Nutrition-Sensitive Programming
Nutrition-Sensitive Programming
Nutrition-Sensitive Programming
Meeting
On
3 Pillars of PRRO
Relief
Recovery
Preparedness
Unconditional transfers
(GFD/UCT)
Nutrition (SF)
Contingency planning
2. Nutrition Interventions
1. Nutrition-Specific Intervention: Mainly address immediate determinants of
Malnutrition
2. Nutrition-sensitive Intervention: Focus on underlying and systemic causes of
Malnutrition
Gaps:
Need:
Improved dietary
households;
diversity
of
Define objectives,
activities and target
population/ groups
Target setting
Baseline Conditions
Set baseline
indicators
Process Indicators
Outcome
Indicators
Impact
Indicators
Output Indicators
Monitoring and measuring achievements along the
pathway; modifying/adjusting targets as necessary
Pathway
Process, activities and actions
Integrated C/FFA
Interventions
Impact of
integrated CFA
End Results
Improved production diversification, and
increased utilisation of diverse nutritious
foods
Behaviour change
decision making
on
nutrition
habits,
C
Dis omm
ast uni
t
er
Ris y-Ma
k R na g
us
e
ed
ing
uc d
t
io n
CM
Co
(Id
nc Pro
en
DR
P r ti f y
e
j
R
e
p
o
Ac je FS
c
t
ti o c t
ua t
Outputs of CMDRR:
n P i de & N
liz
l an nt i f nee
1. Development Plan (CAPs)
a
s ( ica ds;
tio 2. Contingency Plan
C A ti o
n; Prio
P
n
Pl s)/ Co riti
a
z
d
n
a
;
E
ing
r
&
ito n
g
n
M tin mo sso )
t
e
c
r
me n, L tices
e
o
o
oj ep Outcluatiot prac
ns
r
P R ts & Eva Bes
u
tp act ng,
u
ASSET CREATION
(O Imp arni
le
PROJECT CYCLE
Im
De mm at
ve un ion
lop ity ;
me
nt
(C
N F ap a
I s cit
,e y
x t bu
en i l d
s i o i ng
n ,r
s e es
r v ou
ice rc
s, e a
t r a llo
in c a
in
g, t i on
et ,
c)
pl Pro
em je
en ct
ta
tio
n
,
n
ig al) t,
s
t De ov men ng
c
e t ( pr elop ardi
j
o n Ap dev aw
r
P me d als , and
n pos sal
p
a
o al pro prai
l
e is ide , Ap
v
a r-w ion
e
r
County/Sub County Proposals:
D pp luste iss
Aligned to CIDP / Sector Plans
A C subm
4.1 Sample Project: Lendorok Irrigation Scheme, Mukutani, Marigat, Baringo County
Watermelons
Situation:
In 2005, Londorok experienced cattle rustling
and became insecure for people to settlement
In 2010 the community started FFA with 700
(400 female & 300 male) beneficiaries
The community prioritized rehabilitation of the
irrigation Scheme to promote crop production &
avert cattle rustling.
Irrigation key in rebuilding community
livelihoods and creating household assets.
117 HHs opened up the initial 23 hectare of
irrigation farm & later expanded an additional 6
hectares.
Implementation
Beans