1-5 Motor Control Theories
1-5 Motor Control Theories
1-5 Motor Control Theories
Neuroscience in Physical
Therapy
Motor Control: Issues and
Theories
Min H. Huang, PT, PhD, NCS
Objectives
Identify individual, task, and
environmental movement constraints
Compare and contrast contemporary
motor control theories
Compare and contrast neurologic
rehabilitation approaches with respect
to assumptions underlying normal and
abnormal movement control, recovery
of function, and clinical practices.
Reflection
What is a theory?
What is the value of theory to
clinical practice?
Environmental Constraints
on Movement
Regulatory
Essential elements that
determine the
movement, e.g. chair
height
Non-regulatory
Feature that are not
essential but may
affect the performance,
e.g. background noise
Individual Constraints on
Movement
Action
goal-directed
movements
Perception
Sensory integration
Cognition
Mental functions
underlying the
establishment of a goal
Task Constraints on
Movement
BodyStability
M
+M
BodyTransport
M
+M
Closedpredictableenvironment
Variability
+ Variability
Openunpredictableenvironment
Variability
M:
manipulation, Variability: inter-trial
+ Variability
variability
MOTOR CONTROL
THEORIES
A TOUR THROUGH
HISTORY
http://www.youtu
be.com/watch?v=m
CiBehv_FOw&featu
re=related
http://www.yo
utube.com/wat
ch?v=r5o5S9zGpE
Reflex Theory
Reflexes are the building blocks of
complex motor behaviors or
movements
Reflex Theory
Sir Charles Sherrington, the integrative
action of the nervous system (1906)
Reflex chaining: complex movements
are a sequence of reflexes elicited
together
This is based on the observation that
monkeys were unable to their arm after
resection of one side of dorsal root
ganglia. Therefore, sensory inputs must
be essential in initiating movements.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMTh2hWvB2g
Taub Therapy Clinic: Constrained-Induced
Movement Therapy
Hierarchical Theory
Hierarchical Theory
Higher centers are always in control of
lower centers
Higher centers inhibit the reflexes
controlled by lower centers
Reflexes controlled by lower centers are
present only when higher centers are
damaged
Neuromaturational theory of development
The brain determines infant behavior!
Hierarchical Theory
Hierarchical Theory
Based on the observation of motor
development in children and adults
A childs capacity to sit, stand, and
walk is related to the progressive
emergence and disappearance of
reflexes
Brain stem reflexes (associated with
head control) emerge before midbrain
reflexes (associated with trunk
control)
Clinical Implications of
Hierarchical Theory
When the influence of higher centers is
temporarily or permanently interfered
with, normal reflexes become exaggerated
and so called pathological reflexes
appear Brunnstrom, 1970
The release of motor responses
integrated at lower levels from restraining,
influences of higher center, especially that
of the cortex, leads to abnormal postural
reflex activityBobath, 1965
Limitations of Hierarchical
Theory
Environment and other non-CNS
factors can affect movement, e.g.
Thelens experiments showed that
babys stepping response reemerges with body weight support
Normal adults exhibit lower level
reflexes, e.g. flexor withdrawal
Motor Programming
Theories
Concept of a central motor pattern
or motor program
Many studies found that
movement is possible even in the
absence of stimuli or sensory input
Sensory inputs are not required to
produce a movement but they are
important in adapting and
modulating the movement
Rossignol, 2011
Evidence of a Motor
Program:
Central Pattern Generator
(CPGs)
Motor Programming
Theories
Motor programs are
Hardwired and stereotyped neural
connections such as central pattern
generators (CPGs)
Abstract rules for generating
movements at the higher level
Motor program can be activated by
sensory stimuli or by central
processes
Motor Programming
Theories
Writing
Limitations of Motor
Programming Theories
Does not consider that the nervous
system must deal with both
musculoskeletal and environmental
variables to produce movements
e.g. identical neural commands
to elbow flexors can produce
different movements depending
on the initial position of the arm
and the force of gravity
Clinical Implications of
Motor Programming
Theories
Movement problems are caused by
abnormal CPGs or higher level
motor programs
It is important to help patients
relearn the correct rules for action
Focus on retraining movements that
are critical to a functional task, not
just specific muscles in isolation
Systems Theory:
Bernsteins Degree of
Freedom Problem
Systems Theory:
Bernsteins Degree of
Freedom Problem
Ting, 2005
Limitation of Systems
Theory
Nervous system is fairly
unimportant
How do we apply mathematics and
body mechanics to clinical
practice?
Clinical Implications of
Systems Theory
Body is a mechanical system. Consider
musculoskeletal factors underlying a
patients movement problem
Changes in movements may not
necessarily result from neural changes,
e.g. faster vs. slow gait, speed during
sit to stand
Encourage the patient to explore
variable movements
Clinical Implications of
Ecological Theory
Individual is an active explorer of
the environment for learning
Individual discovers multiple ways
to solve movement problems in
environment
Fundamental to the play-based
therapy
for pediatric
patients
Baby
Sense. Scientific
America Frontier.
(1:00-2:40,
5:10-7:30)
http://vsx.onstreammedia.com/vsx/pbssaf/search/P
BSPlayer?
assetId=68932&ccstart=235620&pt=0&preview=u
http://www.yo
utube.com/w
atch?
v=r5o5S9zGpE
NEUROLOGIC
REHABILITATION
APPROACHES
Motorcontrolmodels
Reflex
Hierarchical
Systems
Muscle
reeducation
Neurotherapeutic
facilitation
Contemporary
task-oriented
Neurologicrehabilitationmodels
Muscle Reeducation
Change function at
the level of muscle
Vera Carter, a
practitioner
beginning her
work with muscle
treatment of polio
patients in
Australia in the
early 1930s
Kendall Historical Collection
Assumptions of
Neurofacilitation
Approaches
Task-Oriented Approach
(motor control of motor
learning approach)
Task-Oriented Approach
Movement is organized around a behavioral
goal and is constrained by the environment
Patients learn by actively attempting to
solve the movement problem rather than
by repetitively practicing normal patterns of
movement.
e.g. RIC constraint-induced movement
therapy camp
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=NhLsh1SW4Ak
Moving forward
.currently available evidence of
doseresponse relationships in motor
learning, time-dependency of neuronal
and functional recovery, and task
specificity of treatment effects.the
lack of evidence as well as major
changes over time in our understanding
of underlying mechanisms about stroke
recovery, which do not concur with the
obsolete and constantly changing
assumptions used to explain the
Bobath ConceptKollen, 2009