Unilever in Brazil

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 15

Unilever in Brazil

Marketing Strategies for


Low-Income Consumers
Group
Members:
•Aditee Thale
•Abhishek Jain
•Vishal
•Vivek Ganatra
•Prachi Ranjan
•Satyajeet Sahu
Brazil: Overview & Regional Differences

•Largest country in South America

•170 million people living predominantly in two clusters , Northeast & Southeast.

•Per capita income was $4420 in 1996 as compared to $380 in India.

Differences in lifestyle:
• Northeast region has an African
influence and is mainly agrarian.
Only 28% of the population has a
washing machine
• Southeast was developed by the
Europeans later and is the main hub
of activity. Washing machines are
more popular here.
Brazilian Fabric Wash Market
Unilever
• It is a US$56 billion company headquartered in London & Rotterdam.
• Started in1929 and till 1996 it had 81% of market share in brazil.
• Detergent division was the cash cow providing fuel for other division like home care
& personal care.
• Popular brands- Omo , Minerva , Campeiro.

Pro cte r & Gam ble


• It is a US$ 40 billion company headquartered in Cincinnati.
• Started in Brazil in 1988 and had 15% of market share.
• Popular Brands- Quanto , Odd fases , Pop
Market Structure
Marketing Mix
• Product
• Product attributes
• New Formula
• Packaging

• Price
• Re-pricing of all three brands
• Dilemma of correct price- not too high or
not too low!
• Promotion
• Product to be placed on the map quickly to break
even
• Avoid advertising as ‘ Product of low income group’
• Simple message, but in sync with the product
• Choice of media for advertising
• BTL activities
• Reach and cost

• Distribution
• Inability to reach to smaller outlets, reducing reach
to low income group who do not visit supermarkets
much.
• Use of generalist wholesalers
Challenges-
• Brand Positioning and Marketing
• Internal resistance
• Belief that lower income market should
be left alone as they have no money
any way
• P&G threat in the most vulnerable
market
• Fear of creating impression of
abandoning premium brands in
promotions
• Loosing next generation brand
Market Share in
Northeast(1996)

Detergents
Value proposition
• Value proposition appropriate
• Each brand serving a different
market segment.
• Catering to consumers’ needs across
stratas
• But a potential market is there to be
exploited
Marketing Strategy
• Introduce an extension of Minerva –
named Minerva White
• With more cleaning power while
retaining the fragrance, with less
emphasis on softness
• Tentative cost : $1.75 / kg (i.e.
without changing the cardboard
packaging)
• Cost break-up:
Formulation cost : $0.99
Packaging cost : $0.35
Promotional cost : $0.35
Distribution cost : $0.05
Total cost : $1.74
Marketing Strategy (contd)
• Targeting the top two wanted
attributes by consumers : Cleanliness
and Smell
• Capitalizing on the ‘perceived
quality’ of Minerva
• Positioned as a tough but fragranced
detergent
• Employ Specialized Distributors

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy