Wireless Broadband Technology Evolution: The Right Choice For The Right Application

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 11

Wireless Broadband Technology Evolution: The Right Choice for the Right Application

December 2006

A Day in the Life


Mobile WAN VoIP BluetoothTM Mobile WAN VoIP Mobile WAN Data BluetoothTM Mobile WAN VoIP Mobile WAN Data GPS BluetoothTM Mobile WAN VoIP Mobile WAN Data MediaFLO BluetoothTM Mobile WAN VoIP Mobile WAN Data Wi-Fi BluetoothTM

Voice call to sales manager

While on call, checks email and downloads presentation with latest sales figures

Checks location and directions to clients office

Watches game on MediaFLO and has a group chat with friends

At home, playing multiplayer 3D game, using Wi-Fi to send video to nearby display
2

Different Access Technology for Different Needs


Wide Area Mobile Data Services
Examples: EV-DO, UMB, HSPA, LTE Ubiquitous coverage and mobility support System optimized for high peak rates, high user throughput, and high system capacity Service differentiation and QoS guarantee

Wide Area Multi-cast Services


Examples: EV-DO Gold/Platinum Multicast, Media Flo, DVB-H, MBMS Ubiquitous coverage and high mobility support Same data transmitted over a large coverage area at pre-determined data rates

Local Area Network


Examples: 802.11a/b/g/n Local coverage and near-static channel High user data rates upon connection

Low-power Device Networks


Example: Bluetooth Short-range connection Low power and low cost

Wireless Broadband Evolution Convergence

Network Evolution
All-IP Network For FixedMobile Convergence (VoIP & data) Co-existence of Different Access Networks for Various Needs Coverage, Mobility, Capacity, QoS, Data Rates

Mobile Device Evolution


Convergence of Communication, Computing & CE Platforms Multi-mode Devices Connect to Various Access Networks Service Requirements, Availability, Cost

Service Evolution
User Behaviors Trend from Wired to Wireless

Same Rich IP Apps and Services in all Environments Ubiquitous & Consistent Experience Desired
4

Mobile Broadband Evolution in 3GPP2


CDMA CDMA/TDM OFDM OFDMA

All-IP Services Broadband downloads CDMA2000 EV-DO

Broadband uploads Low Latency Advanced QoS VoIP, PTT an d VT OFDM Multicast EV-DO

Multi-Carrier Rev A Lower delays and higher data rates Software Upgrade EV-DO

1X

REL 0
DL: 2.4 Mbps peak UL: 153 kbps peak

REV A
DL: 3.1 Mbps peak UL: 1.8 Mbps peak

REV B
DL: 6.2 73.5 Mbps peak2 UL: 3.6 27 Mbps peak 2

DL: up to 280 Mbps peak3 UL: up to 68 Mbps peak3

UMB1
Highly optimized OFDMA solution 5-20 MHz carrier bandwidth4 VoIP FDD & TDD5 Modes MIMO & SDMA Support

1 UMB (Ultra Mobile Broadband) - Previously referred to as Rev C LBC 2 Peak rates scalable with number of carriers standard supports up to 15 carriers. Upper range highlights introduction of 64-QAM (1 RF carrier 4.9 Mbps peak) 3 Expected rates for 20 MHz, FDD, 4x4 MIMO 4 1.25 MHz option also included in the standard 5 TDD mode is under discussion

1999

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010 +
5

Mobile Broadband Evolution in 3GPP

Is WiMax A Good Choice for Mobile Broadband?


Mobile WiMax is based on fixed WiMax design philosophy
Adaptation of the Wireline DOCSIS MAC for wireless communications A mobile wireless channel is very different
Significant channel variations throughout coverage area Shared medium requires efficient mechanisms to allocate/deallocate resources Significant other-cell interference that needs to be managed Handoff challenges for mobile devices

Good for fixed point-to-multipoint

Our analysis shows significant performance gain of 3G over Mobile WiMax


Mobile WiMax requires 2 to 6 times more base stations to provide the same coverage
More than 6 dB link budget deficiency compared to EV-DO Rev. A at the same carrier frequency, and worse link budget at higher carrier frequencies (i.e. 2.5 and 3.5 GHz)

3G (EV-DO Rev. A or HSPA) data throughput outperforms Mobile WiMax by 50-80%


Performance based on typical mobile channel conditions used in 3GPP2 evaluation Due to poor control channel coverage, WiMax applies 1/3 re-use for control channels, thereby resulting in more than 50% control channel overhead, and hence lower throughput

Mobile WiMax can support ~50% of VoIP capacity of 3G networks with the same bandwidth
Mobile WiMax data throughput drops significantly when supporting real-time traffic

3Gs Greater Capacity Means Fewer Required Cell Sites

3G CDMA Continues to Drive Mobile Broadband Growth


Subscriber in Millions

Global Mobile Broadband Subscriber Forecast based on Technology 2005 - 2010

900 800 700 600


601.3 WCDMA (include HSDPA, HSUPA, etc.) 1xEV-DO (include Rev 0, A, B, etc.) Fixed and Mobile WiMAX

500 400 300 200 100


50.3 104.6 0.1 51 0.7 89.3 2.6 192.4 145.2 200.5 6.8 14.3 254.5 23.8 308.9 447.8

0 2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Note: 1xEV-DO forecast does not include 1x subscribers


Source 1. WCDMA & CDMA2000 1xEV-DO: Blended forecast from iGR (Feb 06), Strategy Analytics (Jan 06), Wireless Intelligence (July 06) and Yankee Group (June 06) 2. WiMAX: Blended forecast from Strategy Analytics (June 06) and ABI (Q2 06)

3G Embedded Laptop Shipments Will Continue to Outpace WiMax

10

Concluding Remarks
Wireless access networks are likely to continue to include a wide range of technologies even after FMC is established in the network core
Access technologies will continue to be optimized for particular operating environment to provide the best performance/cost trade-off for that service Wireless access networks are likely to remain hybrid and various, with a mix of singlebearer and multimode devices used to connect to them.

From Mobile Broadband perspective, 3G Technologies today (EV-DO Rev. A and R6 HSPA) already provides excellent QoS support and high data rate services
Evolution in existing spectrum (EV-DO Rev. B and HSPA+) offers additional enhancement in user-experience with higher data rates and lower delays UMB and LTE are highly optimized OFDMA system for wider bandwidths in new or vacant spectrum for further improvement in user experience

Compared to Mobile WiMax (based on 802.16e), 3G Technologies (EV-DO or HSPA) has better performance as well as greater economies of scale
11

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy