Chap 7 - Summary
Chap 7 - Summary
Chap 7 - Summary
The first wave( 1897-1904): during this period, merger occurred between firms that were monopoly in the same industries. The first wave was mostly horizontal mergers that happened in heavy manufacturing industries. Most mergers were failed due to the fact that greater efficiency couldnt be reached and the supreme court passed an act that anticompetitive mergers could be stopped
The second wave( 1916-1929): most mergers happened between oligopolies due to the economic boom. Lot of technological developments such as railroads and transportation by motor vehicles let mergers occurred. Government had a policy that also encouraged companies to work together. The types of mergers were mainly horizontal and conglomerate mergers. Food products, primary metals, petroleum products, transportations equipments and chemicals were the industries that chose to merge. Also, investment banks started helping firms to merge and acquisitive. The wave was stopped by the Great Depression. The third wave( 1965-1969): the type of merger that occurred during this phrase were mainly conglomerate mergers which were motivated by extreme high stock price, strict antitrust laws and interest rate. Investment banks didnt play the vital role because mergers were all financed from equities. The poor performance of conglomerate mergers resulted in the end of the third wave. The fourth wave(1981-1989): the target firms were often larger in size than the third wave mergers. Industries that went mergers were oil and gas, pharmaceutical, banking and airline. Foreign takeovers had been common since this phrase. The antitakeover law led to the end of this wave. The fifth wave(1992-2000): globalization, stock market boom and deregulation caused the rise of the fifth wave merger which mainly involved banking and telecommunications industries. Most mergers were equity financed and firms mainly looked for long term profit motives. The stock market bubble led to the end of the merger.
Acquisition
A strategy through which one firm buys a controlling, or 100 percent, interest in another firm with the intent of making the acquired firm a subsidiary business within a portfolio
Takeover
A special type of acquisition wherein the target firm does not solicit the acquiring firms bid; thus, takeovers are unfriendly acquisitions
Entry Barriers
Due to economies of scale and differentiated products, it is much easier and cheaper to acquire current players By acquiring existing firms, acquirer have immediate access to a market Cross-border acquisition - where acquisition made between companies with head-office in different countries
Internal development of product perceived to be high risk in nature( esp. R&D cost ), therefore acquiring will lead to new and current product s performance easily predicted and assessed. Firms then able to enter market quickly and have predictability of returns to their investment
Risk
Avoiding or lowering internal risks i.e. internal product development vs. predictable acquired product Should always be strategic in nature rather than short term results oriented
Mixed Portfolios
Reshaping
By mixing its portfolios of revenues, firms try to reshape their competitive edge and reduce risk that effects its profitability Through re-shaping exercise, firms use acquisition to strengthen its competitive scope and products
New capabilities
Acquisition used to gain access to new capabilities. Firms intention to acquire diverse talents; i.e. especially through cross-border acquisitions
Too Large
Lead to additional cost to manage, bureaucratic controls, rigid and standardized managerial behavior thus reducing flexibility and innovations
Results
Acquired firm has assets or resources that are complementary to the acquiring firms core business Acquisition is friendly Acquiring firm conducts effective due diligence to select target firms and evaluate the target firms health (financial, cultural and human resources) Acquiring firm has financial slack (cash or a favorable debt position) Merged firm maintain low to moderate debt position) Acquiring firm has sustained and consistent on R&D and innovation Acquiring firm manages changes well and is flexible and adaptable
High probability of synergy and competitive advantage by maintaining strength Faster and more effective integration and possibly lower premiums Firms with strongest complementary are acquired and overpayment is avoided Financial (debt or equity) is easier and less costly to obtain Lower financing cost, lower risk (i.e. of bankruptcy), and avoidance of trade-offs that are associated with high debts Maintain long term competitive advantage in markets Faster and more effective integration facilities achievement of synergy
RESTRUCTURING
Down scoping
Refocus exercise by eliminating business unrelated to its core business. Management tend to be more effective, better understanding on operation and management of less diversified company Avoid being conglomerates , focusing on core competencies and improve competitiveness
Leveraged buyout
A party buys all of a firms assets in order to take the firm private Strategy to correct managerial mistakes or the firms management are making decision not for the interest of shareholders. It may also be used to build firm resources and expand Types - Management buyout (MBOs), Employees buyout (EBOs) and whole-firm buyout
OUTCOMES OF RESTRUCTURING
Short term Outcomes
Reduced Labor cost (Downsizing) Reduced debt cost (Down Scoping and Leveraged Buyout) Emphasis on strategic controls (Down Scoping and Leveraged Buyout) High debt cost (Leveraged Buyout)
Thank you!