Business Regulations
Business Regulations
B.Com/BBA
3rd SEMESTER CU-FYUGP
MUBASHIRA AP
NIMISHA A
JASIL RISVAN CT
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
MAJOR COURSE
AUTHORS:
Publisher: Vertex
Research & Technology
(Something Different)
Government Registered TN-27-0012873
6/16, Santam Colony, Anna Nagar West Extension, Chennai - 600101.
Email: support@vertexrt.org / www.vertexrt.org
Copyright: Authors
ISBN:
Price: Rs.110/-
PREFACE
We would like to thank publication for undertaking this book. We're pleased to present this
book, tailored to the third-semester syllabus of the University of Calicut's four-year
undergraduate program. It will also benefit those preparing for competitive exams featuring
business regulations.
We would also like to take this opportunity to express our sincere gratitude to our publishers
for bringing our book to fruition.
-AUTHORS
CONTENTS
1) Introduction to Business Regulations…………………………………01
4) Void agreements…………………………………………………………29
6) Contract of Indemnity………………………………………………….43
7) Contract of Guarantee………………………………………………….46
9) Contract of Agency……………………………………………………..59
16) E-Commerce……………………………………………………………94
Syllabus
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
CHAPTER-1
Chapter Overview
5
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
SHORT ANSWER
1. Define Law.
2. State the importance of Law in
society.
SHORT ESSAY
1. Explain the need for the Law in a
civilized society.
2. Discuss the various sources of
Law.
ESSAY
1. Define Business Law. What are the
main features of Business Law?
2. Explain the relevance and need for
Business Law in the current
business scenario.
3. Analyze how Business Law helps
in resolving commercial disputes
and promoting fair trade practices.
6
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
CHAPTER-2
Chapter overview
9. Possibility of performance
An agreement to do an act
impossible in itself is void.
11
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
CASE STUDIES
In this case, there was a dispute over money that one person lost in a bet (a wager). The person
wanted to recover the money, but the court had to decide whether they could do that.
The case was about a wagering agreement, which is essentially a bet where people agree to
win or lose money based on some event happening (like betting on the outcome of a game).
Court's Decision: The court ruled that wagering agreements are void. This means that such
betting agreements are not legally enforceable. However, betting or wagering is not
considered illegal unless there are specific laws in that state that prohibit it (for example, in
states like Maharashtra and Gujarat, wagering is illegal).
In this case, there was an agreement between two people: one person (the buyer) promised to
pay an extra amount of money if a horse proved to be "lucky."
Problem: The term "lucky" was unclear. It wasn't explained what exactly "lucky" meant in this
context. Was it about the horse winning races, or something else? No one knew for sure.
Court's Decision: Because the term "lucky" was too vague, the court said the agreement was
uncertain and could not be enforced. In legal terms, they declared the agreement "void"
because it was not clear enough to understand or act upon.
12
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
Void Agreement
Case: Ravi, a 17-year-old boy (a minor), entered into a contract with Ramesh to sell his bike
for ₹40,000. Ramesh paid the money, but later Ravi refused to give the bike. Ramesh went to
court to enforce the agreement.
Judgment: The court held that the agreement was void because a minor is not legally
competent to enter into a contract under Section 11 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
SHORT ANSWER
1. Meaning of Contract
2. Express Contract
3. what is Agreement
4. what do you mean by voidable
Agreement
5. Executed Contract?
6. Unilateral Contract
7. Illegal Contract
SHORT ESSAY
1. What is the Importance of
Agreement
2. Discuss different type of
Contracts?
3. How does an agreement become
Contract?
4. What are the Contracts that is
expressly declared as good by law.
ESSAY
13
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
CHAPTER-3
OFFER OR PROPOSAL
Chapter overview
14
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
Example: A bus starts its route and a Example: A company offers to supply
passenger boards—by conduct, both coal to a factory for 6 months at
imply a contract. ₹1000/ton. The factory can place
orders as needed.
B. Classification on the Basis of Offerees
c) Counter Offer
a) Specific Offer
When an offeree modifies the terms
An offer made to a specific person or of the original offer, thereby rejecting
group that can be accepted only by the original offer and proposing a new
them. one.
Example: A offers to sell his house to Example: A offers to sell a car for ₹5
B for ₹50 lakh. lakh. B says he’ll buy it for ₹4.5 lakh.
This is a counter offer.
b) General Offer
Acceptance
An offer made to the public at large,
and can be accepted by anyone who Section 2(b) of the Indian Contract Act,
fulfills the conditions. 1872 defines acceptance “When the person
to whom the proposal is made signifies his
Example: A company publishes in a
assent thereto, the proposal is said to be
newspaper: “₹5,000 reward to anyone
accepted. A proposal, when accepted,
who finds and returns our lost dog.”
becomes a promise.”
16
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
18
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
and does not exist as a valid It should create on the basis of nature
consideration. pure love and affection
Aspect English law Indian law Assignment: Rights under a contract can
Privity of Strictly Same rule be assigned to a third party, who then can
contract followed in but some sue.
20
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
The law does not create liability To make a valid contract, a person must
just because the minor received a be of sound mind. This means the person
benefit. should be able to:
5. Minor Can Always Claim to be a
Minor (No Estoppel) Understand the terms of the
A minor can always say in court contract, and
that they were underage at the time Make a reasonable decision about
of the agreement. it.
Even if they lied about their age, If someone does not have this mental
the law still protects them. capacity, they are considered of unsound
mind, and any contract made during that
6. No Specific Performance against
time is not valid.
Minor
The court will not force a minor to There are three main types of people
perform or complete a contract. considered of unsound mind:
They are not legally bound to do
anything under such agreements. 1. Idiots
7. Minor and Partnership
People who have a permanent lack of
A minor cannot be a full partner in
a business. understanding from birth. They can
But they can be admitted to receive never enter into a valid contract.
benefits, like profit — with consent 2. Lunatics
from all partners.
They are not responsible for any People who may have temporary
business losses. periods of madness but are sometimes
8. Minor as an Agent mentally stable. They can make
A minor can work as an agent contracts only when they are of sound
(representing someone else). mind.
But the minor is not personally
responsible — the principal is 3. Drunkards/Intoxicated Persons
liable for the agent’s actions.
9. Minor Cannot Be Declared Insolvent If someone is drunk or intoxicated to
Since a minor cannot make valid the point that they cannot understand
contracts or borrow money legally, what they are doing, they cannot enter
They cannot be declared insolvent into a contract during that time.
by a court.
10. Minors liability for necessities. A drunkard or drunken person
When necessities are supplied to a means someone who is under the
minor or their family, the payment influence of alcohol to such an
can be recovered from the minor’s extent that they cannot
property, but not from the minor understand what they are doing
personally." or cannot make sound decisions.
An intoxicated person is
someone who is under the
Persons of unsound mind (section 12)
influence of alcohol or drugs to
the point that
22
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
3. Convicts
property, with the intention of forcing situation where one party is forced or
someone to enter into an agreement.” threatened to enter into a contract against
their will. The key point is that duress
Key Features of Coercion involves actual violence or a serious threat
of violence to a person. If threat against
1. Act Forbidden by Law (IPC) the goods or property of a person it is not
considered as duress.
If someone commits or threatens to
commit an act that is prohibited under the Threat to suicide
Indian Penal Code (IPC) like assault, theft,
or blackmail it is considered coercion. When someone says, "If you don’t do
what I say, I’ll kill myself,"
2. Unlawful Detention
They are using emotional blackmail. This
If a person unlawfully detains another is a kind of threat, and in law, it can count
person or their property (e.g., holding as coercion because it pressures the other
someone or their belongings against their person to act out of fear or guilt, not by
will), it is also coercion. their own free choice. So, threatening
suicide to make someone sign a contract or
3. Intention to Enter a Contract do something is considered coercion under
the law.
Coercion must be used with the specific
purpose of forcing someone to enter into a
Undue Influence (16)
contract. If there’s no intent to form a
contract, then it is not relevant under this According to Indian Contract Act Undue
section. Influence defined as "A contract is said to
be induced by 'undue influence' where the
4. Coercion can be used by a Party to
relations subsisting between the parties
contract or even by a Stranger.
are such that one of the parties is in a
position to dominate the will of the other
Coercion can be applied not only by one
and uses that position to obtain an unfair
of the parties to the contract but also by an
advantage over the other."
outsider. As long as coercion influences
the contract, it is legally relevant.
Undue influence refers to the use of
improper or excessive emotional, mental,
5. Place is Irrelevant
or moral pressure on someone, especially
It does not matter where the coercion in a position of vulnerability, to persuade
occurs whether in India or outside. As long them to agree to something or enter into a
as it influences a contract governed by contract against their free will.
Indian law, it is treated as coercion.
There is presumption of undue
Duress influence in the following
relationships:
It is the equivalent term to coercion as Parent and child
per English Law. Duress refers to a Guardian and ward
24
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
In this following case of the existence of 3. Making a promise without any intention
undue influence should be proven in front of keeping it.
of the court.
4. Any other act meant to deceive.
Pardanashin Woman
5. Any act or omission the law considers
In cases of undue influence, there is a fraudulent.
special situation involving a Pardanashin
woman. A Pardanashin woman is someone Elements of Fraud
who lives in seclusion, without contact
1. Fraud must be committed by a party to
with the outside world, and is not exposed
the contract
to its tricks or corruptions. If someone
enters into a contract with a Pardanashin
The person who is doing the fraud
woman, they must prove in court that her
should be one of the people involved
consent to the contract was given freely
in the contract.
and without any undue influence.
2. False statement or suggestion
A person making a contract with a
Pardanashin woman must prove the One person says something that they
following: know is false, or hides the truth on
purpose. This kind of false statement is
She personally signed the
considered fraud.
agreement, fully understanding
what she was doing. 3. Hiding important facts
She clearly understood the nature
and consequences of the If someone hides a very important
transaction. fact that could affect the other person's
She received advice from someone decision to agree to the contract, it is
who was independent and had no fraud.
personal interest in the deal.
4. False promise with no intention to
Fraud (17) perform
25
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
The mistake must be about a fact Only one party is under a mistake.
essential to the agreement. Generally, contracts are not voidable
When such a mistake occurs, the for a unilateral mistake unless: The
contract is void under Section 20 of the other party is aware of the mistake and
Indian Contract Act. takes advantage of it. The mistake is
about the nature of the contract or
Types of Bilateral Mistake: identity of the person involved.
CASE STUDIES
Judgment: The court ruled that there was no contract, as no offer to work under new
terms had been communicated to the ship owners. Therefore, they had not accepted any
such offer, and Laird could not claim wages.
2) Revocation of offer
Grant made an offer to sell his house to Routledge and stated that the offer would remain open for
six weeks. However, before Routledge accepted the offer, Grant revoked it within that six-week
period.
Holding:, the court held that Grant was entitled to revoke the offer at any time before acceptance.
Since Routledge had not provided any consideration (payment or something of value) to keep the
offer open, Grant was not legally bound to keep it open for six weeks.
Legal Principle: Unless there's consideration to keep an offer open (creating an option contract), the
offeror can revoke it at any time before acceptance.
28
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
3) Case: Kedarnath Bhattacharji v. Gorie MohammadCitation: (1886) ILR 14 Cal 64 Court: Calcutta
High Court
The defendant (Gorie Mohammad) promised to donate Rs. 100 for the construction of a Town Hall
in Howrah. The plaintiff (Kedarnath), a municipal commissioner, entered into contracts with
builders based on this promise. The defendant later refused to pay, claiming there was no
consideration, as he did not receive any benefit personally.
"Though the promise was gratuitous, the plaintiff incurred a liability by acting on it. That constitutes
valid consideration".
4) Contract with Minor Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose (1903) 30 Cal. 539 (PC)
Case Summary: In this landmark case, the Privy Council addressed the issue of the validity of
contracts entered into by minors under the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Dharmodas Ghose, a minor,
had entered into a contract with Mohori Bibee, a moneylender, for the loan of a sum of money.
Ghose, in turn, mortgaged his property as security for the loan. Later, when Ghose sought to avoid
the contract on the grounds of his minority, the Privy Council ruled in his favor, holding that the
contract was void due to his status as a minor.
5) Case Study: Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v. Boots Cash Chemists (1953)
Boots ran a self-service store where customers picked up medicine from shelves and paid at the
cashier’s counter.
The Pharmaceutical Society claimed this violated the law, which required a registered pharmacist to
supervise the sale of medicines.
Decision: The court said: Placing goods on a shelf is not an offer, but an invitation to offer.
6) Persons Disqualified Law: Kedar Nath v. State of West BengalCitation: AIR 1953 Cal 405
Kedar Nath, the plaintiff, was an adjudicated insolvent at the time of entering into a contractual
agreement. The plaintiff filed a suit to enforce the contract despite being declared insolvent.
The issue arose whether a person who has been adjudicated an insolvent under the Provincial
Insolvency Act, 1920 (now replaced by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016) is legally
capable of entering into a valid contract. The Calcutta High Court held that an insolvent person is
disqualified from contracting unless the insolvency proceedings have been concluded and the
individual has been discharged from insolvency. 29
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
7) Persons of un sound mind - Case Study: Inder Singh v. Parmeshwardhari SinghCitation: AIR
1957 SC 510
Inder Singh entered into a property transaction with Parmeshwardhari Singh. The latter was alleged
to be of unsound mind at the time of the contract. It was argued that the agreement was invalid due
to his mental condition.
Judgment: The Supreme Court held that a person must be of sound mind at the time of the contract.
Occasional unsoundness does not make all contracts void. Since there was no conclusive evidence
of unsoundness during the contract, the agreement was held valid. A person who is sometimes of
unsound mind can contract during lucid intervals, and the burden of proof lies on the person alleging
unsoundness.
The plaintiff, Ammiraju, threatened to commit suicide unless his wife and son agreed to execute a
deed transferring family property to his brother. Fearing for his life, they executed the deed. Later,
they challenged the validity of the deed, claiming it was executed under coercion.
Judgment: The Madras High Court held that a threat to commit suicide does constitute coercion
under Section 15.
The Ranee Annapurni Nachiaran elderly and inexperienced woman was under the influence of a
trusted adviser, the Swaminatha Ayyar.
She transferred a large portion of her property to him without receiving fair consideration.
The transfer was challenged on the ground that it was made under undue influence.
Judgment: The court held that the contract was made under undue influence as the defendant was in
a position to dominate the will of the plaintiff.
The plaintiff did not fully understand the nature of the transaction, and the defendant had unfairly
gained from it.
In this case, the husband of an illiterate woman misrepresented the contents of a document, leading
her to believe she was signing a deed concerning two of her lands. In reality, the document pertained
to four of her lands. The husband's deliberate misrepresentation exploited her illiteracy and trust.
Judgment: The Supreme Court held that the husband's actions amounted to fraud as defined under30
Section 17. The Court emphasized that any act fitted to deceive, including misrepresentation of
document contents to an illiterate person, vitiates free consent.
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
Facts: In this case, Tarsem Singh agreed to sell a plot of land to Sukhminder Singh. Both parties
believed the land to be 10 acres in size. However, it was later discovered that the actual size was 15
acres.
Judgment: The court held that since both parties were under a mutual mistake concerning a matter of
fact essential to the agreement the size of the land the contract was void under Section 20. The
absence of a "consensus ad idem" (meeting of minds) meant there was no valid contract.
In this case, Mugneeram Bangur & Co. represented a piece of land as having no requisition on it.
Relying on this representation, Satya Brata Ghose agreed to purchase the land. However, after
entering into the agreement, Ghose discovered that the property was subject to requisition a fact that
was not disclosed by Mugneeram Bangur & Co.
Judgment: The Supreme Court held that Mugneeram Bangur & Co. had misrepresented the status of
the property to Satya Brata Ghose. As per Section 18 of the Indian Contract Act, this constituted
misrepresentation. Consequently, under Section 19, the contract was deemed voidable at the option
of the aggrieved party.
31
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
8. Analyze what are the types of 13. Evaluate the persons who are
mistake? disqualified by law from entering
9. Discuss the position of what is in to a contract?
mean by contract with a
Pardanashin Woman? ESSAY
10. Threat to commit Suicide -Does it 1. Critically evaluate Consent in a
amount to coercion, Evaluate? contract is said to be free when it is
11. Who are the persons in a dominant not caused by any actions section
position and who are not in a 15 to Section 22?
dominant position in case of undue 2. Analyze the position of a minors
influence evaluate? Agreement?
12. What is fraud and the Essential 3. Features of a valid consideration?
elements in the concept of a fraud 4. Distinguish between Mistake and
and also explain the concept Misrepresentation
silence amount to fraud or not?
CHAPTER-4
VOID AGREEMENT
Chapter overview
Novation Substitution of a new contract in place of X owes Y Rs. 5000. Then X,Y
existing contract between the same parties or and Z mutually agree that Z will
different parties only with mutual consent pay the amount to Y instead of
X.
Alteration Change in one or more of the material terms of a A agrees to service B's laptop
contract within 2 days. However, due to
the unavailability of parts, they
both agree to extend the period
to 5 days
Remission Acceptance of lesser performance than what was A borrower owes the bank
contracted for . ₹3,00,000. The bank agrees to
accept ₹285,000 as full and final
settlement. Bank remitted
15,000
Waiver Deliberate abandonment of a right which a party A landlord has the right to evict
is entitled to under a contract. a tenant for late rent, but chooses
to allow the tenant to stay. The
landlord has waived the strict
right to evict.
35
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
3. Change of law
36
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
38
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
III. Suit Upon Quantum Meruit IV. Suit for specific performance
In some cases damages are not a
The term ‘Quantum Meruit’ means remedy for the breach of contract so
‘as much as earned’ or ‘in proportion the court directs the defaulting party
to the work done’. When a person has to carry out the performance of the
began the work and before he could contract specifically.
complete it the contract terminated by The court at their discretion order
the other party then he can claim for specific performance in the following
the work done under the contract. cases:
Example: A freelancer agrees to Where compensation in money
design your full website for ₹1 lakh. would not afford adequate relief
After doing 40% of the work, you Where there is no standard for
decide to cancel the project. ascertaining the actual damages
The freelancer can sue to recover When it is probable that monetary
payment for the work already consideration on non performance of
delivered (40%). the acting cannot be obtained
39
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
41
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
CHAPTER-5
Chapter overview
Contingent contract - characteristics - rules regarding performance of
contingent contract- Difference between wagering agreement and contingent
contract
Quasi contract - definition - features - types - difference between contract and
quasi contract.
Contingent contract
Section 31 of the Contract Act defines Rules regarding performance of
contingent contract as “a contract to do contingent contract
or not to do something if some event According to section 32 to 36 of the
collateral to such contract, does or does Contract Act the following are the rules
not happen”. Insurance contract is the best regarding performance of contingent to
example contract
1) It is dependent on the happening of
Characteristics of contingent contract an uncertain future event section 32
It is depends on a future event A contingent contract is made on
The event is uncertain the basis of a future uncertain
The uncertain event is collateral to event; it cannot be enforced by law
the contract until that event has happened.
42
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
44
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
There is no
It is an agreement
agreement
It is full -fledged
It is an implied
contract and is
contract
binding
It is to fulfill
To prevent unfair
promise made by
gain
parties
CASE STUDIES
1. Narendra Kumar v. Karam Chand Thapar & Bros.Citation: AIR 1969 Cal 157
Title: Contingent contract and impossibility of event
Facts: Payment was promised if a third party approved certain construction work. The third party
refused approval.
Decision: Since the approval was the basis of the contract, and it did not occur, the contract becomes
void.
Key Point: If the condition for a contingent contract becomes impossible, the contract becomes void
under Section 32.
2. State of West Bengal v. B.K. Mondal & Sons (AIR 1962 SC 779)
Title: Quasi Contract
Concept: Non-gratuitous act (Section 70)
Facts: Contractor did work for the government without formal contract. The Government used the
benefit.
Decision: Government was bound to compensate, even without formal agreement.
Principle: One who enjoys the benefit of another’s lawful act must pay.
ESSAY
1. Explain the rules regarding
performance of contingent
contract
2. State briefly the types of quasi
contract with examples
CHAPTER-6
CONTRACT OF INDEMNITY
Chapter Overview
the terms of any compromise of such The indemnifier is entitled to all the
suit. benefits of securities and equitable rights
held by the indemnity holder against third
Rights of Indemnifier parties. This ensures fairness and prevents
According to Section 141, Indian contract unjust enrichment of the indemnity holder.
act the indemnifier compensates the 3. Right to Refuse Indemnity
indemnity holder for a loss; he gains
certain rights as follows: The indemnifier has the right to refuse
compensation if the loss suffered by the
1. Right to Subrogation indemnity holder is outside the scope of
Once the indemnifier has paid for the loss, the indemnity contract, or if the indemnity
he steps into the shoes of the indemnity holder acted beyond the authority or
holder and gains all the rights and contrary to the terms of the contract.
remedies that the indemnity holder had
against the third party. This includes rights
over any securities or claims.
2. Right to Equities
CASE STUDIES
CASE: The plaintiff had given security for the defendant's loan. When the creditor enforced the
security, the plaintiff sought indemnity from the defendant.
Judgment: Justice M.C. Chagla held that the Indian Contract Act is not exhaustive on indemnity and
courts can draw from English law. He emphasized that indemnity includes protection from liability,
not just actual loss.
CASE: Jarvis (defendant) asked Adamson (plaintiff, an auctioneer) to sell some cattle at an auction.
Adamson sold the cattle as instructed, but later it turned out that Jarvis did not own the cattle. In
fact, the cattle belonged to someone else. The true owner of the cattle sued Adamson for selling
property that wasn’t his to sell. Adamson, having been sued, claimed Jarvis should compensate him
(indemnify him) because he had acted in good faith based on Jarvis’s instructions. Adamson sued
Jarvis to recover the amount he lost because of Jarvis’s actions.
Judgment: The court held that Jarvis must indemnify Adamson because Adamson had suffered a48
loss due to following Jarvis’s instructions. Since Adamson was acting on Jarvis’s behalf, Jarvis was
obligated to protect him from any resulting liability or loss.
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
B. SHORT ESSAY
1. Features of contract of
indemnity?
2. Insurance is a contract of
indemnity-Discuss?
CHAPTER-7
CONTRACT OF GUARANTEE
Chapter overview
Contract of guarantee-parties-features
Liability of surety -Rights of surety
Discharge of contract of guarantee
The person The person The person The Surety gives the guarantee only at
who iswho gives to whom the the request of the Debtor.
primarily the guarantee is
liable to guarantee; given. F. Surety’s Liability
perform the i.e., the one
obligation or who The Surety is responsible to pay if the
repay the promises to Debtor fails to pay.
debt. discharge
the liability
if the
principal G. Consideration
debtor fails.
Example: Rohit wants to take a loan of There must be something of value
₹50,000 from a bank, but the bank needs exchanged. The benefit received by the
someone to guarantee that Rohit will repay Debtor is enough.
it
Rohit is the Virat is the Bank is the H. Free Consent
Principal Surety Creditor
Debtor All three must give their consent freely
that is no force, no fraud, or no
pressure is involved in obtaining the
Features of a Contract of Guarantee consent of parties to contract.
All three should agree and have a clear Even if the Debtor is discharged by
understanding of the guarantee. law (e.g., becomes insolvent), the
Surety still has to pay the debt.
E. Request by Debtor
50
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
The surety has the right to be If one co-surety pays more than their
compensated by the principal debtor. fair share of the debt (or the entire
He can recover all amounts that he has amount), they have the right to claim
rightfully paid under the guarantee. contribution from the other co-sureties.
The liability is typically divided
B. Right Against the creditor equally, unless otherwise agreed or
specified, to ensure that no single co-
1. Right to Securities (Section 141) surety bears the full burden.
If the creditor has any securities (like 2. Release of Co-surety
pledged goods, property, etc.) from the
principal debtor at the time of the Once the obligations under the
contract of guarantee, the surety is guarantee are fulfilled or if the principal
entitled to those. Even if the surety was debtor is released, the co-surety is
unaware of those securities, he still has discharged from their responsibilities.
the right to claim them after paying the The release of one co-surety does not
debt. automatically release others, unless the
terms of the agreement dictate so.
If the creditor loses or releases the
securities without the surety’s consent, 3. Right to Share the Benefit
the surety is discharged to that extent.
If any co-surety receives a benefit
2. Right to Set-off (or Set of Claims) (e.g., through security, repayment, or
recovery from the debtor), all co-
51
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
sureties are entitled to share that benefit is discharged from the original
equally, in proportion to their liability. guarantee.
1. Misrepresentation or Concealment:
If the guarantee was obtained by
lying or hiding important facts, the
surety can refuse to be bound.
2. Co-surety Not Joining: If the
contract said that multiple sureties
must sign, but some didn't, then the
surety can walk away.
3. Failure of Consideration: If the
creditor promised something in
2. By Death: When a surety dies, their return but did not actually give it,
guarantee automatically ends for the surety is free from the contract.
future transactions (but still applies
to past transactions). 4. Lack of Essential Elements: If the
guarantee contract is missing
3. By Novation: If a new contract something important (like consent,
replaces the old one (with the lawful object, or consideration), the
agreement of all parties), the surety surety can step away.
CASE STUDIES
1) Bank of Bihar Ltd. v. Damodar Prasad & another (1969 AIR 297, SC)
A borrower took a loan from the Bank of Bihar. Damodar Prasad signed as a guarantor, meaning he
52
promised to pay if the borrower failed. The borrower defaulted (failed to repay).The bank directly
sued Damodar Prasad, the guarantor. Damodar Prasad argued, "First, sue the borrower. Only if he
doesn't pay, come to me."
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
2) Punjab National Bank v. Sri Vikram Cotton Mills Ltd. (1970 AIR 1973, SC)
Punjab National Bank gave credit to Sri Vikram Cotton Mills. A third party gave a guarantee for
repayment. Later, Sri Vikram Cotton Mills went into liquidation (a process like bankruptcy).The
bank directly demanded payment from the guarantor.
Judgment: Even if the principal debtor goes into liquidation, the guarantor still has to pay. The
guarantee is an independent contract, and the creditor can enforce it directly.
3) State Bank of India v. Premco Saw Mill (1983 AIR 1440, SC)
A creditor can proceed directly against the surety without initiating any action against the principal
debtor.
SBI gave a loan to Premco Saw Mill. A third party signed as a guarantor (surety).The borrower
defaulted. The bank sued only the guarantor, not the borrower. The surety said the bank should have
first sued the borrower.
Judgment by Supreme Court: The surety cannot demand that the creditor must first sue the principal
debtor. The creditor has the right to recover directly from the surety.
SHORT ESSAY
53
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
ESSAY
1) How would you define a contract of
guarantee, and what is its
significance in today’s business
environment?
2) What are the rights and obligations
of the surety, the debtor, and the
creditor in a contract of guarantee?
3) What methods can be used to
revoke a contract of guarantee?
Could you provide hypothetical
examples to explain these methods?
CHAPTER-8
CONTRACT OF BAILMENT AND PLEDGE
Chapter overview
Bailment and Pledge are special types of another for a specific purpose, under the
contracts covered under Sections 148 to condition that the goods will be returned
181 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. once the purpose is fulfilled, either in the
same form or as agreed.
Bailment refers to the delivery of goods
or movable property by one person to
54
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
In most cases, consideration is also out by the bailee. The purpose should
involved in such arrangements. be clearly stated or implied. Once the
purpose is fulfilled, the contract comes
to an end.
Section 148 – "Bailment" Defined a
"Bailment" is the delivery of goods by one 3. Consideration
person to another for some purpose, upon Consideration is an essential element
a contract that they shall, when the in a Contract of Bailment. For a valid
purpose is accomplished, be returned or contract of bailment, there must either
otherwise disposed of according to the be a reward (remuneration) or an
directions of the person delivering them.” agreement for mutual benefit.
The person who delivers the goods is This could be a paid bailment (where
called the "bailor". the bailee is compensated for taking
The person to whom the goods are care of the goods) or a gratuitous
delivered is called the "bailee". bailment (where the bailee is
not compensated).
Example: Rohit gives his laptop to virat a 4. Valid Contract
technician, for repair. Rohit tells virat to
return the laptop after fixing it. In this A valid contract must exist for a
case: bailment agreement. This means that
there must be mutual consent,
consideration, and both parties must
Rohit is the bailor (he is giving the have the capacity to contract. A
laptop), bailment agreement can be express (in
Virat is the bailee (he is receiving it writing or spoken) or implied (formed
for a purpose). based on conduct or circumstances).
7. Movable Goods
B. Based on Benefit Received
A Contract of Bailment applies only
to movable goods. It cannot apply to 1. Bailment for the Exclusive
immovable property such as land or Benefit of the Bailor
buildings. Only tangible, movable Only the bailor benefits.
items can be subject to bailment.
Example: Asking someone to keep
your bag safely while you go out.
Duties of Bailor
A. Based on Reward (Consideration)
1. Duty to disclose faults in the goods
(Section 150):
1. Gratuitous Bailment
No consideration involved. The bailor must tell the bailee (the
Done as a favor or out of person receiving the goods) about
friendship. any known defects or problems in
the goods. If not, and the bailee
Example: Lending your friend a
suffers damage, the bailor is
book for free.
responsible.
2. Non-Gratuitous Bailment
2. Duty to bear expenses (Section 158):
Consideration (payment) is
involved. The bailor must pay for the
It's a regular bailment contract. reasonable expenses the bailee
incurs while taking care of the
56
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
The bailor must take responsibility If the goods make money (like rent
for natural wear and tear or any or interest) and there’s no deal
regular risk involved unless there is saying otherwise, the bailor can ask
an agreement that says otherwise. for it.
6. Duty to receive back the goods: 6. Right to Sue for Loss or Misuse
When the bailment ends, the bailor If the goods are lost or misused
must take the goods back. The because of the bailee’s
bailee isn’t supposed to keep carelessness, the bailor
the goods forever. can go to court.
57
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
The Bailee must not use the goods for If the Bailee spends money while
any purpose other than what was taking care of the goods, they can ask
agreed with the Bailor. the Bailor to reimburse the expenses.
Possession must be lawful, not Example: A bank can keep items in a safe
obtained by coercion or fraud. deposit box if the customer
Lien arises only when there are has unpaid loans.
unsatisfied claims related to the
goods.
Lien is a right of defense, not a
right to sue.
Example: A mechanic repairs a car and The person who delivers the goods
keeps it until the customer pays the repair is called the Pawnor.
bill. The person to whom the goods are
delivered is called the Pawnee.
General Lien( Section 171)
Features
The Bailee can hold any goods
1. Delivery of Goods: In a pledge, goods
they have from the Bailor until all
are delivered to the creditor as
debts are paid, not just debts
security.
related to specific goods.
2. Purpose of Security: The goods are
Common for: Banks, warehouses,
given to secure payment of a debt or
carriers, etc.
performance of a promise.
Conditions: 3. Transfer of Possession: Only
possession is transferred, not
The Bailee must have possession ownership.
of the goods. 4. Return of Goods: After the debt is
It applies to all goods held, not just paid or the promise is fulfilled, goods
those connected to a specific must be returned to the pledgor.
service. 5. Movable Goods Only: Only movable
goods can be pledged (not immovable
property).
59
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
6. Existing Goods: Only goods that The finder must not mix the goods with
already exist can be pledged; future or his own; if he does and the goods are
contingent goods cannot. damaged or lost, he may be held liable.
A Finder of Lost Goods is a person who The finder must try to locate the true
finds goods belonging to someone else and owner and return the goods when found.
takes them into his custody.
Rights of the Finder
Though not the owner, the finder
1. Lien for Expenses (Right to Retain)
becomes a bailee under the law and has
certain rights and responsibilities. Under Section 168, the finder may retain
the goods until he receives compensation
Section 71 of the Indian Contract Act, for any money spent in preserving the
1872 "a person who finds goods belonging goods or finding the owner.
to another and takes them into his custody
is subject to the same responsibility as a 2. Right to Sue for Reward
bailee."
If the owner had offered a reward for the
Duties of the Finder (Like a Bailee) return of the lost goods, the finder can
claim and sue for it.
1. Reasonable Care
3. Right to Sell (Section 169)
The finder must take the same care of the
goods as a prudent person would take of The finder can sell the goods in the
their own property. following situations
60
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
CASE STUDIES
CASE: Bernard agreed to move several barrels of brandy for Coggs. He did not charge any money
for this favor. However, during transportation, Bernard dropped and damaged some barrels because
of his carelessness.
Judgment: Yes. The court ruled that even though Bernard was not paid, he was still responsible
because he had accepted the duty of care. His negligence made him liable.
CASE: A young chimney sweep found a jewel and took it to a goldsmith (Delamirie) to find out
what it was worth. The goldsmith’s apprentice took the jewel and refused to return it.
Judgment: Yes. The court held that the finder of lost goods has a right to keep them against
everyone except the true owner.
A woman left her gold jewelry with a jeweler for safekeeping while she was away. When 61
she
returned, the jeweler claimed the jewelry had been stolen and refused to return it.
Judgment: The court ruled that the jeweler, as a bailee, was expected to take reasonable care of the
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
CHAPTER-9
CREATION OF AGENCY
Chapter Overview
62
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
Features of agency
63
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
64
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
company must accept the actions of principal. Once the act is done, the
that person as an agent. principal has two choices:
carry out the tasks or duties that have been If the agent is unable to perform the
assigned to him. This is because the task due to illness or absence, and
principal has chosen the agent based on immediate action is needed, a sub-
trust and competence, so delegating agent can be appointed.
authority to someone else could undermine
that trust. Substituted or Co-agent
66
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
Works under the supervision and Works directly under the principal,
Control
control of the original agent. not under the original agent.
No direct privity; not directly
Direct privity; stands in place of
responsible to the principal
Relationship with the original agent and is directly
(unless fraud/negligence).
Principal responsible to the principal..
The original agent is responsible The substituted agent is directly
Responsibility for the sub-agent’s acts. responsible to the principal for
their actions
An agent unable to perform a task
An agent for a company hires a delegates it to another qualified
Example Situation
junior clerk to help perform tasks agent with the principal’s
permission.
67
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
2. To act with reasonable care, skill If the agent acts within the scope of
and diligence [Section 212] actual or apparent authority, the
principal is bound by the agent’s
The agent must perform their duties actions.
with proper skill, care, and attention—
just as a competent person would in The third party can hold the principal
similar circumstances. liable, not the agent (unless the agent
acts outside the scope or does not
3. Duty to render proper records disclose the principal properly).
[Section 213]
2) Section 227 – Acts Exceeding
The agent must maintain and provide Authority (Partly Within Authority)
accurate records of all transactions and
activities related to the principal’s If an agent performs an act that is
business, whenever the principal partly within and partly outside his
requests them. authority, and the two parts can be
separated, the principal is bound only
4. Duty not to deal on his own account to the extent of the authorized part.
[Sections 215 & 216]
3) Section 229 – Notice to Agent is
The agent must not use the principal’s Notice to Principal
business for personal benefit. If they
want to do so, they must get prior Any notice or information given to the
permission from the principal and fully agent, in the course of the business he
disclose the situation. is employed for, is deemed to have
been given to the principal. This makes
Liabilities of an Agent and Principal the principal liable for consequences
A. Liability of Principal and Agent to based on such notice.
Third Parties
69
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
CASE STUDIES
Judgment: An agent entered into a business contract on behalf of a principal. The principal claimed
he had not directly authorized the contract and wanted to avoid liability.
Judgment: The Supreme Court ruled that the principal was liable because the agent had acted within
his apparent authority—meaning, his actions seemed legitimate to outsiders based on past dealings
or position.
Michael Adams owns a residential property in Cityville he wishes to sell. On May 1, 2025, he enters
into a Real Estate Agency Agreement with Rebecca Lee, a licensed real estate agent. The agreement
appoints Rebecca as his exclusive agent to sell the property for a commission of 5% of the final sale
price. The term of the contract is six months. 70
Execution: Rebecca lists the property on the local MLS and hosts several open houses. After a
month, a buyer offers $400,000. Rebecca negotiates the offer and closes the deal at $410,000. The
sale is finalized in July 2025.
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
3) Case: P. Krishna Bhatta v. Mundila Ganapathi Bhatta (AIR 1955 Mad 648)
Case: An agent was appointed to manage a property but went beyond his given authority by entering
into a transaction the principal had not approved. The other party involved in the deal assumed the
agent had the right to make such a deal.
Judgment: The Madras High Court held that the principal was not liable for the agent’s unauthorized
actions. The court stated that a principal is only bound by the actions of an agent that are within the
agent’s actual or apparent authority. In this case, the agent exceeded both.
CASE: An agent made a contract without proper authority. Later, the principal accepted the benefits
that came from the contract.
Judgment: The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the principal’s acceptance of the benefit meant
he had ratified the act. This ratification made the contract legally valid from the start.
5. Case: National Bank of India Ltd v. R. Raghunathan (AIR 1948 Mad 396)
CASE: An agent entered into a contract and signed it in his own name without disclosing that he
was acting for a principal.
Judgment: The Madras High Court ruled that the agent was personally liable because the third party
didn’t know he was just an agent. If the principal is not disclosed, the agent bears responsibility.
CASE: The principal wanted to terminate the agency before the agreed time, but the agent objected
because the agency was tied to a personal interest or investment.
Judgment: The court held that the agency could not be revoked as it was "coupled with interest".
Under Section 202 of the Contract Act, such an agency is irrevocable without the agent’s consent.
71
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
CHAPTER-10
Chapter overview
72
Sales of goods act 1930 – Basic concepts
Type of goods
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
However, in order to provide a separate Existing goods are further divided into:
and detailed framework, a new law the
Indian Sale of Goods Act, 1930 was a) Specific Goods
passed. The Act came into force on 1st Goods identified and agreed upon at
July 1930. Later, in 1963, the word the time the contract of sale is made.
"Indian" was dropped from its title, and it
became known simply as the Sale of Example: You go to a shop and buy a
Goods Act, 1930. specific painting hanging on the wall.
That painting is specific goods it was
Section 4(1) defines "A contract of sale clearly identified when the contract
of goods is a contract whereby the seller was made.
transfers or agrees to transfer the property
in goods to the buyer for a price. There b) Ascertained Goods
may be a contract of sale between one part
Goods that are identified later, after
owner and another."
the contract is made.
Basic Concepts
Example: A contract says "I will buy
Section 2(1) Buyer: means a person 10 sacks of rice from your warehouse."
who buys or agrees to buy goods. After the contract, the seller selects 10
specific sacks and sets them aside.
73
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
CASE STUDIES
S. M. Sundram v. R. V. Krishnaswami Chettiar Citation: AIR 1938 Mad 27
The case is often referenced in connection with Section 15 and Section 16 of the Act, focusing on
whether the goods delivered matched the contractual description and was fit for the purpose intended.
Case: In this case, a buyer ordered a specific quality of groundnut oil. The seller delivered oil that did not
match the agreed description or quality. The buyer refused to accept the goods and was sued by the
seller.
Judgment: The court held that the goods did not correspond with the contract description and quality,
and hence the buyer was entitled to reject them. It reinforced the principle that in a contract for sale by
description, the delivered goods must conform strictly to the description.
SHORT ESSAY
1. What are the different types of goods?
CHAPTER-11
74
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
Chapter overview
The Contract of Sale of Goods Act, Such as when the goods are delivered,
1930 defines the sale of goods and outlines when payment is made, or when the
the essential elements that must be present goods are identified as the ones to be
for a valid contract of sale. sold.
1. Two Persons: Buyer and Seller It's important to note that the transfer
of ownership is different from the
A contract of sale of goods requires transfer of possession, which may
the involvement of two parties: a seller happen at different times.
and a buyer. The seller agrees to
transfer the goods to the buyer, and the 4. Delivery of Goods
buyer agrees to pay for the goods.
Delivery refers to the act of handing
2. Subject Matter: Movable Goods over the goods from the seller to the
buyer, which is a crucial step in the
The goods that are being sold must sale. Delivery can happen in several
be movable property. Movable goods ways:
refer to physical items that can be
transferred from one place to another, Immediate Delivery: The goods are
such as machinery, electronics, or transferred right away at the time
clothing. Immovable property like land of the agreement.
or buildings is excluded from the scope Delivery in Installments: Goods
of this act. may be delivered in parts at
different a time, which is agreed
3. Transfer of Property (Ownership upon by both parties.
Rights) Delivery at a Future Date: The
Transfer of property means that delivery can be set for a future
ownership of the goods is transferred time, provided both parties agree.
from the seller to the buyer. The 5. Price
transfer of ownership is absolute, Price refers to the money or
meaning the buyer acquires full consideration paid for the goods being
ownership rights over the goods. The sold. The price must be ascertainable,
point of transfer could depend on
various factors, Meaning it can be determined from
the contract or by external methods if
not specifically stated.
75
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
The price does not necessarily have Absolute Contract: In this type, the
to be a specific amount; it can also be transfer of goods happens without
determined based on a formula or an any conditions attached.
agreed-upon method, such as market Conditional Contract: Here, the
price. The agreement is not valid sale is dependent on certain
without the determination of price. conditions being met, such as
payment of the price or availability
6. Contract of Sale: Absolute or of the goods.
Conditional 7. Essential Elements of a Valid
A contract of sale can be either Contract
absolute or conditional: A sale of goods contract must also
adhere to the basic requirements for
any valid contract
76
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
This section defines the "price" as the Section 2(4) of the Sales of Goods Act,
money consideration agreed upon in the 1930 defines "document of title to goods"
contract for the sale of goods. as a document that shows the ownership of
goods or entitles the holder to possess,
Section 9 - Ascertained Price: It talks transfer, or receive the goods. This
about how the price of goods can be document can be something like a bill of
determined (ascertained) in the following lading, warehouse receipt, or dock
ways: warrant, which can be used to transfer the
By the contract itself: If the ownership or possession of goods.
contract specifically mentions the Earnest money
price.
By agreement: If the parties agree Earnest money is a small amount of
upon a price. money that a buyer gives to a seller when
Course of dealings: If there’s an they agree to buy something. It shows that
established pattern in the way the the buyer is serious about the deal.
parties have conducted business
previously, it can help determine If the sale happens, the earnest money
the price. usually goes towards the price of the item.
Reasonable price: If no price is But if the buyer changes their mind and
agreed upon, the price can be based cancels the deal without a good reason, the
on what is reasonable in the seller can keep the earnest money.
circumstances.
Government or market authorities:
If the price is fixed by law or
government regulation.
CASE STUDIES
CASE: The seller (Varley) sold a reaping machine to the buyer (Whipp), describing it as "nearly
new" and used only once. The transaction happened without the buyer inspecting the machine.
When the machine was delivered, it turned out to be heavily used and in poor condition. The buyer
refused to accept it and brought a claim.
Judgment: The court ruled in favor of the buyer. It held that the goods did not match the description
under which they were sold. This was a breach of condition, not just a minor breach. The buyer was
entitled to reject the goods and recover his payment.
77
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
Case: The buyer told the seller he needed a car suitable for long-distance touring. The seller
recommended a specific car model (a Bugatti).The car turned out to be unsuitable for touring and
developed issues. The buyer sued the seller for breach of contract.
Judgment: The court held that there was indeed a breach of implied condition under the Sale of
Goods Act. Since the buyer relied on the seller’s expertise, the seller was bound to supply goods
reasonably fit for that stated purpose.
SHORT ANSWER
1. What is the subject matter of
goods in the contract of sale act?
2. What do you mean by delivery of
goods?
3. Hire purchase –explain
4. What do you mean by Mortgage?
5. Earnest money-Discuss?
SHORT ESSAY
1. what are the type of delivery?
2. Write a short essay on Price of
Goods?
3. Critically evaluate the
importantance of sales of goods act
1930?
4. Document title of Goods? Analyze
the importantance of it in contract
of sale of goods?
5. What do you mean by Agreement
to sell and its features?
ESSAY
1. Differentiate between Sale,
agreement to sell, Hire purchase,
Bailment, Mortgage?
2. Evaluate the essential elements of
Sales of goods act 1930?
78
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 12
Chapter Overview
In a contract, there are many Its breach gives the right to claim
stipulations (terms and conditions). damages (compensation), but not the right
to reject the goods or treat the contract as
Some stipulations are very important cancelled.
they go to the heart of the contract. These
are called conditions.
Warranty = a side condition
If a condition is broken, the whole (important but not the heart of the
contract can be cancelled. contract).
If a warranty is broken, the contract is Imagine you order a red car from a dealer.
not cancelled, but you might get Condition: The main condition is that you
compensation. must receive a car.
Section 12(1) "A contract of sale of If they don’t give you any car, you can
goods may contain terms (stipulations) cancel the contract.
that are either conditions or warranties."
Warranty: A small warranty is that the car
Section 12(2) -"A condition is a stipulation should be red.
essential to the main purpose of the
contract, the breach of which gives the If they deliver a blue car instead, you
aggrieved party the right to treat the can’t cancel the contract
contract as repudiated (i.e., cancel the
But you can ask for compensation or
contract)."
maybe repaint.
Condition = a very important term; if Condition = Very important, contract
it’s broken, the buyer can cancel the depends on it.
whole contract.
Warranty = Less important, contract
continues even if broken.
Section 12(3) “Warranty is a stipulation
collateral to the main purpose of the
contract”.
79
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
80
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
If it turns out that the seller has no The buyer must get a reasonable
right or authority to sell the goods (for chance to compare the bulk with the
example, if the goods were stolen), the sample.
buyer can reject the goods and claim a The goods must be free from hidden
refund or even claim damages. defects that would make them unfit for
use.
82
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
CASE STUDIES
Case: The Ghaziabad Development Authority entered into a contract with the Union of India for the
supply of construction materials for a project. The materials supplied were defective and did not
meet the specifications mentioned in the contract. The Ghaziabad Development Authority wanted to
reject the goods but the Union of India contended that the breach, if any, was a breach of warranty
(which wouldn't entitle the buyer to reject the goods), and not a condition.
Judgment: The Supreme Court ruled that a breach of condition gives the buyer the right to reject the
goods, while a breach of warranty entitles the buyer to only claim damages .
Case: The buyer purchased a second-hand car from the seller. The seller represented that they had
full ownership of the car and the right to sell it. It was later discovered that the car had been stolen.
Despite the car being in the buyer's possession and being used, the buyer learned that the seller had
no title or ownership of the vehicle.
Judgment: The court held that the seller’s breach of the implied condition of title under Section 14
of the Sale of Goods Act 1930 was fundamental.
Since the seller did not have legal ownership or title to the car, it was a breach of the implied
condition that the seller must have the right to sell the goods.
Even though the buyer had used the car, the lack of title gave the buyer the right to rescind the
contract and return the car for a full refund.
CHAPTER-13
Chapter overview
84
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
85
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
4. Sale by Seller in Possession After resell the goods. The buyer in resale
Sale (Section 30(1)) gets good title.
CASE STUDIES
Case: Pigs were sold at auction with a notice saying “sold with all faults.”
Issue: The pigs had a contagious disease, which the buyer later discovered. Decision: The seller was
not liable.
86
Reason: Under caveat emptor, the buyer should have inspected the pigs. The seller didn’t
misrepresent anything—he just didn’t disclose the defect.
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
Case: Milk sold by the dairy contained typhoid germs. A customer's wife died after consuming it.
Issue: Can the buyer sue for the defective (dangerous) product?
Reason: Food must be fit for consumption. This is an exception to caveat emptor—buyers trust
sellers of food to provide safe products.
Mr. Rowland, a car dealer, bought a car from another dealer and later sold it to Mr. Divall, a
customer.
After a few months, it was discovered that the car had been stolen before Rowland bought it. The
true owner reclaimed the car from Mr. Divall. Mr. Divall then sued Mr. Rowland to recover the
purchase price.
Decision: The court held that the seller had no title to pass, and therefore the buyer acquired no legal
ownership.
Since there was a total failure of consideration (i.e., Mr. Divall never got legal ownership), he was
entitled to get his money back.
Principle Involved: Caveat Emptor – buyer must examine goods; seller is not liable unless there's
fraud or misrepresentation.
Case: The buyer, Jones, purchased hemp from the seller, just, under the belief that it was suitable for
immediate use. However, the hemp was found to be damaged by sea water and not usable for the
intended purpose. The buyer argued that he should be compensated.
87
Judgment: The court held that the buyer had the opportunity to inspect the goods and no express
warranty was given by the seller. Hence, under the doctrine of Caveat Emptor, the buyer was
responsible for ensuring the quality and suitability of the goods before purchase.
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
SHORT ESSAY
1. Explain the principle of Caveat
Emptor under the Sale of Goods Act,
1930. What are its exceptions as
recognized by law?
2. Discuss the concept of Sale by
Owner as per Section 27 of the Sale
of Goods Act. How does ownership
affect the validity of a sale?
ESSAY
1. Explain the doctrine of Caveat
Emptor as laid down under the Sale
of Goods Act, 1930. Discuss its
relevance and application in the
modern business environment,
particularly in the context of e-
88
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
CHAPTER-14
Chapter Overview
89
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
The seller is not obligated to deliver the correct goods and reject wrong
goods until the buyer asks (applies) for it. ones, Reject all.
Example: If goods are ready and the Example: Ordered 100 shirts, received
buyer does not come forward or apply 120 – buyer has options as above.
for delivery, the seller need not deliver
until asked. 7. Section 39 – Delivery by
Installments
4. Section 36 – Rules on Delivery
Time and place Delivery can be in installments only if
Delivery must be made at a agreed. If one installment is late or
reasonable hour (not at midnight defective, the buyer may, accept others
unless agreed). and reject the faulty one, or Cancel the
If no location is mentioned, entire contract if the breach is serious
delivery happens at the seller’s (i.e., “goes to the root of the contract”).
business place or home if there’s 8. Section 40 – Delivery to Carrier
no business.
Goods with third party: If goods If goods are handed over to a carrier
are held by someone else (e.g., a (e.g., courier, shipping company), it’s
warehouse), the buyer needs that considered as delivery to the buyer,
third party’s acknowledgment unless agreed otherwise.
before delivery is complete.
The seller should make a reasonable
contract with the carrier (protect the
5. Section 37 – Expenses of Delivery
goods), else the buyer can sue the seller
Seller’s responsibility: Cost of for loss/damage.
preparing goods for delivery (e.g.,
Unpaid Seller
packing).
Under Section 45 of the Indian Sale of
Buyer’s responsibility: Cost of receiving
Goods Act, 1930, an "unpaid seller" is
goods (e.g., transport to their home or
defined as a seller of goods is deemed to
factory).
be an unpaid seller:
6. Section 38 – Delivery of Wrong
1. When the whole of the price has not
Quantity
been paid or tendered; or
Short delivery (less than agreed):
Buyer can reject all or accept 2. When a bill of exchange or other
what’s given and ask for damages. negotiable instrument has been received as
Excess delivery (more than agreed) conditional payment and the condition on
:Buyer can accept the correct which it was received has not been
quantity and reject the rest, accept fulfilled.
all and pay for extras, reject
everything. Example: Noushad sells a television to
Mixed goods: If different items are Shafeeq for ₹30,000. Shafeeq takes the
delivered, buyer can: Accept TV home and gives Noushad a post-dated
cheque for the amount.
90
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
A few days later, when Noushad deposits Even though he accepted a cheque (a
the cheque in the bank, it bounces due to conditional payment), the condition that
insufficient funds. the cheque clears was not fulfilled.
A. Rights against goods (Section 46(1)) The seller who still has possession of the
goods can keep them until payment is
The right of an unpaid seller against the made.
goods can be discussed under two heads
91
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
If the goods are in transit and the buyer 3) Right to Sue for Interest and Special
becomes insolvent, the seller can stop the Damages (Section 61)
goods and regain possession. This ends
The seller may claim: Interest on the
once the goods are delivered to the buyer.
unpaid amount from the date it was due
3. Right of Resale (Section 54) (if agreed in the contract or permitted by
law).
The seller can resell the goods: If the
goods are perishable. After giving notice Special damages if the buyer’s breach
to the buyer. If the buyer doesn’t pay after caused further loss beyond the usual
such notice. measure of damages.
usually by the fall of the hammer or rare goods) and monetary damages
any customary manner. would not suffice.
Rescission-The buyer can rescind
Right to Bid May Be Reserved
(cancel) the contract, effectively
The seller may reserve the right to bid, returning the parties to their pre-
but this must be expressly notified contractual positions, and may
beforehand. recover any payments made under the
contract.
Seller’s Right to Bid is Limited Rejection of Goods-If the goods
If the right to bid is not reserved, delivered does not conform to the
neither the seller nor his agent can bid. contract (e.g., damaged, defective, or
If they do, the sale is voidable at the incorrect goods), the buyer has the
buyer's option. right to reject them and demand a
refund, repair, or replacement.
Use of Pretended Bidding is Restitution-The buyer may be
Fraudulent entitled to restitution, which means
they can recover any money or
Any pretended bidding to raise the
property given to the seller under the
price is considered fraudulent and
contract.
renders the sale voidable at the buyer's
B. SELLERS
option.
Damages: The seller can claim
Right to Reject Bid Before Completion damages for the loss caused by the
buyer’s failure to fulfill the
A bidder may retract their bid anytime contract.
before the fall of the hammer or Specific Performance While less
announcement of sale completion. common, the seller can seek
Reserve Price (Upset Price) specific performance from the
buyer to fulfill their obligations,
The auctioneer can refuse to sell the particularly in the case of unique
goods if the bidding does not reach a goods or real property.
minimum (reserve) price, if such price Rescission: If the buyer has
is fixed. breached the contract, the seller
may rescind (cancel) the contract
Buyers and Sellers Remedies for Breach
and seek restitution.
of Contract
Retention of Title: If the buyer has
A. BUYERS not paid for the goods, the seller
The buyer can claim damages for the may have a right to retain
actual loss ownership of the goods until
Specific performance-The buyer may payment is made (depending on the
seek a court order compelling the jurisdiction and terms of the
seller to fulfill the terms of the contract).
contract, particularly if the item or Withholding Performance: The
service is unique (e.g., real estate or seller may withhold delivery of the
goods or services until the buyer
93
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
has performed their part of the lawsuit to claim the contract price
contract, particularly in the case of of the goods.
a contract involving payment on
delivery.
Action for the Price: If the buyer
refuses to pay or takes possession
of the goods, the seller can bring a
Judgment: No. The court held that the machine did not correspond to the description
provided at the time of the contract. Whipp was entitled to reject it.
Case: Mohan Lal sold a consignment of goods to Grain Chambers Ltd., but full payment
was not received. Grain Chambers refused to either pay or return the goods.
Judgment: The Allahabad High Court held that Mohan Lal was entitled to lien and stoppage
under the Sale of Goods Act, as he had not been paid fully.
CASE: Hadley, a mill owner, sent a broken shaft through Baxendale (a carrier) for repairs.
Baxendale delayed the delivery. As a result, Hadley’s mill remained shut longer, and he lost
profits.
Judgment: The court ruled that since Baxendale wasn’t informed that delay would cause a
business loss, he was not liable for that loss.
94
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
Case: Payne, the auctioneer, received a bid from Cave for an item. Cave withdrew his bid
before the hammer fell to finalize the sale.
Judgment: The court said Cave could legally withdraw his bid before the hammer fell, since
the bid was just an offer.
CHAPTER-15
CYBER LAW
Chapter overview
Introduction to Indian Cyber Law- Features
IT Act 2000- Objectives
97
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
SHORT ANSWER
Important Amendments:
1. What is cyber law?
2. What are the objectives of the IT
In 2008, the IT Act was amended to Act 2000?
introduce new crimes like cyber terrorism,
identity theft, child pornography, and to SHORT ESSAY
strengthen data protection rules. 1. Explain the features of Indian cyber
law?
CHAPTER-16
E- COMMERCE
Chapter overview
E-commerce - meaning - definition - features - Advantages and disadvantages
Digital signature- meaning -definition -working-uses- advantages and
limitations
Electronic contract - features
98
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
100
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
3. Legally Valid: E-contracts are legally ● There is a valid offer and acceptance.
enforceable under the Information ● There is lawful consideration.
Technology Act, 2000 in India. ● Both parties are competent to
contract.
● The contract is not for an illegal
purpose.
CASE STUDIES
Decision: Supreme Court held that email exchanges can form a valid contract if terms are clear and
agreed upon.
Learning Point: E-contracts (via email or website) are valid under the Indian Contract Act if there is
offer, acceptance, and consideration.
Decision: Consumer forum directed full refund and penalty, citing defective product and
misrepresentation.
101
Learning Point: E-commerce buyers have consumer rights and can file complaints for fraud or
misrepresentation.
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
Decision: The court held the employee guilty under Sections 66 and 72 of IT Act, recognizing that
unauthorized use of a digital signature is a cybercrime.
Learning Point: Protecting access to DSC is legally critical; unauthorized use is punishable.
SHORT ANSWER
1. What is e-commerce?
2. Describe digital signature
3. What is electronic contract
SHORT ESSAY
1. Explain advantages and limitations
of e-commerce
2. Evaluate the working of digital
signature
3. Analyse the uses of digital
signature
4. Explain features of electronic
contract
ESSAY
1. Explain advantages and
disadvantages of digital signature
2. What is e-commerce? Briefly
explain its features
102
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
CHAPTER-17
CYBERSPACE
Chapter overview
Cyberspace - Importance - components
Cybercrime - major cyber crimes- preventive techniques
Importance of Cyberspace
103
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
2. DATA THEFT
It refers to the unauthorized copying, 4. E-MAIL SPOOFING
transfer, or retrieval of data from a system Email spoofing is a technique used by
or device without the owner’s consent. It is attackers to send emails that appear to
a form of cybercrime that targets sensitive come from a trusted or legitimate source
or confidential information such as when, in fact, they are not.
personal details, financial records,
intellectual property, or trade secrets. The goal is to deceive the recipient into
believing the message is authentic, often to
steal sensitive information, spread
3. IDENTITY THEFT malware, or carry out scams.
Identity theft is a form of cybercrime
Preventing Email Spoofing
where someone illegally obtains and uses
another person's personal information—
For Individuals:
such as name, address, Social Security
● Check sender details carefully
number, or financial details—without their
(hover over the "From" address).
permission, usually for financial gain or
● Do not click suspicious links or
fraud.
download attachments.
● Enable spam filters and keep
antivirus software updated.
Preventing Identity Theft
● Use email authentication, like
verifying DKIM signatures (in
o Secure Personal Information: Shred
some clients).
documents with personal data before
disposing of them. Lock up sensitive
For Organizations:
records.
105
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
CASE STUDIES
Outcome: Strict enforcement of IT Act Sections 67, 67A, 67B and POCSO Act. ISPs were
instructed to monitor and report such content.
Outcome: The cybercrime cell traced the IP address and arrested a former colleague who did it out
of revenge. Charges were filed under IT Act Sections 66C, 66D, and IPC Section 509.
108
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
CHAPTER-18
PENALTIES AND OFFENCES
Chapter overview
Penalties and Offences Section under IT Act, 2000
109
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
110
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
111
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
ESSAY
1. Explain Penalties and Offences
Section under IT Act, 2000
CHAPTER-19
Chapter overview
Investigation under the IT Act, 2000
Adjudication under the IT Act, 2000
IPR- Types -purpose- importance - challenges
112
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
Given the nature of cybercrimes, The Adjudicating Officer has civil court
electronic evidence plays a central role. powers, such as
Investigators use cyber forensics to ● Enforcing attendance of witnesses
retrieve data from computers, networks, ● Compelling production of
and mobile devices. The Indian Evidence documents
Act, 1872 was amended to include digital ● Receiving evidence on affidavit
evidence, which is now admissible in ● Issuing commissions for
court if collected properly. examination
113
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
(CAT). However, in 2017, the CAT was software code. The duration is life of the
merged with the Telecom Disputes author + 60 years (in India)
Settlement and Appellate Tribunal
(TDSAT). Example: Books, songs, films, paintings,
software
4. Role of Judiciary
2) Trademark
For serious cybercrimes like cyber
terrorism, child pornography, or hacking It is used to protect Words, logos, slogans,
involving amounts over Rs. 5 crore, the brand names and to distinguish
matter is dealt with by Judicial Magistrates goods/services of one company from
or Sessions Courts. These crimes often fall another
under both the IT Act and the Indian Penal The duration is 10 years and then it can
Code (IPC), and require trial under the renewable
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). Example: McDonald's "I'm Lovin' It"
3) Patent
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)
It is used to protect new inventions or
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) processes. It must be novel, non-obvious,
are the legal rights given to individuals or and useful. The duration is 20 years from
organizations for creations of the mind, filing
such as inventions, literary and artistic Example: Pharmaceuticals, machines, new
works, designs, symbols, names, and technology
images.
4) Industrial Designs
Purpose
● To encourage creativity and It is used to protect Aesthetic/visual design
innovation of objects. The duration is of 10 years,
● To protect creators' economic and extendable to 15
moral rights
● To promote fair competition in Example: Bottle shapes (Coca-Cola),
business and trade phone designs
Types of Creations Protected
● Inventions
● Artistic and literary works 5) Geographical Indications (GIs)
● Brand names and logos
● Software and digital content It is used to protect products that originate
● Designs and patterns from a specific region and have qualities
Types of Intellectual Property Rights due to that region. The duration: 10 years,
renewable
1) Copyright
It is used to protect Literary, artistic, Examples: Darjeeling Tea, Mysore Silk,
musical, and dramatic works; also Banarasi Saree
114
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
CASE STUDIES
Judgment: Delhi High Court held this as passing off and ordered Akash Arora to stop using the
domain.
Principle: Domain names can have trademark value; imitation causes confusion = infringement.
Learning: Brand names in digital space are also protected.
ESSAY
1. Explain importance and challenges of
IPR
OPEN-ENDED MODULE
Divide students into groups and
Course Title: Business Regulations assign a specific case study related to
consumer regulations or environmental
Course Objectives: regulations. Ask them to analyze the case,
● To develop understanding of the identify key issues, and present their
legal environment of business in findings.
India.
● To impart knowledge of key Activity II
provisions of business laws
Visit to a local court or consumer forum
including the Indian Contract Act,
Sale of Goods Act, IT Act and Objective:
others. To provide students with first-hand
● To enable students to apply legal exposure to legal procedures, courtroom
principles in real-world business decorum, and the practical application of
situations. business and commercial laws.
● Develop legal reasoning, public
speaking, and teamwork skills Pre-Visit Preparation:
116
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
117
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
Assessment Criteria:
2. Role Allocation ● Understanding of relevant law
Assign students to the following roles: ● Quality of legal arguments
● Judge ● Team coordination and preparation
● Plaintiff and Defendant ● Role play realism and
● Advocates (Prosecution & professionalism
Defense) ● Reflective report or oral
● Witnesses presentation post-trial
● Court clerk / Reporter
● Jury (optional) Activity V
Group Debates
Organize debates on topics like
3. Preparation Phase (1–2 weeks) Choose relevant, debatable topics from the
Guide students to: syllabus. Examples include:
Digital Laws:
“Data privacy laws are sufficient to
protect consumers in India.”
QP Code: Name:
Register No:
Section A
All Questions can be answered. Each Question carries 3 marks (Ceiling: 24 Marks)
Section B
All Questions can be answered. Each Question carries 6 marks (Ceiling: 36 Marks)
Section C
Answer any ONE .Each Question carries 10 marks (1x10=10 Marks)
120
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
SYLLABUS
MODULE UNIT CONTENT HRS
Introduction to Business Regulations 15
1 Definition and importance of Business Regulations-Business Law 1
Indian Contract Act, 1872- Contract - Definition - Essentials of valid
2
contracts- Classification of contracts
3
Offer and Acceptance - Consideration - Capacity to contract - Free
I. 3 consent - Coercion - Undue influence - Misrepresentation - Fraud - 5
Mistake
Void agreements -Discharge of contract - Breach of
4
contract and remedies
4
5 Contingent contracts -Quasi contracts 2
II. An overview of Special Contracts 15
6 Contract of Indemnity: Meaning – Nature-Right of indemnity 2
holder and indemnifier
7 Contract of Guarantee: Meaning- Nature-Rights and liabilities of 3
surety -Discharge of surety from liability
8 Contract of Bailment and Pledge-Rights and duties of bailor and 5
bailee, Pledger and Pledgee
9 Contract of Agency - Creation of agency - Delegation of authority - 5
Duties and liabilities of principal and agent -Termination of agency.
Sale Of Goods Act 10
121
BUSINESS REGULATIONS
Note: The subject teacher has to prepare the detailed syllabus of the module
122