Thomas
Thomas
October, 2024
SCHOOL OF POSTGRADUATE STUDIES
October, 2024
Table of Contents
Table of Contents.................................................................................................................................i
Abstract..............................................................................................................................................iii
CHAPTER ONE.................................................................................................................................1
1.1. Back ground of the study................................................................................................1
1.2. Statement of the problem...............................................................................................2
1.3. Research Questions.........................................................................................................4
1.4. Objectives of the study....................................................................................................4
1.4.1. General objective........................................................................................................4
1.4.2. Specific Objectives.....................................................................................................4
1.5. Significance of the Study................................................................................................5
1.6. Scope of the Study...........................................................................................................5
1.7. Limitation of the Study...................................................................................................5
1.8. Organization of the Study..............................................................................................5
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW.................................................................................6
2.1. An Overview of Human Resource training and Development...................................6
2.1.1. Human Resource Development..................................................................................7
2.1.2. Training and Development Strategies........................................................................9
2.1.3. Benefits of Training and Development....................................................................15
2.1.4. Employee Performance............................................................................................16
2.1.5. Capacity Building.....................................................................................................19
2.1.6. Relationship between Training and Development and Organizational
Competitiveness........................................................................................................................19
2.2. Empirical reviews..........................................................................................................20
2.3. A framework for analyzing the effect of training and development strategies
on organizational competitiveness.........................................................................................21
2.4. Conceptual framework.................................................................................................22
CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY.................................................23
3.1. The Research Design:...................................................................................................23
3.2. The Research Method:..................................................................................................23
3.3. Subjects and Sampling Techniques.............................................................................23
3.4. Sample Size Determination:.........................................................................................23
i
3.5. Techniques of Data Analysis........................................................................................24
3.6. Ethical Consideration...................................................................................................24
3.7. Work plan and budget..................................................................................................25
3.7.1. Plan of activities.......................................................................................................25
3.7.2. Budget Cost breakdown of the study.......................................................................26
Reference...........................................................................................................................................27
APPENDIX I.....................................................................................................................................29
Part II.......................................................................................................................................30
ii
Abstract
Service quality is determinant factors that enable banks to get superior advantage over their
competitors by increasing customer satisfaction and loyalty.
The main objective of the study will be to investigate the role of service quality in building on
customer loyalty in CBO Jamo branches.
The current study measured customer services quality and its relation with customer satisfaction
and loyalty in the Jamo branches banks. Descriptive method will be used as the research method
of the study. The sample of respondents will be selected based on convenience sampling
procedure. The dimensions of the study will be tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, assurance,
and empathy. Study data collected using structured questionnaire and categorized under four
dimensions of the model. Correlation and multiple regressions will be used to investigate the
relationship between dependent and independent variables.
Keywords: Service quality, Loyalty, Customer satisfaction, Jamo branches; Cooperative Bank of
Oromia
iii
CHAPTER ONE
In this context, the subject of service quality in relation to customer needs a fresh understanding
in the current business scenario. Service quality is particularly essential in the banking services
context because it provides high level of customer satisfaction and wins customer loyalty, for
this reason it becomes a key to competitive advantage (Almossawi, 2001).
Customer satisfaction is also crucial in the banking sector because of the special nature of the
service which is characterized by intensive contact with customers who have different needs and
require customized solutions and it is known to be one of the most important and serious issues
towards success in today’s competitive business environment, as it affects company market
shares and customer loyalty (Clemes, 2008).
Similarly, service loyalty is one of the most important structures in service marketing, duettist
final effect on customers’ repeated purchases, and in fact ,those loyal customers who purchase
repeatedly are considered as the base of any business (Mohsan,2011).Although these concepts
have been used so many times in the marketing literature, but the relations between these three
concepts still remain ambiguous and this calls for investigation to find the relation of these three
concepts (Mohsan, 2011).
1
banking, He used (Parasuraman, A.Zeithaml, & Berry, 1988) SERVQUAL scale as the starting
point, a refine the measurement by adding items extracted from a separately conducted
qualitative study about bank service quality (Avkiran N. K., 1994).
This study will investigate the role of customer service quality in building customer loyalty using
BANKSERV model in selected banks of CBO, Jamo branches.
On the relationship between customer satisfaction and service quality in Tehran banks conducted
by (Mosahab, Mohamad, & T.Ramayah, 2010) concluded that nearly 43 percent of customer’s
satisfaction change is explained by service quality. On the other hand, service quality has a direct
relation with loyalty, and nearly 45 percent of loyalty changes can be explained by service
quality changes. Another point is that if the satisfaction variable enters the model, the resulted
determination index will be higher in figure than other cases (0.803). This figure means that
nearly 80 percent of loyalty changes can be explained by satisfaction and service quality,
although satisfaction plays a more important role in this relation (Mosahab, Mohamad, &
T.Ramayah, 2010).
This study focused merely on service quality without considering above mentioned factors like
cost, financial performance and others. Service quality has been proven to be the best
determinant of customer satisfaction and indirectly customer loyalty when it comes to service
sectors Daniel et al (2012). Unsatisfactory service leads to a drop in customer satisfaction,
loyalty and willingness to recommend the service to a friend. This would in turn lead to an
increase the number of customers shifts to competitors.
2
1.3. Research Questions
This study tried to answer the following research questions:
1. What are the service quality dimensions in Cooperative Bank of Oromia, Jamo Branches?
3. What is the extent of relationship between service quality dimensions and Customer Loyalty in
Cooperative Bank of Oromia, Jamo Branches?
4. What is the relationship between customer satisfaction and customer loyalty in Cooperative
Bank of Oromia, Jamo Branches?
1. To identify the service quality dimensions provided by Cooperative Bank of Oromia, Jamo
Branches;
3
1.5. Significance of the Study
The ultimate success or failure of a company depends on its ability to make profitable sell, what
it produces and continuously offering quality services relatively for a longer period. This study is
therefore intended to help the company management to direct their attention to this highly
essential function of business.
The finding of this study may help banks to understand the role of good customer service on
customer satisfaction and loyalty. It provides literature for the bank industry under customer
service quality. It helps to other researchers who want to conduct further study on the subject in
the future. It provides solution for bank industry service quality problems and it may give them
an idea of where they are presently in terms of their service quality and what they should do in
the future.
This study will be conducted to examine the role of customer service quality in building
customer loyalty Cooperative Bank of Oromia, Jamo Branches; the sample will draw from the
Jamo branch, thus this study may be limited in its generalize ability of the findings to others
private banks found. The number of variable used in this study will be only five which may not
consider more factors, like corporate image, location, price, technology employed, security
issues and other variables which can influence customer satisfaction and loyalty
4
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW
Introduction
This chapter gives an overview of literature that is related to the research problem presented in
previous chapter. The concept of service quality dimensions, customer satisfaction, customer
loyalty, relation between service quality and customer satisfaction, relation between customer
satisfaction and loyalty, service quality in commercial bank and service quality model will be
introduce in order to give a clear idea about the research area.
Many writers define ‘customer service’ in different ways: for instance, Catherine McGuinn
(2009) defined customer service as a philosophy that directs all practices of an organization to
serve the needs of customers in a manner that is mutually beneficial to all stakeholders and
involves the facilitation of customer satisfaction, loyalty and goodwill(McGuinn,2009).
(Kotler, 2010) defined service as any activity or benefit that one party can offer to another that is
essentially intangible and does not result in the ownership of anything and its production may or
may not be tied to a physical product(Kottler,2010).
Any intangible actions that are performed by person or machines or both to create good
perception within users are called service. Although services are performed by service providers
and consumers together, its quality results in perception and value assessment by the customer
(A.N.Rao, D.E.Johnson, B, & K.Ladha, 2007).
5
2.2. Characteristics of Services
According to Bitner et al. (1993) service has four characteristics: intangibility, inseparability,
heterogeneity and perishability.
Intangibility of Services
Regan (1963) introduced the idea of services being activities, benefits or satisfactions which are
offered for sale or provided in connection with the sale of goods. The degree of intangibility has
been suggested as a means of differentiating tangible products with services. Most of the time,
services are explained as being intangible since their outcome is considered to be an action rather
than a physical product highlight the fact that the degree of tangibility has implications for the
ease with which consumers can evaluate services and products (A.Zeithaml, Parasuman, &
Berry, 1985).
Inseparability of Services
Inseparability is taken to show the simultaneous delivery and consumption of services and it is
believed to enable consumers to affect or shape the performance and quality of the service
(A.Zeithaml, Parasuman, & Berry, 1985).
Heterogeneity of Services
Heterogeneity reveals the degree of high variability in service delivery. This is a particular
problem for services with high labor involvement, as the service performance is delivered by
different people and the performance of people can vary from day to day and also from person to
person. Besides, it offers the opportunity to provide high degree of flexibility and customization
of the service and this can be used as a benefit and point of differentiation (wolak, Kalafatis, &
Harris, 1998).
Perishability of Services
The notion of perishability reflects services cannot be stored and carried forward to a future time
period and suggest that services are time dependent and time important which make them very
perishable. The issue of perish ability is primarily the concern of the service producer and that
the consumer only becomes aware of the issue when there is insufficient supply and they have to
wait for the service (Bitner, W.Brown, & P.Fish, 1993).
6
2.3. Service Quality
In today’s increasingly competitive business environment, service quality is essential for the
success of any organization. Service quality is important aspect that affects the competitiveness
of business. Banks should always increase the quality of service continuously since there is no
assurance that the current outstanding service will be suitable for future. Thus, banks should
develop new strategy to satisfy their customer and should provide quality service to gain
competitive advantage over competitors (Siddiqi, 2011).
Service quality is considered an important tool for a firm’s struggle to differentiate itself from its
competitors. The relevance of service quality to companies is emphasized especially the fact that
it offers a competitive advantage to companies that strive to improve it and hence bring customer
satisfaction (Ladhari, 2009).
The challenge in defining service quality is that it is a subjective concept, like beauty. Everyone
has a different definition based on their personal experiences. It has also received a great deal of
attention from academicians, practitioners and services marketing literature, service quality is
defined as the overall assessment of a service by the customer. Researcher points out that, by
defining service quality, companies will be able to deliver services with higher quality level
presumably resulting in increased customer satisfaction. Understanding service quality must
involve acknowledging the characteristics of service which are intangibility, heterogeneity and
inseparability. In that way, service quality would be easily measured (Negi et al., 2009).
Crosby (1984) defined quality as conformance to requirements. This definition implies that
organizations must establish requirements and specifications. Once these requirements and
specifications are established, the quality goal of the various functions of an organization is to
comply strictly with them. Quality also defined from different point of views, from customer
point of view quality means fitness for use and meeting customer satisfaction and from process
point of view it means conformance with the process design, standards and specifications.
Quality may also be defined as the degree of excellence at an acceptable price from product point
of view and from the cost point of view it means best combination between costs and features
(Crosby, 1984).
A solid foundation in defining and measuring service quality was emanated in the mid-eighties
by (Gronroos, 1984) and (A.Zeithaml, Parasuman, & Berry, 1985). They were amongst the
earliest scholars laid down the foundation for the definitions as well as development of service
7
quality. Service quality defined as the degree and direction of discrepancy between consumer’s
perceptions and expectations in terms of different but relatively important dimensions of the
service quality, which can affect their future purchasing behavior. This definition clearly shows
that service quality is what customers’ assess through their expectations and perceptions of a
service experience. Customers’ perceptions of service quality result from a comparison of their
before-service expectations with their actual service experience. Service quality is based on a
comparison between what the customer feels should be offered and what is provided
(A.Zeithaml, Parasuman, & Berry, 1985).
If the customer’s expectations are meeting or exceeded, then the company is perceived to be
offering higher service quality. But if on the other hand, if the expectations of the customers are
not meet, the company is on its way not only to face displeased and hostile customers, which in
turn leads to defection to competitors. Customer’s expectation serves as a foundation for
evaluating service quality because, quality is high when performance exceeds expectation and
quality is low when performance does not meet their expectation. Expectation is viewed in
service quality literature as desires or wants of consumer that is, what they feel a service provider
should offer rather than would offer (Parasuraman, A.Zeithaml, & Berry, 1988).
Perceived service is the outcome of the consumer’s view of the service dimensions, which are
both technical and functional in nature (Gronroos, 1984). (Parasuraman, A.Zeithaml, & Berry,
1988), define perceived quality as a form of attitude, related but not equal to satisfaction, and
results from a consumption of expectations with perceptions of performance. Therefore, having a
better understanding of consumers attitudes will help to know how they perceive service quality
in banks and respond accordingly (Parasuraman, A.Zeithaml, & Berry, 1988).
The service process as well as the service outcome will contribute quality evaluations. As stated
by (Gronroos, 1984) there are two types of service quality these are technical quality and
functional quality. Technical quality is what the customer is actually receiving from the service
(outcome) while functional quality is the manner in which the service is delivered (process). It is
likely to be much more effective to tell a service contact employee what specific attributes
service quality includes, such as responsiveness. Management can say, if we can improve our
responsiveness, quality will increase (Asubonteng et al; 1996).
8
2.4. Customer Service Quality Dimensions
Service’s exclusive characteristics of intangibility, heterogeneity, and inseparability lead them to
possess high levels of experience and credence properties, as a result, they became difficult to
evaluate as we did in tangible goods. Hence, recognition of the determinants of service quality is
necessary in order to specify measure, control and improve customer perceived service quality
(Johnston, 1995).
The BANKSERV instrument, developed by Avkiran (1994), was adapted from SERVQUAL to
specifically suit the Australian banking industry. It is an instrument, designed to allow customers
to reflect on their expectations and perceptions in single statements. It avoids the potential
psychometric problems associated with SERVQUAL and the negatively worded questionnaire
items found in its (Avkiran, 1999) .Moreover, the SERVQUAL model has been proven to be the
best model to measure service quality in service sectors especially with the customer perspective.
This idea generates an assumption that the five dimensions of SERVQUAL model could have a
direct relationship with customer satisfaction and loyalty. For the purpose of measuring customer
satisfaction with respect to different aspects of service quality and to overcome problems which
is created as a result of the gap between management and customers, a survey instrument was
developed by (Parasuraman, A.Zeithaml, & Berry, 1988). The instrument is called SERVQUAL.
The basic assumption of the measurement was that customers can evaluate a firm’s service
quality by comparing their perception with their provided by service businesses. (Parasuraman,
A.Zeithaml, & Berry, 1988), measured the quality of services provided by retail banks, a long-
distance telephone company, a securities broker, an appliance repair and maintenance firm, and
credit card companies. Based on this study, ten key determinants of service quality identified
(Parasuraman, A.Zeithaml, & Berry, 1988).
Assurance: knowledge and competence of service providers and the ability to convey trust and
confidence.
9
Though, the SERVQUAL model has been the major generic model used to measure and manage
service quality across different service settings and various cultural backgrounds, it has been
subjected to a number of theoretical and operational criticisms (Buttle, 1996).
Customer satisfaction is the state of mind that customers have about a company when their
expectations have been met or exceeded over the lifetime of the product or service. Service
companies have since recently focused on customers in order to improve competitiveness.
Customer satisfaction is one of the important outcomes of marketing activity (Rigopoulou, et al.
2008).
Good customer satisfaction has an effect on the profitability of nearly every business. For
example, when customers receive good service, each will typically tell nine to ten people.
However, customers who receive poor service will typically relate their dissatisfaction to
between fifteen and twenty others. Therefore, customer satisfaction is an asset that should be
monitored and managed just like any physical asset (Naik et al. 2010). The satisfaction judgment
is related to all the experiences made with a certain business concerning its given products, the
sales process, and the after- sale service. Whether the customer is satisfied after purchase also
depends on the offer’s performance in relation to the customer’s expectation. Customers form
their expectation from past buying experience, friends and associates advice, and marketers and
competitors information and promises (Kotler, 2010).
Higher customer satisfaction leads to greater customer loyalty which in turn leads to higher
future revenue. As a result, many market leaders are found to be highly superior customer-
10
service orientated. They have been rewarded with high revenue and customer retention as well.
For that reason, organizations in the same market sector are forced to assess the quality of the
services that they provide in order to attract and retain their customers. Because satisfied
customers are a key to long-term business success (Zeithaml et al., 1996). Customer satisfaction
is consumer's fulfillment response. It is a judgment that a product or service feature, or the
product or service itself, provided (or is providing) a pleasurable level of consumption-related
fulfillment, including levels of under- or over fulfillment (Oliver, 1997)
Henley center headlight vision (Anon., 2007) states the research carried out in the UK with
public sector organizations suggests that there are five themes that are likely to be relevant to all
organizations in measuring customer satisfaction:
Loyalty has both behavioral and attitudinal dimensions. The behavioral dimension consists of
repeated purchase of product while attitudinal loyalty refers to attitudinal commitment or
favorable attitude toward a product resulting in repeat purchasing behavior. It is an influenced
purchase response resulting from an evaluative attitude favoring the purchase. Loyalty is thus,
viewed as the customer’s demonstration of faithful obedience to an organization despite the
11
occasional error or indifferent services (Daniel, 2012). In addition, Loyalty in service businesses
refers to the customer’s commitment to do business with a particular organization, purchasing
their products repeatedly and recommending others to the organization’s products. Christopher
L. and, Johan W. (2006) as certain that customer loyalty is actually the result of an organization
creating a benefit for customers that they will maintain or increase their purchases from the
organization. They indicate that true loyalty is created when the customer becomes an advocate for
the organization without incentives (Christopher L. and, JochenW. 2006).
As service quality improves, the probability of customer satisfaction increases. Quality was only
one of many dimensions on which satisfaction was based; satisfaction was also one potential
influence on future quality perceptions (Clemes, 2008).
(Parasuraman, A.Zeithaml, & Berry, 1988) , defined service quality and customer satisfaction as
follows: Service quality is a global judgment, or attitude, relating to the superiority of the
service, whereas satisfaction is related to a specific transaction. Satisfaction is a post
consumption experience which compares perceived quality with expected quality, whereas,
service quality refers to a global evaluation of a firm's service delivery system (Parasuraman et
al., 1985).
(Siddiqi, 2011), described that all the service quality attributes are positively related to customer
satisfaction and customer satisfaction is positively related to customer loyalty in the retail
banking settings. Furthermore, Daniel O. Auka (2012) also stated that high quality of service will
result in high customer satisfaction and increase loyalty (Siddiqi, 2011), Daniel O., 2012).
12
2.8. Relationship between Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty
Both the service management and the marketing literatures suggest that there is a strong
theoretical foundation for an empirical exploration of the linkages between customer satisfaction
and customer loyalty. These literatures state that there is a strong and positive relationship
between customer satisfaction and loyalty. A satisfied customer is six times more likely to
repurchase a product and share his experience with five or six other people whereas, one
unsatisfied customer can drive out more business from the organization than ten highly satisfied
customers do. With higher customer satisfaction the level of loyalty also increases
(Mohsanet.al.2011).
Lin (2009) stated that customer satisfaction has measurable impact on customer loyalty in that
when satisfaction reaches a certain level; on the high side, loyalty increases considerably; at the
same time, when satisfaction falls to a certain point, loyalty reduces too. He proposed that a link
between satisfaction and loyalty can be classified into four different groups:-
There is a positive relationship between customer satisfaction and customer loyalty but this
connection is not always a linear relation. It depends on factors such as market regulation,
switching costs, and brand equity, existence of loyalty programs, proprietary technology, and
product differentiation at the industry level (Sudharshan, 1995).
13
2.9.2. Cooperative of Oromia
Cooperative Bank of Oromia was commercially licensed October 2004 and commenced
operations in March 2005. As there is no legal provisions that allow establishment of a
cooperative bank in the country, the bank was registered in accordance with article 304 of the
commercial code of Ethiopia.
Measuring service quality has been one of the most persistent topics in management literature.
This is because the need to develop valid instruments for the systematic evaluation of firms
„performance from the customer point of view; and the association between perceived service
quality and other key organizational outcomes, which has led to the development of models for
measuring service quality( Cronin et al.,2010).
Parasuraman et al., 1985 developed a conceptual model of service quality where they identified
five gaps that could impact the consumer’s evaluation of service quality in four different
industries (retail banking, credit card, securities brokerage and product repair and maintenance
(Parasuraman et al., 1985).
14
Gap between Service Quality Specification and Service Delivery;
2.11. SERVQUAL
Cronin and Taylor (1992) were amongst the researchers who leveled maximum attack on the
SERVQUAL scale. They questioned the conceptual basis of the SERVQUAL scale and found it
confusing with service satisfaction. They, therefore, opined that expectation (E) component of
SERVQUAL be discarded and instead performance (P) component alone be used. They
proposed what is referred to as the ERVPERF scale. Besides theoretical arguments, Cronin and
Taylor (1992) provided empirical evidence across four industries (namely banks, pest control,
dry cleaning, and fast food) to corroborate the superiority of their performance-only instrument
over disconfirmation-based SERVQUAL scale (Cronin and Taylor, 1992).
Being a variant of the SERVQUAL scale and containing perceived performance component
alone, performance only scale is comprised of only 22 items. A higher perceived performance
implies higher service quality. Methodologically, the SERVPERF scale represents marked
improvement over the SERVQUAL scale. Not only is the scale more efficient in reducing the
number of items to be measured by 50 per cent, it has also been empirically found superior to the
SERVQUAL scale for being able to explain greater variance in the overall service quality
measured through the use of single-item scale (Sanjay and Garima,2004).
2.12. BANKSERV
The SERVQUAL model has come in for criticism from many authors, for example, (Avkiran,
1999), criticizes the SERVQUAL as gigantic data user, cost and time inefficient, cause it
compare perceived performance with expectations in separate items (22-expectations items and
22-perceptions items) Whereas, the BANKSERV instrument captures the similar comparison of
perceived performance with expectations in a battery of single statements (Avkiran, 1999).
Asubonteng et al. (1996) did eighteen critical reviews on empirical studies of service quality and
conclude that SERVQUAL instrument is industry specific. When SERVQUAL applied for retail
banking, problems were identified with regard to its dimensionality and the value of expectation
scores (Asubonteng et al. 1996).
15
2.13. Conceptual Framework
The following conceptual framework drawn by researcher to indicates the crucial process, which
is useful to show the direction of the study. The study shows the relationship between the five
service quality dimensions (reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy and tangible) and
customer satisfaction and loyalty.
Reliability
Tangibility
Responsiveness
Asssurance
16
CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
Where,
Where; n is the sample size; N is the population size e is the level of precision or sampling error=
(0.05)
After sample size of bank was determined, the researcher used convenience sampling methods to
select the sample from the available population. The rationale behind employing convenience
17
sampling method was because there is no point in time during which all clients are available due
to different reasons and it is not possible to contact everyone who may be sample.
Structured questionnaire were used to collect data. Structured questionnaires containing closed
end and can easily understood by respondents. The questionnaires have four parts: The first part
of the questionnaire is about the personal information of respondents. The second section was
design to measure the customers’ perception about the bank service delivery system. The third
parts of the questioner were about the overall judgment of service quality and satisfaction and the
last part was about customer’s loyalty.
The questionnaires were divided into four sections: Section A: Personal Information, Section B:
Customers Perceptions and in Section C: Customers was asking the overall judgment of service
quality and satisfaction based on a five- scale interval and section D: Customer loyalty.
Section A of the questionnaire was used for statistical purpose only. The first section consisted of
questions to find out the demographic features of the respondents such as gender, age, marital
status, jobs, academic qualification, and types of account. Section B was used to evaluate service
quality in bank. The SERVQUAL instrument is select to measure service quality. SERVQUAL
developed by (Parasuraman, Zeithaml, & Berry, 1998) focuses on the service attributes. Section
C was used to measure the overall satisfaction level of customer. The last part of the
questionnaire was measures customer loyalty level. These consist of three customer loyalty items
which was develop by researcher and except the first part of questionnaire all are measures by
using a five- point Likert response scale.
18
3.6. Validity and Reliability of Instruments
The researcher attempt to insure that the finding will be valid and reliable; the instrument content
was asses using expert judgment and Likert-type’s scales in research; which is necessary to
calculate the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for reliability and consistency (Renganathanet .al,
2012).
Descriptive analysis
The descriptive statistical results was present by tables, frequency distributions and percentages
to give a condense picture of the data. This will achieve through summary of statistics, which
includes the means and standard deviations values which are computed for each variable in this
study.
In this study Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationships between
service quality dimensions (Tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, assurance and empathy),
customer satisfaction and loyalty.
Multiple regression analysis was used to investigate the effect of service quality dimensions
(Tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, assurance and empathy) on customer satisfaction and
loyalty.
Regression functions
The equation of multiple regressions on this study is generally built around two sets of variable,
namely dependent and independent variables. The basic objective of using regression equation
was making the researcher more effective at describing, understanding, predicting, and
controlling the stated variables.
19
3.8. Ethical Considerations
The consideration of ethics in research and business is of growing importance. Therefore, it is
critical to understand the basics of ethical research. This is especially important if your research
involves interaction with businesses or members of the general community who serve as
participants (i.e., respondents) in your research. As a researcher, you were needed to ensure that
no psychological, financial and social harm occurs to those who involves in the study.
20
3.9. Work plan and budget
S/ Activities Duration
N
21
3.9.2. Budget Cost breakdown of the study
An indicative plan for the budget/ or logistics requirement for the execution of these research
work is summarized and presented below in the form of categorical cost breakdown
Subtotal 4245.00
Subtotal 1300.00
22
Reference
A.N.Rao, D.E.Johnson, B, S., & K.Ladha, J. (2007). Weed Management in Direct seeded Rice.
A.Zeithaml, V., Parasuman, A. P., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service
Quality and its Implications for future research . Journal of Marketing 49, 41-50.
Auka, D. O., Bosire, J., & V.Matern. (2013). Percieved Service Quality and Customer Loyalty in
Retail Banking.
Avkiran. (1999). The Evidence of Efficiency Gains: The role of Mergers and the benefits to the
public . Journal of Banking and Finance,23, 991-1013.
Bitner, M. J., W.Brown, S., & P.Fish, R. (1993). Tracking the Evolution of service Marketing
Literature. Journal of Retailing69(1), 61-103.
Gronroos, C. (1984). A Service Quality Model and its Marketing implications. European Journal
of Marketing .
23
Mosahab, R., Mohamad, O., & T.Ramayah. (2010). Service quality,Customer satisfaction and
loyalty: a test of mediation. International Business research 3(4).
Oguntu. (2012). Effects of training on employee performance: A case of United Nations Support
office for the African Union Mission in Somalia .
Parasuraman, A. P., A.Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL A Multiple-item Scale
for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing 64(1), 12-40.
wolak, R., Kalafatis, S., & Harris, P. (1998). An investigation into four characteristics of
services. Journal of Emperical Generalisations in Marketing Science3(2).
24
APPENDIX I
QUEEN’S COLLEGE
This questionnaire is prepared to gather information on the Role of Customer service quality in
building Customer Loyalty. The purpose of this study is to collect data for the evidence which
would support to write a research paper for academic purpose .Your input is very important to
the researcher. Hence, you are kindly requested to fill this questionnaire to achieve the grand
objective of the study. Your response will be kept highly confidential and used only for this
research.
I thank you very much in advance for participating in this survey and providing your thoughtful
feedback. If you have any questions or comments please contact by the following address Tel-
+251913424568
Part I
Personal information
Please read each question carefully and tick in the box corresponding to the response that
most accurately represents your view.
25
Part II
Keys: Strongly Agree (SA=5), Agree (A=4), Neutral (N= 3), Disagree (DA=2), Strongly
Disagree (SDA=1) Please insert a tick mark where you think is appropriate in the space provided
in front of the statement
26
3.2
Effects of Training Improve quality service for customer
1. Availability of trainers
2. Availability of time.
3. Availability of materials.
6 Organizational Competitiveness
6.1 Trainings are important in improving the organizational
Performance to give quality service.
6.2 Employees become more committed toward their jobs
After receiving trainings.
6.3 Employees’ job satisfaction is increased through trainings.
6.4 Job performance helps to in enhancing the Organizational
Efficiency and effectiveness.
6.5 Trainings increase employee confidence when performing
Work related task after receiving trainings.
6.6 Trainings and development motivate employees to enhance
their job performance
27
28