This document discusses managing diversity in global work culture. It addresses several themes, including leveraging diversity for profit and innovation while navigating tensions between globalization and local customs. Managing diversity effectively requires understanding differences in culture and how they impact work. Research has found systematic differences in how managers from different cultures approach tasks, relationships, decision making, and more. To be successful globally, managers must perceive, understand, and make judgments with an appreciation of multi-cultural differences.
This document discusses managing diversity in global work culture. It addresses several themes, including leveraging diversity for profit and innovation while navigating tensions between globalization and local customs. Managing diversity effectively requires understanding differences in culture and how they impact work. Research has found systematic differences in how managers from different cultures approach tasks, relationships, decision making, and more. To be successful globally, managers must perceive, understand, and make judgments with an appreciation of multi-cultural differences.
Original Description:
Managing cultural differences in a global business setting
This document discusses managing diversity in global work culture. It addresses several themes, including leveraging diversity for profit and innovation while navigating tensions between globalization and local customs. Managing diversity effectively requires understanding differences in culture and how they impact work. Research has found systematic differences in how managers from different cultures approach tasks, relationships, decision making, and more. To be successful globally, managers must perceive, understand, and make judgments with an appreciation of multi-cultural differences.
This document discusses managing diversity in global work culture. It addresses several themes, including leveraging diversity for profit and innovation while navigating tensions between globalization and local customs. Managing diversity effectively requires understanding differences in culture and how they impact work. Research has found systematic differences in how managers from different cultures approach tasks, relationships, decision making, and more. To be successful globally, managers must perceive, understand, and make judgments with an appreciation of multi-cultural differences.
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 16
Culture and HRM
Managing Diversity in the Global Work Culture
1. General Themes Profit Power of Diversity Management Perspectives, brands, reach and information Tensions Global, information oriented markets vs. local customs, stereotypes, and rules Tribalism vs. acceptance of differences Over adaptation vs. respectful intolerance Group think vs. innovation Universalism vs. relativism (multi-cultural) Leadership challenges: leverage people diversity Clearer definition of strategic diversity management e.g., Euro manager global skills USA Praxis compliance, PC or innovation tool Understand who you are and where you are and what you (the business) need Goal: 1. Create a culture to maximize the potential of personnel and their performance. 2. Build a work system wherein employee knowledge and innovation unleash global (and local) market place power. 3. Install practices which reflect an openness to (and ability to leverage) differences in people and situations 4. Apply mature and flexible judgment to country cultures and customs which are very different (major vs. minor) 5. Educate managers to understand and appreciate that heterogeneity, not homogeneity, is the basic characteristic of the global work culture. Managing Diversity in the Global Work Culture (contd) 2. Special issue of Diversity Role of women in business around the world Gender issues differ broadly (context) e.g., exclusion or mandated inclusion Management jobs vs. lower jobs Compensation levels Africa, Middle East, China, Japan, North America, Europe Business Goals Effective use of female managers and the female belief she will be allowed to perform at an appropriate level and grow professionally Leveraging most effectively the entire labor pool Focusing on business needs and local customs 3. Ethics in International management decisions Legal compliance: home and abroad Varying definitions of acceptable behavior and transparency Corruption is bad business: costs, sustainability Common challenges: Bribery vs. gift Child labor Environmental issues Universal vs. culturally contingent no brainers vs. foggy bottom Culture and Work The Boulders 1. Premise: People organize, manage and work differently from culture to culture. There are systematic and culturally based differences in managers values, attitudes, and behaviors. 2. Managers Challenge: a. Understand (and feel comfortable with) the differences b. Use this understanding to design and implement the management tools and relationships needed to complete the work of the company (the hardware and the software) 3. Example: Managers from more specific cultures focus on behavior that takes place at work. Managers from more diffuse cultures focus on a wider range of behaviors (e.g. personal or family lives). USA managers (specific culture) differ dramatically from Chinese or Russian managers (different cultures) on the ideas of employer provided housing. 4. Worldwide differences in managerial style a. Andre Laurent, Geert Hofstede, and Fons Trompenaar studies provide deep food for thought to guide management understanding of actions. b. Laurent focused on key management approaches to work situations, highlighting the differences across cultures. Tasks and relationships: USA, Germany, Sweden more task oriented China, Japan, France more relationship orientated e.g. 1. approaching a project communications 2. by passing the hierarchy (to get the job done!): good idea or insubordination? Role of the manager Japan, Spain, Italy knowledge expert USA, Dutch, English problem solver (help employee to discover solutions) e.g. USA manager interacting with French employees
c. Hofstede focused on 5 dimensions of differences between cultures and nationalities Individualism and collectivism (see chart) Power distance (see chart) Uncertainty avoidance (see chart) Career success and quality of life (see chart) Long term short term view of life (see chart) d. Trompenaars confirmed findings of Laurent and Hofstede and documented additional dimensions Rules and relationships Canada, USA, UK Universalistic Venezuela, Korea particularist e.g. traffic ticket question joint ventures International negotiations
5. The question of convergence vs. divergence a. Corporate Hardware is growing more similar. Behavior of people maintain cultural uniqueness. b. National cultural differences arent overcome by company culture. Laurent discovered more pronounced cultural differences among employees around the world working in the same company than among those working for local companies in their own countries (power of local leadership style and authority). 6. Management lesson: perception, understanding and judgment about multi- cultural differences and impact on work are key global leadership skills. op Individualism: Organizational Characteristics and Selected HR Practices Dominant Values Sample Countries Organizational Features Reward Practices Staffing/Appraisal Practices
Personal accomplishment Belief in individual control and responsibility Belief in creating ones own destiny United States Great Britain Canada Organizations not compelled to care for employees total well- being Employees look after their own individual interests Explicit systems of control necessary to ensure compliance and prevent wide deviation from organizational norms Performance based pay Individual achievement awarded External equity emphasized Extrinsic rewards are important indicators of personal success Attempts made to isolate individual contributions (i.e., who did what) Emphasis on short-term objectives Emphasis on credentials and visible performance outcomes attributed to individual High turnover; commitment to organization for career reasons Performance rather than seniority as criterion for advancement Team accomplishment Sacrifice for others Belief in group control and responsibility Belief in the hand of fate Singapore South Korea Indonesia Organizations committed to high- level involvement in workers personal lives Loyalty to the firm is critical Normative, rather than formal, systems of control to ensure compliance Group-based performance is important criterion for rewards Seniority-based pay utilized Intrinsic rewards essential Internal equity guides pay policies Personal needs (such as number of children) affect pay received Value of credentials and visible performance outcomes depends on perceived contributions to team efforts Low turnover; commitment to organization as family Seniority plays an important role in personnel decisions Fitting in with work group crucial; belief that interpersonal relations are important performance dimension Individualism High Low Power Distance: Organizational Characteristics and Selected HR Practices Dominant Values Sample Countries Organizational Features Reward Practices Staffing/Appraisal Practices
Top-down communications Class divisions seen as natural Authoritarianism Malaysia Philippines Mexico Centralization and tall organizational structures Traditional line of command Hierarchical compensation system Difference in pay and benefits reflect job and status differences; large differential between higher- and lower-level jobs Visible rewards that project power, such as a large office or company car Limited search methods in recruitment; emphasis on connections and whom you know Few formal mechanisms of selection Superior makes selection choice for his or her sphere of influence Egalitarianism Status based on achievement Joint decision making The Netherlands Australia Switzerland Flatter organizational structures Decentralized control Great degree of worker involvement Egalitarian-based compensation systems Small differences in pay and benefits between higher- and lower-level jobs Multiple search methods; extensive advertisement Formalized selection methods to give everyone a fair chance Superior constrained in making selection choices Selection based on merit; loyalty to superiors deemphasized Power Distance High Low Uncertainty Avoidance: Organizational Characteristics and Selected HR Practice Dominant Values Sample Countries Organizational Features Reward Practices Staffing/Appraisal Practices
Fear of random events and the unknown High value placed on stability and routine Low tolerance for ambiguity Greece Portugal Italy Mechanistic structures Written rules and policies guide the firm Organizations strive to be predictable Bureaucratic pay policies utilized Compensation programs tend to be centralized Fixed pay more important than variable pay Bureaucratic rules/procedures to govern hiring and promotion Seniority an important factor in hiring and promotions Government/union regulations Limit employer discretion in recruitment, promotion, and terminations Unexpected viewed as challenging and exciting Stability and routine seen as boring Ambiguity seen as providing opportunities Singapore Denmark Sweden Less-structured activities Fewer written rules to cope with changing environmental forces Managers are more adaptable and tend to make riskier decisions Variable pay a key component in pay programs External equity emphasized Decentralized pay program is the norm Fewer rules/procedures to govern hiring and promotions Seniority deemphasized in personal decisions Employer provided much latitude in recruitment, promotions, and terminations Uncertainty Avoidance High Low Masculinity/Femininity: Organizational Characteristics and Selected HR Practices Dominant Values Sample Countries Organizational Features Reward Practices Staffing/Appraisal Practices
Material possessions important Men given higher power and status than women Rigid gender stereotypes Mexico Germany United States Some occupations labeled as male others as female Fewer women in higher-level positions Differential pay policies that allow for gender inequities Tradition an acceptable basis for pay decisions Male traits rewarded in promotions and other personnel decisions De facto preferential treatment for men in hiring/promotion decisions into higher-level jobs (even if it is illegal) Glass ceiling for women Occupational segregation Quality of life valued more than material gain Men not believed to be inherently superior Minimal gender stereotyping The Netherlands Norway Sweden Finland More flexibility in career choice for men and women More women in higher-level jobs Jobs evaluated without regard for gender of job holders Focus on work content rather than tradition to assess value of different jobs Well-developed equity goals for pay determination Gender deemphasized in hiring/promotion decisions for any job More women in upper-level positions Occupational integration between the sexes Masculinity High Low Long-Term/Short-Term Orientation: Organizational Characteristics and Selected HR Practices Dominant Values Sample Countries Organizational Features Reward Practices Staffing/Appraisal Practices
Future-oriented Delayed gratification Long-term goals Japan Hong Kong China Stable organizations Low employee turnover Strong company culture Long-term rewards Seniority as basis for pay Managers rewarded for multiyear accomplishments No expectation of frequent pay adjustments Slow promotions Promotions from within High employment security High emphasis on saving employees face High emphasis on coaching versus evaluation High investment in training and employee development Past- or present- oriented Immediate gratification Short-term goals United States Indonesia Changing organization High employee turnover Weak company culture Short-term rewards Recent performance as a basis for pay Managers rewarded for annual accomplishments High expectation of frequent pay adjustments Fast promotions Internal and external hires Low employment security Low emphasis on saving employees face High emphasis on evaluation versus coaching Low investment in training and employee development Long-Term/Short-Term Orientation High Low Culture construct definitions and sample questionnaire items Cultural construct definitions Specific questionnaire item Power distance: The degree to which members of a collective expect power to be distributed equally. Followers are (should be) expected to obey their leaders without question. Uncertainty avoidance: The extent to which a society, organization, or group relies on social norms, rules and procedures to alleviate unpredictability of future events. Most people lead (should lead) highly structured lives with few unexpected events. Humane orientation: The degree to which a collective encourages and rewards individuals for being fair, altruistic, generous, caring and kind to others. People are generally (should be generally) very tolerant of mistakes. Collectivism I (institutional collectivism): The degree to which organizational and societal institutional practices encourage and reward collective distribution of resources and collective action. Leaders encourage (should encourage) group loyalty even if individual goals suffer. Collectivism II (in-group collectivism): The degree to which individuals express pride, loyalty and cohesiveness in their organizations and families. Employees feel (should feel) great loyalty towards this organization. Assertiveness: The degree to which individuals are assertive, confrontational and aggressive in their relationship with others. People are (should be) generally dominant in their relationships with each other. Gender egalitarianism: The degree to which a collective minimizes gender inequality. Boys are encouraged (should be encouraged) more than girls to attain a higher education. Future orientation: The extent to which individuals engage in future-oriented behaviors such as delaying gratification, planning and investing in the future. More people live (should live) for the present rather than the future. Performance orientation: The degree to which a collective encourages and rewards group members for performance and improvement and excellence. Students are encouraged (should be encouraged) to strive for continuously improved performance. Examples of the impact of the cultural and institutional context on HRM practices HRM practices Impact of the cultural context Impact of the institutional context Recruitment and selection In societies low on in-group collectivism individual achievements represent important selection criteria. In societies high on in-group collectivism the emphasis in the recruiting process is more on team-related skills than on individual competencies. Education system The reputation of educational institutions such as public and private universities varies in different countries. This is reflected in the recruiting processes (i.e., HR marketing) and selection criteria of the firms in those countries. Training and development In societies high on gender egalitarianism women have the same chances for vertical career advancement as men. In societies low on gender egalitarianism female managers are rare. Education system Education systems differ between different countries (existence of a dual vocational training system, quality and reputation of higher education institutions). This has an effect on the training needs perceived and fulfilled by MNEs. Compensation In societies high on uncertainty avoidance employees tend to be rather risk averse and prefer fixed compensation packages or seniority-based pay. In societies low on uncertainty avoidance employees tend to be rather risk0taking and accept high income variability through performance based pay. Legislation and industrial relations Legislation such as the regulation of minimum wages or respective union agreements with respect to compensation have an impact on the firms compensation choices with respect to pay mix and pay level. Task distribution Societies high on collectivism tend to emphasize group work Societies high on individualism rather attribute individual responsibilities in the work system Legislation and norms Legislations and respective norms support gender- based division of labor to a differing extent in different countries. While in some countries the percentage of female managers is relatively high, in other countries it is not common that women work at all HRM PRACTICES AND CULTURE FIT HRM CHOICE BEST FIT CULTURE/COMMENT 1) Pay-for-performance 1) 2) Decentralized Selection 2) 3) Flat Structure 3) 4) Fixed Pay 4) 5) Performance Evaluation Focus 5) 6) Merit Driven Selection 6) 7) High Employment Security 7) 8) Group Based Pay Plans 8) 9) Broad Career Paths 9) 10) Fast Promotions 10) HRM PRACTICES AND CULTURE FIT Contd HRM CHOICE BEST FIT CULTURE/COMMENT 11) Seniority Based Pay 11) 12) Line Management Driven Selection 12) 13) Objective Job Evaluation 13) 14) Multi-Year Pay Plans 14) 15) Performance Coaching Focus 15) 16) Equity Goal Pay Plans 16) 17) Tight Management Systems 17) 18) Few Work Rules 18) 19) Hierarchical Pay Structure 19) 20) Great Employee Involvement 20) MANAGING HUMAN RESOURCES IN DIFFERENT CULTURES IN THE BUREAUCRATIC CULTURE IN THE TECHNICAL CULTURE IN THE MANAGERIAL CULTURE Structuring the Organization Establish rational and detailed organization chart to be communicated throughout the organization. Develop, organize and obtain consensus or interrelationships among functions. Keep organization minimal and adaptive to changes. Designing Jobs Formalize and standardize job descriptions. Put emphasis on tasks to be performed. Formalize relationships as accountabilities will be most often shared. Be flexible and formalize accountabilities. Put emphasis on end results to be accomplished. Delegating Decision Making Authority Extremely limited delegation and freedom are required. Decision making must be mostly controlled. High degree of delegation and freedom is supported. Controlling and Assessing Performance Need for a heavy system of administrative checks and balances to measure how tasks are performed. Emphasis is on compliance with standards and norms. Effective cost accounting system is required to measure efficiency. Emphasis is on qualitative criteria. Sophisticated control system is required to measure end results. Emphasis is on quantitative criteria. External Competitiveness Internal Equity Usually minimal.
Must be absolute and normative. Must integrate seniority and diplomas. Median
Limited. Must reflect balance of power among functions. High
Fair. Must reflect job value and performance. Incentive Components Benefits None
Highly formalized and common throughout the organization Limited.
Formalized and Personalized. High
Informal and personalized. Providing Job Security Must be absolute Fair Minimal Career Development Strict and objective rules and procedures must be established for promotions and career developments. Develop bridges between function to improve organizational integration. Reward high performers through rapid promotions IHRM TRUTHS/LESSONS (2010 CONSULTING STUDY) Effectiveness of an HRM practice depends on how well it matches a cultures value system, BUT.
Lesson #1: National Culture may be an elusive concept Lesson #2: Cultures change over time. Lesson #3: HQ sometimes blames international personnel problems on cultural factors without careful study. Lesson #4: Hard data on the success or failure of different HRM practices as a function of national culture are practically non-existent. Lesson #5: Different cultures have very different notions of right and wrong. Lesson #6: The business laws of other countries often force companies to change their HRM practices. Lesson #7: Global companies must find the Right Balance between tailor- made HRM policies to fit particular cultures and the need to integrate global consistency with local adaptability
(New Concepts in Latino American Cultures) Vanessa Pérez Rosario (Eds.) - Hispanic Caribbean Literature of Migration - Narratives of Displacement-Palgrave Macmillan US (2010)
A simple approach to SEO: How to understand the basics of search engine optimisation in a simple and practical way through a non-specialist discovery path for everyone
Bridges to Japanese Business Etiquette - Understanding Japan Cross-cultural Management: Bridges to Japanese Business Etiquette - Understanding Japan Cross-cultural Management