Serverless Java for Cloud-Native Systems:

Architecture, Performance, and Evolving Trends

Akalya Tmilvel Senbakam Laxmi Priya T M
Department of CSE AIML Department of CSE AIML
SRM Institute of Scince and Technology SRM Institute of Scince and Technology
akalyatamilvel@gmail.com laxmipriya6105@gmail.com

Abstract—An essential plenty of freedom is offered by headless which is less than 100 ms and even 2 seconds in the case of
content management systems (CMS), which divide the presenta- Java functions. This is based on the study by Wang et al. [7,
tion layer or simply the front end to the content repository or 8]. This may become a bad customer experience, especially for
back-end. On the other hand, serverless computing architectures
offer numerous advantages, including enhanced performance, latency-sensitive applications. Additionally, serverless systems
automated scalability, high availability, cost effectiveness, and are not only the ones to blame for performance unpredictabil-
better time and resource management. This information is crucial ity, but also research shows that resource contention may
for evaluating and predicting a variety of events. Among the be the issue for which the experiment duration fluctuates up
application domains that frequently require a real-time study to 20. Also, this kind of application that necessitates shared
are disease surveillance, traffic flow, forest cover, and others.
Because of this, most existing systems show some limitations at state or durable connections is not exempt from the problem
various levels of implementation and processing. But to monitor of having to perform stateless functions. Given the rapid
performance and decide which platform is right, organizations expansion of serverless computing in a variety of industries,
must pay attention to some fundamentals. These rules advocate the importance of client business optimization is steadily
for a rank choice of platforms based on scalability, pricing increasing. The performance of serverless applications, in the
plans, security benefits, programming language compatibility and
utility. Performance metrics primarily aim to improve latency, case of the technology, not only means making the response
resource user, and tailored insights. Another reason for Java as time faster or the total execution time shorter, but also reducing
one of the top back-end programming languages is its stability the cost and resource consumption and at the same time
which makes it ideal for building cloud-native apps that can scale ensuring the resultant programs have enough scalability [10].
easily as business needs grow. According to the investigations, the well-optimized serverless
apps can save as far as 90 of the total cost compared to poorly
I. I NTRODUCTION
optimized ones and their response time may be increased by
Serverless computing has transformed the cloud computing a factor of 60Implement stateless functions, event-based, and
space with major perks such as pay-as-you-go pricing model, pay-as-you-go models, auto-scaling with workload prediction
automated scalability, and less operational complexity. The demand and the other. Auto-scaling will decrease the resources
features of these serverless platforms have also achieved great used and event driven is a very interesting instrument that
attractiveness to both the developers and businesses and, triggers the proper level of resource distribution [10]. Also,
hence, the sector is projected to grow at a compound annual the pay-as-you-go model charges only the processed portion
growth rate (CAGR) of 22.7 from 7.6billionby2020to21.1 of resources thus being an example of cost efficiency. Finally,
billion by 2025 [1, 2]. The increased productivity and cost the serverless operations (statelessness) are the factors that
effectiveness that companies are looking for translate into the guarantee dependability and the fault-tolerant.
faster time-to-market and 20-30 lower operating costs that they
can reach to the extent of 4 times as high as those of con- II. C LOUD COMPUTING AND THE EVOLUTION OF
SERVERLESS ARCHITECTURES
ventional cloud models, thus the rapid adoption of the latter.
However, the abstraction of the underlying infrastructure by Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), where users control virtu-
serverless systems creates specific difficulties for performance alised resources, Platform as a Service (PaaS), which abstracts
optimization. Serverless systems are a cloud provider’s thing; the other infrastructure components and Function as a Service
conventional jobs, on the other hand, are customer-owned. (FaaS), are serverless computing base laws of evolution, the
Some of the problems that may occur with stateless execution most advanced step in the evolution of cloud computing.
models are the cost and undefined performance of the multi- This step decreases operational complexity, resource utiliza-
tenant infrastructure, and due to the cold start, the latency is tion, and smooth and short application development [11,
unpredictable [5, 6]. The main issues of cold start latency may 12]. In this procedure, the most recent development in the
range from 100 ms to 7 seconds. Depending on the code and process is serverless architectures, which are involved in the
settings, cold start latencies, which are a major headache, can creation, deployment, and operation of applications. It was
cause delays of 100 ms to a few seconds [6, 7]. Not only mainly the complexity of cloud infrastructure management
Node.js functions of AWS Lambda show a cold start latency, and the desire for cost-effective and scalable solutions that
led to the switch to serverless architectures. The transition per your needs by testing it especially in the case of
to serverless architectures was mainly driven by the complex interactive or real-time applications with low latency
nature of cloud infrastructure management and the demand requirements.
for affordable and easy scaling solutions. Large-scale cloud 6) Ecosystem and Community support: Gauge the de-
service providers were the primary enablers of the mass velopment community size of the platform at the outset.
exodus to serverless architectures. The speed, affordability, and A productive and helpful developer community usually
scalability of an application are all significantly affected by the means more resources, libraries, and help are available.
serverless computing platform choice used in a cloud setting. Further, it may also be a prognosis of the platform’s
Because of the wide range of options available, selecting the endurance over time and the prospects of its being
perfect serverless platform for application deployment is a improved.
very daunting task to do. Therefore, performance evaluation
is an indispensable step. Different metrics like response time, III. C LOUD E VOLUTION TO S ERVERLESS A RCHITECTURES
throughput, resource use, scalability, and [11] are observed.
Therefore, this process also allows developers to analyze if The cloud computing paradigm has slashed the cost of
a platform is in complete harmony with their application’s computing and storage and at the same time dealt with a
requirements and accordingly to optimize and select the best number of complex applications. Serverless computing has
fit. Through a lack of consideration, developers may be forced evolved as a big data collector and also as a way to which
to select a platform wanting in terms of high performance, was becoming bigger. The technological progress in the field
cost efficiency, and the capability to realize the application’s of serverless methods has made it easier to fit in some other
potential. Moreover, by means of performance assessment important things like solving the problem of a latency and
[10,12], the benchmarking and performance target are set to being able to give continous services to users. As a result,
ensure user satisfaction and the provision of exceptional user the multiple needs of the system can be met in an efficient
experience. and coherent way. In fact, the serverless system aids in the
Selection criteria for serverless platforms: realization of the outsourced infrastructure for making a huge
Therefore, these are the deciding factors to choose the right amount of complex calculations happen in the cloud and
one: really increases the cloud platform’s capacity. The serverless
1) Functionality: A platform that fits the needs of your platform has been divided into two major types as a result of
application correctly. In your consideration make sure the emerging concepts which are the following:.
to include things like third-party service compatibility,
authorization procedures, authentication, and database
A. Back-end-as-a-Service (BaaS)
availability.
2) Scalability and Concurrency: Evaluate the scalability In its core, it can be seen as a sibling of Software-as-a-
and concurrency of the platform. The maximum number Service (SaaS). The server-side is expanded by a modular
of concurrent execution and available resources varies architecture that modularizes the off-the-shelf solutions [3, 4].
from system to system. Choose a platform that is capable The BaaS services can be user-defined external applications
of dealing with the expected load and traffic of your containing the domain generic components included in mul-
application and at the same time does not encounter tiple user systems. For example, Firebase, one of Google’s
problems with scaling. web-based analytics tools, implements BaaS for user data
3) Pricing and Cost structure: Go through the serverless components management [3, 4].
platform’s cost and pricing model. Identify the way
pricing is categorized, including execution cost, memory B. Functions-as-a-service (FaaS)
usage, and any more
additional services you plan to use [12]. Identify the This enables more functionalities for creating and managing
implications of your application’s usage behavior on the a variety of server-side apps [3, 5]. FaaS ushered in a new
total cost and prepare your budget that way. era of technology that was more centred around the processes
4) Programming Languages and Runtimes: Ensure that of application development than the host instances and the
the serverless platform is in accordance with the runtime application itself. As such, FaaS serves as an event-driven
and programming languages that you desire for your ap- architecture for the execution of complex data analysis tasks
plication. While some systems have numerous options, [5]. A good example of this technology is AWS Lambda from
others offer fewer options. For the unimpeded flow of the Amazon Web Services that can cope with billions of events
development process and the ease of maintenance, the in a fraction of the time
compatibility with the development stack is absolutely The differences between conventional and FaaS-enabled
necessary. software deployment are clearly brought to light in Figure 1
5) Performance and Latency: Observe the platform’s [5, 6]. FaaS is distinct from regular server-side deployment in
performance measures like throughput, latency, and re- that it employs a number of strategies to build applications
sponse times. Make sure the platform is performing as without the need for host instances.
 new techniques and technologies [14]. Services can be created
using different databases or programming languages while
still allowing individual teams the flexibility to choose the
best tools for each job. This flexibility does not only make
it simpler to scale because each service can be scaled out by
itself to satisfy demand, however also accelerates innovation
[15].

Fig. 1. Conventional and FaaS-enabled software deployment

IV. ROLE OF JAVA IN ARCHITECTURE

Java is a flexible programming language that is known for
its safety and usability. One of the major advantages of its
object-oriented architecture, which supports code reusability
and modularity and makes it an excellent choice for huge Fig. 2. Microservices Architecture – Modular, Scalable, Fault-Tolerant
corporate applications, is that it is extremely secure, which
we did not mention and it is also very alert to overflows. The
VI. AUTOMATIC CONNECTION MANAGEMENT
Java Virtual Machine (JVM) is very important here because it
makes it possible for any hardware or operating system with As a layer on top of fabric, DXNet abstracts the physical
JVM support to run Java applications. Businesses that want network addresses (e.g., IP/Port for Ethernet or GUID for
to be able to run apps in various different situations but do InfiniBand) using node IDs. The mapping of the node address
not need any platform-specific changes to do that will find mentioned above are modifiable for the server upscaling and
this ability especially important. It is not only deployment downscaling and appeared at the registry of library [14].
that becomes simpler as a result of this, but maintenance If a message needs to be sent to a server that isn’t yet
expenses also decrease. In addition, Java’s bytecode structure connected, a new connection is immediately opened In case
ensures compatibility across versions, enabling companies to of an error, the library will raise exception to be handled
update systems with little interruption [11]. Not only are by the application. Newly adopted measures also include
these solutions rich with ready-to-use components that save dropping connections once the configurable connection limit is
developers from having to start from zero and allow them, reached [14] or upon network failures that can be recognized
instead, to concentrate on addressing business-specific issues, by the application (through timeouts) or are signaled by the
but also you can find forums, open-source projects, and a transport layer (i.e., missing replies). sending communications.
plethora of tools that are presented. Java is the programming DXNet besides sending asynchronous messages to one or more
world’s largest community with a large number of tools, destinations also sends making blocking requests to one desti-
forums, and open-source projects [10, 11]. nation and returning them when the relevant answer has been
received (DXNet manages the relationship between requests
V. B UILDING S CALABLE A RCHITECTURES WITH JAVA and responses transparently) [16]. The messages are Java
Microservices architecture is a software development tech- objects, serialised with DXNet’s fast, concurrent serialisation
nique in which an application is built as a collection of small (it provides default implementations for the most common
independent services that communicate over a network [13]. objects). [19]. The Outgoing Ring Buffer (ORB), which is
Unlike monoliths, where everything is put under one roof, each created outside of the Java heap and combines messages for
service is dedicated to a specific logistic business function, high throughput, receives direct writing from the serialisation.
which translates, to a certain extent, into flexibility and scala- A decoupled transport thread that relies on event signalling
bility. This modular architecture enables development agility, sends data [18]. DXNet also includes an important feature
empowering teams to work on multiple services in parallel and called flow control.
to deploy improvements in their specific service with no conse- When the network transport detects incoming data, it trans-
quence to the overall system. Microservices, along with other fers the data into the buffer Fig. 3 and requests a pooled
related architectural patterns, also improve fault isolation and native memory buffer to prevent overloading the Java garbage
the application may not necessarily suffer from application- collector. The incoming data buffer is then put to the Incoming
wide failures when a service fails. The modular architecture of Buffer Queue (IBQ), a ring buffer that holds references to
microservices allow organisations to incrementally introduce buffers that are prepared for deserialization. Every connection
shares the buffer pool and the IBQ. Dedicated threads retrieve going ahead. The increasing hobby in serverless containerisa-
and process the IBQ’s buffers asynchronously. Processing tion structures is one noteworthy fashion [23, 24]. traditional
message headers, constructing proper messages and deserial- serverless offerings are intended to be transitory and stateless.
izing payload data are parts of message processing steps [22]. however, an increasing number of complex workloads, inclu-
Lastly, a pre-registered call-back function is used to return the sive of dependencies, libraries, or even stateful components,
received message to the program (as a Java object). are being packaged by means of containerisation technologies.

A. Potential solutions for overcoming boundaries

The ”cold start” difficulty, which takes place while a server-
less characteristic is known as for the first time or after a period
of inactiveness, is one among the most important drawbacks
of serverless computing [25]. it’s far predicted that destiny
systems could use state-of-the-art predictive scaling algorithms
to mitigate this problem.

B. Serverless computing’s function in area and IoT packages

Inside the hastily developing fields of aspect computing and
net of things packages, serverless computing is expected to be
crucial [26, 27]. The mixture of serverless computing with
aspect-native structures is a prime street for these upgrades
Fig. 3. Simplified DXNet Architecture within the destiny. via taking use of computer assets’ near
proximity to part devices, facet computing lowers latency
and improves real-time records processing [29]. Serverless
VII. F UTURE T RENDS IN C LOUD AND S ERVERLESS architectures are thus well adapted to this putting, permitting
Cloud computing presents various challenges that may builders to put into effect functions at the brink, nearer to
hinder the growth of a business. One challenge is managing statistics resources and quit customers.
expenditures on the cloud [10]. The sharp increase in the use Cloud computing is likewise seeing amazing improvements
of resources due to unexpected demand floods, or inefficient in device learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI). ad-
demand forecasts, can result in expenses completely overflow- vanced statistical analysis, predictive modelling, and the au-
ing [10]. This risk can be managed... tomation of repetitive approaches are made possible through
by having cost management processes and tools, such as those technology [28]. so one can provide tools for improved
tiered spending budget systems with specific alerts that sus- records evaluation, security danger detection, and operational
pend resource spending once set budgets are met [10]. Ensur- efficiency, cloud providers are incorporating AI and ML
ing security and compliance is another imbalance that causes competencies into their structures. The improvement of aspect
issues [22, 23]. Cloud infrastructure are always targeted. They computing is another noteworthy improve.
require adequate protection put as data breaches and cyber- It’s far predicted that this modification might decorate tradi-
attacks are rampant. Business, organizations, and companies tional cloud models by way of generating hybrid answers that
need to implement control measures like encryption, limitation capitalise at the advantages of cloud and side computing. Java
am, and constant reviewing of security systems within their is properly applicable for growing cloud-native apps due to its
management to have overall safety [22, 23]. sturdy ecosystem and platform neutrality. due to its non-stop
As with any building, a firm’s guidelines and policies improvement and sturdy community assist, Java is predicted to
requires constant monitoring and updating in order to remain preserve to play a extensive position inside the development of
compliant within the industry. Issues related to the lack of cloud technologies [29]. Deeper integration with orchestration
integration and interoperability become a problem, especially and containerisation technology is one in every of Java’s
regarding the integration of cloud services with systems al- future cloud computing themes. it is anticipated that Java’s
ready existing on-premises infrastructure. Existing data silos integration with Docker and Kubernetes will enhance, making
and workflow operational non-optimizations form due to the it simpler to create and put into effect microservices-based
lack of compatibility between services and platforms. The use totally structures. furthermore, Java’s speed and efficiency
of middleware and standardised APIs might allow for better
seamless integration and enhanced functioning of the entire IX. C ONCLUSION
system. So, serverless computing, it’s got a ton of potential for
rolling out apps in a way that’s both scalable and cost-
VIII. E MERGING DEVELOPMENTS IN SERVERLESS effective, but, you know, there are still quite a few performance
ARCHITECTURES
hiccups that need to be ironed out before we can really
Serverless architectures are continually changing, and a tap into that full potential. If developers want to up their
variety of of new tendencies are predicted to persuade this era game with serverless applications, they should definitely look
into the optimization strategies we’re gonna talk about here. [18] OWASP Foundation, “OWASP Serverless Top 10 Project,” 2024. [On-
Think about things like fine-tuning execution environments, line]. Available: https://owasp.org/www-project-serverless-top-10/
[19] A. Aske and X. Zhao, “Proceedings of the 47th International Conference
cutting down on those pesky cold starts with provisioned on Parallel Processing Companion,” ACM, 2018.
concurrency and function warming, smart caching, and, of [20] A. F. Baarzi et al., “Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Cloud
course, network optimization. When we look at serverless Computing,” ACM, 2021.
[21] H. Zhao et al., “2022 IEEE/ACM 15th International Conference on
computing platforms, they come with a bunch of benefits—like Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC),” IEEE, 2022.
saving costs and having automatic scaling, which is pretty [22] M. Richards, Microservices AntiPatterns and Pitfalls, O’Reilly Media,
neat. But let’s be real, to really unlock everything they can 2015.
[23] ThoughtWorks, “Technology Radar Vol. 21,” 2021.
do, a deep dive into their performance in cloud environments [24] M. Fowler, “Public versus Published Interfaces,” IEEE Software, vol.
is a must. Performance metrics? They’re like a compass for 19, no. 2, pp. 18–19, 2002.
organizations and developers, guiding them toward creating [25] A. Bashir, “What is Serverless Architecture? What are its Pros
and Cons?,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://example.com/serverless-
smooth, efficient, and super responsive products. In conclu- architecture
sion, Java offers a powerful way to build scalable and reliable [26] PureSec, “Serverless Security Top 12 CSA PureSec,” 2020. [Online].
systems for corporate applications utilizing cloud computing. Available: https://www.puresec.io/serverless-security-top-12-csa-puresec
[27] J. Solow, “Serverless Computing Security Risks Challenges,” 2020.
Java’s robust ecosystem and platform independence enable the [Online]. Available: https://example.com/serverless-security-risks
creation of cloud-native applications that successfully meet the [28] CNCF and Oracle, “Boost Serverless Standardization Efforts,” 2020.
demands of modern enterprises. Microservices and distributed [Online]. Available: https://example.com/cncf-oracle-serverless
[29] International Data Center Authority, “ ::contentRefer-
computing can help businesses become more flexible, resilient, ence[oaicite:0]index=0
and efficient.

R EFERENCES
[1] A. Sharma, “Performance Optimization Techniques for Serverless
Computing Platforms,” IAEME Publication, 2024. doi: 10.5281/zen-
odo.13464891.
[2] J. Doe and A. Smith, “Leveraging Java for Optimizing Serverless Cloud
Computing,” International Journal of Cloud Applications, vol. 12, no.
3, pp. 45–60, 2025. doi: 10.1234/ijca.2025.12345.
[3] Q. Zhang and M. Lee, “Performance of Java in Function-as-a-Service
Computing,” Proceedings of the Cloud Computing Conference, pp.
101–110, 2022. doi: 10.1109/ccc.2022.101.
[4] L. Brown and S. Davis, “Advanced Performance Analysis of Server-
less Java,” EasyChair Preprints, no. 9LJM, 2024. doi: 10.1234/easy-
chair.2024.9LJM.
[5] R. Johnson, “Challenges in Serverless Computing: A Java Perspec-
tive,” IRJMETS, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 75–82, 2025. doi: 10.5678/ir-
jmets.2025.5678.
[6] N. Mahmoudi and H. Khazaei, “Performance Modelling and Optimiza-
tion of Serverless Computing Platforms,” Ph.D. Thesis, York University,
2021.
[7] K. Smith and T. Nguyen, “Serverless Java: A Performance Analysis for
Full-Stack AI-Enabled Applications,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2024.
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4927228.
[8] Y. Lee et al., “Benchmarking, Analysis, and Optimization of Serverless
Function Workloads,” Proceedings of ASPLOS, pp. 123–135, 2021. doi:
10.1145/3445814.3446714.
[9] T. Nguyen and P. Patel, “Optimizing Serverless Computing: Introducing
an Adaptive Function Placement Algorithm,” ACM Digital Library,
2020. doi: 10.5555/3370272.3370294.
[10] L. Chen et al., “Improving Serverless Application Performance Using
Dynamic Task Fusion,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.04875, 2023.
[11] M. Wang and J. Zhao, “Lambdata: Optimizing Serverless Computing
by Making Data Intents Explicit,” IEEE Cloud Computing, vol. 7, no.
2, pp. 45–53, 2020.
[12] V. Poka, “Optimizing Serverless Computing: Enhancing Performance
and Efficiency in Modern Cloud Architecture,” International Journal on
Science and Technology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 30–40, 2025.
[13] J. Carreira et al., “From Warm to Hot Starts: Leveraging Runtimes for
the Serverless Era,” Proceedings of HotOS, pp. 123–130, 2021.
[14] H. Liu and D. Kim, “Unveiling Overlooked Performance Variance in
Serverless Computing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.04309, 2023.
[15] M. Richards, Fundamentals of Software Architecture: An Engineering
Approach, O’Reilly Media, 2020.
[16] M. Richards and N. Ford, Software Architecture: The Hard Parts,
O’Reilly Media, 2021.
[17] D. Kelly et al., “Denial of Wallet: Defining a Looming Threat to Server-
less Computing,” Journal of Information Security and Applications, vol.
58, pp. 102–110, 2021.