McDonalds Competitive Analysis Presentation
McDonalds Competitive Analysis Presentation
McDonalds Competitive Analysis Presentation
s
Team 1:
Chris Athens
Ben Baker
Chris Bolinger
Josh Carver
Jordan Guenther
Jeff Ward
History
1948 McDonald brothers open the first McDonalds and names Speedee as
their company image.
1955- Ray Kroc opens the Des Plaines restaurant. The 1st days revenues $366.12
1957 Ray Kroc hands out free hamburgers to Salvation Army guests
1961 Ray Kroc buyout the McDonalds brothers for $2.7 million
1965 - McDonalds goes public with the companys first offering on the stock
exchange for $22.50 per share.
First television commercial is aired
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krXP_TUZqsk
History
1966 McDonalds stocks split for the first time.
1967 - Big Mac invented
McDonalds in Canada and Puerto Rico open
1971 - Makadonaldo (Japan)
1973 - Egg McMuffin invented
1974 - Ronald McDonald House opened
1979 - Happy Meals introduced
1979-present - Continued growth
Problems
Customer Service
McDonalds is currently ranked last amongst its
top competitors in the FFHR subsector.
#1 Burger King
#2 Wendys
#3 McDonalds
Problems (cont.)
Health Issues
Competition
Top
Burger King 14%
Wendys 13%
Other strong competitors
Sonic 6%
Jack in the Box 4%
Hardees 3%
White Castle 1%
Marketing Techniques
Product Image
Customers associate with the brand
Domestic
Global
Marketing Techniques
(cont.)
Slogans
Marketing Mix
Five Ps
Marketing and Communications
Responsibility
McSpirit Nights
Commercials
Atmosphere
Global Marketing
National Marketing Campaign
Marketing North America
Hong Kong
France
Australia
Catering to local needs across seas
Management In
McDonalds
Ray Kroc
The quality of a leader is reflected in the
standards they set for themselves
We take the hamburger business more
seriously than anyone else
You're only as good as the people you hire
If there is time to lean there is time to
clean
Hamburger University
Management Continued
Hamburger University has given emphasis to
consistent restaurant operations procedures,
service, quality and cleanliness.
Because of its success H.U. has become the
global center of excellence for McDonalds
operations training and leadership development.
With this training it creates unity for the CEO
to the local store manager, they all have the
same goals in mind which is.
Financial Health
We looked at 4 major aspects of financial
health of McDonalds and their competitors
Liquidity
Leverage
Rates of Return
Stock Market Ratios
We also took Altmans Z-Score into
account to see how healthy these
companies were during the recession.
Liquidity
The ability to meet current obligations
We took into account the Current Ratio and
the Quick Ratio.
Current Ratio = Current Assets/Current
Liabilities.
Quick Ratio = (cash + marketable securities +
net receivables) / Current Liabilities
Leverage
The ratios between debt and equity which
provides information about bankruptcy.
We will look at the Debt-to Asset Ratio
and the Debt-to-Equity Ratio
Debt-to-Asset = Total Liabilities/Total
Assets
Debt-to-Equity = Long-term
Debt/Shareholders Equity
Meaning of Ratios
Debt-to-Asset shows whether assets are financed
through equity, value under 1, or financed through
debt, a value above 1.
Above 1, might mean trouble if the company is
under pressure.
Debt-to-Equity shows whether a company can
generate new funds from the capital market.
A higher ratio means a company is thought to
have smaller new-financing capacity and will
have trouble finding future financing funding.
Altmans Z-Score
The score analyzes the future success or
failure of a company.
Z-Score =
Evaluation of Score
Score < 1.8 indicates bankruptcy is high
Score > 1.8 but < 2.7 bankruptcy is fair
Score >2.7 but < 3.0 bankruptcy is possible,
but not likely,
Score > 3.0 indicates bankruptcy is low and
company is in good health.
McDonalds Score was
Return on Assests
Return on assets (ROA) is an indicator of
how profitable a company is relative to its
total assets.
ROA gives companies and organizations an
ideaas to how efficient theirmanagement
isat using their assets to create earnings.
In order to calculate return on assets, you
must divide a company's annual earnings by
its total assets; ROA is displayed as a
percentage.
Return on Assets
ROAtells you what earnings were produced
from invested capital or assets.
ROA for public companies can vary
substantially and will be highly dependent
on the industry.
This is why when using ROA as a
comparative measure,it is best to compare
it againsta company'sprevious ROA
numbers or the ROA of a similar company
Return on Assets
2008 ROA
MacDonalds
15.2%
Sonic
10.6%
Burger King
7.10%
Jack in the Box
7.60%
Wendys
-10.3%
5 year Average
10.5%
10.3%
3.20%
7.40%
-4.50%
Return on Assets
This shows that if MacDonalds net income was
generated from their total value of assets, the
return would be right around 15 cents per dollar. It
is also a great indicator of how efficient
MacDonalds is at using their assets to generate
income.
On the other side however, Wendys would show a
lose of 10 cents on the dollar if their net income is
based off their total value of assets. Sonic would
have a gain of 10 cents on the dollar while both
Burger King and Jack in the Box would have 7 cents
gain on the dollar.
Return on Equity
The amount of net incomereturnedas a
percentageof shareholders equity.
Return on equitymeasures a corporation's
profitabilityby showing how muchprofit a
company makeswith the money shareholders have
invested.
ROE is expressed as a percentage and calculated
by dividing net income by shareholders' equity.
ROE is usefulfor comparing the profitability of a
company to that of other firms in the same
industry.
Return on Equity
These numbers tell us how much profit is being
produced from money that investors have provided
to these companies.
15-20% is usually considered exceptional. For
every dollar of income 20 cents can be credited to
the investors capital.
This ratio is often considered the most important.
The main goal of any company is to maximize
shareholder wealth.
This ratio tells you and your investors how much
money you are making off their money.
Return on Equity
2008 ROE
MacDonalds
32.2%
Sonic
44.1%
Burger King
20.9%
Jack in the Box
23.0%
Wendys
-55.9%
5 year Average
20.6%
36.3%
13.8%
19.3%
-41.3%
Return on Equity
According to the information, Sonic and
MacDonalds are leading the way by making 44
cents and 32 cents for every investors dollar
respectively.
Jack in the box makes roughly 23 cents per dollar
while Burger King makes 20 cents. All four of
these are considered to be outstanding.
Wendys is not fairing very well. For every dollar
an investor puts into Wendys, they are losing
almost 56 cents in return. That is not what a
company wants to see if they are looking for
potential investors.
Date
Actual EPS
Last AVG
Estimate
McDonalds
Dec. 2008
3.76
3.63
Sonic
Aug. 2008
0.97
0.98
Burger King
Jun. 2008
1.38
1.35
Wendys/Arbys
Dec. 2008
-0.75
0.13
Sep. 2008
2.01
2.00
Dividend-Yield Ratio
The dividend yield on a company stock is the
companys annual dividend divided by price per share
Company
Price/Share
Annual Dividend
Dividend Yield
McDonalds
$54.82
$2.00
3.65%
Sonic
NA
NA
NA
Burger King
$22.68
$0.25
1.10%
Wendys/Arbys
$5.30
$0.06
1.13%
NA
NA
NA
Dupre Elementary
st
1 grade class
If you could eat at McDonalds or Burger
King for lunch today, which one would you
pick?
94% responded MCDONALDS with
thunderous cheers
6% responded Burger King without
much enthusiasm
Past Strategies
Product Development
Hits: Fries, Happy Meal, Big Mac, Egg
McMuffin, Salads, Apple Slices, Yogurt
Parfaits, & Promotions
Misses: McPizza, Fajita, Carrot Sticks, McLean,
and the Arch Deluxe
Forward Integration
Distribution through franchisees with
control over store presentation, menu
items
New Strategies
Product Development: Focus on core
business
Quality and taste issues
Food delivery methods
Cost Reductions
Home office cost reductions
Franchising corporate owned restaurants
Recommendations
Improvements in:
Customer Service
Focus on team, not individuals
Reward the behavior that you want
Training/Compensation
Training in customer service, speed and accuracy
Increase pay to attract more qualified applicants
Technology
Improvement of order verification system