October 12
The table below illustrates the type of terms that are in renewable project finance transactions.
October 12
Capacity: 150 MW
Sponsor: renewable energy developer EarthFirst Canada Inc. Loans: $214 million including a two-year construction period and will have a 20-year final maturity Average Life: 10- to 13-year range. Purchase Price Agreement: A 20-year power purchase agreement with British Columbia-based electric utility BC Hydro, which has a rating of AA' by Standard & Poor's.
October 12
BNP Paribas was in the market last week with a 144A for the Panoche Energy Center in California.
Standard & Poor's has a rating of BBB-' on the deal, which is expected to price this week.
October 12
Dokie Wind Energy Project Canadian Example WestLB project financing for a wind farm in British Columbia, Canada.
Capacity: 150 MW
Sponsor: renewable energy developer EarthFirst Canada Inc. Loans: $214 million including a two-year construction period and will have a 20-year final maturity Average Life: 10- to 13-year range. Purchase Price Agreement: A 20-year power purchase agreement with British Columbia-based electric utility BC Hydro, which has a rating of AA' by Standard & Poor's.
October 12
BNP Paribas was in the market last week with a 144A for the Panoche Energy Center in California.
Standard & Poor's has a rating of BBB-' on the deal, which is expected to price this week.
October 12
Reserve Accounts
12 Months Debt Service Reserve Account $15 Million Operating Reserve Major Maintenance Reserve
Regulatory Support Guaranteed by Sponsor Covenants Distributions allowed only if DSCR is above 1.3 times
October 12
Reserve Accounts FPL Example The debt service reserve covers 12 months of debt service funded at closing, either in cash or an Letter of Credit. The major maintenance account is funded at closing in the amount of $1 million initially to $3.5 million by 2020. The special $15 million O&M reserve is funded at closing, with either: cash, a letter of credit , or a guarantee from a corporate entity with a senior unsecured rating of at least 'BBB'.
October 12
10
FPL Example
Loan Amount $370 Million Operating Reserve to Cover Expenses $14 Million Debt Leverage 52% Capacity 700 MW Average PPA Tariff: $35/MWH (Excludes production tax credit)
Most Projects already completed and FPL guarantees completion (limited construction risk)
2005 Loan Higher Leverage 65% Additional Subordinated Debt Total of 83% Financing
October 12
11
Disbursement controls in the form of conditions precedent to each drawdown under the construction loan, such as requiring the borrower to present invoices, builders' certificates or other evidence as to the need and purpose for which funds will be used. Borrower covenants not to amend or waive any of its rights under the principal project agreements without the consent of the lender. Borrower completion covenants requiring the borrower to complete the project in accordance with project plans and specifications and prohibiting material alterations without the consent of the lender.
October 12
12
October 12
13
The flow of funds is not standard but acceptable. American Wind will repay debt once annually, due in part to the annual variation of wind and thus power production. However, the issuer desires to make bi-annual distributions, and has structured the flow of funds accordingly. The trustee allocates funds monthly in the following priority; O&M expenses, the debt service fund (1/12 of the debt service requirement),
October 12
14
Re-Finance No Re-Finance
37.3%
44.6%
29.2%
21.7%
18.9%
I R 15.0% R
10.0%
5.0%
16.0%
7.8% 7.7%
0.0%
Low
High
Very High
October 12
15
October 12
16
The discussion covers how to build a well structured financial model that clearly delineates inputs, effectively presents key value drivers, uses separate modules to organize various components, accurately computes cash flow that is available to different debt and equity investors, and presents results of the analysis that accurately display risks of the investment.
Project Finance Modelling October 12 17
A Financial Model is a Statistical Tool In developing a financial model, the basic thing you are doing is summarizing a complex set of technical and economic factors into a number (such as value per share, IRR or debt service coverage).
Forecasting has become an essential tool for any business and it is central to statistics -- in assessing value, credit analysis, corporate strategy and other business functions, you must use some sort of forecast. Some believe economic forecasting has limited effectiveness and worse, is fundamentally dishonest because uncertain unanticipated events such as the internet growth, high oil prices, sub-prime crisis, falling dollar continually occur.
The whole idea of modeling, like statistics, is quantification. If a concept cannot be quantified, it is a philosophy. The fundamental notion of statistics is presenting and summarizing information, this is the same as a financial.
October 12
18
Nicholas Taleb:
In the not too distant past, say the pre-computer days, projections remained vague and qualitative, one had to make a mental effort to keep track of them, and it was a strain to push scenarios into the future. It took pencils, erasers, reams of paper, and huge wastebaskets to engage in the activity. The activity of projecting, in short, was effortful, undesirable, and marred with self doubt. But things changed with the intrusion of the spreadsheet. When you put an Excel spreadsheet into computer literate hands, you get projections effortlessly extending ad infinitum. We have become excessively bureaucratic planners thanks to these potent computer programs given to those who are incapable of handling their knowledge.
October 12
19
October 12
20
October 12
21
Introduction
In understanding a transaction and writing language for project finance contracts (construction contract, loan agreement, concession agreement, purchase power agreement) cash flow is the ultimate issue. One must understand how much cash flow is generated, who gets the cash flow and the priorities each party has to the cash flow.
October 12
22
As the growth of trade transformed the principles of gambling into the creation of wealth, the inevitable result was capitalism, the epitome of risk-taking. But capitalism could not have flourished without two new activities that had been unnecessary so long as the future was a matter of chance.
The first was bookkeeping, a humble activity but one that encouraged the dissemination of the new techniques of numbering and counting. The other was forecasting, a much less humble and far more challenging activity that links risk taking with direct payoffs.
October 12
23
Lessons from Financial Crisis on Risk Assessment Complex Structuring Risk Analysis Financing and return requirements
October 12
24
Alternative Models
Back of the Envelope
Quickly run the impact of an acquisition on debt service coverage Sensitivity of earnings to commodity price swings
Deterministic
Set a number of assumptions and translate into financial ratios and cash flow
Stochastic
Develop a range of possible inputs using Monte Carlo simulation. Used where there is a good and predictable history for value drivers.
October 12
25
Financial issues that must generally be addressed in valuation, financial structuring and credit analysis include:
What is the minimum level of the project IRR that is acceptable (relative to the weighted average cost of capital) What is the level of the minimum required equity IRR with different amounts of debt on the balance sheet What is the debt capacity of a project for senior debt and subordinated debt as measured by the minimum DSCR or the LLCR What should be the credit spread on senior and subordinated debt What is the tradeoff between risk and return in evaluating covenants
October 12
26
Mathematical Models
Mathematical models include beta adjustments for the CAPM, statistical models for credit analysis, Monte Carlo simulation and value at risk.
October 12
27
Equity Returns for Tollroads The following slide illustrates equity IRRs on selected tollroads. This information more relevant than theoretical weighted average cost of capital calculations
October 12
28
Standard & Poor's considers that minimum DSCR threshold tests for most contract-driven projects to be around 1.30 times (x), provided that this figure holds under stress analysis. Such levels are too low for merchant projects. Instead, minimum DSCR levels for equity distributions may need to exceed 1.70x for investment-grade transactions, depending on the industry. For example, one financial institution suggests that under base case assumptions the DSC should show not less than 1.2:1 for every year of operation during the loan life, and no less than 1.4 on average. Under a Downside Case, with up to 5 years added to the repayment period, the DSC should be no less than 1.0:1 for every year or less than 1.15:1 on average during the life of the loan. Projects with merchant exposure may find that leverage cannot exceed 50% if investment-grade rated debt is sought. On the other hand, contract-revenue driven projects, on the other hand, typically have had leverage levels around 70% to 80%.
October 12 29
October 12
30
180,000
40,000
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
2026
2030
2034
2038
2042
2046
2050
2054
2058
2062
2066
2070
2074
2078
2082
2086
2090
Income Tax
200,000
180,000
Break Even Analysis Traffic Growth Post 2026 0.0% Post 2016 Toll Increase 0.0% Wilton Farm Percent 70.0% Background Traffic Growth 0.0% O&M Increase 0.0% EMRR Increase 0.0% Interest Rate Increase 0.0% TIFIA Final Payment 31-Dec-2043
ASN Amortization ASN Interest Payment Funding of Distribution Account Funding of Sinking Fund CAB Amortization
160,000
140,000
TIFIA Amortization
120,000
100,000
80,000
Bank Loan Interest Payment TIFIA Interest Payment and Fee Deposit to EMRR
60,000
40,000
Major Maintenance (net of use of MMRA)
20,000
2006 2010 2014 2018 2022 2026 2030 2034 2038 2042 2046 2050 2054 2058 2062 2066 2070 2074 2078 2082
Total Revenue
October 12
31
October 12
32
October 12
33
Working Sheets
Arrangements by revenues, expenses and capital expenditures Arrangements by capacity, demand, and cost structure
Output Sheets
Valuation IRR, Debt Service Coverage Ratios
October 12
34
Revenue, Expense and Capital Expenditure Analysis Inputs: Working Capital Analysis Operating Drivers from Contracts and Other, Debt and DSCRA Schedule
Cash Flow Statement With Waterfall, Debt Defaults, Sweeps etc. DSCRA Balance, Debt Balance Equity Balance
Balance Sheet Equity IRR DSCR, LLCR Project Finance Modelling October 12 35
Inputs
Prices, Costs, Capacity, Technical Parameters
Debt Schedule
Debt Balance From Drawdown Debt Balance, Interest Expense
Working Sheet to
Derive Revenues Expenses and Working Capital
Depreciation
Depreciation Expense Plant Balance
Outputs
Free Cash Flow, Equity Cash Flow Value (IRR), DSCR
Annual Financials
Income Statement, Cash Flow (CASH WATERFALL) and Balance Sheet
October 12
36
October 12
37
October 12
38
October 12
39
Divide the model into separate modules, beginning with an input section.
Compute how the value drivers determine operating revenues, operating expenses and capital expenditures in a separate working module rather than in financial statements.
Understand the starting point of the model as it relates to the valuation issue (balance sheet, sources and uses statement or both). Carefully define the time period of the model using codes that define alternative phases of the analysis. Work through every single balance sheet item showing the opening balance, changes and the closing balance for each the accounts. This analysis should be made for everything ranging from cash accounts to common equity. Include separate modules for debt issues, fixed plant assets, working capital and cash balances.
October 12 40
Simple Formulas
The modeling practices are discussed in another sheet named spreadsheet conventions. The most important is keeping the formulas simple and making the sheets transparent and easy to read. The following should be in many other lines.
October 12
41
It is good practice to have accounts for all balance sheet items Some examples include:
The plant balance The debt balance for each issue Debt service reserve balances Maintenance reserve balances The NOL balance The Un-amortised debt fee balance The basis for changes in working capital Common equity balance
October 12
42
Typically, the length of a loan is between 10 and 15 years, but loan terms have become longer as banks have become more experienced in the wind industry. The interest rate is often 1-1.5 per cent above the base rate at which the bank borrows their own funds (referred to as the interbank offer rate). In addition, banks usually charge a loan set-up fee of around 1 per cent of the loan cost, and they can make extra money by offering administrative and account services associated with the loan. Products to fix interest rates or foreign exchange rates are often sold to the project owner. It is also typical for investors to have a series of requirements over the loan period; these are referred to as financial covenants. These requirements are often the result of the due diligence and are listed within the financing agreement. Typical covenants include the regular provision of information about operational and financial reporting, insurance coverage and management of project bank accounts.
October 12
43
October 12
44
October 12
45
October 12
46
October 12
47
October 12
48
October 12
49
Finance is critical path. After the Commercial Operation Date, the Permanent Loan is Repaid.
The slower the loan is repaid, the better the financial results of the project. Bankers are reluctant to make loans with tenors that extend for the life of the project.
After the Commercial Operation Date, the Project can Begin to Pay Dividends
Dividends or Distributions Define the Equity Cash Flow of the Project. Dividend Payments can be Limited by Covenants and Cash Flow Sweeps.
October 12
50
Completion Test
Sponsor Risk
Construction
Project Identification Technical and Economic Feasibility Fuel Supply and Power Purchase Agreements Permits Obtained Financial Structure Negotiated
Letter of Intent
Groundbreaking
Time
October 12
51
2-3 YRS. 1 YR
Development Stage Negotiations Project Contracts
S i t e O Site & & Offtake Govt M Approval Contract
Project Identification
Go-Ahead Approval
Financing Negotiations
Further Engineering
EPC Other O&M
Fuel Supply
C L O S E
Pre-Development Costs
October 12
52
October 12
53
October 12
54
While the equity IRR is the fundamental measure of return for a project, a number of ambiguities arise from its measurement. Some of these include:
Including shareholder subordinated loans in the calculation (these may depend on the tax law regarding the deductibility of interest for a particular country)
Including development fees that are paid to the sponsor but do not cover out-of-pocket costs for consultants, lawyers etc. as a cash inflow in the equity IRR calculation
Including assumptions with respect to debt re-financing which accelerates cash flows to equity holders.
Basic rule: is money going into or out of the pockets of equity investors
October 12
55
In contrast to free cash flow, equity cash flow should be discounted at a higher discount rate
October 12
56
Discount Rates and Valuation for Real Estate Projects Merrill Lynch performed a discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis on Equity Office, based on projections provided by our management.
The illustrative present value indications of unlevered free cash flows for Equity Office for the years 2007 though 2010 using discount rates ranging from 7.25% to 7.75%, based on the estimated cost of capital of Equity Office, which included consideration of historical rates of return for publicly-traded common stocks, risks inherent in the industry and specific risks associated with the continuing operations of Equity Office on a standalone basis, The present value of the illustrative terminal value using estimated 2011 EBITDA based on terminal EBITDA multiples ranging from 17.5x to 18.5x, based upon total enterprise value to estimated 2007 EBITDA multiples for the selected comparable companies.
Project Finance Modelling October 12 57
Free cash flow can be computed from the income statement or from the cash flow statement. The amount of free cash flow (free after all capital expenditures and operating expenses and taxes) is the sum of equity cash flow and debt service.
A complexity in measuring free cash flow is making adjustments for interest during construction. Interest during construction would not exist with no debt financing and the tax deductions on the depreciation portion that represents IDC would not exist. The first method is easier to compute, the second method is more intuitive.
October 12
58
October 12
59
NPV calculations are misleading if used to compared two projects of different sizes IRR calculations exaggerate the value of early cash flows and understate the value of later cash flows
Projects are exposed to non-traditional risks (discussed earlier).
October 12
60
October 12
61
Traditional
Project Finance
October 12
62
Project and Equity IRR Issue Equity Bridge Loans and Recourse Debt
In some projects, equity holders provide loans to the project from their balance sheet instead of equity. The issue arises as to whether these should be considered equity or debt. Example Instead of providing equity, a sponsor secures a loan to the project. The loan will be re-paid in a bullet at the end of seven years.
When the loan is re-paid, the sponsor provides equity to finance the loan.
Issue Should the equity bridge loan be considered debt or equity for purposes of computing IRR.
The loan uses resources of the parent and must be guaranteed by the parent
October 12
63
IRRs in PFI IRRs are negotiated in PFI transactions as part of the concession agreement where the IRR drives pricing in the contract. Concession agreements in PFI project financings limit increases in the IRR that come about from interest savings from re-financing. (e.g. share excess profit 50/50). In concession agreements, the IRR is used to monitor the performance of the project as well as for the investment decision.
October 12
64
Other Valuation Metrics Payback and Discounted Payback The payback period measures the number of years that it takes before the cumulative forecast of cash flow equals the initial investment. It is criticized because it gives equal weight to cash flows before the payback and zero weight thereafter. However, if you are explaining the benefits of a project and you can tell an investor that the money he invests will be all paid back in three years, and everything else is gravy, the payback can be an effective analysis tool. The payback can be modified where cash flows are accumulated and the payback is measured using discounted cash flows. This is the discounted payback.
October 12
65
Begin with the notion that management has a rate of return criteria where only projects that have an IRR of above 14% are approved for investment and projects that have an IRR below 14% are not. Further, assume that this rate of return is measured using equity cash flow rather than free cash flow, due to corporate objectives related to earnings per share (EPS) growth. In this hypothetical situation as long as free cash flow from the project is expected to yield a higher rate of return (project IRR) than the after tax cost of debt, the equity return can be increased if more debt is used to finance the asset. (Magnifying asset returns to increase equity return is the where the term leverage comes from). If, because of the reluctance of bankers to take credit risk, debt cannot be raised for the project, the equity return criteria will probably not be met. On the other hand, if a significant amount of project debt can be raised, the equity IRR will exceed 14% and the investment will be made. Therefore, in this hypothetical example the amount of debt directly affects the investment decision. Indeed, the investment is driven by the amount of debt that can be raised rather than by the beta of the project or the risk adjusted allequity cost of capital relative to the project IRR. The notion that the leverage of a project affects cost of capital is demonstrated in the following quote from a rating agency: Nonetheless, a project's leverage level is often an indication of its creditworthiness. For instance, a merchant project's ability to produce a stable and predictable revenue stream will never match that of a traditional contract revenue-driven project. Projects with merchant exposure may find that leverage cannot exceed 50% if investmentgrade rated debt is sought. Contract-revenue driven projects, on the other hand, typically have had leverage levels around 70% to 80%.
October 12
66
October 12
67
DSCR - General Discussion Basic Definition Cash into the project divided by debt paid to the bank Should find in the cash flow statement The rule is that the higher the risk, the higher the DSCR, since a larger multiple of cash flow has to be held in relation to debtservice.
The DSCR used in Credit Rating and in Covenants Measures the possibility of default
For example, if a wind project generates a net income of a1 million per annum and the bank requires a DSCR of 1.3, the project could take out a loan for which the debt service would be a770,000 per annum.
October 12
68
Debt Sizing
October 12
69
High Risk Project has higher margin, shorter-term and declining debt service. Low risk has flat debt service, and longer-term and higher IRR on Equity
October 12
70
Determining the Credit Classification of Project Finance Debt Determining the credit classification is important because:
Credit classification is probability of default Credit classification and risk drives the credit spread Credit classification drives the ability to gain bank financing Achieving an investment grade bond rating or above drives access to investors in bonds
Other than being used for covenants, the primary purpose of credit ratios such as the DSCR is to gauge the credit risk of a project loan.
Banks or Rating Agencies Value Debt with Risk Classification Systems Map of Internal Ratings to Public Rating Agencies
Internal Credit Ratings 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Corresponding Moody's Aaa Aa1 Aa2/Aa3 A1/A2/A3 Baa1/Baa2/Baa3 Ba1 Ba2/Ba3 B1 B2/B3 Caa - O
Code Meaning A Exceptional B Excellent C Strong D Good E Satisfactory F Adequate G Watch List H Weak I Substandard L Doubtful N In Elimination S In Consolidation Z Pending Classification
October 12
72
Risk Classification and Target of BBB in Project Finance from S&P website
October 12
73
October 12
74
Traditional Credit Analysis Backward Looking Credit Ratios to Gauge Bond Ratings and Bank Ratings Credit ratios are used gauge the credit classification from financial statements such as the debt service coverage benchmarks in project finance.
October 12
75
October 12
76
Strong Ratings
Characteristics of Strong Ratings Capacity to generate sufficient cash flow to maintain DSCRs within industry norms for investment grade ratings. Fully amortizing debt Lender has control over cash flows and collateral Strong management with track record of meeting budgets in the country Comprehensive risk mitigation Characteristics of Weak Ratings DSCR below 1.0 under moderate stress test scenarios Bullet maturities Reserve funds from operating cash flow Lender has limited control over cash flow Management has limited experience in the country
October 12
77
Template of objective benchmarks that measure risk factors, such as DSCRs, LLCRs and break-even oil prices.
Simulation model that alters critical inputs changed that measures the likelihood of default (Monte Carlo Simulation with oil price varied to measure the potential for the DSCR to fall below 1.0)
Stress test to evaluate whether the transaction can withstand in a critical revenue or expense. Determine financial flexibility in the face of adversity.
Judgmental criteria and weighting systems that use descriptions to distinguish credit quality.
October 12
78
DSCR
The debt service coverage ratio is a financial output in a project finance transaction which cannot be determined by sponsors of a project in advance. The debt service coverage ratio statistic can be driven my many factors including the debt to capital ratio. Unlike the DSCR, the debt to capital ratio is driven by a decision by sponsors and lenders. There is a direct relationship between debt service coverage ratios and the debt to capital ratio once free cash flows have been established. The table above shows the average and minimum debt service coverage ratio for the combined cycle plant assuming that price levels for the plant result in a project IRR of 11.09%. The graph illustrates that a debt service coverage ratio of 50% is consistent with a minimum debt service coverage ratio of 1.76x and an average debt service coverage ratio of 2.19x.
Average Minimum
October 12
79
Minimum ratio could dip to 1.5 At a minimum, investment-grade merchant projects probably will have to exceed a 2.0x annual DSCR through debt maturity, but also show steadily increasing ratios. Even with 2.0x coverage levels, Standard & Poor's will need to be satisfied that the scenarios behind such forecasts are defensible. Hence, Standard & Poor's may rely on more conservative scenarios when determining its rating levels. For more traditional contract revenue driven projects, minimum base case coverage levels should exceed 1.3x to 1.5x levels for investment-grade.
October 12
80
October 12
81
Typically, we want revenues after all operating costs and taxes to be about 50% higher than what we actually need to repay the debt. This means that on any given period, revenues can be a third lower for any reason (whether lower wind, poor operating performance, or lower electricity prices) and we will still have enough money to repay debt. This implies 1.5x DSCR Wind is highly predictable in the long run but highly volatile and uncertain in the short term, thus leading to strong comfort that the long term average will be close to predictions, but with an also strong likelihood that some seasons or even some years could see significantly lower production levels. The DSCR has increased from 1.40x to 1.45x according to a study by LBL.
October 12 82
At a minimum, investment-grade merchant projects probably will have to exceed a 2.0x annual DSCR through debt maturity, but also show steadily increasing ratios. Even with 2.0x coverage levels, Standard & Poor's will need to be satisfied that the scenarios behind such forecasts are defensible. Hence, Standard & Poor's may rely on more conservative scenarios when determining its rating levels. For more traditional contract revenue driven projects, minimum base case coverage levels should exceed 1.3x to 1.5x levels for investment-grade.
October 12
83
October 12
84
DSCR Criteria in PFI Transactions The DSCR in PFI transactions can be very low in the range of 1.05 1.2. The low DSCR results from the tight coverage of revenue and expense fluctuations with contracts. With the low DSCR, small risks in other transactions can become large risks for project loans. For example, interest rate fluctuations may have a small effect on transactions where the DSCR is 1.8, but the fluctuations in interest rates can cause default in the very tight PFI transactions. This is why there are 100% interest rate swaps in PFI.
October 12
85
There are many intricacies in computing the DSCR despite it being a simple ratio.
October 12
86
averages all of the minimum DSCRs remaining through maturity (as opposed to calculating the average CFO and dividing by the average annual debt service). The average DSCR provides a general measure of a project's cash flow coverage of debt obligations.
The average DSCR, when viewed alongside the long-term and short-term minimum DSCR, does provide another measure of project comparability. Generally, stronger projects will show annual DSCRs that steadily increase with time to partially offset the risk that future cash flows tend to be less certain than near term cash flows.
October 12
87
Difference Between Free Cash Flow and Cash Flow for the DSCR
Free cash flow Excludes interest income Adjusts taxes to remove benefits of interest income Includes proceeds from asset sales and insurance proceeds Determines the amount the project would earn if there was no debt financing Should make adjustments for interest during construction Cash flow for debt service Includes interest income
October 12
88
A project has better quality if it has a debt service reserve account Why not include all cash available to pay bank, including cash in accounts According to S&P
The ratio calculation also excludes any cash balances that a project could draw on to service debt, such as the debt service reserve fund or maintenance reserve funds.
October 12
89
Senior DSCR: For the senior DSCR, divide the net cash flow by the senior debt service obligations, exactly as it would if only one class of debt existed.
Subordinated DSCR Two Methods. The first method calculates the ratio of the total net cash flow to the project's total debt service obligations (senior plus subordinated). This consolidated calculation provides the only true measure of project cash flow available to service subordinated debt. The second method takes the net cash flow and then subtracts the senior debt service obligation to determine the residual cash flow available to cover subordinated debt service. This method, does not, however, provide a reliable measure of credit risk that subordinated debt faces. A combination of small subordinated debt service relative to the residual CFO could result in a much higher subordinated DSCR relative to the consolidated DSCR calculation. Moreover, the ratio of residual CFO to subordinated debt is much more sensitive to small changes to a project's total CFO than the consolidated measure.
October 12
90
October 12
91
In reviewing various transactions, various DSCR issues arise. Some of these include:
If there is a cash flow sweep, should an interest only ratio be computed, or should alternative ratios be used. In computing break-even analysis should debt service reserves be included in the ratio. If there are breakage costs for interest rate swaps, how should breakage costs be treated. Should different ratios be used for backward looking analysis and forward looking analysis. In using DSCRs as triggers to limit dividends or to sweep cash flow, which ratios should be used.
October 12
92
The DSCR is not generally computed before the date of project completion. Therefore, language related to the definition of the completion of the project must be included in the loan agreement: "Completion Date" means the first date on which the Agent receives notification from the Lenders' Technical Adviser that the following conditions have been fulfilled to the satisfaction of the Lenders' Technical Adviser:
[the completion tests under the Concession Agreement have been completed, the Authority has issued to the Borrower the [Completion Certificate] pursuant to Clause {cross-reference} of the Concession Agreement and the [Operating Commencement Date] under the Concession Agreement has occurred]; [and] [the completion tests under the Construction Contract have been completed and the Borrower has issued to the Contractor the [Final Acceptance Certificate] pursuant to Clause {cross-reference} of the Construction Contract]; [and {describe other Completion Date conditions}][;
October 12
93
The primary function of the DSCR is to measure the probability of defalut a ratio of 1.0 implies a default. Fundamental events of default include
the failure of the borrower to pay debt service; failure to comply with insurance requirements; entry of a final court judgment in excess of a significant dollar amount which is not paid or stayed after a certain period; abandonment of the project; bankruptcy of the borrower; failure of the sponsor to maintain ownership of the project (if the sponsor's ownership is a critical component of the evaluation of the project's credit risk).
October 12
94
October 12
95
October 12
96
Loan Life Coverage Ratio (LLCR): The LLCR computes the present value of cash flows over the debt tenor at the interest rate on debt as the numerator of the ratio. The denominator of the ratio is the present value of debt service at the debt rate. The denominator should equate to the amount of the debt. The denominator should be reduced for debt service and other reserves
Project Life Coverage Ratio (PLCR): The PLCR is similar to the LLCR except that the present value of cash flows is computed over the economic life rather than over the debt tenor. As with the LLCR, the denominator of the PLCR is the present value of debt service at the debt rate.
The PLCR measures how much tail the project has from cash flows after the loan is re-paid.
October 12
97
October 12
98
Loan Life Coverage Ratio (LLCR) Loan Life Coverage Ratio the present value of cash flow before debt service using the interest rate; divided by the remaining debt balance: LLCR = PV (debt rate, cash before debt service)/Debt Balance DSRA
Essentially the LLCR is DSCR on a present value basis so that the credit quality of the whole project is measured. LLCR numerator is the PV of the cash available for debt service, discounted at the pre-tax debt rate LLCR denominator is the PV of debt service at the debt rate, which is the same as the initial debt issued for the project The LLCR does not have a standard definition it would make most sense to use free cash flow rather than the numerator of the DSCR
October 12
99
LLCR and Credit Quality The LLCR Concept can be used to gauge the economics of the project relative to the amount of debt outstanding:
If no dividends can be paid until all of the debt is paid, the present value of cash flow can be compared to the present value of the debt.
If the present value of the debt exceeds the present value of the free cash flow at the debt rate, there is no way the project can payoff the debt the project has too much gearing. If the debt holders get all of the cash flow before any equity, the present value of the debt relative to the present value of cash is an effective statistic that can measure how much a variable changes before a debt default occurs.
For example, if the cost increases by a certain amount, a LLCR of 1.0 measures the break-even point before which the debt cannot be repaid.
October 12
100
Project Life Coverage Ratio (PLCR) The PLCR or project life coverage ratio covers the residual cash flow of the project as well as the loan life period.
In the PLCR, the numerator uses the present value of cash flow over the life of the project rather than over the life of the debt. The PLCR is related to the loan to value ratio if one assumes that the present value of the cash flow is the value of the project:
PLCR = Value/Loans Debt to Value = Loan/Value Debt to Value = 1/PLCR
As a rule of thumb, the present value of the operating cash flows before tax should be 1.5x the debt amount.
October 12
101
The PLCR or project life coverage ratio covers the residual cash flow of the project as well as the loan life period.
As a rule of thumb, the present value of the operating cash flows before tax should be 1.5x the debt amount.
Loan Life Coverage Ratio Essentially the DSCR on a present value basis
LLCR numerator is the PV of the cash available for debt service, discounted at the pre-tax debt rate
LLCR denominator is the PV of debt service at the debt rate, which is the same as the initial debt issued for the project The LLCR does not have a standard definition it would make most sense to use free cash flow rather than the numerator of the DSCR Prospective DSCR and Borrowing Base
October 12
102
Lenders want to know how their risk reduces over the life of a project.
If the loan was only for one year, the risks are less than a 20 year loan, if the cash flows are the same and the cash flow can support the debt repayment.
In project finance, the risk associated with longer terms is measured by the average loan life. Average loan life is used in a similar manner to the payback period to check that the loan is not over-extended. The Average loan life accounts for the manner in which a loan is paid back if the loan has a bullet payment, the loan life is the same as the tenor. The formula is simply the average outstanding amount of the loan divided by the initial balance of the loan.
October 12 103
October 12
104
Default Rates and Credit Spreads -- Note that Credit Spreads Increase When Default Rates Increase
October 12
105
Credit Spreads
Increase of 5%
Credit Crisis
October 12
106
Credit classification is very important in establishing the access to funding and the cost of funding as illustrated on the graphs below:
October 12
107
The following is an example of bond spreads at a point in time (bondsonline.com). These spreads change over time.
Rating Aaa/AAA Aa1/AA+ Aa2/AA Aa3/AAA1/A+ A2/A A3/ABaa1/BBB+ Baa2/BBB Baa3/BBBBa1/BB+ Ba2/BB Ba3/BBB1/B+ B2/B B3/BCaa/CCC
7 yr
10 yr 27 30 37 40 Note the Jump50 at 44 BB+ to BB 53 55 62 65 71 75 82 88 100 107 126 149 116 121 130 133 265 210 320 290 425 375 450 450 750 775 1300 1375
30 yr 55 60 65 70 79 90 108 127 175 146 168 235 300 450 725 850 1500
October 12
108
Theory of Credit Spreads: Credit Spread on Debt Facilities The spread on a loan is directly related to the probability of default and the loss, given default.
S = P (1-R)
The credit spread (s) can be characterized as the default probability (P) times the loss in the event of a default (R).
Project Finance Modelling October 12 109
Borrower Risk
EXPECTED LOSS
Loss Severity
Loan Equivalent
Exposure (Exposure) $$
If default occurs, how much exposure do we expect to have?
$$
October 12
110
Comparison of PD x LGD with Precise Formula Case 1: No LGD and One Year .
October 12
111
Comparison of PD x LGD with Precise Formula Case 2: LGD and Multiple Years .
Assumptions Years Risk Free Rate 1 Prob Default 1 Loss Given Default 1 5 5% 20.8% 80% BB PD 5 7 20.80%
Alternative Computations of Credit Spread Credit Spread 1 3.88% PD x LGD 1 16.64% Proof Risk Free Opening 100 Closing 127.63 Value 127.63
Risky - No Default Risky - Default Total Value Credit Spread Formula With LGD
100 100
cs = ((1+rf)/((1-pd)+pd*(1-lgd))-rf)^(1/years)-1
October 12
112
Probability of Default
This chart shows rating migrations and the probability of default for alternative loans. Note the increase in default probability with longer loans.
October 12
113
October 12
114
Market participants consistently report lower default rates, and especially lower loss rates on project finance than on other equivalent corporate exposure, largely because of the effect of transaction structuring and transparency and control of collateral. Project finance transactions are by their nature, complex and require a strong understanding of the underlying markets and their risk drivers. Only a limited number of banks have dedicated project finance credit teams.
October 12
115
October 12
116
October 12
117
9.3% 8.8%
% 6.0%
5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% Jul-01 Feb-01 Mar-01 Feb-02 Mar-02 Jul-02 Dec-01 May-01 May-02 Aug-01 Aug-02 Dec-02 Sep-01 Nov-01 Sep-02 Nov-02 Feb-03 Jan-01 Jun-01 Jan-02 Jun-02 Apr-01 Apr-02 Jan-03 Oct-01 Oct-02
3.77%*
Months
Note: Project*Long run annual default rate is 3.77% Finance Modelling
October 12
118
The table below shows the default rates in a study conducted for Basel II
October 12
119
Recovery rates
Immediately upon announcement of default, after some reasonable period for information to become available, or after a full settlement has been reached
Recovery rates of bond Subordinated classes are appreciably different from one another in recovery realization Difference between secured vs. unsecured senior is not statistically significant Recovery rates of bank facilities Bank facilities( loans, commitments, letter of credit) are senior to all public senior bonds Bankruptcy law and practices differs from jurisdiction to jurisdiction
October 12
120
Recovery Rates
October 12
121
Net cash from operations before debt service (CFO) Revenues minus cash expenses, including taxes, but excluding debt service
Minimum debt service coverage ratio (MDSCR) Lowest CFO to annual principal and interest payment ratio
Short-term minimum DSCR (STDSCR) Lowest DSCR over the next three years
Average debt service coverage ratio (ADSCR) Average of annual DSCRs through debt maturity
October 12
122
October 12
123
October 12
124
Three approaches
Basic
PD and LGD defined from four supervisory ratings categories
Foundation
Bank estimates PD or other risk parameters and uses basic approach for other parameters
Advanced
Bank estimates PD, LGD, EAD
LGD 2001: Initial evidence on realised losses suggests that losses during difficult periods exceeds those of senior, unsecured corporate exposures.
October 12
125
Payoff to claimholders
Value of the company and changes in value to equity and debt investors
At maturity date T, the debt-holders receive face value of bond F as long as the value of the firm V(T) exceeds F and V(T) otherwise. They get F - Max[F V(T), 0]: The payoff of riskless debt minus the payoff of a put on V(T) with exercise price F. Equity holders get Max[V(T) - F, 0], the payoff of a call on the firm.
Equity Debt
V(T)
October 12 126
A1
A2
Assets
The payoffs to the bond holders are limited to the amount lent B at best.
October 12
127
Telecom DSCR Criteria (Reference) Standard & Poors believes that a projects credit is generally strengthened by covenants that limit, or even preclude, distributions to sponsors unless both robust historic and projected DSCRs are met, and reserve funds are fully funded. Given the merchant-type risk associated with most telecom deals, Standard & Poors would generally require that distribution test DSCRs be computed on a 12-months-back and 24-months-forward basis, using forecasts made by independent consultants, and be at least 2 times (x) for low speculative- and investment-grade projects.
October 12
128
Standard & Poor's considers that minimum DSCR threshold tests for most contract-driven projects to be around 1.30 times (x), provided that this figure holds under stress analysis. Such levels are too low for merchant projects. Instead, minimum DSCR levels for equity distributions may need to exceed 1.70x for investment-grade transactions, depending on the industry. For example, one financial institution suggests that under base case assumptions the DSC should show not less than 1.2:1 for every year of operation during the loan life, and no less than 1.4 on average. Under a Downside Case, with up to 5 years added to the repayment period, the DSC should be no less than 1.0:1 for every year or less than 1.15:1 on average during the life of the loan. Projects with merchant exposure may find that leverage cannot exceed 50% if investment-grade rated debt is sought. On the other hand, contract-revenue driven projects, on the other hand, typically have had leverage levels around 70% to 80%.
October 12
129
October 12
130
Moodys
S&P
Aaa
AAA
The debt has the highest rating. Capacity to pay interest and principal is extremely strong. Regarded as having maximum safety and gilt-edged.
Aa
AA
The debt has a very strong capacity to pay interest and repay principal. Regarded as highquality.
The debt has a strong capacity to repay interest and principal. However, it is somewhat susceptible to adverse changes in circumstances and economic conditions. Regarded as upper-medium grade in terms of creditworthiness.
Baa
BBB
The debt is regarded as having adequate capacity to pay interest and repay principal. Whereas it normally exhibits adequate protection parameters, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances may lead to a weakened capacity to pay interest and repay principal for debt. These bonds/loans are lower-medium grade in therms of creditworthiness.
October 12
131
Moodys
S&P
Debt rated in the categories below are regarded as low grade and predominantly speculative.
Ba
BB
The ability of these entities to meet obligations may be moderate and not well safeguarded in the future. The lowest degree of speculative. These issues offer poor financial security. Assurance of payment of obligations over the long term is small.
Investment-grade cutoff
Caa
CCC
Very poor financial security. They may be in default of their obligations or there may be dangers present with respect to timely debt repayment.
Ca
CC
These entities are often in default or have other marked shortcomings. The highest degree of speculation.
This rating is preserved for debt that may have substantial risk; be in default; or extremely speculative. Potential recovery values are low. The debt is in default and payment of interest and/or repayment of principal is in arrears.
October 12
132
October 12
133