Ethics in Emergency Medicine: Amalia Muhaimin
Ethics in Emergency Medicine: Amalia Muhaimin
Ethics in Emergency Medicine: Amalia Muhaimin
Amalia Muhaimin
Department of Public Health, Division of Bioethics School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
5. Limiting Resuscitation
6. Futility 7. Confidentiality
3. In time of life threatening crisis physician's duty to do that which the occasion demands, even without the consent of the patient.
How urgent?
How urgent a situation is depends
upon: - consequences of a delay in rendering treatment, or - consequences of a failure to render any treatment at all.
Informed refusal
1. Patients with decision making capacity (capacity) have a right not to consent to care.
2. The elements of a valid, informed refusal are the same as consent: capacity & comprehension of information (risks & harm)
3. Refusal of care may conflict with physicians judgment & recommendation emphasize the risks & consequences
4. Both consent and refusal must be made voluntary, without coercion/duress. 5. Physicians should provide treatment despite: - a verbal refusal in patients with no capacity, or - life threat is so acute no time to assess refusal. 6. When patients do not have capacity benefit must outweigh the potential risk of harm
Case 1:
25 y.o. with head injury due to traffic
accident, GCS 15, mouth & nose bleeding, mandibular fracture Doctor suggests head CT-scan, receives informed consent from patient, but disapproved by hospital due to administrative matter (who will pay?)
decision making capacity with the legal definition of competence. List the ways decisions can be made when a patient lacks decision-making capacity
obtained by history, behavior, or physical examination The determination of decision making capacity requires that: 1. The patient appreciates he/she has the power to make decisions on his/her behalf 2. The patient understands - the medical situation & prognosis, - the nature of the recommended evaluation or care, - the alternatives, - the risks & benefits of each, and - the likely consequences 3. The patient's decision is stable over time, and is consistent with his or her life values or goals.
Level of capacity
The degree/level of decision-making capacity varies with the degree & probability of risk, benefit, & patient's decision to consent/refuse.
The greater the risk the more exacting
the standard of capacity A patient might need a low level of capacity to consent to a procedure with substantial benefits and minimal risks, but a high level of capacity to refuse the same
made? depends on: - the speed with which the decision must be made - what information about patient preferences is available
When patients previously expressed
Case 2:
60 y.o. referred from private hospital with
(suspect of) CRF (7 days of hospitalization, askeskin) Arrived in E.R. unconscious (somnolen, GCS 12), suspect of metabolic disorder Latest lab results reveal normal, doctors advise head CT-scan to find etiology & establish diagnosis Wife disagrees (wishes for homecare) but children agrees to go on
3. Limiting Resuscitation
Define "Do Not Resuscitate Order" (DNR
order). Explain conditions which must be present to withhold resuscitation Explain the role of family and significant others in decisions about resuscitation.
difference Indeed a difference, but not a moral one in itself There can be a moral difference in some situations Creates potential difficulty for families, as well as for physicians
withhold resuscitation attempts on patients who have expressed clear wishes (Indonesia?)
Challenge communication means of
communication must be legally, ethically, and medically sound (ex: form with patient & physician signature, patient arm-band, etc.)
Emergency setting presents difficulties
should be initiated.
The decision to resuscitate must be an
Case 3:
30 y.o. in coma due to traffic accident,
GCS 4 Develops respiratory failure doctor suggest patient put on NRM / ventilator After 3 hours parents decide to stop life support & bring home their child on whatever condition
Reference
Blank R., Merrick J. (ed). End of Life Decision
Making. A Cross-National Study. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2005 Peterson L. Workshop and Panel Discussion on End of Life: Developing palliative care unit & strengthening hospital ethics committee. Yogyakarta, 15-17 January 2008 SAEM Ethics Committee Ethics Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Residencies,1994