
understood. As a general rule, the later the
generation, the higher the capacity or efficien- Later Generations
cy for the same column cross section. There
They typically will be thinner metal of con-
are subtle differences that apply to specific
struction leading to lower crush strength and
cases, but these must be examined on an indi-
corrosion resistance. They will have lower
vidual basis.
pressure drops, but higher capacities and effi-
For an existing column, buy the cheapest that ciencies.
meets your combination of required stages and
Christian: 1st and 2nd Generation Packing
capacity. For a new column, 3rd generation
are more or less industrial standards:
types typically reduce column diameter and
total capital, making them the preferred option - easy to replace,
despite the premium price. However, the de-
sign team should always check. In some situa- - variety of suppliers,
tions that premium price can make the overall
plant more expensive and sway the decision - well-known (implemented in several soft-
towards 1st generation packing. ware packages),
Karl: Like most things in life, there is no one - larger wall thickness (corrosion resistance).
size fits all. Distillation is similar. There is the Disadvantages are normally high pressure
best choice for each application. Many times, drop and low capacity.
15
3rd or 4th Generation Packing are optimized reached in the performance test run. Even in
for well understood systems performance test
runs can fail.
- low pressure drop,
In polar and foaming systems, the design of
- high capacity and the actual capacity can be challenging.
There have been many failures in foaming
- sufficient mass transfer (compared to 1st or
systems reaching design capacities.
2nd generation type packing with same sur-
face area) by open structures and thin coil ma- 10. WHAT ARE THE ADVANTAGES AND
terials, resulting in wide operation limits. Dis- DISADVANTAGES TO DIVIDED WALL
advantages are thin material, which is more COLUMNS?
sensitive to corrosion, and higher investments
costs due to difficulty in getting “equivalent” Andrew: The potential advantages of a divid-
products. Typically, these packing types also ed-wall column are lower capital and operat-
provide less holdup. In some rare cases this ing costs. The major disadvantage is that the
might be a problem, such as when the process column is more complex, and both design
asks for higher liquid residence times. and control are more challenging. The entire
possible range of feed and product composi-
9. WHAT ARE SOME OF THE MORE DIFFI- tions must be well understood. The equip-
CULT APPLICATIONS TO DESIGN? ment for controlling the liquid-vapor splits
must be designed to accommodate the spec-
Andrew: Applications that include a mix of
trum of composition and rate ranges. Alterna-
challenging process conditions and device hy-
tively, a design margin can be incorporated to
draulics can be difficult to design. Small errors
deal with feed and product variations. Howev-
in estimates of vapor-liquid equilibrium can
er, allowing for extra reflux or extra boil up will
have large consequences for design or perfor-
reduce the capital and energy savings that
mance of super fractionators (100+ stages re-
made the option attractive in the first place.
quired) or systems requiring extremely high
purities. Reactive distillation can be particularly One other minor disadvantage should be
challenging. Reaction pathways and kinetics mentioned. In a divided-wall column, the total
interact with composition profiles, making it reboiler duty will drop, but the duty at the
difficult to predict holdups that will provide an highest temperature level may go up. This is
effective space velocity. Making changes to because 100% of the reboiler duty is now at
systems with extreme changes in vapor and the equilibrium temperature of the heaviest
liquid rates can be challenging, since different product instead of being split across multiple
equipment designs must be placed in placed in products. In some heat integrated systems
different parts of the column. You need to be this may negate much of the potential energy
able to predict these locations correctly. One savings.
more: when working with exceptionally large
diameter towers, one needs to pay particular Christian: Typical advantages are better ener-
attention to both fluid flow and distribution as gy efficiency and lower investment because
well as the equipment’s structural details. multiple separations are done in one column.
The disadvantages are that control and de-
Mike: The correct efficiencies associated with sign are more complex. As a consequence,
alcohol separations are difficult to ascertain troubleshooting may become more complicat-
and to utilize. Refinery columns often require ed, just because more parameters are in-
numerous transitions, feeds, draws, and side volved.
strippers requiring attention to detail.
11. WHAT ARE SOME OF DISTILLATION
Karl: In a new column one can put in adequate PROCESS CONTROL ISSUES?
safety margins. In revamps, often the safety
margins are challenged. In one C3 Splitter Andrew: The biggest issue in distillation con-
revamp, which is very well understood VLE, trol is interaction between control loops and
the vendor was very aggressive in guarantee- loop delay time. The simplest loops, over-
ing a capacity and the capacity was not head liquid level control and bottoms liquid
16
level control are typically, but not always, Most control system assembly issues case
straightforward. Beyond that, composition con- histories come from chemicals and olefins/
trols can be overly complex and create the gas towers, where splits are usually much
largest interactions. Controlling composition tighter than between petroleum cuts in refin-
really means controlling the entire composition ery towers. Over half of the reported control
profile throughout the column. However, the system assembly issues stem from violation
composition controls get feedback from only of three basic principles. First, violation of the
one point on a column. As a result, all SISO material balance control principle. Special
(single-input, single-output) control configura- difficulties have been encountered when
tions suffer from loop interaction and lag. It is adopting the material balance control to tow-
possible to set up controls to meet composition ers with side draws. The good practices for
specifications on all product streams. This is this situation were described by Luyben’s
known as two-point control, or two-product classic article ("10 Schemes to Control Distil-
control, and is such a difficult control problem lation Columns with Sidestream Draw offs",
that extremely few industrial units even at- ISA J., 13 (7), p. 37, 1966.). The second is
tempt it. violation of what is known as “Richardson’s
rule” which states “It is not a good idea to
Advanced control logic can reduce control in- control a level on a small stream.” The third is
teraction and delay, but rarely eliminates it. attempting to simultaneously control two com-
Selecting a good basic control configuration positions in a two-product column without de-
greatly eases the task of an advanced control- coupling the interference between them.
ler. At the other extreme, selecting a poor
basic configuration will make the task of an Some case histories address the drawbacks
advanced controller nearly impossible. of some of the common material balance con-
trol schemes. Examples include the slow dy-
Henry: Copyright © by Henry Z. Kister, reprint- namic response of a scheme that controls
ed by permission. tray temperature by manipulating reflux in
large tray towers, or the inverse response ex-
Experience is the best teacher and learning perienced with the scheme that controls the
from the past is the best way for solving to- bottom level by manipulating the reboiler
day’s problems and avoiding tomorrow’s. To steam.
this end, we conducted a survey of the case
studies of malfunctioning towers (Kister, H. Z. Two approaches have been successful in im-
"What Caused Tower Malfunctions in the Last proving control system assembly: the tradi-
50 Years", Trans. IChemE Vol. 81, Part A, p.5, tional approach diagnoses deficiencies and
January 2003). eliminates them by judicious changes to the
control system. The alternative, more modern
This survey was updated in Kister’s book way is to replace the conventional control
“Distillation Troubleshooting”, (John Wiley & scheme by advanced controls, using models
Sons, 2006) and recently the control issue in and statistical process controls.
Kister’s IChemE-sponsored on-line course
“Troubleshooting Distillation Controls” https:// Most of the temperature/composition control
www.kisterdistillationseminars.com or https:// malfunctions come from chemicals and ole-
www.icheme.org/career/training/online. Below fins/gas towers, where splits are usually
is an overview of the prime distillation control much tighter than between petroleum cuts in
issues based on this survey. refinery towers. The major composition con-
trol issue has been correctly identifying the
Our survey put control issues in the 3rd spot on best temperature control tray. Application of
the distillation malfunction list, to be surpassed the excellent method by Tolliver and McCune
only by fouling/plugging and problems in the ("Finding the Optimum Temperature Control
column bottom sump. The prime control issues Trays for Distillation Columns", InTech 27(9),
can be categorized into three classes: control p.75, 1980) has effectively dealt with this is-
system assembly issues, temperature and sue. Still, there are some situations where
composition control issues, and condenser, finding a satisfactory temperature control can
pressure, and reboiler control issues. be elusive. Other key issues have been
achieving successful analyzer control and
A related category is misleading instruments. obtaining adequate pressure compensation
A control system is only as good as its instru- for temperature control. With analyzers, the
mentation. This category is discussed at length main problems have been measurement lags
in “Distillation Troubleshooting” and excluded and on-line time. Modern analyzer controls
here due to space limitations. are often associated with advanced controls
17
and have grown in significance in recent years. common when the control valve is in the con-
densate lines out of the reboiler. Such control
Two approaches have been successful in im- problems often lead to column capacity limita-
proving temperature and composition controls. tion, hammering, fouling, and corrosion. The
The traditional approach uses solutions such variety of solutions, well-illustrated in
as defining the best temperature control tray “Distillation Troubleshooting”, is a tribute to
and cascading analyzers onto temperature the ingenuity and resourcefulness of engi-
controls. A more modern way is to use virtual neers, supervisors, and operators.
analyzers, based on model calculations from
tower measurements, and using statistical pro- Advanced controls have their own problems.
cess controls. Useful tricks, such as pressure One issue is updating multivariable controls
correction to the temperature, or using an av- (MVC), which can be troublesome when the
erage temperature, have been incorporated process train changes, especially if the MVC
with both approaches. simultaneously optimizes an entire unit rather
than individual towers. Another issue is the
More pressure, condenser and reboiler control response to bad measurements. So far, the
case histories come from refinery than from
number of reported case histories of trouble-
chemical towers. One reason for this is refin-
ers' extensive use of hot vapor bypasses. some advanced controls has been low.
About one third of the reported pressure and 12. WHY ARE SOME CONDENSERS
condenser control case histories are associat- PLACED AT GROUND LEVEL, AND DO
ed with hot vapor bypasses, practically all in YOU RECOMMEND THIS DESIGN?
refineries. There is little doubt that this is po-
tentially the most troublesome pressure control Andrew: Consistent with good equipment de-
method, mostly due to poor configuration of sign and minimizing overall plant cost, there
hot vapor bypass piping, evolving from poor is no problem with having condensers at
understanding of its principles. These princi- ground level. The biggest reason for putting
ples have been detailed in recent papers by
them there is to reduce their capital and
Kister and Hanson (“Control Column Pressure
maintenance costs. Less structure is required
via Hot Vapor Bypass”, Chemical Engineering
Progress, February, p. 35, 2015) and Kister when the condenser is placed close to the
(“Flooded Condensers Controls: Principles and ground. Access for maintenance is easier.
Troubleshooting”, Chemical Engineering, Jan- There is one operational consequence to
uary, p.37, 2016). When configured correctly,
consider. Putting the condenser close to the
our experience is that hot vapor bypasses are
seldom troublesome. ground normally necessitates a vertical rise to
the overhead reflux drum. The drum is in-
Another troublesome pressure/condenser con- stalled at a higher elevation to make the in-
trol is by cooling water throttling. It has induced stallation of pumps cheaper and easier.
low cooling water velocities and high outlet Therefore, the condenser operates at a high-
temperatures, leading to fouling, corrosion, er pressure than the drum because of the
and instability, even boiling of cooling water. static head between them.
This is more of a problem in chemical towers,
when venting an inerts stream from the reflux For most applications with total condensers,
drum requires a temperature control at the the liquid will be sufficiently subcooled to pre-
drum to avoid product loss or product contami- vent vaporization in the line to the reflux
nation. A third issue is low points that accumu- drum. Partial condensers, on the other hand,
late condensate in the pressure-controlled va- may have problems with unstable two-phase
por product lines with the condensate back- flow regimes in the outlet line to the drum.
pressuring the column.
Having a condenser at ground level is not a
Reboiler and preheater controls have been good choice when the higher pressure creat-
troublesome in both refinery, chemical, and ed by the static head increases upstream
olefins/gas towers. Temperature control prob- costs. One such application is a fluid catalytic
lems with preheaters are common, often due cracker (FCC) main fractionator overhead
to disturbances in the heating medium or due system. The extra liquid height can create
to vaporization in the feed lines. Almost all the significant cost or capacity problems for the
reboiler case histories reported involved a la- upstream FCC air blower. On larger, modern
tent-heat heating medium. Hydraulic problems units the air blower is an axial compressor.
such as “stall” are common when the control These compressors have limited head capa-
valve is in the steam/vapor line to the reboiler, bility and small changes in the downstream
while loss of reboiler condensate seal is pressure profile caused by the static head
18
between the exchanger and the reflux drum Correct piping is mandatory. Liquid leaving
could have large consequences. the condenser is subcooled, and dew point
vapor will collapse onto it causing instability
Henry: Copyright © by Henry Z. Kister, reprint- and hammering. Figure 5a shows a configu-
ed by permission. ration that I have seen more than two dozen
Money and environment. The hot vapor by- times, none of which worked. The bypass va-
pass scheme permits mounting water-cooled por must enter the vapor space of the reflux
total condensers at ground level instead of on drum (Figure 5b) with no previous contact
a platform above the reflux drum. Locating with the subcooled liquid. The bypass must
large cooling water condensers at ground level be free of pockets where liquid can accumu-
eliminates the need for massive condenser late; any horizontal runs should drain into the
support structure and for piping cooling water reflux drum. Most important, liquid from the
to high elevations and provides easy access condenser, as well as any other subcooled
for maintenance. Keep in mind that for a 7- liquid streams like the reflux pump minimum
meters long elevated condenser, a 20-meters flow recycle, must enter the reflux drum near
long platform is needed because the tubes the bottom of the drum (Figure 5b).
need to be pulled out at the turnaround. With Operation is likely to be troublesome if the
the hot vapor bypass scheme and ground-level drum liquid surface is agitated. Agitation may
condensers the piping is simple, the control be due to high-velocity impingement of the
valve is small, the response is fast, and there hot vapor jet on the liquid surface, due to up-
are no concerns about drawing vacuum in the ward-directed subcooled liquid jet reaching
cooling water return pipes at the high eleva- the liquid surface, as well as other causes.
tions. These advantages can translate into Agitation of the liquid surface can be avoided
handsome savings in steelwork, platforms, by judicious baffling (Figure 5b).
trolleys, and maintenance. These savings can
be major in large installations, especially Because of the liquid leg between the con-
where a battery of condensers rather than a denser and the drum, sudden reduction in
single exchanger is used. Further, with the in- drum pressure can rapidly suck the liquid
creasing environmental awareness, the elimi- right out of the condenser, causing a major
nation of the massive platforms, steelwork, upset. There is also the possibility of U-tube
and piping reduces the carbon footprints of the oscillations. Both issues can be mitigated by
plant. adding a throttling valve in the liquid leg be-
tween the condenser and the drum (Figure
As stated in my reply to 11 above, about one 5b).
third of the reported pressure and condenser
control case histories are associated with in- This technique can suffer from interaction be-
correctly configured ground-level condensers tween the drum and the condenser liquid lev-
controlled by hot vapor bypasses, evolving els. To minimize the interaction, the pressure
from poor understanding of its principles. controller should be tuned much tighter than
These principles have been detailed in recent the drum level controller. This can be an is-
papers by Kister and Hanson (“Control Column sue if the reflux drum is small, and the level
Pressure via Hot Vapor Bypass”, Chemical controller needs to be tuned fast to avoid
Engineering Progress, February, p. 35, 2015) overflow or loss of level. This scenario is un-
and Kister (“Flooded Condensers Controls: common; we have encountered this situation
Principles and Troubleshooting”, Chemical En- only once, but another case was reported in
gineering, January, p.37, 2016). When config- the literature.
ured correctly, our experience is that hot vapor
bypasses are seldom troublesome. Figure 5 Because of the liquid leg between the con-
shows samples of incorrectly and correctly- denser and the drum, non-condensables ac-
configured arrangements. Some key consider- cumulate in the condenser and need venting
ations are: from their accumulation points. If a vent line is
absent, instability and capacity bottlenecks
This method is only suitable for total conden- are likely to result.
sers, i.e., no vapor product. It should not be
used for partial condensers, as it depends on Leakage of vapor through the bypass valve at
subcooling. the closed position can substantially reduce
condenser capacity. Under sizing of the by
19
pass control valve may lead to inability to keep In summary, this method has major cost and
the tower pressure up in cold winter days environmental advantages in large water-
when the drum is not insulated. In some cas- cooled total condensers, and we would highly
es, the reflux drum vapor space may need to recommend it in the correct applications. To
be insulated to minimize interference from rain make it work it is imperative to understand its
and snowstorms. principles and configure it properly. When
configured correctly, our experience is that
We have seen cases when the hot vapor by- ground level condensers with hot vapor by-
pass control valve is manipulated by the drum pass controls are seldom troublesome.
pressure instead of the tower pressure. We do
not recommend this. Dynamically, this control 13. WHAT ARE THE ADVANTAGES AND
is inferior because the vapor volume in the DISADVANTAGES OF MULTIPLE DOWN-
drum is much smaller than in the tower and COMER TYPE TRAYS?
more variable in response to ambient changes.
Andrew: I will only address generic trays with
There are other less common issues described multiple downcomers here, not specialized
in the cited articles above. designs used in proprietary tray configura-
tions.
A
Trays with multiple flow paths add extra
downcomers to extend the weir length and
reduce liquid load per length of weir. This re-
duces tray pressure drop and is the most im-
portant reason for using them—their ability to
handle high liquid loads. The reduced pres-
sure drop also increases their vapor handling
capacity.
The main disadvantage of multiple-pass trays
is that they increase the minimum liquid rate
as well. Blowing, which reduces efficiency,
can occur at low liquid rates. As weir length
increases, so does the liquid rate at which
blowing starts. Multiple-pass trays generally
have less capacity range than single-pass
B trays.
Two-pass trays are relatively straightforward
to understand and design. Trays with three
passes or more include non-symmetrical sec-
tions, requiring a more detailed understand-
ing of hydraulics to get constant vapor-to-
liquid ratios in all sections. Design and analy-
sis of trays with three or more passes should
be left to specialists.
Multiple-pass trays are also used to reduce
the flow path length across the tray. However,
if the only purpose is to reduce flow path
length, a stepped tray with an intermediate
weir is often more effective.
Figure 5. Hot vapor bypass controls with Mike: Multiple downcomer type trays have
ground-level condensers (a) Incorrect arrange- been employed very successfully for over 50
ment, hot bypass vapor collapsing onto sub- years in many applications and at exception-
cooled liquid, leads to instability, poor control, ally large diameters. Efficiencies are some-
hammering (b) Correct arrangement, vapor times slightly less than with crossflow trays.
going to vapor, liquid to liquid, no contact be- Multiple downcomer trays employ significantly
tween hot vapor and subcooled liquid. more metal and therefore cost more. Their
capacities, however, are often 20% higher
20
Karl: The challenge of these types of trays is trays can be placed at tighter spacing and
estimating the correct efficiencies. They can still give substantial capacity gains. Alter-
be at least 10% less efficient due to the low natively, the tray spacing can be opti-
path flow length. But they can be installed on mized to give more capacity, more stag-
lower tray spacing and end up with higher es, or both.
overall tower efficiency, with the advantage of
higher capacity. Rarely do you get higher ca- 2. The small holes make such trays prone to
pacity and efficiency. plugging. Such trays are not a good appli-
cation for fouling services.
Henry: Copyright © by Henry Z. Kister, reprint-
ed by permission. 3. There are some troubleshooting issues
with multiple downcomer trays, mostly at
These are excellent high-capacity trays for the lower pressures (< 10 barg). Since the
correct applications. Their capacity enhance- downcomers have no static seals, they
ment is a result of three factors: are prone to vapor to breaking in
(“blowby”). In addition, with the large num-
1. The addition of downcomers increases ber of downcomers, metering the correct
weir lengths, thus lowering the weir loads amount of liquid to the various panels be-
(the weir load is the quantity of liquid flow- comes an issue, and can lead to maldistri-
ing per unit weir length). This shifts the op- bution and dry regions. Dry regions often
erating point to the left on Figure 6. Towers lead to or aggravate blowby issues. Good
that have high weir loads with conventional initial liquid distribution is critical, and we
trays (especially > 80 m3/h/m of outlet have seen problems with feed and reflux
weir) can significantly gain capacity by the entry. These troubleshooting issues can
additional weir length. The designs usually cause large reductions in tray efficiency,
aim at bringing the towers to the maximum forcing operator to use excess reflux and
region (20-30 m3/h/m of outlet weir). Tow- reboil, and often run into a capacity limit.
ers that operate at low weir loads (< 50 These issues are discussed with tips on
m3/h/m of outlet weir) have little to gain how they can be diagnosed using gamma
from this type of trays. scans in Kister’s article (“Gamma Scan
2. These trays use truncated downcomers, Quantitative Analysis Can Diagnose and
terminating just over about halfway through Mitigate Channeling in High-Capacity
the tray spacing. Liquid issues from holes Trays with Truncated Downcomers”,
or slots at the bottom of these downcom- Chem. Eng. Progr., April, p. 45, 2013).
ers. This allows perforating what normally 4. Due to the ease of losing the downcomer
would be the dead seal areas under the seal, the turndown of multiple downcomer
downcomers and gains active area. trays is relatively low, typically about 1.5,
3. These trays usually use small perforations, compared to 2 for sieve trays, 2.5 for fixed
typically 5 mm, and seldom more than 7. valves, and 4-5 for moving valve trays.
Smaller holes gain capacity, with 5 mm 5. Multiple downcomer trays are very difficult
holes typically giving 7% higher capacity to inspect at the turnaround. This again
compared to 13 mm holes at weir loads of emphasizes the need to avoid them in
20-30 m3/h/m of outlet weir. fouling services. When metallurgists need
4. The capacity can be further enhanced by to inspect the tower wall for corrosion at
incorporating slots that impart a forward turnarounds, this can be prohibitive.
push to the liquid, together with anti-jump 6. They are expensive, especially when
baffles that catch this liquid and divert it there is a need to change tray spacing,
into the downcomers. which may require special techniques to
The disadvantages of these trays are: avoid or minimize welding to the tower
shell. For a new tower, the expense can
1. The additional downcomers reduce the be offset by reducing column height or
flow path length, which lowers tray efficien- diameter.
cy. The efficiency of this type of tray is typi-
cally of the order of 10% less than conven- 7. Multiple downcomer type trays are far
tional trays. This would normally mean a more sensitive to out-of-levelness than
stage loss; however, the capacity gains are conventional trays. Many towers have ex-
so high, that the multi downcomer type perienced severe efficiency loss because
21
the trays were not installed level to the tight tray was blocking liquid flow appreciably.
vendor specs. Sticking to these specs can be Once the tower was idled and entered, the
challenging in tall towers, especially during engineers found that a tower revamp crew
windy conditions when the tower sways, and had left a vacuum cleaner (yes, a vacuum
waiting for the wind to drop may prolong the cleaner) in one of the tray’s downcomers.
turnaround.
Karl: The tower should be scanned it the tow-
er is have challenges. If a tower is having
challenges the simple checks should be per-
formed first. Confirm the levels, take a tem-
perature profile, and pressure profile. These
simple checks will then lead to an answer of
when a tower should be scanned.
Henry: Copyright © by Henry Z. Kister, re-
printed by permission.
Commercial gamma scanning has been suc-
cessfully applied to troubleshoot tens of thou-
sands of towers for over five decades. Scan
data have traditionally been interpreted by
visual examination of the scans to detect
Figure 6. A typical tray capacity diagram, va- changes or trends in entrainment, froth (or
por (V) versus liquid (L), with the liquid load spray) heights, and liquid holdup.
expressed as weir loads (liquid flow rate, m3/h, Most gamma scan applications are qualita-
divided by outlet weir length, m). The upper tive, even many of those that may claim to be
curve is a typical jet flood curve, slightly steep- quantitative. Qualitative gamma scans can
er than in reality to illustrate the principle. The readily detect gross abnormalities such as
diagram shows a maximum vapor-handling flooding, missing trays, collapsed trays, ex-
capacity at a weir load of 2-3 gpm/in (20-30 cessive liquid level in the bottom sump, or
m3/h /m of weir length) . heavy foaming. This technique can also help
Christian diagnose a flood mechanism and shed light
on more subtle abnormalities such as high or
First of all, we have to distinguish between low tray loadings, excessive entrainment, ex-
multi-pass or multi downcomer trays. Both de- cessive weeping, blockage, and multipass
signs have their application in columns with liquid maldistribution. Gamma scans per-
high liquid loads. Multi pass type trays, like 2 , formed on a routine basis can also be used to
4 or 6 pass trays, deliver a stable efficiency, monitor deterioration in column performance
when properly designed. Some have a report- due to fouling, corrosion, and other factors.
edly lower efficiency due to reduced flow path
length and different liquid guiding on the tray In packed towers, a “grid” of four equal
panels. Furthermore, all of them come with a chords is often shot (Figure 7), one chord af-
dynamically sealed downcomer, which limits ter the other. For each chord, the source and
the operating range of the tray. If not properly detector are moved simultaneously down the
designed, this tray type shows a high risk of bed, taking shots every 2 to 4 inches. This
gas by passing. Additionally, some of them do “grid” gamma scan looks for maldistribution
not have a manway, which excludes the possi- and channeling, which is by far the main
bility of inspection during turnarounds or for cause of packed tower efficiency loss. When
trouble shooting. liquid distribution is good the four chords give
the same detector readings. Differences be-
14. WHEN SHOULD TOWER SCANNING BE tween the chords are interpreted as bed mal-
UTILIZED? distribution.
Mike: The best reason to scan is when liquid Judicious setting of the chords can also pro-
cannot get down the tower. Several years ago, vide a measurement of liquid height and
a paper was given at a Chicago Engineering frothiness in collectors, parting boxes, and
Conference describing a trayed tower that was distributors, and identify trough or pan over-
having capacity problems. Gamma scanning flows or level unevenness causing liquid
showed that one downcomer on one particular
22
some liquid accumulation or solids there, sug- Karl: Most pumps and compressor have a
gesting flooding or plugging. This type of scan minimum flow of 60%. Rarely is a plant run-
is effective for evaluating the extent of maldis- ning less than 60% due to these constraints.
tribution and bed plugging. But I have seen design jet flood designed at
30% - at the normal design unit rate, which
Christian: Tower scanning gives you more in- leads to low tray pressure drop and low tray
formation about distribution of the liquid inside efficiency. I prefer to design jet flood 50% or
the column during operation. Also “dislocated” higher. Jet flood can go to 110% without los-
internals/trays can be detected. Typically, it ing efficiency, if you have good down comer
can help to locate the problem and also to capacity – so at 50% you still have 60% safe-
make assumptions about possible options to ty factor. Many operating companies still re-
solve the problem. However, it does not usual- quire downturn of 33% and vendors are re-
ly allow for solutions without opening the col- quired to meet this requirement even though
umn. So, you have to decide whether it makes the plant will almost never be running at 33%.
sense to scan the column or to directly open it.
Christian: Typical turn down ratios for pack-
15. WHAT IS A GOOD TURN DOWN PER- ings are:
CENTAGE TO KEEP GOOD EFFICIENCY?
•1st and 2nd Generation Packing: 1 : 3
Andrew: Most specifications arbitrarily call for
a turndown to 50% of maximum capacity. •3rd and 4th Generation Packing (RMSR/
RMXR): 1 : 4
Packing has an exceptionally large capacity
range and turndown is usually not a problem. •Structured metal Packing (RVT RMP
The challenge in packed towers lies with the 250):1:6
liquid distributors. Most liquid distributors
should perform well from 100% to 50% of rate. For random and structured packing, the “turn
The range can be extended by using more down ratio” may not be the proper design cri-
complex, more expensive, and larger equip- teria. It is more useful to discuss minimum
ment. Even so, it is unusual to see a liquid dis- and maximum gas factors and liquid loads.
tributor with a realistic operating range wider Limitations are normally fixed by the tower
than 33% to 100%. Pushing a gravity distribu- internals, mainly liquid distributors and col-
tor to operate below its minimum reasonable lecting trays which have lower operation
flow rate leads to a gradual, but accelerating, ranges than packing media.
drop in performance. Exceeding maximum Typical turndown rates for trays are:
rates tends to result in a rapid performance
drop. For pressure-spray distributors the •Movable Valve trays (e.g., V1): 1 : 4-5
trends are reversed.
•Sieve and fixed valve trays: 1 : 2-3
As for trays, most single pass trays will oper-
We are always working to improve product
ate reasonably well in the 33-100% range.
performance. For example, our MRV Fixed
This is true of sieve trays as well as valve
Valve Tray shows good and constant efficien-
trays. The more tray passes, the smaller the
cy over a wide operating range of 1 : 4, com-
turndown range. Special high-capacity trays
pared to the typical operating range of 1:2-3
with dynamically sealed downcomers may
for standard fixed valve trays (FRI test unit,
have reduced operating ranges for the liquid
total reflux).
rate. Special designs can accommodate much
larger turndown ranges. Trays with ranges of Besides that, there are special tray designs
10% to 100% can be built, but the required that show much higher turndown ratios (e.g.,
features normally lead to higher tray pressure bubble cup trays) but have other disad-
drops and either lower capacity for the diame- vantages (cost, pressure drop). Dual flow
ter or higher tray spacing. trays are used in some special applications;
they only have a very low turndown ratio.
Mike: Plant operators can select any turndown
percentage that they truly need. Tray design-
ers can adjust the tray design to accommodate
those needs. Here is an extreme example: If
a trayed tower needs to be turned down to 1%
of full rates, that tower can indeed achieve
good efficiencies as such rates - as long as
the tray spacings are 100 inches.
24
INTRODUCTION CATALYSTS
Refining industry is going through many chal- Catalysts are materials which when added to
lenges. Chief among them being the use of a chemical reaction increases the rate or the
technologies and catalysts which reduces the speed at which the reaction is occurring. Eve-
carbon footprint of products they produce while ry reaction proceeds via a path/mechanism
at the same time raising the performance of called the reaction mechanism with a particu-
products. lar activation energy associated with it. This
activation energy is the minimum amount of
With increasing frequency, refiners driven by energy required to take the reactants to the
economics, are processing heavier and more condition in which they will start reacting with
difficult crudes, while at the same time have to each other to carry out the chemical reaction.
meet the increasingly stringent product specifi- If this amount of energy is not available, no
cations. Attaining these goals require altera- reaction will happen. As shown in Fig 1, intro-
tions in either process and/or catalyst design. duction of catalyst results in a different path/
Hydroprocessing technologies allow produc- mechanism whose associated activation en-
tion of cleaner and better performing premium ergy is much smaller than that without the
products. It has become an integral part of in- catalyst and results in a higher reaction rate
dustry and practically it is impossible to attain at the same temperature.
product specifications without passing through
at least one hydroprocessing step. Catalysts
HYDROTREATING CATALYSTS
are “the heart” of hydroprocessing technolo-
gies and its performance is critical to refinery’s Hydrotreating process is applied either as a
profitability. Going forward, its importance will finishing step of final products or as an inter-
increase in the coming decades to combat cli- mediate step to prepare feed for downstream
mate change. processes like reforming, fluid catalytic crack-
ing or hydrocracking. The process involves
This paper will provide a brief introduction on chemical reactions between organic com-
hydrotreating and hydrocracking catalysts pounds containing the contaminants and hy-
commonly called as hydroprocessing cata- drogen in presence of a catalyst. If these
lysts.
contaminates are not removed, it may result in Ni or Co oxides and from 8-24 wt% as Mo
emissions and cause environmental problems, oxides. Active forms of these metals are their
damaging ecosystems as well as human sulfide forms and good sulfiding is essential
health. Based on the types of contaminants for achieving full performance potential.
removed, the reactions can be called as hy-
The interaction between metal and support
drodesulfurization or HDS (removing sulfur),
also has a big impact on activity. Before
hydrodenitrogenation or HDN (removing nitro-
1995, most catalysts were of “Type I” kind in
gen), hydrodeoxygenation or HDO (removing
which the metals had a strong interaction with
oxygen), hydrodemetallization or HDM
the support. Since then, “Type II” catalysts
(removing metals) and hydrodearomatization
have become the industry standard which
or HDA (saturating aromatics). Process flow
relies on careful tuning of the metal-support
schemes are pretty much similar for most hy-
interaction and have found wide acceptance
droprocessing processes; however, the oper-
in a variety of hydrotreating applications es-
ating severity varies, determined by variables
pecially in ULSD production and hydrocrack-
like type of contaminants, depth of contami-
ing pretreat. Active phase in Type II catalyst
nant conversion, hydrogen partial pressure
has weak interaction with the support and has
and catalyst. Typically, the reactions are con-
more stacking of MoS2 slabs than Type I giv-
ducted in fixed trickle bed reactor(s) with cata-
ing it more intrinsic activity. As shown in Fig
lyst pellets stacked in a packed bed and gas
3, further improvements in Type II catalysts
(hydrogen) and liquid (oil) flowing co-currently
have enabled them to provide significantly
from the top of the reactor.
higher activities. This has been made possi-
Catalyst activity is determined by several fac- ble with better raw materials, improved manu-
tors including the type/quantity of metals, dis- facturing techniques including use of che-
persion of metals and metal-support interac- lates, optimisation of metal dispersion on sup-
tion. Though metals with different groupings port, enhanced promoter effectiveness and
have been researched, typically two groups of advanced analytical tech-niques giving more
metals are used in the production of commer- insight into catalyst morphology.
cial catalysts. The active phase normally com-
prising metal from Group VI (Molybdenum-Mo)
and the promoter metals from Group VIII
(Nickel-Ni and Cobalt-Co). Other promoter
metals can also be added to improve the per-
formance, for e.g., Phosphorous is added to
NiMo catalysts with the objective to improve
HDN activity. Traditional hydrotreating pro-
cesses mainly employs CoMo and NiMo com-
binations. One of the key components opti-
mised during catalyst manufacturing process is
the quantity of metals or metals loading. As
shown in Fig 2, activity of catalyst increases
Fig 3: Development progress – from Type I
with higher metals loading but after a peak,
through Type II (Haldor Topsoe, 2016)
activity drops off. There is an optimal loading
for each support, which varies from 1-6 wt% as
The metals are supported on a carrier
(support). The nature of support plays a key
role in the morphology, dispersion, and cata-
lytic activity of the prepared catalysts. The
support also provides the mechanical
strength to the catalyst as well as high sur-
face area to maximize metals dispersion.
Among the available and developed supports
for hydrotreating catalysts, gamma alumina (γ
-Al2O3) has been widely applied due to its
reasonably high surface area, porosity and
thermal stability, excellent mechanical
strength, very good morphology, easy availa-
bility and low cost.
Fig 2: Relationship between metals and activity
(ART, 2015)
28
To process a particular feed, a universal cata- hydrogenates the unsaturates that are formed
lyst or a catalytic system does not exist and during the cracking step. The main composi-
catalyst selection must be tailor-made. In low tion of any hydrocracking catalyst contains an
pressure units that need low reaction severity, acid support for cracking/ isomerization func-
a CoMo combination is typically applied. For tions and metals for hydrogenation/ dehydro-
high pressure units were the reaction severity genation functions.
is high, a NiMo combination is normally pre-
ferred. To optimise for particular reactions For cracking catalysts, hydrogenation func-
within “zones” in reactor, a stacked combina- tion is provided by Group VI (Mo, Tungsten-
tion of CoMo and NiMo catalysts is sometimes W) and VIII base metals (Co, Ni) or noble
chosen to provide the best performance rather metals (Platinum-Pt or Palladium-Pd), with
than just using one combination alone. Fig 4 extensive use of base metals as these are
illustrates an example on balancing HDS activ- relatively cheap. Most commonly used combi-
ity while minimising hydrogen consumption nations in industrial hydrocracking catalysts
using stacked combination. As NiMo catalyst is are NiMo and NiW in their sulfided form. Met-
added to the system, there is a significant al pairs such as CoMo and CoW have limited
boost in HDS activity and the product sulfur use because of their lower hydrogenation ac-
goes down before eventually hitting a mini- tivities. Though not widely used as base met-
mum (max HDS activity). With increase in per- als, noble metals exhibit much higher activi-
centage of NiMo catalyst, hydrogen consump- ties than the sulfided base metals in a clean
tion also increases. In the region where the reaction environment and are typically used
system shows the best HDS activity, hydrogen in the second stage of a two-stage hy-
consumption is only slightly greater than that drocracking process. In the first stage opera-
of all CoMo system, and well below that for all tion or in a single-stage process, noble met-
NiMo system. als tend to lose their advantage over the sul-
fided base metals due to the presence of con-
taminants, primarily H2S. Without significant
performance advantage, it is not economical
to operate with noble metal catalyst under
these process conditions. The metal loading
for base metal catalyst varies from 1-6 wt%
for Ni oxides and from 8-20 wt% for Mo or W
oxides. In addition to metals loading, atomic
ratio of metals is also important as it impacts
the hydrogenation activity of the catalyst. A
study of the hydrogenation activity of Group
VI and VIII using toluene as a model com-
pound in the presence of H2S, concluded the
optimum atomic ratio to be about 0.25 as
shown in Fig 5.
Fig 4: Balancing HDS activity while minimising
H2 consumption (ART, 2014)
Good HDN activity is the primary function of a
hydrotreating catalyst in a hydrocracking unit
as the organic nitrogen compounds are detri-
mental to the performance of cracking catalyst.
The rate limiting step in HDN reaction pathway
is aromatic ring saturation because in most
refractory nitrogen compounds the nitrogen
atom is incorporated in the aromatic ring which
needs to be saturated first before the nitrogen
can be extracted. As a result, NiMo catalyst
are used as hydrocracking pretreat catalysts.
HYDROCRACKING CATALYSTS
Compared to hydrotreating catalyst, hy- Fig 5: Correlation between conversion and
drocracking catalyst performs a dual-functional atomic ratio (UOP, 2004)
role where it cracks the high molecular weight
hydrocarbon and then simultaneously
29
Since the acid function is responsible for isom- catalyst having more larger pores than the
erization/cracking reactions, cracking catalyst zeolite catalyst. Larger pore structure of
activity is primarily determined by the total amorphous catalyst support preferentially
acidity of the catalyst. Acidity is a function of converts heavy molecules and combined with
silica to alumina ratio and is provided either by its lower activity result in higher yields of the
amorphous (alumina and silica-alumina) or heavier products.
crystalline (zeolites) components which also
acts as the support. Of several solid oxide ma-
terials used as amorphous supports, silica-
alumina is most widely used due its high acidi-
ty and low cost. Cracking catalysts made with
amorphous solid oxide have high selectivity
towards distillate products. Zeolites are mi-
croporous, crystalline aluminosilicates with tet-
rahedrally coordinated framework aluminium.
Among various zeolite materials, modified Y
zeolite is most successfully applied in industri-
al hydrocracking. Most zeolites are synthe-
sised from a slurry consisting of silica, alumina
and caustic. The synthesised zeolite is modi-
fied by ionic exchange and thermal or chemi-
cal treatment called dealumination to obtain an Fig 7: Comparison of pore structure (UOP,
active catalyst; an ultra-stable Y (USY) zeolite 2004)
with appropriate unit cell size (UCS). Catalyst
The product yield depends on metal to acid
manufacturing operating severity determines
activity ratio of the catalyst in use and in-
the degree of dealumination. As the degree of
creases with increasing ratio. The yield could
dealumination increases, silica to alumina ratio
approach maximum when a catalyst can ex-
increases and UCS decreases as shown in Fig
hibit ideal cracking behaviour. The product
6. Since the properties of dealuminated Y zeo-
distribution characteristics are quite different
lite can be varied so widely during manufactur-
between amorphous catalysts and those con-
ing process, USY is the most versatile material
taining Y zeolite. Fig 8 shows the incremental
for hydrocracking. A high UCS USY zeolite will
yield as a function of the distillation tempera-
have higher activity and are typically used in
ture of the product slates for both types of
naphtha production while a low UCS USY zeo-
catalyst. At the same conversion level to 700°
lite will have lower activity and are used for
F, amorphous SiO2·Al2O3 catalyst shows a
distillate production.
much higher distillates selectivity whereas the
product of Y zeolite catalyst is heavily skewed
toward naphtha. The Y zeolite catalyst being
significantly more active than the amorphous
catalyst lacks the proper metal/acid balance.
As a result, excessive secondary cracking
occurs over the Y zeolite catalyst shifting the
product to lighter boiling range.
De-scaling Application:
Why the Pump Fails?
Abhijeet Keer
have been larger to meet the demand of the 1. Frequent Change of operating point
operation. 2. Running the pump on bypass flow
3. Varying system resistances
This shows the first and foremost pain point of 4. Quality of water being Pumped
the System i.e. intermittent operation.
5. High speed application
6. High pressure meaning high system re-
Secondly, if we refer to fig.1 again, we will see sistances
that there is recirculation valve placed near to
Reservoir from where the Pump is taking the
Suction. As we have seen, the operation of These are some of the causes of problems
descaling is intermittent one; there is a dwell associated with the Pump, which lead to fre-
time in the operation. Till the next cycle starts, quent breakdown of the equipment.
the pump has to keep running and hence, the
flow of the pump is routed through recirculation The typical failures encountered by the
valve, back to the reservoir. The operating Pumps are high vibration, high bearing tem-
point for the pump usually in this condition is peratures, seizure, even shaft breakage is not
Minimum allowable continuous flow, which uncommon.
shall be sufficient so that, there will not be any
undesired Temperature increase of the water
being pumped and secondly the vibrations of The frequent changes in operating condition
the equipment shall not go beyond the limit. lead to transient operations and also lead to
fatigue loading of the pump. If we observe the
cross section of one of these typical multi-
So our second pain point highlighted here is stage pumps, we see that the shaft of the
the running of pump towards left of the perfor- pump is carrying a radial and huge amount of
mance curve. Axial thrust due to the high pressure opera-
tion. The shaft being slender and with number
3.0 VARIOUS PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED of impellers mounted will deflect. Of course, it
WITH THE PROCESS will be designed to keep the deflection within
limit but the simultaneous action of Axial
thrust, and that too fluctuating, present the
Now, as we understand the system, let us list conditions, which are needed to be analysed
out the problems associated with the pumping in detail during the design stage and will be
of the water required for the operation.
Fig.1
33
different for each application. Many of the thrust bearing. Balancing drum on the other
times, these transient conditions are over- hand, requires additional thrust bearing to car-
looked rather not even considered during the ry residual axial thrust
enquiry stage. The result being the frequent
failure of the pump on field. For intermittent operation and high axial
thrust, such as this, of course balancing drum
is the obvious choice. One of the key things
Most commonly observed pain point is the vi- here worth noticing is that, the design of the
bration of the equipment. One thing to note balancing drum is for single duty point, which
here is the design of Rotor of the multistage is Best efficiency point of the Pump. Hence for
pump. Here is the quick simple calculation to all other operating points, especially at lower
illustrate, how one might go wrong, if the sub- flows, the Axial thrust will change and will be
mitted operating conditions by the customers huge due to high pressure at lower flow.
are not assessed properly.
Let’s say the operating speed of the equipment These fluctuations in the Axial thrust could
under consideration is around 4500 rpm. even lead to relative movement between the
Now, at this operating speed if we want to keep Bearings thrust plate and the Shaft. And this
the vibrations below 2.5 mm/s then it is impera- likely to result in the Fretting damage as well.
tive to balance the Rotor dynamically at grade Fretting occurs when there is an oscillating
G2.5 as per ISO 1940. Now let’s do some movement between two surfaces which are
basic calculation; having almost zero clearance. In case of
thrust plate, it is mounted on the shaft with the
V = r x w ; where v = vibration velocity mm/s
Interference fit, but due to huge amount of
r = eccentricity, mm thrust and that too fluctuating; the fretting
w = angular speed, rad/s damage is likely to happen.
now,
Also during design stage, one needs to take
care of the elongation of the shaft due to load-
ing and should select the material which will
remain stiff without any excessive deflection.
Hence, r = 5.3 microns
One more problem associated with intermit-
Which means that, the eccentricity allowable tent operation that might be overlooked during
for the centre of mass at given operating speed the selection of the equipment is, the changes
is only 5 microns. Now, if we are assembling in nozzle loads. This leads to the misalign-
the impellers on the Shaft, there must be some ment of the equipment, which leads to higher
clearance for the assembly of shaft with the vibrations, uneven wear, bearing temperature
impeller, surely now, if we choose the sliding fit rise, etc.
between shaft and impeller which might result
in minimum limit higher than this 10 microns Along with that, if the pump is running at lower
( radially 5 microns). This will surely lead to flow, means at higher system resistance,
higher vibrations. there are chances of flow separation on the
Now, this all what we discussed is for the Best suction side of the vane. This in turn disturbs
efficiency point of the pump. One can guess, the head generation and results in flow pulsa-
what will happen when the pump is running on tions in the fluid and also in the pump compo-
the left of the curve where the vibrations are nents. Another problem is the suction or dis-
inherently higher due to flow transients. charge recirculation due to low flow condi-
tions. Mostly, in case of low specific speed
Another point of interest could be checking the pumps such as these, discharge recirculation
natural frequencies of the baseplates as well could be more pronounced which could even
as complete assembled pump. One should lead to damage at the Impeller shroud outside
make sure; the pump is not in resonance while diameter and vane tip area.
operating at given operating speed.
Another pain point is the descaling water used
In case of Multistage Pumps, the axial thrust accumulates with solid particles. Despite pre-
that the Shaft needs to carry is huge. There are filtration, not all particles can be removed from
various means by which the Axial thrust can be the water. Solid particle accumulation in the
compensated. For multistage Pumps, balanc- process water can be harmful for the sealing
ing disk or balancing drum are usually em- in the liquid end and other wetted parts. This
ployed methods to counter Axial thrust. Balanc- also results in uneven wear of the hydraulic
ing disk completely balances the axial thrust components, especially close clearance areas
and hence does not require an additional such as mechanical seals. The wear at impel-
ler outside diameter is also not uncommon.
34
4.0 CONCLUSION
5.0 REFERENCES
Tower trays and internals are the heart of all The size and shape of the downcomer is
distillation columns. Their design is an essen- specified by the liquid flow rate, whereas the
tial part of a process engineer’s task and de- size of the active area is determined by the
termines the process reliability and economy. gas load.
This article is the part of a series on different One of the main tasks at designing a proper
kinds of trays and internals. tray is to choose suitable values for these two
areas. This sets the tower diameter!
In almost all tray towers, the liquid flows hori-
zontally from the inlet, gets in contact with the FLOW PASSES
vertical streaming gas, generates a two-phase
layer on the active area, leaves the tray at the One of the very first steps in the design of a
outlet weir and degases in the downcomer tray is to deal with the liquid load: It shows,
while passing to the next tray below. how many downcomers per tray are required
and how the downcomer(s) have to be de-
The main focus in tray towers is often only the signed. To handle the liquid load, you have to
active area (type of tray, pressure drop, froth supply the appro-priate downcomer area as
height, efficiency, ...), where the mass transfer well as enough weir length.
takes place. To understand all the complexity
of trays, it is necessary to get an overview of To achieve this goal, there are different lay-
the various shapes and layouts of downcom- outs with one or more downcomers and spe-
ers. cial down-comer shapes. (Some other de-
signs like Dual-flow trays, baffle trays, shower
DOWNCOMERS (DC) decks, ... have no down-comers.)
The main function of the downcomer is to col- In the easiest case, there is only one down-
lect all liquid from the active area, degas the comer (Fig. 2). The liquid is streaming from
liquid, lead the liquid to the next tray and seal one side of the tower to the other. There is
the downcomer against gas bypass (Fig. 1). one active area and one flow path. This
(common) design is called 1-pass or Single-
pass tray. The tray design is turned by 180°
at each stage. It is used for tower diameters
up to 3m. (For some special applica-tions you
will even find 1-pass trays up to 8m.)
inboard design has a center downcomer, the load of each active area for each design case
other (outboard design) has two side down- (min / design / max).
comers. The liquid is strea-ming from the cen-
ter down-comer to the side downcomers and
on the next stage from the sides to the center
downcomer. The active area is symmetrical
on each tray. 2-pass designs are often used in
practice.
boxes in the active area. These designs are vapor and liquid rate is low (medium to high-
called Multi-Downcomer designs (”MD trays”). pressure systems).
There are different principles: REVERSE-FLOW
You can place the downcomer boxes over the Another design for the flow path is the so-
entire diameter of the tower and rotate the de- called Reverse-Flow tray (Fig. 10). It is used
sign by 90° per stage (Fig. 7). The crossing to achieve long flow paths and long contact
points of the boxes are blocked to have no liq- times between gas and liquid.
uid shortcuts.
DOWNCOMER SHAPES
The side downcomer in a classic design is nor
Another option is to place the downcomer box- -mally chordal (Fig. 11). This design is com-
es only on one half of the cross section area parably easy in construction and fabrication
and rotate the designs by 180° per stage (Fig. for tower attachments and tray parts.
8). These designs are also known as Calming
Section trays.
3. The liquid is accelerated by leaving through To achieve a uniform overflow at the entire
the clearance. This rise in kinetic energy is length of the downcomer, you can use
taken from potential energy and results in an Notched Weirs (Fig. 17). At low loads the liq-
additional liquid head. uid uses the bottom parts of the notches. At
higher loads the entire weir is used by the liq-
4. The pressure p1 of the gas is higher than
uid.
the pressure p2 at the tray above. This differ-
ence in pressure results in liquid head in the To achieve a uniform overflow at the entire
down-comer. length of the downcomer, you can use
Notched Weirs (Fig. 17). At low loads the liq-
All these values are calculated as “clear liq-
uid uses the bottom parts of the notches. At
uid”. In praxis the liquid in the downcomer
higher loads the entire weir is used by the liq-
contains gas (calculated as so-called Aeration
uid.
Factor) and leads to a higher level in the
downcomer than the clear liquid height. If this
level exceeds the downcomer height plus weir
height, the down-comer will not be able to
handle the load and floods.
Sealstatic = HW – HCL.
For liquid-tight trays (e.g. bubble cap or tunnel
trays) this seal is present, whenever liquid is
on the tray. For all other tray types (e.g. sieve,
float valves, fixed valves) the seal is only
working, if there is enough gas for no weep-
ing.
Just like for the weir blocks, Anti-Jump Baffles
If there is no Static Seal (due to design, poor
have to be as high as the two-phase layer on
hydraulics or at startup of the tower) there is
the active area. Therefore they block the pas-
the risk of gas bypassing the active area
sage during inspections. It is good practice to
through the downcomer.
have bolted manways in the baffles.
During operation the weir crest generates ad-
SWEPT-BACK WEIR
ditional liquid height (How) (Fig. 22) and gen-
To achieve a long weir, you can use a so- erates a Dynamic Seal
called Swept-back Weir (Fig. 20). The down-
Sealdynamic = How + HW – HCL.
comer stays chordal, but the weir is – similar
to the shape of multi-chordal downcomers –
longer than the chordal length.
INTERRUPTER BAR
At float valve trays you may sometimes find
elements, that are looking similar to inlet
weirs. They are not for sealing the downcomer
but to keep the first valve row functional (Fig.
26). The bar is about 13mm high and is called
Interrupter Bar.
BUBBLING INITIATORS
At high liquid outlet velocity, the liquid over-
runs the first rows (of fixed valves, sieve
holes, ...). To break the impulse at high ca-
pacity trays there are Bubbling Initiators (also
In any case, the gas inlet should not affect the
called Bubbling Promoters, Fig. 27). They are
outlet of the liquid. It is good practice to make
placed instead of the first row of “normal” con-
the last downcomer long enough to bypass
tact elements. The gas outlet openings of the
the gas inlet.
Bubbling Initiators are not oriented towards
the downcomer (to prevent gas entry through
the clearance).
43
DRAW-OFF (DRAW)
You will find seal pans not only at the very last
downcomer of a tower. Whenever there is a
change in flow path number and/or tray orien-
tation (“transitions”), the liquid is transferred
to the next tray (or to a liquid distributor) by
pipes. Fig. 31 shows some examples for Draw
-Offs from a seal pan.
In all cases you have to ensure that the seal is MECHANICAL ASPECTS
not affected by the Draw-Off.
The active area is carried by the support ring,
the downcomer (at the outlet weir side) and
the downcomer seal segment (at the inlet).
There-fore these downcomer elements have
to be designed to withstand the dead load
plus the liquid load.
For large tower diameters, the upper part of
the downcomers (so-called Downcomer
Truss) will be fabricated in a higher material
thickness (Fig. 35).
FEED TO DOWNCOMER
In downcomers there are used so-called
As mentioned before, you will install so-called
Down-comer Brackets (Fig. 36). They support
False Downcomers (FDC) to feed liquid on
the downcomer seal segment and prevent the
the top tray of a section (Fig. 33). They are
walls from vibration. In center/off-center down-
designed accordingly to the downcomers of
comers the brackets additionally connect the
the following trays.
walls and keep them in place – in best case
even at a pressure surge. (A well-known fail-
ure pattern is when the downcomer walls are
pushed inwards after a pressure surge and
the panels of the active area therefore slip
and fall.)
Since everything is person to person, every- Management seeks the exact report of any
thing counts or nothing counts at all. Many project’s progress at various stages/phases
times whether it is in projects, events, inci- let it be Engineering, Procurement, Execu-
dents or a survey one has to go through cir- tion/Construction, and Completion.
cumstances where he/she has been asked or
he/she is required to report/state exactly what Let’s go in details of progress on each phase,
he has seen/reviewed. One is expected to 3a. Engineering Progress Reporting
state facts without adding anything in it due to
his/her previous experience, existing An expert is asked to go to an engineering
knowledge, or added knowledge by others contractor’s office or at a consultant’s office,
while viewing/reviewing the situation. One is the first thing will come to anybody's mind
neither expected to exaggerate nor understate. that how can someone review the actual pro-
A statement of facts or report which states how gress when most of the things are in soft form
the progress/situation is as of that moment of in computers of various designer or engineer-
visit/review without being judgemental or emo- ing function heads?
tionally attached at all is a cold eye review re-
port. answer is, the expert will have a schedule
and expected deliverables list from engineer-
1. History ing with him and he will have a clear under-
standing of the job before he proceed to re-
Historical book Mahabharata in India has a view. Once the review started, he will note
record of first cold eye review. A battle, which down the facts against schedule & delivera-
was being narrated by Sanjay to a blind king, bles not expectations or statements of team
namely Dhritarashtra, without being attached members who are working on that job.
to any of both parties indulged in battle. Sanjay
was the person with the capability to see what 3b. Procurement Progress Reporting
is going on at the battleground and he has to
state the facts to the king. In short cold eye When an expert is about to review procure-
review means an emotionless review of any ment progress, he will be informed by so
situation or any work in progress. many sources, we had MRs ready, this was
floated to vendors, that was EQ or CQ from
2. Why it’s termed Cold Eye Review vendors, but an expert is expected not to get
involved in any opinions and check against
The review report author or originator is ex- agreed procurement schedule baselines
pected to be an experienced professional/ whether the progress is made as required
subject matter specialist in whatever field the and where exactly the procurement stands on
review being performed, his vision without at- the day of review.
tachment is expected in the final submission,
his review namely cold eye review ignores ad- 3c. Execution/Construction Progress Report-
vice and search facts beyond appeasement. ing
Cold eye here is something to tell the reader of
that report that this is what I saw exactly This is the most complicated work in case
against given scope, specs, drawings, or de- someone is requested to ascertain the correct
tails in any form. progress in huge projects or someone is ex-
pected to provide cold eye review of a huge
3. How Cold Eye Review is a necessity in Pro- event. The expert will find many works are
jects ongoing and will be dragged by many on the
percentage progress they want to report. The
An unfortunate fact that false reporting always cold eye review involved experienced profes-
occurs, there are several reasons, excuses sional/subject matter expert will have to iso-
and misunderstandings why it occurs, let’s not late himself from influences and check reality
47
on the ground against agreed schedule or 7. Discussion / Reporting findings of cold eye
time frame, quality standards, or other rele- review
vant documents.
To avoid conflict and in an attempt to make
3d. Completion Progress Reporting things work as per plan again, the cold eye
review report will be taken up for discussion
Unfortunate that many works in projects or with senior level team direct related to or in-
huge events marked verbally complete but so volved in execution. The management put for-
many things remain to be done, I am not go- ward findings to have a responsibility matrix
ing into punch listing here but an expert shall developed and targets set again to close the
keep in mind that complete means complete findings. Management can have an insight
in all sense. In cold eye review the EP/SME where were the lapses and can correct from
will check it against required inspection rec- their end too.
ords vs signed off records, verifying things
physically by himself. 8. Action plan for implementation of cold eye
review findings
4. How can management ask Cold Eye Re-
view on the prevailing situation Once discussion with all concerned complet-
ed, the detailed implementation plan will be
Experienced Professional / Subject Matter generated and all responsible will have a say
Expert is always asked to help on finding facts before the action plan is finalized. All lapses
and to the best understanding of facts, man- or grey areas where no one seems taking the
agement uses it to compare with what is re- work can be redistributed to team members
ported. Normally from any event or work there and the action plan is finalized and imple-
will be many sources providing information to mented.
many heads at the same time. An execution
head will get reports from his project involved 9. Conclusion
team that so and so activity is complete but
the quality team is not coming to inspect, at Cold Eye Review is key to success for the
the same instance quality team’s head will be complicated work which has huge volumes
appraised that execution/construction has not and huge teams working. It brings the efforts
yet completed the work and raised request to toward a single goal. Cold eye review is a hot
inspect. There will be ambiguity and cross work to be completed when nothing else
fights among departments and professionals. seems to give correct reports.
Management needs to carefully choose a per- ABOUT THE AUTHOR
son who can have a viewpoint not inclined to
any team when he is on his mission to pro-
duce a cold eye review report.
5. Cold eye review is not punch listing, why
it’s so & how?
Cold eye review is a detailed document that
provides insight into the current situation and
has no influence on upcoming works or prepa-
rations. The Cold eye review for a work if
seen incomplete will mark it incomplete even
Lalit Mohan Nainwal has always strived for
if it’s argued that whole preparation is done
knowledge, Lalit continued his education with
and work will be completed within a short
his career as a shipwright apprentice and
time. Its not punch list which can mark work
achieved his AMIE(Mech), C Eng (India) &
as partially complete with few comments
MBA. Apart from Indian Navy's Docks, Lalit
open.
worked with several renowned EPC compa-
6. Outputs of Cold Eye Reviews nies in India & abroad such as Tata Projects,
SKE&C, and KBR Inc. in major projects such
Cold eye review is expected to deliver a crys- as HRRL, KPPC Aromatics, Pearl GTL, and
tal clear picture of a project progress or ongo- Ichthys LNG Project.
ing event where does it stand when the study/
review was done.
48
49
Piping systems associated with production, classified on three levels – Level 1, Level
transporting oil & gas, water/gas injection into 2 and Level 3. Level 1 procedure repre-
reservoirs, experience wear & tear with time & sents longitudinal area of metal loss
operations. There would be metal loss due to based on the maximum defect depth and
erosion, erosion-corrosion and cavitation to overall defect length. The ASME B31G,
name a few. The presence of corrosion de- RSTRENG 085dL, and DNVGL RP F-101
fects provides a means for localized fractures method for single defect can be classified
to propagate causing pipe ruptures & leak- as Level 1 methods. Level 2 procedure
ages. This also reduces the pipe/pipeline max- represents longitudinal area of metal loss
imum allowable operating pressure [MAOP]. based on the defect depth profile. The
RSTRENG Effective Area method and
The following article covers methods by DNV DNVGL RP F-101 method for complex
standards to quantitatively estimate the ero- shaped defects can be classified as Level
sion rate for ductile pipes and bends due to the 2 methods. Level 3 assessment methods
presence of sand. It is to be noted that corro- involve using Finite element methods
sion can occur in many other scenarios such (FEM) provided the FEM model is validat-
as pipe dimensioning, flow rate limitations, ed against experimental results.
pipe performance such as pressure drop, vi-
brations, noise, insulation, hydrate formation 3. Corrosion failures are caused by two main
and removal, severe slug flow, terrain slugging mechanisms – Leakage resulting in a rel-
and also upheaval buckling. However all these atively small loss of product and Rupture
aspects are not covered in this document. causing a sudden release of pressure
which propagates in isolation.
Based on the erosional rates of pipes and
bends, the Maximum Safe Pressure/Revised 4. To understand corrosion assessment pro-
MAOP is evaluated based on a Level 1 As- cedures, two terms come into play – Foli-
sessment procedure for the remaining strength as Bulging factor [MT] and flow stress [sf].
of the pipeline. The Level 1 procedures taken Folais factor represents the bulging effect
up in this article are RSTRENG 085dL method, of a shell surface that is thinner in wall
DNVGL RP F-101 (Part-B) and thickness [WT] than the surrounding shell.
PETROBRAS’s PB Equation. It takes into account the work-hardening
effect, i.e., the increase in the stress con-
GENERAL NOTES & ASSUMPTIONS centration levels as the corrosion defect
1. In evaluating corrosion defects, the gener- begins to bulge before eventually causing
ally accepted or traditional approach is the a failure. The flow stress is the stress at
ASME B31G code which gives overly con- which the corrosion defect is predicted to
servative results in terms of lower burst cause a failure.
pressures with which operators repair/ 5. In pipeline assessment literature, SMYS &
replace the corroded pipe/pipeline seg- yield strength are used differently. Specif-
ments. This represents higher mainte- ic Minimum Yield Strength (SMYS) is the
nance costs necessitating the need to fol- absolute minimum yield strength for a par-
low a procedure that meets pipeline integri- ticular material grade specified by ASTM
ty requirements while also lowering mainte- standards. Whereas, yield strength is ob-
nance, repair & replacement costs. tained from mill conducted tensile tests. In
2. To assess pipeline integrity, standard cor- cases, where the yield strength value is
rosion assessment procedures are not available, SMYS can be used instead.
50
6. When a corrosion defect occurs inside a 9. The potential for sand particles to get car-
pipe/pipeline, the defect tends to propa- ried from the formation to well bore in oil &
gate longitudinally. ASME B31G mandates gas wells is subjected to the reservoir ge-
a maximum allowable longitudinal length ology. With the onset of water formation or
[LM] for a given defect depth [d]. As per rapid change in well conditions, there is
Modified ASME B31G method i.e., 085dL sand formation. Employing a zero rate of
method, defects are classified as Long de- sand production would be economically
fect and short defect based on the condi- infeasible. Therefore sand management
tion, LS2/Dt = 50, Where D = Pipeline Out- programmes are put in place whereby up-
er diameter (OD) and t = pipeline nominal stream facilities are equipped with sand
wall thickness. When field measured de- traps with necessary safeguards that aid
fect’s longitudinal length, L < LS, the de- in achieving an acceptable sand rate. The
fect is termed as short defect. When L > standard used for this article is DNVGL
LS, the defect is termed as long defect. RP O501 which provides empirical models
The DNVGL RP F-101 method does not that cover plain erosion & not the com-
classify defects in relation to their longitu- bined effects of corrosion-erosion, droplet
dinal length. The pressure strength of long erosion & cavitation. The article therefore
defects is a function of the longitudinal de- considers plain erosion which leads to
fect length [L]. The Longer the defect, low- corrosion pits in the pipeline & the associ-
er is the failure pressure However a limit ated MAOP is computed using the stand-
exists in the value of L, beyond which any ard corrosion assessment methods.
large increase in the longitudinal defect
length, L produces very little reduction in
10. When applying the original ASME B31G
the failure pressure.
method in simplified form (Appendix L of
7. Long Internal defects are one of the vari- ASME B31.8), the Safe Operating Pres-
ous causes for geometry corrosion in- sure given as P’ must first be calculated
duced damage that occur in oil & gas pipe- using the pressure corresponding to a
lines. These occur on the pipe/pipeline hoop stress equal to 100% of SMYS for
the operating pressure, P. The resulting P’
bottom due to accumulation of liquids in-
is the estimated failure pressure, which
cluding water. Whereas long external de- must then be divided by the design factor/
fects are caused on the pipeline’s outer desired factor of safety to obtain the cor-
surface due to loss of protective coatings. rect P’.
8. ASME B31G assumes a parabolic profile
across the area of the defect, i.e., Area of
defect = 2/3´d´L, where, d = Defect depth
and L = Defect longitudinal length. Where-
as with the RSTRENG 085dL method, the
defect area is approximated as 85% of the
peak depth, i.e., by using a factor of 0.85,
i.e., Defect Area = 0.85´d´L.
6.
7.
CASE STUDY
A case study is made for a case of 30 MMscfd
of well fluids transported through an 8” DN
carbon steel flowline from the well head to a
trunk line. The design details are, (3)
Parameter Value Unit
(14)
(9)
(11)
(13)
(18)
PIPE BEND EROSION RATE – DNVGL RP
O501 Where,
The geometry factor [GF], is taken to be 1.0 The pipeline area exposed to erosion is,
based on the assumption that the straight line
section, upstream of the bend is greater than
10D. For straight line section less than 10D,
the GF increases to 2 or 3. To arrive at the (29)
particle size correction term, G, the dimen-
The function characterizing pipeline ductility,
sionless parameter A is calculated first.
F(a) as follows,
(33)
(21)
MAX SAFE PRESSURE IN CORRODED AR-
The particle size correction function [G] is, EA
(41)
(35) Since L2/Dt < 50, the Folias bulging factor is,
As per ASME B31G, B cannot be > 4.0. For
corrosion depth [d/t] between 10% and
17.5%, the value of B is to be limited to 4.0. (42)
For e.g., with d/t = 0.32, the value of B & Lm
is, (43)
(44)
(37)
RSTRENG 085DL METHOD
(45)
The max safe pressure with RSTRENG
085dL method is determined as follows, Performing similar calculations for Pipe Bend
with d = 0.06” and L=1.3”, the Max safe pres-
sure is 90.0 bara.
DNV RP F101 SINGLE DEFECT METHOD
(38) The max safe pressure with DNVGL RP F101
single defect method is determined as,
Where,
SMYS = Specific Min Yield Strength [MPa]
D = Pipeline OD [in]
(46)
M = Folias Bulging Factor [-]
Where,
For the condition, L2/Dt £ 50, M is,
su = Ultimate Tensile Strength [MPa]
D = Pipeline OD [in]
M = Folias Bulging Factor [-]
(39)
(40)
55
Where, REFERENCES
su = Ultimate Tensile Strength [MPa] “Managing Sand Production and Erosion”,
DNVGL-RP-O501, Aug 2015 Edition.
M = Folias Bulging Factor [-]
“Manual for Determining Remaining Strength
of Corroded Pipelines”, ASME B31G-1991
(52) “Folias Factor”, Science Direct, https://
www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/
Applying the PETROBRAS PB method to the folias-factor
same inclined pipe and pipe bend data for an
“Modified Equation for the Assessment of
ultimate tensile strength of 530 MPa, the max
Long Corrosion Defects”, Adilson C. Benja-
safe pressure is,
min, Ronaldo D Vieria, Jose Luiz F. Friere,
Jaime T.P. de Castro, https://
www.researchgate.net/publication/24965714
(53)
(54)
(55)
ITEM
Solids Rate pph 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000
Saltation Velocity fps 43 47 51 56 60
Gas Velocity fps 97 97 97 97 97
Solids Velocity fps 88 88 88 88 88
Total Calculated
Pressure Drop psi 2.9 3.2 3.5 3.8 4.1
This article points out some of the technical the hole. This is clearly visible in the picture
points in the manufacturing/fabrication of as the area around the hole is largely dry.
Mass Transfer products.
The sharp edge of a laser cut hole does not
These do not affect the fabrication in a really allow the free flow of fluid through the hole.
significant way, but if noticed, could be very This is clearly indicated because the area
useful and make life easy from a manufactur- around the edges of the hole is quite wet.
ing point of view.
TRAYS
1A- SIEVE TRAY DECK – SURFACE TEN-
SION OF FLUID FLOW
Let us consider the Sieve tray deck (The fol-
lowing information equally applies to all kinds
of tray deck openings.) ,
Fig.2 Typ. View of Valve Rise in 3D & actual Naturally the production time for multistage
sample of Press for Fix Valve tools is higher than with a progressive die, but
the product yield is about 80% of the raw ma-
Fixed valves are not used in huge quantities terial which results in significant cost savings
generally. So, NC presses are used to bal- This is accomplished by tight nesting of prod-
ance the production rates and the valve rise. uct on a sheet. Fig 3 shows the difference in
NC press can produce valves at speeds com- product yield for a progressive die and multi-
parable to CNC Turret punch and produce stage multi tool production.
valves with bigger rise than a Turret punch.
The rise produced by a NC press is compara- Unlike random packing valves are not used in
ble to that of Normal OBC press. large quantities in Mass transfer, so it might
not be a good idea to choose a progressive
The top half of Fig.2 shows a 3D image of the die in this situation. It is advisable to choose
typical heights desired in fixed valves. The the manufacturing process based on de-
bottom half shows the actual picture of a fixed mand.
valve punched on a NC Press.
1D-STYLES OF TRAY DECK ASSEMBLY
The maximum height of a fixed valve pro- It is important to note that the choice of tray
duced in a CNC Turret was 8.0mm due to the deck design (joining different sections) is not
limitations of standard Turret Gap between top particularly dependent on process but is
& bottom turrets. heavily influenced by manufacturability and
ease of installation in a column.
NC presses can easily produce a life of 12-
13mm. It could easily go up to 15-16 mm rise.
We have made fixed valves with a 4.0mm
thickness in Hastelloy C276 on NC Press,
which cannot be done on a standard CNC
Turret punch due to limitations of a CNC turret
handling thicker material and loner runs.
two sections of the tray deck are illustrated in area, it will result in better performance of the
Fig4., where process design remains intact for mass transfer process.
all and change has been made mechanically
considering ease for manufacturing as well as On a sieve tray section if we can extend the
installation. perforation area till the area specified for
clamping and fitting (illustrated in the pictures
The first style being the most awkward and above) and can match holes on adjacent sec-
difficult style, where two sections are joined tions, when they are clamped together, addi-
inside a column by bolting them together. The tional room can be created for an extra sieve
second style is an improvement on the first valve, opening up more process working area
style where a jog at each end of the section enabling better performance of the tray.
allows for the overlap of adjacent sections
making the bolting of the sections slightly easi- In a floating valve tray, we can make provi-
er than the first style and is commonly used sion for extra valves around the area where
for assembly of sections. two sections are joined together by cutting
the overlapped section of the bottom section
The third style, the latest development in join- in a extra large ‘U’ form to allow for the legs
ing tray deck sections which is considered of the valve to float up and down as illustrated
most installation friendly design and which is by the bottom half of Fig5.
an NBC (non-bolting construction) design that
allows the installer to hold a section by its ex- This kind of arrangement is not easy to make
tended teeth and sliding the teeth through the in a fixed valve tray unlike a floating valve
slots of the next section. tray because more material is needed at the
corner of a tray to prevent the tray from being
We know, installation in Column is not an easy torn away from base deck. A bigger slot
task and by choosing Third option, one can needs to be made on the bottom tray where it
save at least 50% of deck assembly time due is joined to the top tray. This slot needs to be
to NBC design. longer than the legs of the valve to allow easy
flow of fluid. This kind of arrangement is only
1E-POSIBILITY OF EXTRA VALVE possible in trays that have some room to
The top half of Fig. 5, shows a Sieve Tray in work around and not fit too tight in the col-
assembly position and the bottom half shows umn.
floating valves in assembly position.
These are some items to consider to in de-
signing better performing mass transfer prod-
ucts.
Fig.5 Typ. Proposed Place for extra valves This can shortened downtime of column.
From a process point of view, the ideal situa- Special Thanks: Mr.Karl Kolmetz, Mr. Kazuo
tion is to have perforations all over the ex- Watari, Mr. Ananth Halvi
posed (diametrical) area in a column. But me-
chanical limitations like joined tray decks sec- ABOUT THE AUTHOR
tions reduce the working area. This lost work- Neil J. Almeida ha over 18
ing area cannot be considered for process cal- years of experience as
culations in valve placement design. consulting Tool Design
Engineer in Mass Transfer and
If we can utilise a portion in this lost working have privilege to develop new
products for clients.
69
You can gauge the extent of your knowledge 8. Which type of tray has a better potential
in process operations and engineering. The to develop efficient tray fractionation effi-
test assumes that you have completed high ciency.
school science. The game of “Twenty Ques- A. Sieve
tions” was popular when I was a teenager in B. Valve
the 1950’s. These questions are a mixture of C. Bubble Cap
operational and process engineering prob- D. Grid
lems. Score yourself based on the attached 9. When we change from a 4” pipe, to a 2”
answer page. If you get 100% correct, I will pipe, at constant volumetric flow, the
send you a free book, “Process Design for Re- pressure drop would increase from 2 psi
liable Operations, 2nd Edition”. to:
A. 4 psi
Increasing the temperature of 1,000 ft3 of B. 8 psi
air from 60°F to 600°F, increases the air C. 16 psi
volume to about: D. 32 psi
2,000 ft3 E. 64 psi
10,000 ft3 10. Why does water passing through a cool-
C. 20,000 ft3 ing tower cool, to less than the ambient
2. The purpose of an impeller in a centrifugal temperature?
pump (in non-viscous flow) is to 11. What happens to the density of water as it
________? cools? Increases or decreases?
3. A steam vacuum ejector using 150# mo- 12. To increase the Net Positive Suction
tive steam, has an internal steam nozzle Head available to a pump, pumping liquid
where the steam velocity increases from from a vapor-liquid separator, at equilibri-
120 ft/sec to 12,000 ft/sec. Where does um, should we increase or decrease the
the energy come from to accelerate the vessel’s pressure?
steam? 13. Operators sometimes spray water on a
4. The purpose of a valve tray in a fractiona- hot pump suction line, to suppress cavita-
tor, is to fractionate between the lighter tion. Does this actually help the pump’s
and heavier components. True or false? performance?
5. A centrifugal pump mechanical seal flush 14. Steam turbines running with 400 psig
pressure should be: steam, exhausting to the atmosphere, are
A. Higher or close to the discharge using what property of the steam to drive
pressure. the turbine:
B. Just a little lower than the dis- A. Temperature
charge pressure. B. Pressure
C. Just a little higher than the suction C. Latent Heat
pressure. 15. When unloading a reciprocating compres-
D. Just a little lower than the suction sor, the most efficient way to reduce load
pressure. is:
6. The energy of an old-style reciprocating A. Open spill-back.
steam driven engine, using 150# pressure B. Open head-end unloader bottle.
steam, that exhausts to the atmosphere, C. Throttle the discharge.
comes from what property of the steam? 16. When we increase the thickness of an
7. How does lowering a distillation tower orifice plate, at constant flowing velocity,
pressure affect the relative volatility be- what happens to the pressure drop?
tween propane and butane? A. Higher
A. Bigger B. Lower
B. Smaller C. Unchanged
C. No effect
70
17. Can the pressure inside of a fired heater ABOUT THE AUTHOR
radiant section, exceed atmospheric pres- Norm Lieberman has a degree in Chemical
sure? Engineering (Cooper Union, 1964). His princi-
18. How does wind affect draft in a fired heat- pal activity is field troubleshooting refinery
er: problems. Over 21,000 operators and engi-
A. Bigger neers have attended his 950 seminars since
B. Smaller 1983, that explain Troubleshooting Tech-
C. No effect niques. Lieberman has authored 11 books on
19. Why do the non-condensables, vented this subject. He resides in New Orleans,
from a steam heater, typically burn when where he was formerly the Plant Manager of
ignited? the Good Hope Refinery in Norco.
20. What is the best way to control reflux and
reboiler duty in a light-ends distillation tow-
er or an aromatic fractionator?
19. ANSWERS
1. 2,000 (remember Rankine or Kelvin)
2. Accelerate the flow – not to increase the
pressure.
3. Mostly from the temperature of the steam.
Almost none comes from the steam’s pres-
sure.
4. False. The purpose of the tray is to mix the
vapor flowing up from the reboiler, with the
liquid flowing down from the condenser.
5. C – Just a little bit higher than the pump
suction pressure.
6. It’s the latent heat – not its pressure.
7. Bigger
8. Bubble cap
9. 32 psi
10. Evaporation of the water.
11. Increases to 40°F (4°C) and then gets less
dense. A unique property of water.
12. At equilibrium, it doesn’t matter.
13. Yes
14. Temperature + Latent Heat (i.e., enthalpy).
15. Open the head-end (or crank-end) unload-
er bottle.
16. Lower – by a lot.
17. Yes
18. Bigger
19. It’s hydrogen from CO2 corrosion. The hy-
drogen ions cause hydrogen assisted
Stress Corrosion Cracking.
20. Closed-loop Spectroscopic analyzer con-
trol. Gas Chrome lag time is excessive.
Check with Tec5USA.
1.0 IMPORTANCE OF ALARM SYSTEM presented at a rate that the operator can deal
Alarm systems are increasingly important in with, be easy to understand.
the safe management of plant and machinery.
Alarm systems forms an essential part of the 2.0 ALARM GROUPING
operator interface which provides vital support Alarm grouping is one of the important theo-
to the operator by warning them of situation ries in the plant alarm management system
that need their attention. Alarm systems thus where the alarms configured are to be
have an important role in preventing, control- grouped into different categories. All alarms
ling and mitigating the effects of abnormal sit- which are configured in the system should be
uations. The effects can be very serious if specified with a group name. The alarm
these alarm systems does not work well. grouping activity later supports alarm rational-
Alarm systems are a very important way of ization activity as well significantly for analy-
automatically monitoring the plant condition sis.
and attracting the attention of the process
plant operator to significant changes that re- 2.1 GENERAL GUIDELINES
quire assessment or action. They help the op- Instrument tags related to process which
erator to maintain the plant within a safe oper- are configured with alarms are to be pro-
ating envelope. A good alarm system helps vided with the group name with respect to
the operator to correct potentially dangerous the respective defined process areas.
situations before the Emergency Shutdown These alarms are commonly called as
(ESD) system is forced to intervene. This im- “PROCESS ALARM”.
proves plant availability, helps to recognize Safety systems related alarms shall be
and act to avoid hazardous situations, helps to provided with the group name of
identify deviations from desired operating con- “SAFETY”.
ditions that could lead to financial loss and Equipment start/stop related alarms shall
helps to understand complex process condi- be provided with a group name of
tions. Alarms should be an important diagnos- “EQUIPMENT”.
tic tool and are one of several sources that an Shut down valves, Blow down valves and
operator uses during an upset. Alarms are sig- Control valves related alarms shall be
nals which are annunciated to the operator, provided with a group name of “VALVES”.
typically by an audible sound, some form of DCS or PLC system related and Commu-
visual indication, usually flashing, and by the nications related alarms shall be provided
presentation of a message or some other with group name of “SYSTEM”.
identifier. An alarm will indicate a problem re- Electrical switch gear related alarms shall
quiring operator attention, and is generally ini- be provided with group name of
tiated by a process measurement passing a “ELECTRICAL”.
defined alarm setting as it approaches an un-
desirable or potentially unsafe value. Alarm 3.0 ALARM PRIORITY
Management helps to identify process prob- Alarm priority is used to aid the operator de-
lems like valves / equipment & instruments termining the order in which to respond to
malfunction and controller tuning problems, alarms. Effective prioritization typically results
reduces unplanned down time of plant, reduc- in higher priorities chosen less frequently
es production losses, prevents incidents, im- than lower priorities. Most of the alarms
proved productivity – both equipment’s and should be assigned to the lowest alarm priori-
personnel’s. Alarm systems should be de- ty (least important) and the fewest to the
signed to meet user needs and operate within highest alarm priority (most important) with
the operator's capabilities. This means that the the consistent transition between the two.
information alarm systems present should be The resulting priorities should have alignment
relevant to the operator’s role at the time, indi- with the consequence and allowable re-
cate clearly what response is required, be sponse time such that the lowest priority
72
alarms have the least severe consequence which are having direct relation to the to-
and longest allowable response time and the tal plant trip or respective valve closure /
highest priority alarms have the most severe open status which gives very less re-
consequence (Example: Fire and Gas system sponse time for operator to take action
alarms) and the shortest allowable response can be considered for “CRITICAL”.
time. Instrument tags which are configured with
alarms which performs remote operation
3.1 GENERAL GUIDELINES i.e. operation performed by operator to be
All alarms configured in the system will be pri- considered for “LOW” class.
oritized based on the class names. Characteristically all bad PV (Process
Value) alarm shall be configured with low
Facility shall generally use four classes for priority except for the points/tags with high
process related alarms and one class for priority alarm where bad PV shall also be
system related alarms. assigned high priority.
Alarms which are grouped under SYSTEM As per HAZOP study report, Alarms listed
should be classified as “SYSTEM”. as safeguards measures or recommenda-
Other alarms which are grouped under tion shall be assigned with priority as de-
different names as per the alarm groups fined by the severity consequence matrix.
guidelines as specified above are to be
classified as “CRITICAL”, “HIGH”, 4.0 REFERENCES
“MEDIUM” and “LOW”. ANSI/ISA-18.2.2016 Management of Alarm
Priority distribution of the process related Systems for the process industries
alarms class shall be: CRITICAL: 5%,
HIGH: 15%, MEDIUM: 30% and LOW: EEMUA PUBLICATIOn No.191 Edition 2
50%. (Determination of priority percentage Alarm Systems A Guide to Design, Manage-
is a case dependent activity with respect to ment and Procurement
the respective process industry/plant. Gen-
eral percentage which works and practical- ABOUT THE AUTHOR
ly possible to implement were suggested
here).
Alarms which are critical to process safety
of the protection of human life or personnel
safety protection by default are to be con-
sidered for “CRITICAL” priority class.
Alarms for commercial loss or product
quality shall be considered for “CRITICAL” Praveen Nagenderan C is a Chemical Engi-
priority class. neer with experience in the field of Oil & Gas
Instrument tags which are configured with production & processing facilities and Refin-
alarms having direct relation to the total ery process units. Professional experience
plant trip or a section trip shall be consid- covers in Production operations, Facility sur-
ered for “CRITICAL” priority class. veillance, Technical safety, Technical Ser-
Instrument tags which are configured with vices - Process, and Projects. Praveen has
alarms which affects the section of the worked with major Oil & Gas companies in
plant but provides relative response time India namely Nayara Energy formerly known
to the operator or which doesn’t trigger as Essar Oil Limited and Cairn Oil & Gas.
total plant shut down immediately shall be
considered for “HIGH” priority class.
Equipment stop related alarms shall be
considered for “HIGH” class based on the
criticality of the equipment with respect to
the process conditions whereas equipment
start related alarms shall be considered for
“LOW” class based on the criticality of the
equipment with respect to the process
conditions.
Alarm priority class for Shutdown valves or
solenoid valve status alarms to be decided
based on the criticality of the process con-
ditions. Shutdown vales or solenoid valve
status feedback CLOSE/OPEN alarms
73
Showed process in Figure 1 is based in the and better heat distribution, leading to higher
syngas gas generation from steam reforming campaign periods.
of natural gas, this is the most common route,
however, there are process variations apply- Most recently is observed a reduction trend in
ing syngas production through coal, biomass the demand by transportation fuels and some
or petroleum coke gasification route. refiners are looking for change his production
focus from transportation fuels to petrochemi-
The process starts with syngas generation cals. The gas to liquids can be applied in syn-
and, as aforementioned, the produced hydro- ergy with conventional refining processes to
carbon chain extension is controlled in the improve the yield of petrochemicals in the re-
Fischer-Tropsch synthesis step through the fining hardware through the production of
CO/H2 ratio in the syngas fed to the FT reac- high quality naphtha that can be applied to
tors (beyond temperature and reaction pres- FCC or steam cracking units to produce light
sure), following the produced hydrocarbons olefins, ensuring higher added value to the
are separated and sent to refining steps as processed crudes and gas as well as partici-
isomerisation, hydrotreating, hydrocracking, pation in a growing market.
catalytic reforming, etc. According to applica-
tion of the produced derivative (Gasoline, Die- Another attractive alternative and synergy
sel, Lubricant, etc.). opportunities to refiners is the production of
ammonia that are the base of any fertilizer.
Some side reactions can occur during the hy- Despite the flat demand over the last years, is
drocarbons production process, leading to expected a growing market in the next years
coke deposition on the catalyst, causing his due to the increasingly demand by food at
deactivation according to following chemical global level. As presented in Figure 2, is also
reactions: expected a growing demand of Methanol in
2 CO = C + CO2 the next years, this intermediate can be used
(Boudouard Reaction) to produce high demand products like formal-
dehyde that is applied to produce plastics and
CO + H2 = C + H2O coatings, allowing great added value to the
(CO Reduction) crude oil and natural producing chain.
The type of reactor applied in the FT synthesis AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGIES
step have strong influence on the yield and The several geopolitics crises over the history
quality of the obtained products, the cam- motivated the development of new technolo-
paign time of the process units also depends gies and the improvement of the Fischer-
on the type of reactor. Fixed bed reactors are Tropsch original process. There is a wide ar-
widely employed to FT synthesis, however, ray of process technologies developed aiming
show a reduced campaign time due to the low to liquid hydrocarbons production from syn-
resistance to catalyst deactivation phenome- gas, among the principal available technolo-
non. Modern process units apply fluidized bed gies we can quote the processes SYN-
or slurry phase reactors that present a higher THOL™ and SPD™ developed by Sasol
resistance to coke depositionon the catalyst Company, the GASEL™ process by Axens
As cited earlier, one of the main advantages of In the sequence, the methanol is dehydrated
GTL technologies is the possibility of applica- to produce Dimethyl-Ether which is posterior-
tion several raw materials to produce syngas, ly dehydrated to produce hydrocarbons, as
which ensures great flexibility. In regions with shown in the sequence:
large coal availability, the gasification technol-
ogies has strategic character given that the
great restriction of this fuel use in the energet- 2 CH3OH = CH3OCH3 + H2O
ic matrix due the high environmental impact, in (Methanol Dehydration)
these cases the coal conversion into syngas CH3OCH3 = C2H4 + H2O
and posteriorly in liquid hydrocarbons is very (Dimethyl-Ether Dehydration)
economically attractive, another alternative is
to apply renewable raw material (biomass) to The methanol conversion to olefins into hy-
produce syngas. drocarbons is called Methanol to Olefins
(MTO) or Methanol to Gasoline (MTG) tech-
On the other hand, in regions with great avail- nologies. The most known processes dedicat-
ability and easy access to large natural gas ed to converting methanol in hydrocarbons
reserves, the syngas production through natu- are the processes MTG™ developed by Exx-
ral gas reforming steam still is shown as the onMobil Company and the MTO-Hydro™ pro-
most economical route to produce this raw cess, developed by UOP Company. Figure 4
material in industrial scale. presents the process flow diagram for the
MTG™ process by ExxonMobil Company.
An alternative route to produce liquid hydro- The MTO technologies presents some ad-
carbons from syngas is the non-catalytic con- vantages in relation to Fischer-Tropsch pro-
version of the natural gas to methanol fol- cesses, once show higher selectivity in the
lowed by the polymerization to produce al- hydrocarbon production, furthermore, the ob-
kenes. Methanol is produced from natural gas tained products require lower additional pro-
according to the following chemical reactions: cessing steps to achieve commercial
REFERENCES
ROBINSON, P.R.; HSU, C.S. Handbook of
Petroleum Technology. 1a ed. Springer, 2017.
GARY, J. H.; HANDWERK, G. E. Petroleum
Refining – Technology and Economics.4thed.
Marcel Dekker., 2001.
IEA (International Energy Agency) - Primary
chemical production in the Sustainable Devel-
opment Scenario, 2000-2030 – 2020.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
IACPE.COM