HT Lecture3
HT Lecture3
Faculty of Engineering
Alexandria University
Heat Transfer
(CHE 252)
❖ For sphere
4
◦𝑉 = 𝜋𝑟𝑜3
3
◦ 𝐴 = 4𝜋𝑟𝑜2
4
◦ 𝑞(
ሶ 𝜋𝑟𝑜3 ) = ℎ(4𝜋𝑟𝑜2 )(𝑇𝑠 − 𝑇∞ )
3
ሶ 0.5
𝑞𝐿
◦ 𝑇𝑠 − 𝑇∞ =
ℎ
ሶ 𝑜
𝑞𝑟
◦ 𝑇𝑠 = + 𝑇∞
3ℎ
Heat Generation in a Solid
To Get 𝑻𝒎𝒂𝒙
❖ Consider a solid medium of surface area A, volume V, and constant
thermal conductivity k, where heat is generated at a constant rate of 𝑞ሶ
per unit volume.
❖ We will first determine the temperature distribution within the
generation volume, then we will get the temperature at the centerline
(or midpoint)
❖ To get the T distribution, apply the heat conduction equation for:
◦ Steady state operation
◦ 1-D
◦ Constant properties
◦ Uniform heat generation
Heat Generation in a Solid
❖ For plane wall (𝑳𝟎.𝟓 = 𝟎. 𝟓 𝑳)
𝑑2 𝑇 𝑞ሶ
◦ 2 + =0
𝑑𝑥 𝑘
𝑑2 𝑇 𝑞ሶ
◦ 2 = −
𝑑𝑥 𝑘
𝑑𝑇 𝑞ሶ
◦ 1st integration: = − 𝑥 + 𝐶1
𝑑𝑥 𝑘
𝑞ሶ 2
◦ 2nd integration: 𝑇 = − 𝑥 + 𝐶1 𝑥 + 𝐶2
2𝑘
𝑑𝑇
◦ B.C.1: at 𝑥 = 0 (dist. from centerline) =0 ∴ 𝐶1 = 0
𝑑𝑥
𝑞ሶ
◦ B.C.2: at 𝑥 = 𝐿0.5 𝑇 = 𝑇𝑠 ∴ 𝐶2 = 𝑇𝑠 + 𝐿0.5 2
2𝑘
𝑞ሶ 𝑞ሶ 𝐿0.5 2
◦ T. dist.: 𝑇 = (𝐿0.5 2 - 𝑥 2 )+ 𝑇𝑠 ∴ At 𝑥 = 0, 𝑇𝑚𝑎𝑥 = + 𝑇𝑠
2𝑘 2𝑘
Heat Generation in a Solid
❖ For cylinder
1 𝑑 𝑑𝑇 𝑞ሶ
◦ 𝑟 + = 0
𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑘
𝑑 𝑑𝑇 𝑞ሶ
◦ 𝑟 =− 𝑟
𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑘
𝑑𝑇 𝑞ሶ 2 𝑑𝑇 𝑞ሶ 𝐶1
◦ 1st integration: 𝑟 = − 𝑟 + 𝐶1 ∴ = − 𝑟 +
𝑑𝑟 2𝑘 𝑑𝑟 2𝑘 𝑟
𝑞ሶ 2
◦ 2nd integration: 𝑇 = − 𝑟 + 𝐶1 ln 𝑟 + 𝐶2
4𝑘
𝑑𝑇
◦ B.C.1: at 𝑟 = 0 =0 ∴ 𝐶1 = 0
𝑑𝑟
𝑞ሶ
◦ B.C.2: at 𝑟 = 𝑟𝑜 𝑇 = 𝑇𝑠 ∴ 𝐶2 = 𝑇𝑠 + 𝑟𝑜 2
4𝑘
𝑞ሶ 𝑞ሶ 𝑟𝑜 2
◦ T. dist.: 𝑇 = (𝑟𝑜 2 - 2
𝑟 )+ 𝑇𝑠 ∴ At 𝑟 = 0, 𝑇𝑚𝑎𝑥 = + 𝑇𝑠
4𝑘 4𝑘
Heat Generation in a Solid
❖ For sphere
1 𝑑 2 𝑑𝑇 𝑞ሶ
◦ 2 𝑟 + =0
𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑘
𝑑 2 𝑑𝑇 𝑞ሶ 2
◦ 𝑟 =− 𝑟
𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑘
2 𝑑𝑇 𝑞ሶ 3 𝑑𝑇 𝑞ሶ 𝐶1
◦ 1 integration: 𝑟
st =− 𝑟 + 𝐶1 ∴ = − 𝑟 +
𝑑𝑟 3𝑘 𝑑𝑟 3𝑘 𝑟2
𝑞ሶ 2 𝐶1
◦ 2nd integration: 𝑇 = − 𝑟 − + 𝐶2
6𝑘 𝑟
𝑑𝑇
◦ B.C.1: at 𝑟 = 0 =0 ∴ 𝐶1 = 0
𝑑𝑟
𝑞ሶ
◦ B.C.2: at 𝑟 = 𝑟𝑜 𝑇 = 𝑇𝑠 ∴ 𝐶2 = 𝑇𝑠 + 𝑟𝑜 2
6𝑘
𝑞ሶ 𝑞ሶ 𝑟𝑜 2
◦ T. dist.: 𝑇 = (𝑟𝑜 2 2
− 𝑟 )+ 𝑇𝑠 ∴ At 𝑟 = 0, 𝑇𝑚𝑎𝑥 = + 𝑇𝑠
6𝑘 6𝑘
Thermal Resistance Concept
❖ For the special case of:
• Steady state
• One-dimensional heat transfer
• No internal heat generation and with
• Constant properties, a very important concept is suggested
❖ An analogy exists between the rate of heat transfer and the rate of
electrical charge transfer (≡electric current flow).
𝑇1 −𝑇2 𝑉1 −𝑉2
𝑞= is analogous to 𝐼 =
𝑅 𝑅𝑒
Thermal Resistance Concept
❖ Therefore, the resistance can be defined as the ratio of a driving force to
the corresponding transfer rate.
❖ For conduction through a plane wall:
𝑘𝐴 𝑇1 −𝑇2 𝐿
𝑞= 𝑇1 − 𝑇2 = ∴𝑅=
𝐿 𝑅 𝑘𝐴
where,
1 𝐿 1
𝑅𝑡𝑜𝑡 = + +
ℎ1 𝐴 𝑘𝐴 ℎ2 𝐴
Composite Wall
Composite Wall
𝑇∞,1 −𝑇𝑠,1 𝑇𝑠,1 −𝑇2 𝑇2 −𝑇3 𝑇3 −𝑇𝑠,4 𝑇𝑠,4 −𝑇∞,4
❖𝑞= = = = =
(1Τ(ℎ1 𝐴)) (𝐿𝐴 Τ(𝑘𝐴 𝐴)) ( 𝐿𝐵 Τ 𝑘 𝐵 𝐴 ) (𝐿𝐶 Τ(𝑘𝐶 𝐴)) (1Τ(ℎ4 𝐴))
𝑇∞,1 −𝑇∞,4
❖𝑞=
𝑅𝑡𝑜𝑡
𝑇∞,1 −𝑇∞,4
❖𝑞=
(1Τ(ℎ1 𝐴))+(𝐿𝐴 Τ(𝑘𝐴 𝐴))+(𝐿𝐵 Τ(𝑘𝐵 𝐴))+(𝐿𝐶 Τ 𝑘𝐶 𝐴 )+(1Τ(ℎ4 𝐴))
❖ With composite systems, it is often convenient to work with an overall
heat transfer coefficient 𝑼, which is defined by an expression
analogous to Newton’s law of cooling.
❖ 𝑞 = 𝑈𝐴 ∆𝑇
∴ The overall heat transfer coefficient is related to the total thermal
resistance by
1 1
❖ 𝑈= =
𝑅𝑡𝑜𝑡 𝐴 (1Τℎ1 )+(𝐿𝐴 Τ𝑘𝐴 )+(𝐿𝐵 Τ𝑘𝐵 )+(𝐿𝐶 Τ𝑘𝐶 )+(1Τℎ4 )
Composite Wall
❖ Composite walls may also be characterized by
series–parallel configurations
❖ Although the heat flow is now multidimensional,
it is often reasonable to assume one-dimensional
conditions.
❖ According to this assumption, two different
thermal circuits may be used.
• For case (a) it is presumed that surfaces normal to the x-
direction are isothermal
• For case (b) it is assumed that surfaces parallel to the x-
direction are adiabatic.
❖ Different results are obtained for 𝑅𝑡𝑜𝑡 and the
corresponding values of 𝑞.
❖ These differences increase with increasing
𝑘𝐹 − 𝑘𝐺 ,as multidimensional effects become
more significant.
Example on Composite Wall
❖ Composite wall dimensions:
• 𝐿𝐸 = 1 𝑚
• 𝐿𝐹 = 𝐿𝐺 = 3 𝑚
• 𝐿𝐻 = 2 𝑚
• 𝐴𝐸 = 𝐴𝐻 = 2 𝑚 2
• 𝐴𝐹 = 𝐴𝐺 = 1 𝑚 2
❖ Thermal conductivity values:
• 𝑘𝐸 = 50 𝑊/𝑚 ∙ 𝐾
• 𝑘𝐹 = 10 𝑊/𝑚 ∙ 𝐾
• 𝑘𝐺 = 30 𝑊/𝑚 ∙ 𝐾
• 𝑘𝐻 = 40 𝑊/𝑚 ∙ 𝐾
❖ Temperature values:
• 𝑇1 = 80 ℃
• 𝑇2 = 20 ℃
Example on Composite Wall
❖ Case (a) surfaces normal to the x-direction are isothermal
• 𝑅𝐸 = 0.01 𝐾/𝑊 •𝑞=
𝑇1 −𝑇𝑖1
𝑅𝐸
• 𝑅𝐹 = 0.3 𝐾/𝑊
• 𝑇𝑖1 = 75.6 ℃
• 𝑅𝐺 = 0.1 𝐾/𝑊 𝑇1 −𝑇𝑖2
• 𝑅𝐻 = 0.05 𝐾/𝑊 •𝑞=
𝑅𝐸 +𝑅𝐹𝐺
𝑅𝐹 ×𝑅𝐺
• 𝑅𝐹𝐺 = = 0.075 𝐾/𝑊 • 𝑇𝑖2 = 42.3 ℃
𝑅𝐹 +𝑅𝐺
𝑇𝑖1 −𝑇𝑖2 75.6−42.3
• 𝑅𝑡𝑜𝑡 = 𝑅𝐸 + 𝑅𝐹𝐺 + 𝑅𝐻 = 0.135 𝐾/𝑊 • 𝑞𝐹 = = = 111 𝑊
𝑅𝐹 0.3
80−20 𝑇𝑖1 −𝑇𝑖2
•𝑞= = 444 𝑊 • 𝑞𝐺 = = 𝑞 − 𝑞𝐹 = 333 𝑊
0.135 𝑅𝐺
Example on Composite Wall
❖ Case (b) surfaces parallel to the x-direction are adiabatic
𝑇1 −𝑇2
• 𝑅𝐸1 = 𝑅𝐸2 = 0.02 𝐾/𝑊 • 𝑞𝐸𝐹𝐻 = = 171.4 𝑊
𝑅𝐸𝐹𝐻
• 𝑅𝐹 = 0.3 𝐾/𝑊 𝑇1 −𝑇𝐹1
• 𝑞𝐸𝐹𝐻 = ∴ 𝑇𝐹1 = 76.6 ℃
• 𝑅𝐻1 = 𝑅𝐻2 = 0.025 𝐾/𝑊 𝑅𝐸1
𝑇1 −𝑇𝐹2
• 𝑅𝐺 = 0.1 𝐾/𝑊 • 𝑞𝐸𝐹𝐻 = ∴ 𝑇𝐹2 = 25.2 ℃
𝑅𝐸1 +𝑅𝐹
• 𝑅𝐸𝐹𝐻 = 0.35 𝐾/𝑊 • 𝑞𝐸𝐺𝐻 =
𝑇1 −𝑇2
= 𝑞 − 𝑞𝐸𝐹𝐻 = 400 𝑊
𝑅𝐸𝐺𝐻
• 𝑅𝐸𝐺𝐻 = 0.15 𝐾/𝑊 𝑇1 −𝑇𝐺1
𝑅𝐸𝐹𝐻 ×𝑅𝐸𝐺𝐻 • 𝑞𝐸𝐺𝐻 = ∴ 𝑇𝐺1 = 72 ℃
• 𝑅𝑡𝑜𝑡 = = 0.105 𝐾/𝑊 𝑅𝐸2
𝑅𝐸𝐹𝐻 +𝑅𝐸𝐺𝐻 𝑇1 −𝑇𝐺2
80−20 • 𝑞𝐸𝐺𝐻 = ∴ 𝑇𝐺2 = 32 ℃
•𝑞= = 571.4 𝑊 𝑅𝐸2 +𝑅𝐺
0.1
𝒒𝑬𝑭𝑯 𝑻𝑭𝟏 𝑻𝑭𝟐
1
❖ 𝑈𝐴 = 𝑈1 𝐴1 = 𝑈2 𝐴2 = 𝑈3 𝐴3 = 𝑈4 𝐴4 =
𝑅𝑡𝑜𝑡
1 1
❖ 𝑈1 = = 1 𝑟1 𝑟 𝑟 𝑟3 𝑟 𝑟 𝑟 1
𝑅𝑡𝑜𝑡 +
ℎ1 𝑘𝐴
ln 𝑟2 +𝑘 1 ln 𝑟2
+𝑘1 ln 𝑟4 +𝑟1 ℎ
1 𝐵 𝐶 3 4 2
❖ 𝑈1 ≠ 𝑈2 ≠ 𝑈3 ≠ 𝑈4
Resistance in Radial Systems: Sphere
𝑑 2 𝑑𝑇
◦ 𝑟 =0
𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟
2 𝑑𝑇 𝑑𝑇 𝐶1
◦ 1st Integration: 𝑟 = 𝐶1 ∴ =
𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑟2
𝐶1
◦ 2nd Integration: 𝑇 = − + 𝐶2
𝑟
𝐶1
◦ B.C.1: at 𝑟 = 𝑟1 𝑇 = 𝑇𝑠,1 ∴ 𝑇𝑠,1 = − + 𝐶2 → (1)
𝑟1
𝐶1
◦ B.C.2: at 𝑟 = 𝑟2 𝑇 = 𝑇𝑠,2 ∴ 𝑇𝑠,2 = − + 𝐶2 → (2)
𝑟2
𝑇𝑠,1 −𝑇𝑠,2 𝑇𝑠,1 −𝑇𝑠,2 1
◦ 1 − 2 : 𝐶1 = 1 1 Sub. in 2 :𝐶2 = 𝑇𝑠,2 + 1 1
− − 𝑟2
𝑟2 𝑟1 𝑟2 𝑟1
𝑇𝑠,1 −𝑇𝑠,2 1 1
◦ ∴ T. dist.: 𝑇 = 1 1 − + 𝑇𝑠,2
− 𝑟2 𝑟
𝑟2 𝑟1
Resistance in Radial Systems: Sphere
𝑑𝑇 2 𝑑𝑇 2 𝑑𝑇
◦ 𝑞 = −𝑘𝐴 = −𝑘 4𝜋𝑟 = − 4𝜋𝑘 𝑟 = − 4𝜋𝑘 𝐶1
𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟
𝑇𝑠,1 −𝑇𝑠,2 𝑇𝑠,1 −𝑇𝑠,2
◦ 𝑞 = − 4𝜋𝑘 1 1 = 4𝜋𝑘 1 1
−
𝑟2 𝑟1
−
𝑟1 𝑟2
1 1
−
𝑟1 𝑟2
◦𝑅=
4𝜋𝑘
Critical Radius of Insulation
❖ We know that adding more insulation to a plane wall always decreases
heat transfer.
❖ The thicker the insulation, the lower the heat transfer rate.
❖ This is expected, since the heat transfer area A is constant, and adding
insulation always increases the thermal resistance of the wall without
increasing the convection resistance.
❖ Adding insulation to a cylindrical pipe or a spherical shell,
however, is a different matter.
❖ The additional insulation increases the conduction resistance of
the insulation layer but decreases the convection resistance of the
surface because of the increase in the outer surface area for convection.
❖ The heat transfer from the pipe may increase or decrease, depending on
which effect dominates.
Critical Radius of Insulation
❖ Consider a cylindrical pipe of outer radius 𝑟1 whose outer surface
temperature 𝑇1 is kept constant.
❖ The pipe is now insulated with a material whose thermal conductivity is
𝑘 and whose outer radius is 𝑟2 .
❖ Heat is lost from the pipe to the surrounding medium at temperature
𝑇∞ , with a convection heat transfer coefficient ℎ.
❖ The rate of heat transfer from the insulated pipe to the surrounding air
can be expressed as
𝑇1 −𝑇∞ 𝑇1 −𝑇∞
❖𝑞= = ln 𝑟2Τ𝑟1 1
𝑅𝑖𝑛𝑠 +𝑅𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣 +
2𝜋𝑘𝐿 2𝜋𝑟2 𝐿ℎ
Critical Radius of Insulation
❖ The variation of 𝑞 with the outer radius of
the insulation 𝑟2 is plotted in the figure.
❖ The value of 𝑟2 at which 𝑞 reaches a
maximum is determined from the
𝑑𝑞
requirement that = 0 (zero slope).
𝑑𝑟2
𝑘
❖ 𝑟𝑐𝑟,𝑐𝑦𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 =
ℎ
2𝑘
❖ 𝑟𝑐𝑟,𝑠𝑝ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 =
ℎ
Practice
Problems
Problem 1
Heat Loss Through an Insulated Steam Pipe
Steam at 𝑇∞1 = 320° C flows in a cast iron pipe (k = 80 W/m⋅K) whose inner
and outer diameters are D1 = 5 cm and D2 = 5.5 cm, respectively. The pipe is
covered with 3-cm-thick glass wool insulation with k = 0.05 W/m⋅K. Heat is
lost to the surroundings at 𝑇∞2 = 5 °C by natural convection and radiation,
with a combined heat transfer coefficient of h2 = 18 W/ m2⋅K. Taking the
heat transfer coefficient inside the pipe to be h1 = 60 W/ m2⋅K.
Determine:
a) 𝑟𝑐𝑟 and compare the radius of the insulation to 𝑟𝑐𝑟
b) rate of heat loss from the steam per unit length of the pipe without insulation
c) rate of heat loss from the steam per unit length of the pipe with insulation
d) rate of heat loss from the steam per unit length of the pipe with insulation if there is a
contact resistance between the iron pipe and the insulation 𝑅𝑐 = 5 × 10−5 m2⋅K/W