Horizontal Boundaries of A Firm

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 52

Economics of Strategy

Besanko, Dranove, Shanley and Schaefer, 3rd Edition

Chapter 2

Horizontal Boundaries of the Firm


Slides by
Richard PonArul
California State University, Chico
John Wiley Sons, Inc.

Horizontal Boundaries

Horizontal boundaries: How big a market does


a firm serve?
In some industries a few large firms dominate
the market (Commercial aircraft manufacture)
In others, smaller firms are the norm (Apparel
design, Universities)

Horizontal Boundaries

There are several industries where large firms


and small firms co-exist (Software, Beer,
Banks, Insurance companies)
What determines the horizontal boundaries of
firms?
How should a firm optimally choose its
horizontal boundaries?

Determinants of Horizontal Boundaries

Economies of scale

Economies of scope

Declining average cost with volume


Cost savings when different goods/services are
produced under one roof

Learning curve

Cost advantage from accumulated expertise and


knowledge

Economies of Scale

When the marginal cost is less than average


cost, there are economies of scale
Example: Computer software. The marginal
cost of reproducing a CD is negligible
compared with the huge fixed cost associated
with software development

U-shaped cost curve

U-Shaped Cost Curve

Average cost declines as fixed costs are


spread over larger volumes
Average cost eventually start increasing as
capacity constraints kick in
U-shape implies cost disadvantage for very
small and very large firms
Unique optimum size for a firm

L-shaped Cost Curve

L-shaped Cost Curve

In reality, cost curves are closer to L-shaped


curves that to U-shaped curves
A minimum efficient size (MES) beyond which
average costs are identical across firms

Economies of Scope

Firm 1 produces two products: A and B


Firm 2 produces A only
If the cost of producing A is smaller for Firm 1
than Firm 2, there are economies of scope

Economies of Scope

TC(QA, QB) < TC(QA, 0) + TC(0, QB)


TC(QA, QB) TC(0,QB) < TC(QA, 0) TC(0, 0)
Production of B reduces the incremental cost
of producing A

Economies of Scope

Common expressions that describe strategies


that exploit the economies of scope

Leveraging core competences


Competing on capabilities
Mobilizing invisible assets
Diversification into related products

Economies of Scope

The terms Economies of Scale and


Economies of Scope are sometimes used
interchangeably
Managers may cite economies of scale and
scope (even when they do not exist) to justify
investment in growth

Some Sources of Economies of Scale/Scope

Production related

Fixed costs
Inventories
Cube-Square rule

Other

Purchasing
Advertising
R&D

Fixed Costs

Certain inputs in the production process may


not fall below a minimum
Increasing the volume of production yields
economies of scale in the short run
In the long run, economies of scale are
obtained through choice of technology

Tradeoffs Among Technologies

Tradeoffs Among Technologies

If output needs to be increased beyond a point,


capital intensive technology needs to be
substituted for labor intensive technology
The lower envelope of the two cost curves is
the long run average cost curve

Long Run and Short Run

Cost reduction through better capacity


utilization

(short run economies of scale)

Cost reduction by switching to high fixed cost


technology

(long run economies of scale)

Economies of Scale and


Specialization

The division of labor is limited to the extent of


the market (Smith)
As markets increase in size, economies of
scale enables specialization

Economies of Scale and


Boundaries

Larger markets lead to specialized firms


As markets get even larger, the specialized
activity may become in house due to
economies of scale

Inventories

Firms carry inventory to avoid stock outs


In addition to lost sales, stock outs can
adversely affect customer loyalty
Bigger firms can afford to keep smaller
inventories (relative to sales volume) compared
with smaller firms

Inventories

Two firms may not experience stock outs at the


same time
Merging the two firms will reduce the
probability of stock out, given the level of
inventory
The combined firm can maintain a lower level
of inventory and have the same probability of
stock out as before

Aircraft, Rolling Stock as


Inventories

The inventory model applies to aircraft, rolling


stock and road vehicles
A larger bus company can keep a smaller
number of spare buses (relative to size of
operations) and still provide reliable service,
whereas smaller companies need
(proportionately) larger number of spares

Cube-Square Rule

Double the diameter of a hollow sphere and


the volume will increase eightfold, whereas the
surface area will increase only fourfold
The cost of the sphere is likely to increase by
less than eight times
If the hollow sphere is part of production
equipment in a chemical plant, cost savings
follow from increased size

Cube-Square Rule

Examples of Scale Economies due to the


Cube-Square Rule

Oil pipelines
Warehousing
Brewing tanks

Economies of Scale in Purchasing

Large buyers can get volume discounts

Reduced transaction costs


More aggressive bargaining by large buyers
Assured flow of business for the supplier

Economies of Scale in Purchasing

Example: Group insurance is typically cheaper


than individual insurance.
Big buyers like CalPers (California Public
Employee Retirement Systems) drive hard
bargains with the insurers

Rationale for Volume Discounts

Cost of service (per unit) is lower for large


buyers
Large buyers may be more price sensitive
Large buyers can disrupt operations of the
seller by refusing to buy

Economies of Scale in Purchasing

Alternatives to bigness

Small firms can join purchasing alliances


Price sensitive firms may get better bargains even
when they are small

Economies of Scale and Scope in


Advertising

Cost per customer = (Cost per potential


customer) x (Proportion of potential customers
who become actual customers)
Large firm have lower cost of reaching a
potential customer (First Term)
Large firm also have a better reach (Second
Term)

Economies of Scale in Advertising

Large national firms may experience lower cost


per potential customer when compared with
small regional firms
Cost of production of the advertisement and
the cost of negotiations with the media can be
spread over different markets

Economies of Scale in Advertising

Large firms may have better reach than small


firms

Example: ubiquity of STARBUCKS

Large firms convert a larger proportion of


potential customers into actual customers

Umbrella Branding and Economies


of Scope

Well known brands like SONY (may be better


SAMSUNG) and KRAFT cover different
products
There are economies of scope in developing
and maintaining these brands
New products are easier to introduce when
there is an established brand with the desired
image (SAMSUNG has been vastly enlarging..).

Umbrella Branding - Limitations

Umbrella branding may not always help

Example: In the U.S. Lexus is a separate brand


from Toyota

Conflicting brand images may cause


diseconomies of scope (Can we explain the
poor performance of Alfa Romeo by this?)

Economies of Scale in R & D

Minimum feasible size for R & D projects and


R & D departments
Economies of scope in R & D; ideas from one
project can help another project
Under what conditions can firms pool their
resources for a joint R & D effort?
What about the recent wave of M&A in
pharmaceuticals

Innovation and Size

Are big firms better at innovating compared to


small firms?
Size reduces the average cost of innovations
Smallness may be more suitable for motivated
researchers

Other Sources of Economies of Scale

Access to a distribution network


Established governmental relations

Strategic Fit

Strategic fit (consistency between customer


priorities of competitive strategy and supply
chain capabilities) is complementarity that
yields economies of scope
Strategic fit renders piece-meal copying of
corporate strategy by rivals unproductive
Strategic fit is essential for long term
competitive advantage

Diseconomies of Scale

Beyond a certain size, bigger may not always


be better
The sources of such diseconomies are

Increasing labor costs


Bureaucracy effects
Scarcity of specialized resources
Conflicting out

Firm Size and Labor Cost

Data indicate that workers in large firms get


paid more than workers in small firms (wage
premium)
Possible reasons

Unionization is more likely in large firms


Work may be more enjoyable in small firms
Large firms may have to attract workers from far
away places

Firm Size and Labor Cost

Large firms experience lower worker turnover


compared to small firms
Savings in recruitment and training costs due
to lower turnover may partially offset the higher
labor cost

Bureaucracy Effects and Firm Size

When a firm gets large

it is difficult to monitor and communicate with


workers
it is difficult to evaluate and reward individual
performance (very important issue. Study the
example in the text)
detailed work rules may stifle the creativity of the
workers

Specialized Resources

As the firm expands, certain resources may be


limited in availability
Example: As a restaurant expands, the chef
may find himself/herself spread too thin
Other limited resources may be

desirable locations
specialized workers
talented managers

Conflicting Out

Professional services firms may find it difficult


to sign up a client if a competitor is already a
client of the firm
When sensitive information has to be shared,
such conflicts may impose a limit to the growth
of the firm

The Learning Curve

Learning economies are distinct from


economies of scale
Learning economies depend on cumulative
output rather than the rate of output
Learning leads to lower costs, higher quality
and more effective pricing and marketing

The Learning Curve


AC

AC1

AC2
Quantity

2Q

Slope of the Learning Curve

Slope of the learning curve is the relative size


of the average cost when cumulative output
doubles
A slope of 0.9 indicates that the average cost
will decline by 10% when the cumulative output
doubles
Learning flattens out over time and the slope
eventually becomes 0

Learning Curve Strategy

Expand output rapidly to benefit from the


learning curve and achieve a cost advantage
May lead to losses in the short term but ensure
long term profitability

BCGs Growth/Share Paradigm

Product life cycle model combined with an


internal capital market, with the firm serving as
a banker
Use the cash generated by cash cows to
exploit the learning economies of rising stars
and problem children

BCGs Growth/Share Matrix

Individual Learning and


Organizational Learning

Learning resides with individuals


Organizational learning includes expertise that
individuals have and they complement each
other
Worker mobility can lead to loss of expertise in
the organization
On the other hand, reducing job turnover may
stifle creativity

Learning Curve and Scale


Economies

Learning reduces unit cost through experience


Capital intensive technologies can offer scale
economies even if there is no learning
Complex labor intensive processes may offer
learning economies without scale economies

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy