Physical Properties and Classification of Soil (UiTM)
Physical Properties and Classification of Soil (UiTM)
Physical Properties and Classification of Soil (UiTM)
INTRODUCTION
To design a foundation that will support a structure, an engineer
must understand the types of soils deposits that will support the
foundation
Engineers must remember that soil at any site frequently is nonhomogenous; that is the soil profile may vary
Soil mechanics theories involve idealized conditions, so the
application of the theories to foundation engineering problems
involves a judicious evaluation of site conditions and soil
parameters
To do this requires some knowledge of the geological process
by which the soil deposit at the site was formed by subsurface
exploration
Good professional judgment constitutes an essential part of
geotechnical engineering and it comes only with practice
3
factors:
Igneous rock
Sedimentary rock
Effects of transport
Air
Water vappour
liquid
Water
Dissolved salts
solid
Rock fragments
Mineral grains
Organic matter
14
Rock fragments
identifiable
Mineral grains
Separate particles of each particular mineral and
Organic matter
Origin from plant or animal remains (called as
humus).
Also featured as top soil, occur in the upper layer not
more than 0.5 m thickness.
Peat deposits are predominantly fibrous organic
material.
In engineering, organic matter has undesirable
properties (e.g: highly compressible, absorb large
quantities of water and low shear strength and thus
low bearing capacity)
17
Water
Fundamental part of natural soil and in fact has a
Air
Soils may be considered in a practical sense
19
Clay minerals
Mainly produced from feldspar
and micas.
It form part of a group of complex
alumino-silicates of potassium,
magnesium and iron (layer-lattice).
Tetrahedral unit
Very small in size, very flaky in shape and have considerable
surface area
Two basic structural units; tetrahedral and octahedral unit.
4 main group of clay;
- kaolinite: derived from weathering of feldspar.
- illite: degradation of micas under marine condition.
- montmorillonite: from further degradation of illite.
- vermiculite: weathering products of biotite and
chlorite.
Octahedral unit
20
21
22
rocks
Physical weathering exfoliation, unloading, erosion,
freezing and thawing
Chemical weathering hydration, carbonation and
oxidation
- The composition of these soils depends on the
environment under which they were transported and
is often different from the parent rock.
23
Soil types
Common descriptive terms gravels, sands,
24
Clay minerals
Minerals are crystalline materials and make
25
Soil fabrics
Soil particles are assumed to be rigid
During deposition, the mineral particles are arranged
Va
Vw
Va = volume of air
1
VwVs
= =volume
of water
Vs = volume of solid = 1
(1m3 of solid material)
28
Voids
(air +
Water)
No water
No air
Air
only
Water
only
solid
solid
c) Saturated29 soil
1+e
solid
a) Void ratio
V = Vs + Vv = Vs + Vw + Va
Assuming the weight of air is negligible, total
mass,
M = M s + Mw
30
Masses
Va = e (1-Sr)
water
Vw = Sre = wGs
solid
Vs = 1
V=1+e
(Specific volume)
air
Volumes
Three separate phases of a soil element with volume of soil solids equal to one
a)
b)
c)
(1)
Porosity (n)
To expressing the quantity of voids.
n = volume of voids = Vv
total volume
V
n=
e
(2)
1+e
Specific volume (V)
The total volume of the soil model.
V=1+e
(3)
32
d)
Air void ratio (Av) ratio of air voids volume to specific volume.
Av = volume of air = Va = e (1-Sr)
total volume 1 + e
1+e
but Sr = wGs/e
Av = e (1-Sr) = e
1- (wGs/e) =
e - wGs
1+e
1+e
1+e 1+e
therefore, Av = e wGs
(5)
1+e
33
f)
g)
Moisture content ()
Ratio of the mass of water to the mass of solid.
w = mass of water = Mw = Vww
mass of solid
Ms
G s w
but Vw = Sre = wGs
Therefore, w = Sre
Gs
(7)
34
h)
i)
(8)
j)
1 + wGs
Gs
1 + S re
1+e
1+e
b = (1 + w) d
(10)
36
(11)
1+e
37
(12)
Note:
b is bulk density above water table
sat is saturated density or bulk density above
water table.
= sub is submerged or effective density
for calculation, use = sub when it
is below water
table. Ground level
Water table
sat
= sub = sat 38
w
= force/unit volume
= .g
(13)
where g = 9.81 m/s
* Formula is same for all condition
39
is obtained as follows:
41
EXAMPLE 1
42
EXAMPLE 2
43
EXAMPLE 3
44
EXAMPLE 4
45
Learning outcome
(WEEK THREE)
At the end of this lecture, students should be
able to:
1.3 Describe and classify the soil based on:
mineral composition, particles sizes and
grading, density, moisture content, void ratio.
Soil consistency Atterberg Limits
and soil
quality test
1.4 Classify the soil using BS and compare
with USA Standard (ASTM)
46
Introduction
Soil is generally classified into 3 phases
Solid, Liquid & Gas
Soil, Water & Air
Solid particles & Voids
Solid particles = Soil particles
Voids = Water + Air
47
Field Identification
Particle size : by implementing visual
examination and feel.
Grading : either the soil is well graded/
poorly graded/uniform graded.
Compactness : sometimes regarded as field
strength and can be reported as loose/
dense/slightly cemented.
Structure : either the soil is classified as
homogenous/inter-stratified/intact/fissured.
48
Field Identification
Cohesion, Plasticity & Consistency : this
method can be used for identifying soil
particles by hand squeezing. Soil can be
classified as either; very soft / soft / firm /
very firm / hard / crumbly.
Dilatancy : dilatancy will exhibits a glossy
water film marking on the surface of the
pat.
49
Field Identification
Dry strength : can be identified by breaking
the soil.
Weathering : can be classified into
unweathered / slightly weathered /
moderately weathered / highly weathered /
fully weathered.
50
Types of Classification
Description is simply what you see and how the soils responds to simple
tests
Classification is a scheme for separating soils into broad groups, each with
broadly similar behavior
There are various classification schemes for different purposes. For civil
engineering purposes soil classifications should be based mainly on
mechanical behavior
There are several schemes published in National Standards. A simple and
universal scheme for soil description is as follows:
1. The nature of soil grains size, grading, shape, surface texture and their
mineralogy
2. The current state of soil current stresses, water content and history of
loading and unloading
3. The structure of fabric layering or bedding, fissuring or jointing and
cementing
4. The formation of the soils may be deposited naturally by water, ice or
wind, may be residual products of rock weathering or may be compacted by
51
machines into embankments and fills
Types of Classification
BS 1377 (British Standards Institutions)
BS 5930 (British Standards Institutions)
ASTM (American Standard of Testing
Materials)
AASHTO (American Association State
Highway & Transportation Official)
MS (Malaysian Standards)
52
Types of Classification
BS 5930 (British Standards Institutions)
53
Types of Classification
BS 5930 (British Standards Institutions)
54
Types of Classification
ASTM or Unified Soil Classification System
55
Soil Classification
Particle Size Test
Typical Grading Curve
Grading Characteristics
56
Soil Classification
Particle Size Test
The aim is to measure the distribution of
particle size in the sample.
When a wide range of sizes is present, the
sample will be sub-divided, and separate tests
carried out on each sub-sample.
Wet sieving is used to separate fine grains from
coarse grains and is carried out by washing soil
specimen on a 60 mm sieve mesh.
57
Soil Classification
Particle Size Test
Dry sieving analyses can only be carried out on
particles > 60 mm; samples (with fines
removed) are dried and shaken through a nest
of sieves of descending mesh size.
Sedimentation is used only for fine soils
(hydrometer test).
58
Soil Classification
Hydrometer analysis
For particle sizes smaller than 0.075mm in diameter
Based on principle of sedimentation of soil grains in water
When soil specimen is dispersed in water, the particles settle at
different velocities
depending on their shape, size and weight and the viscosity of the
water
This analysis is effective for separating soil fractions down to a size of
about 0.5m
59
61
62
the sample
= the maximum size of the smallest 30% of
D60
the sample
= the maximum size of the smallest 60% of
the sample
65
66
69
70
71
Small
Aperture
Big
Aperture
72
20 mm
20 mm
75
76
Pan
77
Sieve
Arrangement
Size 37.5 mm
Size 28 mm
Size 20 mm
Size 14 mm
Size 10 mm
Size 6.3 mm
Size 5 mm
Size 3.35 mm
Pan
Sieve Shaker
Endecott EFL 2000
80
Size 37.5 mm
Size 28 mm
Size 20 mm
Size 14 mm
Size 10 mm
Size 6.3 mm
Size 5 mm
Size 3.35 mm
Pan
Sieve Shaker
Endecott EFL 2000
81
Size 37.5 mm
Size 28 mm
Size 20 mm
Size 14 mm
Size 10 mm
Size 6.3 mm
Size 5 mm
Size 3.35 mm
Pan
Sieve Shaker
Endecott EFL 2000
82
Size 37.5 mm
Size 28 mm
Size 20 mm
Size 14 mm
Size 10 mm
Size 6.3 mm
Size 5 mm
Size 3.35 mm
Pan
Sieve Shaker
Endecott EFL 2000
Size 37.5 mm
Size 28 mm
Size 20 mm
Size 14 mm
Size 10 mm
Size 6.3 mm
Size 5 mm
Size 3.35 mm
Pan
Sieve
Arrangement
28
55
20
14
100 154
10
6.3
205 305
5.0
199
3.35
275
Retained (g)
Stage 2
Sieve size
2
1.18
(mm or m)
Mass of soil 54.3 38
Retained (g)
600
425
300
212
150
63
30
14.2
15.5
13.1
11.2
16.5
86
87
S.O.L.A.T
Print Out
Layout
88
Soil Mass of
1165 g
90
Soil Mass of
500 +/- g
This portion will
be discard
Soil Mass of
500 +/- g
This portion will
be riffled again
Soil Mass of
200 +/- g
This portion will
be discarded
Soil Mass of
196 g
This portion will
Be used for the 2nd stage of
sieving
S.O.L.A.T
Print Out
Layout
93
Sieve
Arrangement
Size 2 mm
Size 1.18 mm
Size 600 m
Size 425 m
Size 300 m
Size 212 m
Size 150 m
Size 63 m
Pan
Sieve Shaker
Endecott EFL 2000
95
Size 2 mm
Size 1.18 mm
Size 600 m
Size 425 m
Size 300 m
Size 212 m
Size 150 m
Size 63 m
Pan
Sieve Shaker
Endecott EFL 2000
96
Size 2 mm
Size 1.18 mm
Size 600 m
Size 425 m
Size 300 m
Size 212 m
Size 150 m
Size 63 m
Pan
Sieve Shaker
Endecott EFL 2000
97
Size 2 mm
Size 1.18 mm
Size 600 m
Size 425 m
Size 300 m
Size 212 m
Size 150 m
Size 63 m
Pan
Sieve Shaker
Endecott EFL 2000
Size 1.18 mm
Size 600 m
Size 425 m
Size 300 m
Size 212 m
Size 150 m
Size 63 m
Pan
100
S.O.L.A.T
Print Out
Layout
101
S.O.L.A.T
Print Out
Layout
102
S.O.L.A.T
Print Out
Layout
103
S.O.L.A.T
Print Out
Layout
104
105
Sieving
Grading Characteristics
D60
D30
D10
0.27
1.6
5.3
106
0.27
107
(5.30 x 0.27)
108
Sieving
Percentage of Particle Size
65 %
Gravel
35 %
Sand
0%
Fines
(Silt & Clay)
110
Sieving
112
113
Lesson Outcomes
(WEEK FOUR)
At the end of the lecture, students should be
able to:#1understand and explain the concept of soil
consistency.
#2understand and explain the usage of soil
classification system.(fine soil classification)
114
117
Shrinkage
limit
Plastic
limit
Liquid
limit
118
water
content
Volume
Semi
Plastic
Solid
Va
VS
Solid
WS
Liquid
Plastic
Wp
WL
119
% Water
Content
120
wL = < 35%
wL = 50 - 70%
wL = 70 - 90%
122
123
124
Activity
Soil
Activity
Muscovite 0.25
Kaolin clay
0.4-0.5
Kaolinite
0.40
0.5-0.75
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
Liquid Limit (LL) Testing
1. Cone Penetrometer Method
2. Casagrande Method
Plastic Limit (PL) Testing
Shrinkage Limit Testing
128
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure (Cone Penetration)
Dial gauge with
360O read out.
Example :
(1O = 0.1 mm)
Height adjustment
for cone and dial
gauge assembly
Cone :
Mass 80 g
Length 35 mm
Angle 30O
Penetration lever.
This lever moves
the dial gauge needle.
129
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure (Cone Penetration)
Electric LL Cone
Penetrometer
130
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
Cone Penetrometer
Method
Stages involve in
testing :
1. Sample preparation
2. Mixing with water
3. Maturing
4. Remixing
5. Placing in cup
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
Soil Sample
Size 425 m
Soil
Passing
Sieve
Size
425 m
1. Sample Preparation
The soil sample that are
used have to pass the
425 micron sieve.
Next a representative
sample is required
weighing around 200250 g.
Pan
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
Soil retained on pan
200 250 g
Pan
Glass Plate
133
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
Glass Plate
Air Tight
Container
3. Maturing
The paste is then transferred
to an air-tight container for
24 hours to allow the water
time to penetrate the soil
fully.
For a soil of a low clay
content, such as silty soil,
the curing period may be
omitted and the test can be
carried out immediately.
134
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
Air Tight
Container
Glass Plate
4. Remixing
Remove the soil from the
container after maturing.
Transfer the soil to the glass
plate.
Remix it with pallette knives
for 10 minutes.
It is essential to obtain a
uniform distribution of water
throughout the sample.
135
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
5. Placing in Cup
Push a portion of the sample
into the cup with a palette
knife taking care not to trap
air.
Strike off the excess and
with the pallette knife to get
a smooth and level surface.
Cone
Penetration
Cup
Cup fully
filled with
soil
136
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
1
6. Setting
Up the Cone
Penetrometer
Pull up the
penetration lever.
Dial gauge will be
set at Zero.
2
4
Adjust the height
till the top of the
cup comes at a
distance where it
do not come into
contact with the
tip of the cone.
iDeaz
137
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
6. Setting
Up the Cone
Penetrometer
138
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
7. Measuring
Cone
Penetration
1
Placed the cup
(containing soil)
at the center of
the base @ the
cone tip is at the
center of the cup.
iDeaz
Push in the
2
locking device in
Push In
order to unlock
the cone and
thus, releasing
the cone.
3
Cone
Penetrates
139
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
Initial Level
5
Read the dial
gauge reading, ie.
it will
corresponds to
the penetration of
the cone.
7. Measuring
Cone
Penetration
*Refer notes
iDeaz
140
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
*
7. Measuring
Cone
Penetration
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
*
7. Measuring
Cone
Penetration
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
*
7. Measuring
Cone
Penetration
143
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
8. Moisture Content
Determination
Take a moisture content
sample of about 10 g from
the cup around the area
penetrated by the cone.
The moisture content sample
should not be smeared into
the container but instead
dropped cleanly by tapping
the spatula held close to the
container.
Tapping
The soil sample falls into
the moisture content tin
144
Oven
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
8. Moisture Content
Determination
145
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
Transfer the
remainder of the
soil from the cup
to the glass plate
for remixing
146
Glass Plate
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
*
9. Remixing &
Repeat Test
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
10. Calculation
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
10. Calculation
149
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
10. Calculation
Graph Plot.
150
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
11. Results
151
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
1
2
11. Results
Intersection of the 20 mm
line with the best fit line
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure (Casagrande)
iDeaz
153
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
(Casagrande)
Motorized
Casagrande
154
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
(Casagrande)
ASTM
BS
Casagrande Liquid
Limit
155
Equipment with Grooving Tools
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
Casagrande Method
Stages involve in
testing :
1. Sample preparation
2. Mixing with water
3. Maturing
4. Remixing
5. Setting the equipment
6. Placing soil in the
Casagrande cup
156
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
Soil Sample
Size 425 m
Soil
Passing
Sieve
Size
425 m
1. Sample Preparation
The soil sample that are
used have to pass the
425 micron sieve.
Next a representative
sample is required
weighing around 200250 g.
Pan
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
Soil retained on pan
200 250 g
Pan
Glass Plate
158
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
Glass Plate
Air Tight
Container
3. Maturing
The paste is then transferred
to an air-tight container for
24 hours to allow the water
time to penetrate the soil
fully.
For a soil of a low clay
content, such as silty soil,
the curing period may be
omitted and the test can be
carried out immediately.
159
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
Air Tight
Container
Glass Plate
4. Remixing
Remove the soil from the
container after maturing.
Transfer the soil to the glass
plate.
Remix it with pallette knives
for 10 minutes.
It is essential to obtain a
uniform distribution of water
throughout the sample.
160
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
5. Setting up the
equipment
Height adjustment screw
1cm
Adjust the drop height of the liquid limit device to 1 cm using the
space block or some grooving tool has an attached tip at the end of
the grooving tool.
Measure the drop height from the block to where the bowl hits
161 the
block.
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
6. Placing in Casagrande Cup
With the cup of the
apparatus resting on it's
base, place a portion of the
sample in the cup, without
entrapping air ensure the
cup is filled and level.
162
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
6. Placing in
Casagrande Cup
Soil Level
Soil Level
iDeaz
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
7. Applying the
Groove
iDeaz
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
7. Applying the
Groove
165
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
8. Applying the
Blows @ Taps
Turn the crank handle at a rate of approximately 2 rotations/s so that the cup
is lifted and dropped, counting the number of bumps.
Continue until the two parts of the sample come into contact at the bottom of
the groove along a distance of 13 mm.
166
Record the number of bumps required.
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
8. Applying the
Blows @ Taps
13 mm
13 mm
The Groove mark
and canal is closed at
a length of 13 mm
13 mm
167
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
9. Moisture Content
Determination
Take a moisture content
sample of about 10 g from
the cup around the area
closed groove area.
The moisture content sample
should not be smeared into
the container but instead
dropped cleanly by tapping
the spatula held close to the
container.
Tapping
The soil sample falls into
the moisture content tin
Oven
168
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
9. Moisture Content
Determination
169
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
Transfer the
remainder of the
soil from the cup
to the glass plate
for remixing
170
Glass Plate
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
*
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
11. Calculation
172
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
11. Calculation
Graph Plot.
173
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
12. Results
174
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
12. Results
1
Draw the 25 taps line
Intersection of the
25 taps line with
the best fit line
25
175
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
Plastic Limit test
Stages involve in
testing :
1. Sample preparation
2. Mixing with water
3. Maturing
4. Remixing
5. Dry
(Plastic Limit)
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
Air Tight
Container
Glass Plate
(Plastic Limit)
4. Remixing
Remove 20 g of the soil from
the container after maturing.
Transfer the soil to the glass
plate.
Remix it with pallette knives
for 10 minutes.
It is essential to obtain a
uniform distribution of water
throughout the sample.
177
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
(Plastic Limit)
5. Dry
Allow the soil to dry partially
on the plate until it becomes
plastic enough to be shape it
into a ball.
Glass Plate
178
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
(Plastic Limit)
6. Ball shape
Glass Plate
179
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
Glass Plate
(Plastic Limit)
7. Hand drying
Mould the ball of the soil
between the fingers and roll
it between the palms of the
hand until the heat of the
hands has dried.
The soil sufficient for slight
cracks to appear on it
surface.
180
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
(Plastic Limit)
8. Dividing samples
Devide the sample in two
sub sample of about 10 g
each and carry out a
separate determination on
each portion.
Each portion, futher divide
into 4 more smaller parts.
Glass Plate
10 g
10 g
181
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
(Plastic Limit)
182
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
(Plastic Limit)
3 mm diameter
Cracking
183
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
(Plastic Limit)
184
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
(Plastic Limit)
Oven
185
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
(Plastic Limit)
Oven
186
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
(Plastic Limit)
12. Results
Moisture content results.
187
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
Classification
188
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
Classification
189
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
Classification
190
Atterbergs Limits
Testing Procedure
Classification
191
Classification
The range of water content over which a soil
has a plastic consistency is termed the
Plasticity Index (IP or PI).
IP = Liquid Limit - Plastic Limit
= wL wP
Plasticity Index = Liquid Limit Plastic Limit
Shrinkage
limit
Plastic
limit
Liquid
limit
192
water
content
Classification
193
194