Research Misconduct Explained
Research Misconduct Explained
1. Duplicate Publication
Definition: Publishing the same or very similar content again (either your own or someone else's), without permission or refe
Why it is wrong:
- Misleads readers
- Wastes journal resources
- Breaks copyright
- Double counts same results
Example: Publishing the same paper in two journals under different titles without disclosure.
Do’s:
- Mention if reused content was published earlier
- Quote and cite reused text/data
- Provide copies of related papers when submitting
Don’ts:
- Don’t reuse your paper without citation
- Don’t submit the same paper to multiple journals
- Don’t share earlier results without permission
2. Salami Slicing
Definition: Breaking one full research study into many small papers just to increase publication count.
Example: One big survey on student health split into separate papers on diet, sleep, and stress.
Why it is wrong:
- Misleads readers
- Wastes publication space
- Makes results look more than they are
Example: Only reporting the 60% success of a medicine, hiding the 30% side effects.
Types of Bias:
- Publication Bias: Only publishing positive results
- Outcome Reporting Bias: Only showing selected outcomes
- Spin: Writing results to look better than they are
- Citation Bias: Citing only positive studies
Impact:
- Leads to mistrust in science
- Creates false knowledge
- Affects health, policy, and future research
Conclusion:
All these practices are forms of research misconduct. Researchers and journals must follow ethical practices to maintain inte