Models For Change
Models For Change
Models For Change
Dr. S.P. Chauhan Professor (OB & HR) Asia-Pacific Institute of Management, New Delhi
Lewins Model
Lewins Model
Lewins Change Management Model
1. Unfreeze Most people make an active effort to resist change. In order to overcome this tendency, a period of thawing or unfreezing must be initiated through motivation.
Lewins Model
Lewins Change Management Model
2. Transition Once change is initiated, the company moves into a transition period, which may last for some time. Adequate leadership and reassurance is necessary for the process to be successful.
Lewins Model
Lewins Change Management Model
3. Refreeze After change has been accepted and successfully implemented, the company becomes stable again, and staff refreezes as they operate under the new guidelines.
Provide rationale
for change Create minor levels of guilt/anxiety about not changing Create sense of psychological safety concerning change
Provide information
that suspects proposed changes Bring about actual shifts in behavior
Implement new
evaluation systems Create minor levels of guilt/anxiety about not changing Implement new hiring and promotion systems
Introduction
The Seven S Framework first appeared in "The Art Of Japanese Management" by Richard Pascale and Anthony Athos in 1981. They had been looking at how Japanese industry had been so successful, at around the same time that Tom Peters and Robert Waterman were exploring what made a company excellent. The Seven S model was born at a meeting of the four authors in 1978. It went on to appear in "In Search of Excellence" by Peters and Waterman, and was taken up as a basic tool by the global management consultancy McKinsey: it's sometimes known as the McKinsey 7S model.
Introduction
Managers, they said, need to take account of all seven of the factors to be sure of successful implementation of a strategy - large or small. They're all interdependent, so if you fail to pay proper attention to one of them, it can bring the others crashing down around you. Oh, and the relative importance of each factor will vary over time, and you can't always tell how that's changing. Like a lot of these models, there's a good dose of common sense in here, but the 7S Framework is useful way of checking that you've covered all the bases.
How do you go about analyzing how well your organization is positioned to achieve its intended objective? This is a question that has been asked for many years, and there are many different answers. Some approaches look at internal factors, others look at external ones, some combine these perspectives, and others look for congruence between various aspects of the organization being studied. Ultimately, the issue comes down to which factors to study.
The McKinsey 7S model involves seven interdependent factors which are categorized as either "hard" or "soft" elements:
Hard Elements
Strategy Structure
Systems
and management can directly influence them: These are strategy statements; organization charts and reporting lines; and formal processes and IT systems. "Soft" elements, on the other hand, can be more difficult to describe, and are less tangible and more influenced by culture. However, these soft elements are as important as the hard elements if the organization is going to be successful.
Strategy
Strategy:
What is our strategy? How do we intend to achieve our objectives? How do we deal with competitive pressure? How are changes in customer demands dealt with? How is strategy adjusted for environmental issues?
Structure
Structure:
How is the company/team divided? What is the hierarchy? How do the various departments coordinate activities? How do the team members organize and align themselves? Is decision making and controlling centralized or decentralized? Is this as it should be, given what we're doing? Where are the lines of communication? Explicit and implicit?
Staff:
What positions or specializations are represented within the team? What positions need to be filled? Are there gaps in required competencies?
Skills:
What are the strongest skills represented within the company/team? Are there any skills gaps? What is the company/team known for doing well? Do the current employees/team members have the ability to do the job? How are skills monitored and assessed?
Benefits of McKinsey 7-S Model The McKinsey 7-S Model offers four primary benefits:
1. It offers an effective method to diagnose and understand an organization. 2. It provides guidance in organizational change. 3. It combines rational and emotional components. 4. All parts are integral and must be addressed in a unified manner.
Disadvantages of the McKinsey 7-S Model Disadvantages of the McKinsey 7-S Model are: - When one part changes, all parts change, because all factors are interrelated. - Differences are ignored. - The model is complex. - Companies using this model have been known to have a higher incidence of failure.
This involves identifying right kinds of people and trying to bring them together so that they can help steer this change programme. Also enough power needs to be given to this group so that they can pursue the change effort.
3. Develop a vision:
This stage entails developing a vision to bring about the change in the organization. Kotter proposes that this vision should be highly focused and stated in very simple terms so that everyone involved in the process accepts and understands it.
- The process is an easy step-by-step model. - The focus is on preparing and accepting change, not the actual change. - Transition is easier with this model.
Disadvantages of Kotters 8 Step Change Model There are some disadvantages offered by this model: - Steps cant be skipped. - The process takes a great deal of time.
ADKAR MODEL
ADKAR MODEL
ADKAR has become one of the most requested change management models from Prosci. Initially developed over a decade ago, this simple acronym has helped thousands more effectively manage change around them - whether changes happening at work, at home or in the community. In 2006, Prosci released the latest work on ADKAR, Jeffery M. Hiatt's book ADKAR: a model for change in business, government and our community.
ADKAR model
The ADKAR model presented in ADKAR: a model for change is a framework for understanding change at an individual level. This model is then extended to show how businesses, government agencies and communities can increase the likelihood that their changes are implemented successfully.
ADKAR Model
The ADKAR model has five elements or objectives. It is useful to think of these elements as building blocks. All five elements must be in place for a change to be realized.
A - Awareness of the need for change D - Desire to support and participate in the change K - Knowledge of how to change A - Ability to implement required skills and behaviors R - Reinforcement to sustain the change
A
4 4 3 2
D
2 1 2 4
K
4 3 4 2
A
4 3 2 2
R
3 3 2 2
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10
3 4 1 3 4 3
4 1 4 3 1 2
2 3 3 3 3 4
3 4 3 2 2 3
2 4 2 3 2 3
Whether they trust the sender What they have heard from others How satisfied they are with work Experience with other changes at work
Thank You