Environmental Law
Environmental Law
---
The relationship between humans and the environment has been a recurring theme
in ancient and medieval philosophical and religious thought. In India, texts like the
Vedas, Upanishads, and Puranas emphasize reverence for nature, with elements
like air (Vayu), water (Varuna), fire (Agni), and earth (Prithvi) considered sacred.
Trees, rivers, and mountains were often personified and worshipped. In ancient
Greek philosophy, thinkers like Aristotle and Plato wrote about natural balance and
the human role within it. Chinese philosophies such as Taoism stressed harmony
between humanity and nature. Islamic jurisprudence introduced concepts like "Hima"
(protected zones) and "Harim" (buffer zones), reflecting environmental zoning
principles. These early traditions provided not only spiritual guidance but also
proto-legal frameworks for environmental protection. They form the moral and ethical
roots of today’s environmental law by emphasizing stewardship, balance, and
respect for the natural world.
---
With the advent of the scientific revolution, environmental understanding shifted from
spiritual interpretations to empirical and analytical perspectives. Ecology, a branch of
biology, emerged as a vital science for studying the interactions between organisms
and their environment. The concept of ecosystems, biosphere, carrying capacity, and
ecological succession became crucial for legal and policy formulations. Biological
sciences revealed how pollutants affect not only individual species but entire
ecosystems. Environmental chemistry and geology contributed insights into soil
degradation, water pollution, and climate change. These sciences provided the
foundation for environmental risk assessment, impact evaluation, and pollution
control. They also informed legal definitions and standards (e.g., permissible limits
for air and water pollutants). In essence, science transformed environmental law
from an ethical obligation to a measurable, enforceable system rooted in data and
logic.
---
---
---
---
---
---
India’s environmental policy has evolved significantly from the pre-independence era
to the present day. During the colonial period, environmental regulation was primarily
resource-centric, with laws such as the Indian Forest Act, 1927 focusing on revenue
generation rather than conservation. Post-independence, a shift occurred as India
began to integrate environmental considerations into national planning. The
Constitution of India, though initially silent on environmental issues, began
incorporating environmental themes following the Stockholm Conference of 1972.
The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 introduced Article 48A (Directive
Principles of State Policy) and Article 51A(g) (Fundamental Duties), mandating
environmental protection and improvement as both a state obligation and a citizen's
duty. This marked the formal beginning of environmentally-conscious policy-making
in India.
---
---
India’s National Forest Policies (especially those of 1952 and 1988) laid the
foundation for forest conservation and community involvement in resource
management. The 1988 policy, in particular, emphasized ecological balance,
sustainable forest management, and people’s participation in forest protection
through programs like Joint Forest Management (JFM). It recognized the rights of
forest-dwelling communities while aiming to increase forest cover and biodiversity
conservation. The Forest Conservation Act, 1980 further regulated the diversion of
forest land for non-forest purposes, making prior approval of the Central Government
mandatory—a critical legal tool to prevent deforestation.
---
The Indian judiciary has played a transformative role in interpreting the right to a
clean and healthy environment as a part of Article 21 (Right to Life) of the
Constitution. In landmark cases such as Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar and MC
Mehta v. Union of India, the Supreme Court recognized environmental rights as
fundamental. This judicial activism created an enforceable constitutional right,
enabling citizens to approach courts through Public Interest Litigation (PIL) for
environmental protection.
---
Apart from Article 21, the Directive Principles of State Policy (Article 48A) call upon
the State to protect and improve the environment and safeguard forests and wildlife.
Article 51A(g) mandates every citizen to protect the environment. These provisions,
although not justiciable on their own, have been used by courts to interpret laws and
policies in favor of environmental protection. They provide a constitutional foundation
for India’s environmental jurisprudence and guide legislative and executive actions.
---
---
---
Polluter Pays Principle: Polluters are liable for environmental damage and must
compensate.
Public Trust Doctrine: The government holds natural resources in trust for citizens
and must prevent their misuse or privatization.
---
---
Two decades after Stockholm, the Earth Summit (UN Conference on Environment
and Development – UNCED) held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, significantly expanded
the scope of international environmental law. The conference produced the Rio
Declaration on Environment and Development, which outlines 27 principles,
including the Precautionary Principle, Polluter Pays Principle, Right to Development,
and Public Participation. It emphasized sustainable development and global
cooperation. The Earth Summit also led to three major international treaties:
---
The CBD, adopted in 1992, is one of the most comprehensive global agreements
dedicated to biodiversity conservation. It has three main objectives: conservation of
biological diversity, sustainable use of its components, and fair and equitable sharing
of benefits arising out of genetic resources. It recognizes the sovereign rights of
states over their natural resources but also obligates them to ensure that activities
within their jurisdiction do not harm biodiversity. The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
(2000) and the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing (2010) supplement
the CBD, focusing on genetically modified organisms and equitable sharing of
biological resources, respectively. India, being a signatory, has implemented the
Biological Diversity Act, 2002 in alignment with the CBD.
---
The UNFCCC, also adopted at the Rio Summit, is the key legal instrument in the
fight against climate change. It establishes a framework for international cooperation
by setting non-binding limits on greenhouse gas emissions and encouraging
reporting and mitigation actions. It paved the way for more specific protocols and
agreements, including:
The Kyoto Protocol (1997), which imposed binding emission reduction targets on
developed countries;
The Paris Agreement (2015), a landmark accord that seeks to limit global warming to
well below 2°C (preferably 1.5°C) above pre-industrial levels through nationally
determined contributions (NDCs).
India has actively participated in these agreements, committing to reduce emissions
intensity and increasing its share of renewable energy.
---
The Montreal Protocol (1987) on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer is
considered one of the most successful environmental agreements, achieving
near-universal ratification and a dramatic reduction in ozone-depleting substances.
---
The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), formed after the Stockholm
Conference, plays a central role in developing, coordinating, and monitoring global
environmental efforts. UNEP helps countries implement environmental treaties,
provides scientific assessments (e.g., the Global Environment Outlook), and leads
global initiatives on issues like plastic pollution, ecosystem restoration, and green
economy. Alongside UNEP, other UN bodies such as the UN Development
Programme (UNDP), World Health Organization (WHO), and World Bank contribute
to environmental policymaking and funding, particularly in developing countries.
---
Despite the large number of treaties and institutions, international environmental law
faces many implementation and enforcement challenges. These include:
Lack of binding commitments for all countries (e.g., in the Paris Agreement),
---
Here is a comprehensive and detailed full-length paragraph with headings for UNIT
IV – International Environmental Law and Policy II, based on your syllabus and
expanded with enriched explanations. Each topic is thoroughly discussed to help
with deep understanding, writing assignments, or preparing for exams.
---
---
---
---
3. Precautionary Principle
---
The Polluter Pays Principle (PPP) is a fundamental tenet of environmental law, which
states that the party responsible for causing pollution should bear the cost of
managing it to prevent damage to human health or the environment. This principle is
embedded in Principle 16 of the Rio Declaration, and it is a key part of several
international and regional environmental agreements. In India, the Supreme Court
has explicitly adopted the Polluter Pays Principle in cases like Indian Council for
Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India, where industrial polluters were held financially
liable for the ecological damage caused. PPP encourages internalization of
environmental costs, ensuring that prices of goods and services reflect their true
ecological impact. It also provides a financial deterrent against pollution and
reinforces accountability for environmental harm.
---
The Public Trust Doctrine asserts that certain natural resources like air, water,
forests, and coastal areas are held by the state in trust for the public and future
generations. This doctrine originated in Roman law and was revived in American
jurisprudence before being adopted in India. The Indian Supreme Court gave it
constitutional backing in the landmark MC Mehta v. Kamal Nath case, ruling that the
government cannot arbitrarily transfer public resources for private use. The doctrine
obligates the state to preserve natural resources for public use and prevents their
exploitation for commercial purposes unless it serves a broader public interest. It
also empowers citizens and environmental groups to challenge state actions that
threaten communal resources, making it a powerful legal tool for environmental
activism.
---
---
The link between environmental protection and human rights has become
increasingly recognized at both international and domestic levels. A clean, safe, and
healthy environment is now considered a precondition for the enjoyment of
fundamental human rights, including the right to life, health, food, water, and
housing. This evolution is reflected in the work of international human rights bodies,
as well as landmark declarations such as the UN Human Rights Council Resolution
(2021) formally recognizing the right to a healthy environment. In India, the Supreme
Court has read environmental rights into Article 21 (Right to Life) of the Constitution
in cases like Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar and MC Mehta v. Union of India,
laying the foundation for India’s unique model of environmental constitutionalism.
These rulings bridge the gap between ecological preservation and social welfare,
emphasizing that human dignity and well-being depend on ecological integrity.
---
---
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a key procedural tool that helps identify,
predict, and evaluate the potential environmental impacts of proposed projects or
policies before they are implemented. The practice of EIA has become widespread
and is recognized under several international instruments, including the Espoo
Convention (1991), which mandates transboundary EIA processes. In India, EIA is
regulated under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, and its EIA Notification
(2006). EIA includes public participation, expert appraisal committees, and a
mitigation plan. Though criticized for dilution in recent years, EIA remains a crucial
preventive mechanism and a reflection of the Precautionary Principle. Aligning
domestic EIA systems with global standards can enhance environmental safeguards
and ensure international best practices are followed.
---
In recent years, climate litigation has emerged as a powerful tool to hold states and
corporations accountable for their contributions to climate change. Courts around the
world are increasingly recognizing the legal obligations of governments to protect
citizens from the impacts of global warming. Landmark cases such as Urgenda
Foundation v. Netherlands, where the Dutch government was ordered to reduce
carbon emissions, and Milieudefensie v. Shell, where a corporation was held
responsible for its emissions, have set new standards in climate law. In India, though
still emerging, climate-related litigation is being pursued under broader
environmental rights frameworks. These developments illustrate how judicial forums
are shaping the enforcement of international environmental obligations, especially
when political will is lacking.
---
Here is the full-length, detailed paragraph version of UNIT V based on the topic
"International Environmental Institutions and Mechanisms". This content includes
well-defined headings, global examples, case law, and Indian perspectives to ensure
you gain deep insight for academic writing, exam preparation, or reference.
---
---
---
---
---
---
The World Bank, though primarily an economic development institution, has become
increasingly active in promoting environmental sustainability. It funds infrastructure
and poverty reduction projects with environmental conditions and safeguards. The
Environmental and Social Framework (ESF), adopted by the World Bank, sets out
minimum requirements for project planning, assessment, and implementation. The
Bank supports climate finance, renewable energy, waste management, and resilient
urban planning, often aligning with Sustainable Development Goals. However, it has
also been criticized for supporting large infrastructure projects that lead to
displacement and deforestation. India has received significant environmental funding
from the Bank for afforestation programs, river clean-ups, and climate adaptation in
vulnerable regions like the Sundarbans.
---
---
---
---
10. Future of Global Environmental Governance
---