Filler Slab
Filler Slab
Filler Slab
410 410
230 305 230
260 260
190 143 380
30 - 35 65 70
50 100 50 100 50 100
5.
6. 7.
230
400 300 - 400
200
150 - 200 150
75
100 200 75 - 150
As concrete in tension zone is replaced by filler material of lesser density, dead weight of the slab is reduced.
Eg. For a room size 3m x 4m ,reduction in the dead weight by replacing concrete using different filler materials 1.Stabilized mud blocks - 15.02% 2.Mangalore tiles 19.66% 3.Burnt bricks 20%
Advantages.
Less steel and cement. Better thermal insulated and sound insulated. Less dead weight. Saving of about 30%dead weight of the slab. Aesthetically pleasing ceiling pattern. Cost effective.
Comparison between the conventional and alternative roofing systems, in terms of volume of concrete required for a plan area of 4.5m x 4.5m (effective).
Roofing systems Volume of concrete per meter run in m3
One way filler slab (a)SMB (b)Mangalore Tile Two way filler slab (a)SMB (b)Mangalore Tile Conventional slab (a)One-way (b)Two-way
0.945 0.833
CONCLUSION
Alternative roofing system provides economic solutions to roofing of houses,especially in case of mass housing projects. Of late, due to unlimited construction activities the construction materials are dwindling at a faster rate. This warrants the application of research efforts to alternative building materials and systems.
Cement is an energy intensive materials any replacement of cement are concrete will help to save precious raw materials and reduce the environmental pollution. One additional feature of filler slab is that it provides an aesthetic ceiling surface while making the roof insulated against the heat. The savings in volume of concrete will be larger than the cost of replacing concrete by means of filler materials.