Electricity Act 2003
Electricity Act 2003
Electricity Act 2003
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
What is an Act ?
The need for the Electricity Act 2003
Significance of Electricity Act 2003
Purpose of Electricity Act 2003
Various provisions under Electricity Act
2003 in regard to Electricity Trading ,
Transmission, Distribution and Tariffs.
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
2.
3.
4.
5.
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
Generation of Electricity
including captive plants
Licensing provisions
Transmission of electricity
Distribution of electricity
Tariffs
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
Works of licensees
Establishment and
operations of ATE
Reorganization of Board
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
10
Special Courts
Dispute Resolution
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
11
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
12
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
13
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
14
15
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
16
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
17
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
18
19
20
21
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
22
23
24
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
25
Regulatory commissions
Section 76: Provides constitution for CERC
consisting of chair persons and three members
(Total four members).
Section 82: Provides constitution for state
commissions consisting of chairperson and two
members (total three members).
Section 108 : Directions by state government.
The state commission shall be guided by
directions by state government in matters of
policy involving public interest.
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
26
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
27
28
Special courts
Section 153: provides for constitution of
special courts for state government for
speedy trials of offences under section
135 to 140 and 150 (abetment).
Section 162: Deals with appointment of
CEIG
Section 166: Constitution of coordination
forum.
Section 185 : Repeal and savings.
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
29
30
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
31
Karnataka Case
CERC Levied Penalty of Rs. 17 Lakhs for
violation of grid code. ( 6.5.09)
The Order was appealed before ATE in
appeal No. 94/2009
ATE Passed Order on 11.01.2010 and
quashed the CERC Order
CERC Refunded the Penalty Recovered.
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
32
Karnataka Case
Grounds
CERC Relied upon SEM Reading instead
of SCADA
Action taken by KPTCL ( LDC) for
restoring the frequency back to 49 Hz not
recognised
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
33
Karnataka Case
Clause 5.4.2 of IEGC
(a) As mentioned above the utilities shall
endeavor to restrict their net drawl from the
grid to within the respective drawl schedule
whenever the system frequency is below 49.5
Hz. When the frequency falls below 49 Hz
requisite load shedding (manual) shall be
carried out to curtail the over drawl.
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
34
Delhi Case
CERC Adjudication Case 1 of 2009
Delhi SLDC V/s NRLDC
Delhi SLDC failed to comply with the
directions of NRLDC
Delhi SLDC Argues that , it is not
responsible for overdrawl. Discoms
responsible
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
35
Delhi Case
Facts of the Case
Para 5.4.2 (b) of the Indian Electricity (the Grid
Code) provides as
Further, in case of certain contingencies and/or
threat to system security, the RLDC may direct
the State Load Dispatch Centre to decrease its
drawal by a certain quantum. Such directions
shall immediately be acted upon.
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
36
Delhi Case
Facts of the Case
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
37
Delhi Case
Adjudicator rejected the argument of Delhi
and held that Delhi SLDC responsible for
the lapse
Imposed fine of Rs. 50,000 per default.
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
38
Cases
Case: SRLDC TN v/s Karnataka.
Case 2: MMD
Case 3: Short term procurement
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
39
THANK YOU
anilkumar ao ra kptcl
40