Reflective Teaching: Lizamarie Campoamor-Olegario U.P. College of Education
Reflective Teaching: Lizamarie Campoamor-Olegario U.P. College of Education
Reflective Teaching: Lizamarie Campoamor-Olegario U.P. College of Education
Introduction
Reflective thinking
much more than understanding the process of analyzing & making judgments about what has happened
Reflective thinking
an active, persistent, & careful consideration of
a belief or supposed form of knowledge, the grounds that support that knowledge, and the further conclusions to which that knowledge leads
Reflective teaching
looking at what you do in the classroom thinking about why you do it thinking about if it works
Reflective teaching
a process of self-observation and self-evaluation Identifying and exploring our own practices and underlying beliefs may lead to changes and improvements in our teaching
Reflective teaching
Two critical questions
"Whats worth doing?" "Is what Im doing working?
Procedural
teaching outcomes
Justificatory
rationales for teaching
Critical
impact of teaching on social justice
Liston and Zeichner, 1991 as cited in Nagle, 2009
Three Traditions
Academic
teaching of the subject matter & student understanding
(Shulman, 1987 as cited in Nagle, 2009)
Social efficiency
the extent to which teaching practice can replicate researchbased teaching practice
(McCaleb, Borko, and Arends, 1992 as cited in Nagle, 2009)
Three Traditions
Developmentalist
students interests, needs, and motivations to understand the best teaching strategies
(Duckworth, 1987 as cited in Nagle, 2009)
Reflection
Reflection is seldom part of todays science education, perhaps explaining why students think science is about memorizing facts.
Gnreux & Thompson (2008)
same
same for all
Knowledge base
Teaching values, beliefs, and philosophy of learning Knowledge of subject
flexible mastery & elaborate understanding of the various aspects of the subject matter
Curriculum knowledge
knowledge of the range of methods & programs available for effective teaching
Knowledge base
Knowledge of pedagogy
ways of organizing and presenting content materials that make students able to understand
Continuing education
continuing personal and professional growth.
back
Ethics of caring
the belief that teachers must care for and seek to understand their students as individuals and as learners with their own unique perspectives respects the wonderful range of multiple talents and capacities of all individuals regardless of cultural, intellectual, or gender differences premium on the dignity of all persons
Ethics of caring
Teachers as role model
of intellectual activity and desirable ways of interacting with people
Dialogue
openness to discuss privately and in confidence anything students want to talk about while maintaining mutual respect
Ethics of caring
Confirmation
ways of nurturing student's self-esteem
Cooperative practice
ability to work cooperatively with students/parents/peers
back
Constructivist approach
ability of helping students actively construct meaning during learning by relating new knowledge to their past experiences and personal purposes.
Constructivist approach
guide peer interaction effectively encourage students to construct meaning for themselves encourage active, meaningful learning
Constructivist approach
students freely raise questions and doubts integrate students' life experiences into the classroom relate subject matter to students' backgrounds, needs, interests, and purpose
Constructivist approach
places emphasis on
big concepts student questions active learning cooperative learning
Constructivist approach
seeks to connect theory to practice views the student as
thinker creator constructor
Action research
back
Response
Logs for students to record procedures, observations, and data does not allow students to do their own thinking or explore the learning process
(Klentschy 2005).
Reflection assignments
allows the teacher to make changes in instruction correct misconceptions further explore complex concepts with which students may be struggling
Both individual journals and small group discussions assist in establishing an environment where students are not afraid of getting feedback [and developing] a culture of assessment as information rather than judgment
(Peters 2008).
Reaction sheets
What aspects of the lesson were most effective? What aspects of the lesson were least effective? Would you have taught any aspect of the lesson differently? Why?
Think aloud
expressing out loud thoughts about teaching with students especially effective when teaching the student how to plan uncovers the reasoning behind making decisions describing and analyzing positive and negative experiences as they surface
Problem-posing
Ask students do devise alternative ways of presenting information Compare different accounts of the same events, ideas, phenomena Supply alternative endings, writing different outcomes Role-play, role reversal, attempt to discern what was left out, what was inconsistent
Problem-posing
Insert ideas that do not appear to belong in a text Delete or omit information Play what if Examine the social context of a given statement Identify the assumption
Shermis (1999)
Wait-time
Mentoring
Before the teacher begins the design of the lessons series: What are some of the content goals you have in mind? In what ways does this series fit within your larger curriculum for this year?
Mentoring
What are some of your concerns about this series? As we think about the topics, what are some of the activities that might engage students in the Three Artistic Processes (creating, performing, responding)? How can student understanding be monitored?
Mentoring
During the teaching of the unit's lessons: As you reflect about the lesson, what are some of the things that come to mind? Describe some of the differences between what you planned and what occurred.
Mentoring
What are some of your observations about student learning? What are some of the variables that might have affected the outcomes? Given the experience of this lesson, what are some of the adjustments you might seek?
Mentoring
Beginning teachers When teaching topics with which they have great depth of knowledge
ask their students more open-ended questions engage them in richer classroom discussions
Mentoring
Beginning teachers When they teach topics with which they felt less confident
structured the lessons more rigidly talked more asked lower cognitive level questions
Peer observation
to be exposed to different styles Guidelines
Each participant would both observe and be observed Pre-observation orientation session/ Plan The observation/ Teach Post-observation/ Debrief
Peer observation
Lesson aspects
Lesson organization time management students task performance time-on-task teacher questions and student responses
classroom interaction class performance during a new teaching activity students use of the first language or English during group work.
Teaching diary
Lesson objectives
Did the students understand what we did in the lesson? Was what we did too easy or too difficult? What problems did the students have (if any)? Was there a clear outcome for the students? What did they learn or practise in the lesson? Was it useful for them?
Teaching diary
Activities and materials What different materials and activities did we use? Did the materials and activities keep the students interested? Could I have done any parts of the lesson differently?
Teaching diary
Students
Were all the students on task (i.e. doing what they were supposed to be doing)? If not, when was that and why did it happen? Which parts of the lesson did the students seem to enjoy most? And least? How much English did the students use?
Teaching diary
Classroom management Did activities last the right length of time? Was the pace of the lesson right? Did I use whole class work, groupwork, pairwork or individual work? What did I use it for? Did it work?
Teaching diary
Did the students understand what to do in the lesson? Were my instructions clear? Did I provide opportunities for all the students to participate? Was I aware of how all of the students were progressing?
Teaching diary
Overall If I taught the lesson again, what would I do differently?
British Council Think (2004).
Conclusion
Plan
How do you usually teach this lesson? What do you expect the students to already know about this concept? Where would you like student thinking to be at the end of this lesson? What misconceptions do you think students have about these ideas? How do you expect students to respond to ___ ?
Teach
Are you asking open ended or closed ended type of questions? Are the students asking procedurally oriented or conceptually oriented questions? Whose thinking is being explored -- the professors, one particular students, a weaker student (or what appears to be a weaker student), or a mixture?
Teach
How are misconceptions and mistakes addressed? Did you notice any student explanations of their own thinking? Is there enough wait time after posing a question?
Debrief
How do you think the lesson went? What worked, what didnt work? What would you do differently if you could teach the lesson again? When ___ happened, why did you decide to do ___ ? What did you mean by ___ ? Based on what happened today, what will you do when the class meets again?
Meaningful tasks
meaningful activities provided tasks suited to developmental level(s) of students
Active teaching
effective demonstrations guided practice
Accountability
variety of mechanisms used
Sources
British Council Think (2004). Writing a teaching diary. Retrieved May 22, 2009 from Cole, A.L. & Knowles, J.G. (2000). Researching teaching: Exploring teacher development through reflexive inquiry. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Gnreux, A.P. & Thompson, W.A. (2008, Jul/Aug). Lights, camera, reflection! Digital Movies: a tool for reflective learning. Journal of College Science Teaching (37) 6, 21. Hwee Khim, M.C. (2005). Reflective Teaching at Manjusri Secondary School. Retrieved May 22, 2009 from http://www3.moe.edu.sg/corporate/contactonline/2005 /Issue08/teachers/teachers.htm
Sources
Kilpatrick, C., Hart, L., Najee-ullah, D., Mitchem, P. ( ). Reflective teaching practice by university faculty: Rationale and case study in computer science Loughran, J.J. (2002, Jan/Feb). Effective reflective practice in search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education (53) 1, 33-43. Mccann, T.M., Johannessen, L.R., Kahn, E., Smagorinsky, P., & Smith, M.W. [eds.] (2005). Reflective teaching: How to develop critically engaged readers, Writers, and Speakers. NW: Heinemann. McDonald, J. & Dominguez, L. (2009, March). Reflective writing Developing patterns for thinking about learning in science. The Science Teacher, 46- .
Sources
Nagle, J.F. (2009). Becoming a reflective practitioner in the age of accountability. The Educational Forum (73) 1., 76-86. Poblete, Sr. (1999). D.P. A reflective teaching model: an Adventist assessment. Retrieved May 22, 2009 from http://circle.adventist.org/files/CD2008/CD1/ict/vol_24/ 24cc_257-276.htm Ravitz, J.L., Becker, H.J., & Wong, Y.T. (2000). Constructivist-compatible beliefs and practices among U.S. teachers. Retrieved May 22, 2009 from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/html/findings.html Richards, J.C. (n.d.). Towards Reflective Teaching. Retrieved July 22, 2009 from The Teacher Trainer http://www.tttjournal.co.uk
Sources
Shermis, S. (1999). Reflective thought, critical thinking. ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading, English, and Communication Digest #143 Retrieved May 22, 2009 from http://reading.indiana.edu/ieo/digests/d143/html Teaching Resource Center (n.d.). Develping your reflective teaching statement. Retrieved May 22, 2009 from http://trc.virginia.edu/Programs/TPT/ The National Capital Language Resource Center. (2004). What language teaching is: Reflective teaching practice. Retrieved May 22, 2009 from http://www.nclrc.org/essentials/whatteach/wtindex.ht m Tice, J. (n.d.). The reflective teaching model. Retrieved May 22, 2009 from http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/think/articles