0% found this document useful (0 votes)
0 views

my-report

The document presents the results of a two-way ANOVA analysis with treatment means and statistics indicating significant differences among treatments, as the P-value is less than 0.05. The LSD test identifies treatment groupings, showing that treatments 6, 7, 3, 4, and 1 are not significantly different from each other, while treatments 5, 2, and 12 show lower means. The report is generated by Dr. Pratheesh P. Gopinath from Kerala Agricultural University.

Uploaded by

saravananjrf2021
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
0 views

my-report

The document presents the results of a two-way ANOVA analysis with treatment means and statistics indicating significant differences among treatments, as the P-value is less than 0.05. The LSD test identifies treatment groupings, showing that treatments 6, 7, 3, 4, and 1 are not significantly different from each other, while treatments 5, 2, and 12 show lower means. The report is generated by Dr. Pratheesh P. Gopinath from Kerala Agricultural University.

Uploaded by

saravananjrf2021
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Two way ANOVA (RBD)

RESULT
RBD ANALYSIS

Table 1: Treatment mean and other statistics

Treatment_means std LCL UCL Min Max


1 71.903 4.491 66.240 77.567 66.87 75.50
2 62.800 3.925 57.137 68.463 59.66 67.20
3 72.503 4.408 66.840 78.167 67.43 75.40
4 72.100 6.286 66.437 77.763 64.89 76.43
5 66.103 3.498 60.440 71.767 63.46 70.07
6 73.103 4.446 67.440 78.767 70.18 78.22
7 72.600 1.922 66.937 78.263 71.15 74.78
12 54.103 4.223 48.440 59.767 51.40 58.97

Table 2: ANOVA TABLE

SoV Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)


Treatment 7 969.299 138.471 6.620 0.001
Replication 2 3.279 1.639 0.078 0.925
Error 14 292.828 20.916 NA NA

Table 3: SEM & Other statistics

MSE SE(d) SE(m) CV


20.916 3.734 2.64 6.711

## Since the P-value in ANOVA table is < 0.05,


## there is a significant difference between atleast a pair of treatments,
## so multiple comparison is required to identify best treatment(s)

Table 4: LSD test

MSE SE(d) SE(m) CD t value CV


20.916 3.734 2.64 8.009 2.145 6.711

1
Table 5: Treatment Grouping

trt_mean grouping
6 73.10333 a
7 72.60000 a
3 72.50333 a
4 72.10000 a
1 71.90333 a
5 66.10333 ab
2 62.80000 b
12 54.10333 c

## Treatments with same letters are not significantly different


Report generated from: GRAPES
Developed by:
Dr. Pratheesh P. Gopinath
Asst. Professor
Agricultural Statistics
Kerala Agricultural University
Contribution:
Adarsh V. S.
PhD. Agricultural Statistics
College of Agriculture, Vellayani

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy