0% found this document useful (0 votes)
122 views

Solutions OPERATOR THEORY Mathematic87.Blogfa

The document discusses several problems in operator theory. Problem 1 proves that the space of bounded linear operators from a Banach space F to a space Y is not a Banach space if Y is not complete, by providing a counterexample using a Cauchy sequence in Y that does not converge. Problem 2 gives an example of a bounded linear operator with a non-closed range, using the embedding of C([0,1]) into L^p([0,1]). Problem 3 provides an example of a normed space and an absolutely convergent series in it that is not convergent, using a Cauchy sequence in a non-Banach space.

Uploaded by

Susu Salim Sand
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
122 views

Solutions OPERATOR THEORY Mathematic87.Blogfa

The document discusses several problems in operator theory. Problem 1 proves that the space of bounded linear operators from a Banach space F to a space Y is not a Banach space if Y is not complete, by providing a counterexample using a Cauchy sequence in Y that does not converge. Problem 2 gives an example of a bounded linear operator with a non-closed range, using the embedding of C([0,1]) into L^p([0,1]). Problem 3 provides an example of a normed space and an absolutely convergent series in it that is not convergent, using a Cauchy sequence in a non-Banach space.

Uploaded by

Susu Salim Sand
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 39

OPERATOR THEORY

Solution I
1. Prove that B(F, Y ) is not a Banach space if Y is not complete. [Hint:
take a Cauchy sequence (y
n
) in Y which does not converge and consider the
sequence of operators (B
n
),
B
n
:= y
n
, F.]
Solution
Take a Cauchy sequence (y
n
) in Y which does not converge and consider the
sequence of operators (B
n
),
B
n
:= y
n
, F.
It is easy to see that B
n
B(F, Y ) and B
n
= y
n
, n N. Since
(B
n
B
m
) = (y
n
y
m
), we have B
n
B
m
= y
n
y
m
. Therefore
(B
n
) is a Cauchy sequence in B(F, Y ). Suppose there exists B B(F, Y )
such that B
n
B 0 as n +. Let y := B1 Y . Then y
n
y =
B
n
1B1 B
n
B 0 as n +, i.e. the sequence (y
n
) converges to
y. This contradiction proves that (B
n
) cannot be convergent. Hence B(F, Y )
is not a Banach space.
2. Give an example of a bounded linear operator A such that Ran(A) is
not closed. [Hint: consider the embedding X Y , where X is the space
C([0, 1]) equipped with the norm

and Y = L
p
([0, 1]) is the completion
of the normed space (C([0, 1]),
p
), 1 p < .]
Solution
Let X be the space C([0, 1]) equipped with the norm

and Y = L
p
([0, 1])
be the completion of the normed space (C([0, 1]),
p
), 1 p < . Let
A : X Y be the embedding: Af = f, f X. Then Ran(A) = C([0, 1])
is dense in Y = L
p
([0, 1]) but does not coincide with it. Therefore Ran(A)
cannot be closed.
1
3. Give an example of a normed space and an absolutely convergent series
in it, which is not convergent.
Solution
Let X be an arbitrary normed non-Banach space (e.g., X = (C([0, 1]),
p
),
1 p < ). Then there exists a Cauchy sequence (x
n
) in X which does
not converge. Since (x
n
) is Cauchy, for any k N there exists n
k
N such
that x
n
x
m
2
k
, n, m n
k
. Consider the series

k=1
(x
n
k+1
x
n
k
) . (1)
This series is absolutely convergent because

k=1
x
n
k+1
x
n
k

k=1
2
k
= 1 < +.
On the other hand, (1) is not convergent in X. Indeed, if the sequence of
partial sums

j
k=1
(x
n
k+1
x
n
k
) = x
n
j+1
x
n
1
is convergent as j +, then
so is the sequence (x
n
j+1
) and also (x
n
), since (x
n
) is Cauchy. Contradiction!
4. Let X be the Banach space C([0, 1]) and Y be the space of all continuously
dierentiable functions on [0, 1] which equal 0 at 0. Both of the spaces are
equipped with the norm

. Show that the linear operator B : X Y ,


(Bf)(t) :=

t
0
f()d,
is bounded, onetoone and onto, but the inverse operator B
1
: Y X
is not bounded. Compare this with the Banach theorem (bounded inverse
theorem).
Solution
2
It is clear that Bf

, f C([0, 1]). So, B is bounded.


Suppose Bf
1
= Bf
2
, i.e.

t
0
f
1
()d =

t
0
f
2
()d, t [0, 1].
Then dierentiation gives f
1
(t) = f
2
(t), t [0, 1], i.e. f
1
= f
2
. So, B is
onetoone.
Let be continuously dierentiable and (0) = 0. Then

X and
(t) =

t
0

()d, t [0, 1],


i.e. = B

. So, B is onto.
It follows from the above that B is invertible and
B
1
(t) =

(t), t [0, 1].


It is easy to see that B
1
: Y X is not bounded. Indeed,
B
1
sin(nt)

= ncos(nt)

= n n sin(nt)

, n N.
This does not contradict the Banach theorem (bounded inverse theorem) be-
cause Y equipped with the norm

is not a Banach space.


5. Denote by C
2
([0, 1]) the space of twice continuously dierentiable func-
tions on the interval [0, 1] equipped with the norm
u := max
0s1
|u(s)| + max
0s1
|u

(s)| + max
0s1
|u

(s)|.
Let X denote the subspace of C
2
([0, 1]) containing functions satisfying bound-
ary conditions u(0) = u(1) = 0. Prove that the operator A =
d
2
ds
2
is a
bounded operator acting from X to C([0, 1]).
Solution
The boundedness of A : X C([0, 1]) follows directly from the denition
of the norm in X. (Note that C([0, 1]) is assumed to be equipped with the
norm

.)
3
6. Show that the operator A from the previous question has a bounded in-
verse A
1
: C([0, 1]) X and construct it eectively.
Solution
Consider the equation Au = f, where f C([0, 1]) is given and u X
is unknown. It is equivalent to
d
2
u(s)
ds
2
= f(s), s [0, 1]. Successive
integration gives
du(s)
ds
=

s
0
f()d + c
1
,
u(s) =

s
0

t
0
f()ddt + c
1
s + c
0
,
where c
1
and c
0
are some constants. Now the boundary conditions u(0) =
u(1) = 0 imply c
0
= 0 and
c
1
=

1
0

t
0
f()ddt.
Hence u = Rf, where
(Rf)(s) :=

s
0

t
0
f()ddt + s

1
0

t
0
f()ddt =
(s 1)

s
0

t
0
f()ddt + s

1
s

t
0
f()ddt.
It is easy to see that Rf X, f C([0, 1]) and
(ARf)(s) =
d
2
ds
2

s
0

t
0
f()ddt + s

1
0

t
0
f()ddt

=
d
ds

s
0
f()d

1
0

t
0
f()ddt

= f(s), s [0, 1],


(RAu)(s) =

s
0

t
0
(u

())ddt + s

1
0

t
0
(u

())ddt =

s
0
(u

(t) u

(0))dt s

1
0
(u

(t) u

(0))dt = u(s) u(0) u

(0)s
su(1) + su(0) + su

(0) = u(s), s [0, 1], u X,


4
since u(0) = u(1) = 0. Hence, AR = I and RA = I, i.e. A is invertible and
A
1
= R.
The boundedness of A
1
= R : C([0, 1]) X can be obtained directly from
the denition of the norm in X. It also follows immediately from the Banach
theorem on the inverse operator. (Note that the completeness of X follows
from the well known results on uniform convergence.)
5
OPERATOR THEORY
Solution II
1. Let B B(C([0, 1])) be dened by the formula
Bf(t) = tf(t), t [0, 1].
Find (B) and the set of all eigenvalues of B.
Solution
(B) = [0, 1] and B does not have eigenvalues. This is a special case of
Question 2.
2. Let g C([0, 1]) be a xed function and let A B(C([0, 1])) be dened
by the formula
Af(t) = g(t)f(t), t [0, 1].
Find (A) and construct eectively the resolvent R(A; ). Find the eigen-
values and eigenvectors of A.
Solution
Let C, g([0, 1]) := {g(t)| t [0, 1]}. Then since g C([0, 1]),
1/(g ) C([0, 1]) and A I has an inverse R(A; ) = (A I)
1

B(C([0, 1])) dened by


R(A; )f(t) = (g(t) )
1
f(t), t [0, 1].
Hence (A) g([0, 1]).
Suppose now g([0, 1]), i.e. = g(t
0
) for some t
0
[0, 1]. Then (A
I)f(t
0
) = (g(t
0
) )f(t
0
) = 0, i.e. Ran(A I) consist of functions
vanishing at t
0
. Consequently Ran(A I) = C([0, 1]) and A I is not
invertible. Therefore g([0, 1]) (A). Finally, (A) = g([0, 1]).
Take an arbitrary g([0, 1]). Let g
1
() := { [0, 1] : g() = }.
The equation Af = f, i.e. (g(t) )f(t) = 0 is equivalent to f(t) = 0,
t [0, 1] \ g
1
(). If g
1
() contains an interval of positive length, then it
is easy to see that the set {f C([0, 1]) \{0} : f(t) = 0, t [0, 1] \g
1
()}
is non-empty and coincides with the set of all eigenvectors corresponding to
1
the eigenvalue . If g
1
() does not contain an interval of positive length,
then [0, 1] \ g
1
() is dense in [0, 1] and f(t) = 0, t [0, 1] \ g
1
() implies
by continuity that f 0. In this case is not an eigenvalue.
3. Let K C be an arbitrary nonempty compact set. Construct an operator
B B(l
p
), 1 p , such that (B) = K.
Solution
Let {
k
}
kN
be a dense subset of K. Consider the operator B : l
p
l
p
dened by
Bx = (
1
x
1
,
2
x
2
, . . . ,
k
x
k
, . . . ), x = (x
1
, x
2
, . . . ) l
p
.
Then B is a bounded linear operator and
k
s are its eigenvalues. (Why?)
Consequently {
k
}
kN
(B). Since (B) is closed and {
k
}
kN
is dense in
K,
K (B).
On the other hand, let C\ K. Then d := inf
kN
|
k
| > 0 and B I
has a bounded inverse (B I)
1
: l
p
l
p
dened by
(B I)
1
x =

1

x
1
,
1

2

x
2
, . . . ,
1

k

x
k
, . . .

,
x = (x
1
, x
2
, . . . ) l
p
.
Hence (B). Therefore
(B) K.
Finally,
(B) = K
4. Let k C([0, 1]) be a given function. Consider the operator B
B(C([0, 1])) dened by the formula
(Bu)(s) =

s
0
k(t)u(t)dt.
2
Construct eectively (not as a power series!) the resolvent of A. How does
this resolvent R(B; ) behave when 0?
Solution
It is clear that Bu is continuously dierentiable for any u C([0, 1]). Hence,
Ran(B) = C([0, 1]) and B is not invertible, i.e. 0 (B).
Suppose now = 0. Consider the equation (BI)u = f, f C([0, 1]), i.e.

s
0
k(t)u(t)dt u(s) = f(s), s [0, 1]. (1)
Suppose this equation has a solution u C([0, 1]). Then

s
0
k(t)u(t)dt = f(s) + u(s), s [0, 1].
Therefore f + u is continuously dierentiable and
k(s)u(s) = (f(s) + u(s))

, s [0, 1].
If f is continuously dierentiable, then
k(s)u(s) = f

(s) + u

(s), s [0, 1],


i.e.
u

(s)
1

k(s)u(s) =
1

(s), s [0, 1]. (2)


Taking s = 0 in (1) gives
u(0) =
1

f(0).
Solving (2) with this initial condition we obtain
u(s) = e
1

s
0
k()d

f(0)

s
0
1

(t)e

t
0
k()d
dt

=
e
1

s
0
k()d

f(0)
1

f(t)e

t
0
k()d

s
0

s
0
f(t)k(t)e

t
0
k()d
dt

=
1

f(s)
1

s
0
f(t)k(t)e
1

s
t
k()d
dt.
Let
A

f(s) :=
1

f(s)
1

s
0
f(t)k(t)e
1

s
t
k()d
dt. (3)
3
It is easy to see that A

: C([0, 1]) C([0, 1]) is a bounded linear operator.


The above argument shows that if f is continuously dierentiable and (1)
has a solution u C([0, 1]), then u = A

f. In particular, (1) with f = 0 has


only a trivial solution u = 0, i.e. Ker(B I) = {0}.
For any f C([0, 1]) and u = A

f the function
f(s) + u(s) =
1

s
0
f(t)k(t)e
1

s
t
k()d
dt
is continuously dierentiable and
(f(s) + u(s))

=
1

f(s)k(s)
k(s)

s
0
f(t)k(t)e
1

s
t
k()d
dt =
k(s)A

f(s) = k(s)u(s)
(see (3)). Hence
f(s) + u(s) =

s
0
k(t)u(t)dt + const.
It follows from (3) that f(0) + u(0) = f(0) + A

f(0) = 0. Therefore
f(s) + u(s) =

s
0
k(t)u(t)dt,
i.e. f = (BI)A

f, f C([0, 1]), i.e. (BI)A

= I. Consequently A

is a right inverse of BI and Ran(BI) = C([0, 1]). Since Ker(BI) =


{0}, the operator B I is invertible for any = 0 and (B I)
1
= A

.
Thus
(B) = {0} and R(B; ) = A

, = 0,
where A

is given by (3).
It follows from the well known property of the resolvent that R(B; )
1/||, = 0. So R(B; ) as 0. If k 0, the above inequality
becomes an equality. Let us show that if k 0, then R(B; ) grows much
faster than 1/|| as 0 in a certain direction. Indeed,
(R(B; )1)(s) = (A

1)(s) =
1

s
0
k(t)e
1

s
t
k()d
dt =

+
1

e
1

s
t
k()d

s
0
=
1

e
1

s
0
k()d
.
Further, k 0 implies

s
0
k()d 0. Let
C := max
[0,1]

s
0
k()d

s
0
0
k()d

> 0.
4
Then for such that
1

s
0
0
k()d > 0 we have
R(B; ) R(B; )1
1
||
e
C/||
as 0.
5. Let A, B B(X). Show that for any (A)

(B),
R(B; ) R(A; ) = R(B; )(A B)R(A; ).
Solution
R(B; )(A B)R(A; ) = R(B; )((A I) (B I))R(A; ) =
R(B; ) R(A; ).
5
OPERATOR THEORY
Solution III
1. Let X be a Banach space and A, B B(X).
(a) Show that if I AB is invertible, then I BA is also invertible. [Hint:
consider B(I AB)
1
A + I.]
(b) Prove that if (AB) and = 0, then (BA).
(c) Give an example of operators A and B such that 0 (AB) but 0
(BA).
(d) Show that (AB)

{0} = (BA)

{0}.
(e) Prove that r(AB) = r(BA).
Solution
(a) Suppose I AB is invertible. Then since
(I BA)

B(I AB)
1
A + I

= (I BA)B(I AB)
1
A + (I BA) =
B(I AB)(I AB)
1
A + (I BA) = BA + (I BA) = I,
and

B(I AB)
1
A + I

(I BA) = B(I AB)


1
A(I BA) + (I BA) =
B(I AB)
1
(I AB)A + (I BA) = BA + (I BA) = I,
the operator I BA is also invertible and (I BA)
1
= B(I AB)
1
A+I.
(b) Take an arbitrary (AB) \{0}. Suppose BAI = (I
1

BA) is
invertible. Then I
1

BA is invertible and (a) implies that I


1

AB is also
invertible. Therefore (I
1

AB) = ABI is invertible, i.e. (AB).


This contradiction shows that BAI cannot be invertible, i.e. (BA).
(c) Consider the right and left shift operators R, L : l
p
l
p
, 1 p ,
Rx = (0, x
1
, x
2
, . . . ), Lx = (x
2
, x
3
, . . . ), x = (x
1
, x
2
, . . . ) l
p
.
It is easy to see that
LRx = L(0, x
1
, x
2
, . . . ) = x, RLx = R(x
2
, x
3
, . . . ) = (0, x
2
, x
3
, . . . ), x l
p
.
Hence LR = I, while Ran(RL) = l
p
. Therefore LR is invertible while RL is
not, i.e. 0 (RL) but 0 (LR).
1
(d) Follows from (b).
(e) Follows from (d) and the denition of the spectral radius.
2. Let X be a Banach space and let operators A, B B(X) commute:
AB = BA. Prove that r(A + B) r(A) + r(B).
Solution
Take an arbitrary > 0. The spectral radius formula implies that A
n

(r(A) +)
n
, B
n
(r(B) +)
n
for suciently large n N. Therefore there
exists M 1 such that
A
n
M(r(A) + )
n
, B
n
M(r(B) + )
n
, n N.
Since A and B commute, we have
(A + B)
n
=
n

k=0
n!
k!(n k)!
A
nk
B
k
.
Hence,
(A + B)
n

n

k=0
n!
k!(n k)!

A
nk

B
k


M
2
n

k=0
n!
k!(n k)!
(r(A) + )
nk
(r(B) + )
k
= M
2
(r(A) + r(B) + 2)
n
for any n N. Consequently
r(A + B) = lim
n+
(A + B)
n

1/n
r(A) + r(B) + 2, > 0,
i.e. r(A + B) r(A) + r(B).
3. Let k C([0, 1] [0, 1]) be a given function. Consider the operator
B B(C([0, 1])) dened by the formula
(Bu)(s) =

s
0
k(s, t)u(t)dt.
2
Find the spectral radius of B. What is the spectrum of B? [Hint: prove by
induction that
|(B
n
u)(s)|
M
n
n!
s
n
u

, n N,
for some constant M > 0.]
Solution
Let us prove by induction that
|(B
n
u)(s)|
M
n
n!
s
n
u

, s [0, 1], n N, (1)


where
M := max
(s,t)[0,1]
2
|k(s, t)|.
For n = 0 inequality (1) is trivial. Suppose (1) holds for n = k. Then for
n = k + 1 we have

B
k+1
u

(s)

s
0
k(s, t)(B
k
u)(t)dt

s
0
|k(s, t)|

(B
k
u)(t)

dt
M

s
0

(B
k
u)(t)

dt M

s
0
M
k
k!
t
k
u

dt =
M
k+1
k!
u

s
0
t
k
dt =
M
k+1
(k + 1)!
s
k+1
u

, s [0, 1].
Hence, (1) is proved by induction.
It follows from (1) that
B
n
u


M
n
n!
u

, u C([0, 1]),
i.e.
B
n

M
n
n!
, n N.
Therefore
r(B) = lim
n+
B
n

1/n
lim
n+
M
(n!)
1/n
= 0.
Since r(B) = 0, (B) cannot contain nonzero elements. Taking into account
that (B) is nonempty we conclude (B) = {0}.
3
OPERATOR THEORY
Solution IV
1. Suppose X is a Banach space and let A B(X) be nilpotent, i.e. A
n
= 0
for some n N. Find (A).
Solution
The Spectral Mapping Theorem implies
{
n
: (A)} = (A
n
) = (0) = {0}.
Therefore, (A)
n
= 0 = 0, i.e. (A) = {0}.
2. Show that the range of the operator B : l
p
l
p
, 1 p < ,
(Bx)
n
:=
1
1 +n
2
x
n
, n N, x = (x
1
, x
2
, . . . ),
is not closed.
Solution
Take an arbitrary y = (y
1
, y
2
, . . . ) l
p
. Let y
(N)
= (y
(N)
1
, y
(N)
2
, . . . ),
y
(N)
n
:=

y
n
if n N,
0 if n > N,
N N.
Then y y
(N)
0 as N + and the vectors x
(N)
dened by x
(N)
n
:=
(1 + n
2
)y
(N)
n
belong to l
p
. (Why?) It is clear that y
(N)
= Bx
(N)
Ran(B).
So, Ran(B) is dense in l
p
. On the other hand Ran(B) does not coincide with
l
p
. Indeed, consider y l
p
, y
n
=
1
1+n
2
, n N. Suppose y Ran(B). Then
there exists x l
p
such that Bx = y, i.e.
1
1 +n
2
x
n
=
1
1 +n
2
, n N,
i.e. x = (1, 1, . . . ) l
p
. This contradiction shows that y Ran(B). Hence,
Ran(B) = l
p
. Since Ran(B) is dense in l
p
, it cannot be closed.
3. Let P B(X) be a projection, i.e. P
2
= P. Construct R(P; ).
1
Solution
If P = 0, then obviously P I = I, (P) = {0} and R(P; ) =
1
I.
If P = I, then P I = (1 )I, (P) = {1} and R(P; ) = (1 )
1
I.
Suppose now P is non-trivial, i.e. P = 0, I. Take any = 0, 1. Then using
the equalities P
2
= P, Q
2
= Q and QP = PQ = 0, where Q = I P, we
obtain

(1 )
1
P
1
Q

(P I) =

(1 )
1
P
1
Q

((1 )P Q) =
P +Q = I
and similarly
(P I)

(1 )
1
P
1
Q

= I.
Thus
R(P; ) = (1 )
1
P
1
Q.
4. Let A
1
l
B(Y, X) be a left inverse of A B(X, Y ), i.e. A
1
l
A = I
X
.
Find (AA
1
l
).
Let B
1
r
B(Y, X) be a right inverse of B B(X, Y ), i.e. BB
1
r
= I
Y
. Find
(B
1
r
B).
Solution
It is easy to see that AA
1
l
is a projection. Indeed,
(AA
1
l
)
2
= AA
1
l
AA
1
l
= AI
X
A
1
l
= AA
1
l
.
It is also clear that AA
1
l
= 0. Indeed, if AA
1
l
= 0 then A
1
l
(AA
1
l
)A =
A
1
l
0A = 0, i.e. I
X
= 0. Contradiction! (We assume of course that
X = {0}.) So, AA
1
l
is a nonzero projection. Hence (AA
1
l
) = {0, 1}
if AA
1
l
= I, i.e. if A is not invertible. If A is invertible, i.e. AA
1
l
= I, then
obviously (AA
1
l
) = {1}.
Similarly
(B
1
r
B) =

{0, 1} if B is not invertible,


{1} if B is invertible.
2
OPERATOR THEORY
Solution V
1. Let B B(X) and let T B(Y, X) be invertible: T
1
B(X, Y ). Prove
that
(B) = (T
1
BT).
Solution
Since T is invertible,
(B) B I is invertible T
1
(B I)T is invertible
T
1
BT I is invertible (T
1
BT),
i.e. (B) = (T
1
BT).
2. Consider the right-shift operator R : l

dened by
Rx = (0, x
1
, x
2
, . . . ), x = (x
1
, x
2
, . . . ) l

.
Find the eigenvalues and the spectrum of this operator. Is this operator
compact?
Solution
It is clear that Ker(R) = {0}, i.e. 0 is not an eigenvalue of R. Suppose = 0
is an eigenvalue of R. Then Rx = x for some non-zero x. So,
0 = x
1
x
1
= x
2
x
2
= x
3

Solving the last system we obtain x = 0. Contradiction! Thus R does not
have eigenvalues.
1
It is clear that Rx = x for any x l

. Therefore R = 1 and (R)


{ C : || 1}. Let us take an arbitrary C such that 0 < || < 1.
Suppose (R). Then the equation
(R I)x = y (1)
has a unique solution x l

for any y l

. For y = (1, 0, 0, . . . ), (1) takes


the form
x
1
= 1
x
1
x
2
= 0
x
2
x
3
= 0

Solving the last system we obtain x
k
=
k
. Since || < 1, the element
x = (x
1
, x
2
, . . . ) does not belong to l

. The obtained contradiction shows


that (R). Hence, { C : 0 < || < 1} (R). Taking into account
that (R) is closed we obtain
(R) = { C : || 1}.
The operator R is not compact. This follows from the fact that R is an isom-
etry or from the fact that its spectrum cannot be the spectrum of a compact
operator.
3. Consider the set
M = {x l

: |x
n
| n

, n N} l

,
where > 0 is a xed number. Prove that M is compact.
Solution
It is clear that M is a closed set. Take an arbitrary > 0. There exists N N
such that n

< , n > N. Let x


(l)
= (x
(l)
1
, . . . , x
(l)
N
) C
N
, l = 1, . . . , L be
a nite net of the set
M
N
:= { x = (x
1
, . . . , x
N
) C
N
: |x
n
| n

, n = 1, . . . , N}.
Such an net can be easily constructed with the help of nets of the disks
{x
n
C : |x
n
| n

}. (The existence of such an net also follows


2
from the fact that M
N
is relatively compact as a bounded subset of the
nitedimensional space C
N
.) Now it is easy to see that
x
(l)
:= (x
(l)
1
, . . . , x
(l)
N
, 0, 0, . . . ), l = 1, . . . , L
is an net of M. Hence M is a closed relatively compact set, i.e. a compact
set.
(An alternative proof: it is clear that M = T(S

), where T B(l

),
Tx := (x
1
, 2

x
2
, 3

x
3
, . . . , n

x
n
, . . . ), x = (x
1
, x
2
, . . . ) l

and S

is the unit ball of l

:
S

= {x l

: |x
n
| 1, n N}.
It is easy to see that T T
N
0 as N +, where T
N
is a nite rank
operator dened by
T
N
x := (x
1
, 2

x
2
, . . . , N

x
N
, 0, 0 . . . ), x = (x
1
, x
2
, . . . ) l

.
Hence T is a compact operator and M = T(S

) is a closed relatively com-


pact set, i.e. a compact set.)
4. Let g C([0, 1]) be a xed function. Consider the operator A
B(C([0, 1])) dened by the formula
(Au)(s) := g(s)u(s),
i.e. the operator of multiplication by g. Is this operator compact?
Solution
It is clear that if g 0 then A is compact. Let us prove that t if g 0 then
A is not compact. Indeed, since g 0, there exists a subinterval [a, b] [0, 1]
such that m := min
s[a,b]
|g(s)| > 0. Consider the sequence u
n
C([0, 1]),
n N, u
n
(s) := sin(2
n sa
ba
), s [0, 1]. It is clear that (u
n
) is a bounded
sequence. On the other hand (Au
n
) does not have Cauchy subsequences.
Indeed, take arbitrary k, n N. Assume for deniteness that k > n, i.e.
k n + 1. Let s
n
:= a + 2
(n+1)
(b a). Then s
n
[a, b] and
Au
k
Au
n
= max
s[0,1]
|g(s)(u
k
(s) u
n
(s))| m max
s[a,b]
|u
k
(s) u
n
(s)|
m|u
k
(s
n
) u
n
(s
n
)| = m| sin(2
kn1
) sin(/2)| = m|0 1| = m > 0.
3
Since (Au
n
) does not have Cauchy subsequences, A is not compact.
(An alternative proof: according to the solution of Exercise 2, Sheet II,
(A) = g([0, 1]). If g 0 is a constant, then 0 g([0, 1]) and (A) cannot
be the spectrum of a compact operator. If g is nonconstant, then g([0, 1]) is
a connected subset of C consisting of more than one point and (A) cannot
be the spectrum of a compact operator.)
5. Let X be an innite-dimensional Banach space and B, T B(X). Which
of the following statements are true?
(i) If BT is compact then either B or T is compact.
(ii) If T
2
= 0 then T is compact.
(iii) If T
n
= I for some n N then T is not compact.
Solution
(i) is false. This follows from the fact that (ii) is false.
(ii) is false. Indeed, let X = l
p
, 1 p + and
Tx = (0, x
1
, 0, x
3
, 0, x
5
, 0, . . . ), x = (x
1
, x
2
, x
3
, . . . ) l
p
.
Then T
2
= 0 and it is easy to see that T is not compact (why?).
(iii) is true. Indeed, suppose T is compact. Then I = T
n
is also compact,
which is impossible, since X is innite-dimensional. Contradiction!
4
OPERATOR THEORY
Solution VI
1. Prove that the norm
p
on l
p
, p = 2, is not induced by an inner product.
(Hint: Prove that for x = (1, 1, 0, . . . ) l
p
and y = (1, 1, 0, . . . ) l
p
the
parallelogram law fails.)
Solution
It is easy to see that
x + y
p
= 2 = x y
p
, x
p
= 2
1/p
= y
p
.
Hence the parallelogram law
x + y
2
+x y
2
= 2(x
2
+y
2
)
is equivalent to 8 = 4 2
2/p
, i.e. to p = 2. So, if p = 2, the parallelogram law
fails, i.e. the norm
p
is not induced by an inner product.
2. Prove that the norm
p
, p = 2 on C([0, 1]) is not induced by an inner
product. (Hint: Prove that for functions f(t) = 1/2 t and
g(t) =
_
1/2 t if 0 t 1/2 ,
t 1/2 if 1/2 < t 1 ,
the parallelogram law fails).
Solution
We have
f(t) + g(t) =
_
1 2t if 0 t 1/2 ,
0 if 1/2 < t 1 ,
f(t) g(t) =
_
0 if 0 t 1/2 ,
1 2t if 1/2 < t 1 ,
1
f + g
p
=
_
_
1/2
0
(1 2t)
p
dt
_
1/p
=
1
(2(p + 1))
1/p
,
f g
p
=
__
1
1/2
|1 2t|
p
dt
_
1/p
=
__
1
1/2
(2t 1)
p
dt
_
1/p
=
1
(2(p + 1))
1/p
,
f
p
=
__
1
0
|1/2 t|
p
dt
_
1/p
=
_
_
1/2
0
(1/2 t)
p
dt +
_
1
1/2
(t 1/2)
p
dt
_
1/p
=
_
2
1
(p + 1)2
p+1
_
1/p
=
1
2(p + 1)
1/p
= g
p
.
Hence the parallelogram law is equivalent to 2 2
2/p
= 1, i.e. to p = 2. So,
if p = 2, the parallelogram law fails, i.e. the norm
p
is not induced by an
inner product.
3. Let {e
n
}
nN
be an orthonormal set in an inner product space H. Prove
that

n=1
|(x, e
n
)(y, e
n
)| xy, x, y H.
Solution
Using the CauchySchwarz inequality for l
2
and Bessels inequality for H we
obtain

n=1
|(x, e
n
)(y, e
n
)|
_

n=1
|(x, e
n
)|
2
_
1/2
_

n=1
|(y, e
n
)|
2
_
1/2
xy.
2
4. Prove that in a complex inner product space H the following equalities
hold:
(x, y) =
1
N
N

k=1
x + e
2ik/N
y
2
e
2ik/N
for N 3,
(x, y) =
1
2
_
2
0
x + e
i
y
2
e
i
d, x, y H.
Solution
1
N
N

k=1
x + e
2ik/N
y
2
e
2ik/N
=
1
N
N

k=1
(x + e
2ik/N
y, x + e
2ik/N
y)e
2ik/N
=
1
N
N

k=1
_
x
2
e
2ik/N
+ (y, x)e
4ik/N
+ (x, y) +y
2
e
2ik/N
_
=
1
N
x
2
e
2i(N+1)/N
e
2i/N
e
2i/N
1
+
1
N
(y, x)
e
4i(N+1)/N
e
4i/N
e
4i/N
1
+ (x, y) +
1
N
y
2
e
2i(N+1)/N
e
2i/N
e
2i/N
1
= (x, y),
since e
2i/N
= 1 and e
4i/N
= 1 for N 3.
Similarly
1
2
_
2
0
x + e
i
y
2
e
i
d =
1
2
_
2
0
(x + e
i
y, x + e
i
y)e
i
d =
1
2
x
2
_
2
0
e
i
d +
1
2
(y, x)
_
2
0
e
2i
d +
1
2
(x, y)
_
2
0
1d +
1
2
y
2
_
2
0
e
i
d = (x, y).
5. Show that A

= spanA for any subset of a Hilbert space.


Solution
3
Claim I: For any subset M of a Hilbert space H the orthogonal complement
M

is a closed linear subspace of H (see Proposition 3.15(i)). Indeed, if


z
1
, z
2
M

, then
(z
1
+ z
2
, y) = (z
1
, y) + (z
2
, y) = 0 + 0 = 0, y M, , F
and hence, z
1
+ z
2
M

. So, M

is a linear subspace of H.
Suppose z Cl(M

). Then there exist z


n
M

, n N such that z
n
z
as n +. Therefore
(z, y) = lim
n+
(z
n
, y) = lim
n+
0 = 0, y M,
i.e. z M

. Thus M

is a closed linear subspace of H.


Claim II: A A

(see Proposition 3.17(ii)). Indeed, for any x A we have


(x, y) = (y, x) = 0, y A

,
i.e. x A

.
Since A

= (A

is a closed linear subspace of H, we obtain


spanA A

.
Now, take any x A

. Since H = spanA (spanA)

, we have
x = z + y, z spanA, y (spanA)

,
and therefore, (x, y) = (z, y) + y
2
. Since y A

, we obtain 0 = y
2
, i.e.
y = 0, i.e. x = z, i.e. x spanA. Consequently A

spanA. Finally,
A

= spanA.
6. Let M and N be closed subspaces of a Hilbert space. Show that
(M + N)

= M

, (M N)

= Cl(M

+ N

).
Solution
4
Let z (M + N)

, i.e.
(z, x + y) = 0, x M, y N. (1)
Taking x = 0 or y = 0 we obtain
(z, x) = 0, x M, (z, y) = 0, y N, (2)
i.e. z M

. Hence (M + N)

.
Suppose now z M

, i.e. (2) holds. Then obviously, (1) holds, i.e


z (M + N)

. Therefore M

(M + N)

. Thus
(M + N)

= M

. (3)
Writing (3) for M

and N

instead of M and N and using Exercise 5, we


obtain
(M

+ N

= M

= M N,
since M and N are closed linear subspaces. Taking the orthogonal com-
plements of the LHS and the RHS and using Exercise 5 again, we arrive
at
Cl(M

+ N

) = (M N)

,
since M

+ N

is a linear subspace.
7. Show that M := {x = (x
n
) l
2
: x
2n
= 0, n N} is a closed subspace
of l
2
. Find M

.
Solution
Take any x, y M. It is clear that for any , F
(x + y)
2n
= x
2n
+ y
2n
= 0,
i.e. x + y M. Hence M is a linear subspace of l
2
. Let us prove that it
is closed.
Take any x Cl(M). There exist x
(k)
M such that x
(k)
x as k +.
Since x
(k)
2n
= 0, we obtain
x
2n
= lim
k+
x
(k)
2n
= 0,
5
i.e. x M. Hence M is closed.
Further,
z M

(z, x) = 0, x M

n=0
z
2n+1
x
2n+1
= 0 for all x
2n+1
F, n N
such that

n=0
|x
2n+1
|
2
< +
z
2n+1
= 0, n = 0, 1, . . .
Therefore
M

= {z = (z
n
) l
2
: z
2n+1
= 0, n = 0, 1, . . . }.
8. Show that vectors x
1
, . . . , x
N
in an inner product space H are linearly
independent i their Gram matrix (a
jk
)
N
j,k=1
= ((x
k
, x
j
))
N
j,k=1
is nonsingular,
i.e. i the corresponding Gram determinant det((x
k
, x
j
)) does not equal zero.
Take an arbitrary x H and set b
j
= (x, x
j
). Show that, whether or not x
j
are linearly independent, the system of equations
N

k=1
a
jk
c
k
= b
j
, j = 1, . . . , N,
is solvable and that for any solution (c
1
, . . . , c
N
) the vector

N
j=1
c
j
x
j
is the
nearest to x point of lin{x
1
, . . . , x
N
}.
Solution
Let c
1
, . . . , c
N
F. It is clear that
N

k=1
c
k
x
k
= 0
_
N

k=1
c
k
x
k
, y
_
= 0, y lin{x
1
, . . . , x
N
}
_
N

k=1
c
k
x
k
, x
j
_
= 0, j = 1, . . . , N
N

k=1
a
jk
c
k
= 0, j = 1, . . . , N.
6
Therefore
the vectors x
1
, . . . , x
N
are linearly independent
N

k=1
c
k
x
k
= 0 i c
1
= = c
N
= 0
the system
N

k=1
a
jk
c
k
= 0, j = 1, . . . , N has only
the trivial solution c
1
= = c
N
= 0
det((x
k
, x
j
)) = det(a
jk
) = 0.
For any x H and b
j
= (x, x
j
), j = 1, . . . , N we have
the vector
N

k=1
c
k
x
k
is the nearest to x point of
lin{x
1
, . . . , x
N
}
x
N

k=1
c
k
x
k
lin{x
1
, . . . , x
N
}


_
x
N

k=1
c
k
x
k
, x
j
_
= 0, j = 1, . . . , N
N

k=1
a
jk
c
k
= b
j
, j = 1, . . . , N.
7
CM414Z/CMMS08 OPERATOR THEORY
Solutions to 2007 Exam
Each question will be marked out of 25. The tentative marks for parts
are indicated in square brackets.
1. Let X be a Banach space and B B(X), i.e. let B be a bounded
linear operator acting on X. Dene the kernel Ker(B) and the range
Ran(B) of B.
Suppose there exists a constant c > 0 such that
Bx cx, x X. (1)
Show that Ker(B) = {0} and Ran(B) is closed.
Suppose A B(X) is left invertible and C B(X) is right invertible,
i.e. there exist A
1
l
, C
1
r
B(X) such that A
1
l
A = I and CC
1
r
= I,
where I is the identity operator. Prove that Ran(A) and Ran(C) are
closed. Show that Ker(A) = {0}. Give an example of a right invertible
C B(X) such that Ker(C) = {0}.
Explain what is meant by saying that P B(X) is a projection.
Let A and C be as above. Prove that AA
1
l
and C
1
r
C are projections.
Solution
Ker(B) := {x X| Bx = 0}, Ran(B) := {Bx| x X}.
Bookwork. [2]
Suppose (1) holds with a positive constant c. If x Ker(B), then it
follows from (1) that x = 0, i.e. x = 0. Hence Ker(B) = {0}.
Let us now prove that Ran(B) is closed. For any y Cl(Ran(B)) there
exist x
n
X such that Bx
n
y as n . Then
x
n
x
m
c
1
Bx
n
Bx
m
0 as n, m .
Hence (x
n
) is a Cauchy sequence in the Banach space X. Let us denote
its limit by x. We have
Bx = B
_
lim
n
x
n
_
= lim
n
Bx
n
= y.
1
Thus y Ran(B), i.e. Ran(B) is closed.
Bookwork. [7]
Since
x = A
1
l
Ax A
1
l
Ax, x X,
A satises (1) with c = 1/A
1
l
. Hence Ran(A) is closed.
Unseen. [3]
Since
x = CC
1
r
x Ran(C), x X,
Ran(C) = X. Hence Ran(C) is clearly closed.
Unseen. [3]
Suppose x Ker(A). Then
x = A
1
l
Ax = A
1
l
(Ax) = A
1
l
0 = 0.
So, Ker(A) = {0}.
Unseen. [3]
Let X = l
2
and C be the left shift operator:
Cx = (x
2
, x
3
, . . . ), x = (x
1
, x
2
, . . . ) l
2
.
It is easy to see that C is right invertible with a right inverse
C
1
r
x = (0, x
1
, x
2
, x
3
, . . . ), x = (x
1
, x
2
, . . . ) l
2
,
and
Ker(C) = {(, 0, 0, 0, . . . )| C} = {0}.
Unseen in this form. [3]
P is called a projection if P
2
= P.
Bookwork. [1]
(AA
1
l
)
2
= AA
1
l
AA
1
l
= AIA
1
l
= AA
1
l
(C
1
r
C)
2
= C
1
r
CC
1
r
C = C
1
r
IC = C
1
r
C.
Homework. [3]
2
2. Let B be a bounded linear operator acting in a Banach space X. For
the operator B dene the following notions: norm, eigenvalue, eigenvec-
tor, resolvent set, spectrum, resolvent.
Let C([, ]) be the Banach space of all continuous complex valued
functions on [, ] equipped with the standard norm
f = max
t[,]
|f(t)|.
Consider the operator A : C([, ]) C([, ]) dened by
(Af)(t) = (sin t)f(t), t , f C([, ]).
Find A.
Find the spectrum (A) and eigenvalues of A.
Consider the bounded linear operator V : C([, ]) C([, ]) de-
ned by
(V f)(t) = f(t), t [, ], f C([, ]).
Find the spectrum of AV + V A.
Solution
If B is bounded we dene its norm by the equality
B := inf{C : Bx Cx, x X}.
(Any of the following equivalent denitions will be accepted as a correct one:
B = inf{C : Bx C, all x s.t. x 1}
= inf{C : Bx C, all x s.t. x = 1} = sup
_
Bx
x
: x = 0
_
= sup{Bx : x 1} = sup{Bx : x = 1}. )
A number C is called an eigenvalue of B if there exists an x X,
x = 0, called an eigenvector of B, such that Bx = x. The resolvent
set (B) is the set of all C for which there exists a bounded lin-
ear operator R(B; ), called the resolvent, such that R(B; )(B I) =
(B I)R(B; ) = I, i.e. R(B; ) = (B I)
1
. The spectrum (B) is
dened as (B) = C \ (B), i.e. (B) is the set of all C such that
B I is not invertible on X.
Bookwork. [4]
It is clear that
Af = max
t[,]
|(sin t)f(t)| max
t[,]
|f(t)| = f, f C([, ]).
3
So, A 1. On the other hand, we have for f 1
Af = max
t[,]
|sin t| = 1 = f.
Hence A 1. Finally, A = 1.
Unseen. [4]
Let C, [1, 1] = {sin t| t [, ]}. Then 1/(sin t )
C([, ]) and AI has an inverse R(A; ) = (AI)
1
B(C([, ]))
dened by
R(A; )g(t) = (sin t )
1
g(t), t [, ].
Hence (A) [1, 1].
Unseen but similar to problems from homework and from 2006 paper. [4]
Suppose now [1, 1], i.e. = sin t

for t

= arcsin [/2, /2].


Then (A I)f(t

) = (sin t

)f(t

) = 0, i.e. Ran(A I) consists


of functions vanishing at t

. Consequently Ran(A I) = C([, ])


and A I is not invertible. Therefore [1, 1] (A). Finally, (A) =
[1, 1].
Unseen but similar to problems from homework and from 2006 paper. [4]
Let [1, 1]. The equation Af = f, i.e. (sin t )f(t) 0 is equiv-
alent to f(t) = 0, t [, ] \ {t

}, where

t

is the second solution


of sin t = , t [, ]. So, f 0 by continuity. Hence cannot be an
eigenvalue of A, i.e. A has no eigenvalues.
Unseen but similar to problems from homework and from 2006 paper. [4]
Since
(AV + V A)f(t) = (sin t)f(t) + (sin(t))f(t)
= (sin t)f(t) (sin t)f(t) = 0,
t [, ], f C([, ]),
AV + V A = 0 and (AV + V A) = {0}.
Unseen. [5]
4
3. Let X and Y be normed spaces. Explain what is meant by saying
that T : X Y is a compact operator.
Let X be a Banach space and K : X X be a compact operator.
Suppose that = 0 belongs to the spectrum of K and , C belong
to the resolvent set of K.
Show that the operator
A := (K I)
1
(K I)
1
is compact. (Here and below, you may use without justication any
textbook material on compact operators.)
Show that ( )
1
is an eigenvalue of (K I)
1
.
Show that
:=
( )
( )( )
is an eigenvalue of nite multiplicity of the operator A if = .
Solution
Let X and Y be normed spaces. A linear operator T : X Y is called
compact if it maps bounded sets of X into relatively compact sets of Y ,
i.e. if for any bounded sequence z
n
X, n N, the sequence (Tz
n
)
nN
has a Cauchy subsequence.
Bookwork. [2]
Let X be a Banach space and K : X X be compact.
Suppose that , C belong to the resolvent set of K. Then
(K I)
1
(K I)
1
= (K I)
1
((K I) (K I))(K I)
1
= ( )(K I)
1
K(K I)
1
and this operator is compact as a product of the compact operator T and
bounded operators (K I)
1
and (K I)
1
.
Unseen. [7]
Since = 0 belongs to the spectrum of K and K is compact, is an eigen-
value K. Let x X \ {0} be a corresponding eigenvector: Kx = x.
Then (K I)x = ( )x. Hence ( )
1
x = (K I)
1
x, i.e.
( )
1
is an eigenvalue of (K I)
1
.
Unseen. [7]
Similarly ( )
1
x = (K I)
1
x. Therefore
Ax = (K I)
1
x (K I)
1
x = ( )
1
x ( )
1
x
=
_





_
x =
( )
( )( )
x = x.
5
Hence is an eigenvalue of A.
Unseen. [7]
Since = 0, this is a nonzero eigenvalue if = . Since A is a compact
operator, has a nite multiplicity.
Unseen. [2]
6
4. Let H be a Hilbert space.
Show that vectors x
1
, . . . , x
N
H are linearly independent if and only if
their Gram matrix (a
jk
)
N
j,k=1
= ((x
k
, x
j
))
N
j,k=1
is nonsingular, i.e. if and
only if the corresponding Gram determinant det((x
k
, x
j
)) does not equal
zero.
Dene the orthogonal complement of a set M H.
Let H = l
2
. Show that L := {x = (x
n
)
nN
l
2
| x
2k1
= x
2k
, k N} is a
closed subspace of l
2
. Find the orthogonal complement of L.
Solution
Let c
1
, . . . , c
N
F. It is clear that
N

k=1
c
k
x
k
= 0
_
N

k=1
c
k
x
k
, y
_
= 0, y lin{x
1
, . . . , x
N
}
_
N

k=1
c
k
x
k
, x
j
_
= 0, j = 1, . . . , N
N

k=1
a
jk
c
k
= 0, j = 1, . . . , N.
Therefore
the vectors x
1
, . . . , x
N
are linearly independent
N

k=1
c
k
x
k
= 0 i c
1
= = c
N
= 0
the system
N

k=1
a
jk
c
k
= 0, j = 1, . . . , N has only
the trivial solution c
1
= = c
N
= 0
det((x
k
, x
j
)) = det(a
jk
) = 0.
Homework. [10]
The orthogonal complement M

of a set M H is the set


M

:= {z H : (z, x) = 0, x M}.
Bookwork. [1]
Take any x, y L l
2
. It is clear that for any scalars and ,
(x + y)
2k1
= x
2k1
+ y
2k1
= x
2k
+ y
2k
= (x + y)
2k
, k N,
i.e. x + y L. Hence L is a linear subspace of l
2
. Let us prove that
it is closed.
7
Take any x Cl(L). There exist x
(j)
L such that x
(j)
x as j +.
Since x
(j)
2k1
= x
(j)
2k
, we obtain
x
2k1
= lim
j+
x
(j)
2k1
= lim
j+
x
(j)
2k
= x
2k
, k N,
i.e. x L. Hence L is closed.
Unseen. [7]
Further,
z L

(z, x) = 0, x L

k=1
(z
2k1
+ z
2k
)x
2k
= 0 for all x
2k
F, k N
such that

k=1
|x
2k
|
2
< +
z
2k1
= z
2k
, k N.
Therefore
M

= {z = (z
n
)
nN
l
2
| z
2k1
= z
2k
, k N}.
Unseen. [7]
8
5. Let H be a complex Hilbert space.
Let B : H H be a bounded linear operator. Explain what is meant
by saying that
i) B is self-adjoint, ii) B is unitary, iii) B is normal.
Show that for any bounded linear operator A : H H there exist unique
self-adjoint operators B and C such that A = B + iC. Prove that A is
normal if and only if B and C commute: BC = CB.
Dene the numerical range Num(A) of A.
Consider the operator A : l
2
l
2
dened by
Ax = (x
1
,
x
2
2
,
x
3
3
, . . . , (1)
k
x
k
k
, . . . ), x = (x
1
, x
2
, . . . ) l
2
.
Find Num(A).
Solution
The operator B is called
(i) self-adjoint if B

= B, i.e. if
(Bx, y) = (x, By), x, y H;
(ii) unitary if B

B = BB

= I, i.e. if B
1
= B

;
(iii) normal if BB

= B

B.
Bookwork. [2]
Suppose there exist self-adjoint operators B and C such that A = B+iC.
Then A

= B iC and we have
B =
1
2
(A + A

), C =
1
2i
(A A

). (2)
It is clear that the above operators are self-adjoint and A = B + iC.
Homework and 2005 paper. [4]
Suppose B and C commute. Then
AA

= (B + iC)(B iC) = B
2
+ iCB iBC + C
2
= B
2
+ iBC iCB + C
2
= (B iC)(B + iC) = A

A,
i.e. A is normal.
Unseen. [4]
Suppose now A is normal. Then (B +iC)(B iC) = (B iC)(B +iC),
i.e.
B
2
+ iCB iBC + C
2
= B
2
+ iBC iCB + C
2
,
i.e. CB BC = BC CB, i.e. CB = BC.
(An alternative way of proving this is to use (2).)
Unseen. [4]
9
Num(A) := {(Ax, x) : x = 1, x H}.
Bookwork. [1]
Take an arbitrary x l
2
such that x
2
= 1. Then
(Ax, x) =

k=1
(1)
k
k
|x
k
|
2

j=1
1
2j
|x
2j
|
2

1
2

j=1
|x
2j
|
2

1
2

k=1
|x
k
|
2
=
1
2
,
(Ax, x) =

k=1
(1)
k
k
|x
k
|
2

j=1
1
2j 1
|x
2j1
|
2

j=1
|x
2j1
|
2

k=1
|x
k
|
2
= 1.
Hence Num(A) [1,
1
2
].
Unseen. [5]
Take an arbitrary [1,
1
2
]. Let t =
1
3
(1 2). Then 0 t 1
and t +
1
2
(1 t) = . Let x = (

t,

1 t, 0, 0, . . . ) l
2
. Then
x
2
= t + 1 t = 1 and
(Ax, x) = t +
1
2
(1 t) = .
Therefore Num(A), [1,
1
2
], i.e. [1,
1
2
] Num(A). Finally,
Num(A) = [1,
1
2
].
Unseen. [5]
10
6. Let H be a complex Hilbert space. State the Hilbert-Schmidt theorem
for a compact self-adjoint linear operator on H.
Let T : H H be a compact self-adjoint linear operator.
Use the Hilbert-Schmidt theorem to prove that there exists a compact
linear operator S : H H such that S
2
= T.
Suppose additionally that T is not a nite rank operator. Which of the
following statements is correct?
(i) There is a unique S : H H such that S
2
= T.
(ii) There are exactly two operators S : H H such that S
2
= T.
(iii) There are innitely many operators S : H H such that S
2
= T.
Justify your answer.
Suppose H is separable. Explain what it means to say that K : H H
is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator.
Give an example of a non-Hilbert-Schmidt operator S : H H such
that T = S
2
is Hilbert-Schmidt.
Solution
The Hilbert-Schmidt theorem: Let T : H H be a compact self-adjoint
operator. Then there exists a nite or a countable orthonormal set
{e
n
}
N
n=1
, N N {}, of eigenvectors of T such that any x H
has a unique representation of the form
x =
N

n=1
c
n
e
n
+ y, y Ker(T), c
n
C. (3)
One then has
Tx =
N

n=1

n
c
n
e
n
, (4)
where
n
= 0 is the eigenvalue of T corresponding to the eigenvector e
n
.
Moreover,
(T) \ {0} = {
n
}
N
n=1
R, |
1
| |
2
|
and
lim
n

n
= 0 if N = .
Bookwork. [4]
Consider the operator
Sx :=
N

n=1
_

n
c
n
e
n
11
(see (3)). It is clear that S
2
= T (see (4)). If N < +then S is obviously
a bounded nite rank operator. Hence S is compact. If N = +,
consider the bounded nite rank operators
S
j
x :=
j

n=1
_

n
c
n
e
n
, j N.
We have
(S S
j
)x
2
=
_
_
_
_
_

n=j+1
_

n
c
n
e
n
_
_
_
_
_
2
=

n=j+1
|
n
||c
n
|
2
sup
nj+1
|
n
|

n=j+1
|c
n
|
2
= |
j+1
|

n=j+1
|c
n
|
2
|
j+1
| x
2
.
Hence
S S
j

_
|
j+1
| 0 as j +,
and S is compact as the norm limit of a sequence of compact (nite rank)
operators.
Unseen. [7]
If T is not a nite rank operator, then N = + in (3), (4). It is clear
that for any choice of + or for each n, the operator

Sx :=

n=1

n
c
n
e
n
satises the equality

S
2
= T. Since the set of such operators is innite
(in fact, has cardinality of the continuum), there are innitely many op-
erators S : H H such that S
2
= T.
Unseen. [6]
Let Hbe separable and let {e
n
}
nN
be an arbitrary complete orthonormal
set in H. K is called a Hilbert-Schmidt operator if

n=1
Ke
n

2
< .
Bookwork. [2]
Let
Sx :=
N

n=1
1

n
(x, e
n
) e
n
.
Then
T = S
2
=
N

n=1
1
n
(x, e
n
) e
n
,
12
and

n=1
Se
n

2
=

n=1
1
n
= ,

n=1
Te
n

2
=

n=1
1
n
2
< .
So, T is Hilbert-Schmidt and S is not.
Unseen. [6]
13

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy