Investigative Judgment Scene 4
Investigative Judgment Scene 4
Investigative Judgment Scene 4
PHASE 1
OUTER
COURT
PHASE 2
MEDIATORIAL
HOLY PLACE
PHASE
PHASE 3
3
EDEN
EDEN
REGAINED
MOST
MOST HOLY
HOLY
PLACE
PLACE
SATAN
THE
SCAPEGOA
T
DAY OF AT-ONE-MENT
FIT
MAN
SATA
N
E
TYP
OR LE
MP
A
EX F
O TY
I
AL
E
R
FIT
MAN
SATAN
Jeremiah 4:23
I beheld the earth, and, lo, [it was] without form, and void; and the
heavens, and they [had] no light.
4:24
I beheld the mountains, and, lo, they trembled, and all the hills moved lightly.
4:25
I beheld, and, lo, [there was] no man, and all the birds of the heavens were
fled.
4:26
I beheld, and, lo, the fruitful place [was] a wilderness, and all the cities thereof
were broken down at the presence of the LORD, [and] by his fierce anger.
4:27
For thus hath the LORD said, The whole land shall be desolate; yet will I not
make a full end.
25:33
And the slain of the LORD shall be at that day from [one] end of the earth even
unto the [other] end of the earth: they shall not be lamented, neither gathered, nor
buried; they shall be dung upon the ground.
SATAN WITH
NO ONE TO
TEMPT
THIS EARTH IS MADE A WILDERNESS WHEN JESUS COMES; SATAN IS BOUND BY A CHAIN OF CIRCUMSTANCE AND
THAT CHAIN IS SATAN WILL HAVE NOBODY TO TEMPT; WHILE THE REDEEMED WILL BE IN HEAVEN FOR 1000 YEARS!
SATAN
S
CHURC
H
SATAN
S
CHURC
H
H
E
A
L
T
H
R
E
F
O
R
M
S
A
B
B
A
T
H
S
A
N
C
T
U
A
R
Y
OUT OF THE
SANCTUARY
EVOLVES ALL OF
THE OTHER PILLARS
V
I
C
T
O
R
Y
O
V
E
R
S
I
N
R
I
G
H
T
E
O
U
S
N
E
S
S
B
Y
F
A
I
T
H
S
T
A
T
E
O
F
T
H
E
D
E
A
D
But Satan has been seeking gradually to rob this message of its power, that
the people may not be prepared to stand in the day of the Lord. {RH, March
22, 1887 par. 8}
LATER TESTIMONY OF SDA LEADERS
Elder W. H. Branson, Chairman of the Survey Commission on Education
summarized in 1935:
We believeAs a result of our study of this situation that the safeguards
that we tried to throw around the policy of accrediting when we entered
upon this course have largely broken down. He further states, It has gone
way beyond anything the denomination planned, and the by-products of this
are found in the schools where boards are pressed by the ACCREDITATION
BODIES to put men on their faculties who have ADVANCED DEGREES, and
did not know where to turn for men of experience and outstanding integrity
to fill the position.
PRETERISM
MEANS:
PAST
FULFILLMEN
T
FUTURISM
MEANS:
FUTURE
FULFILLMEN
T
HISTORICISM
ONLY TRUE
METHOD
MEANS:
PAST-PRESENT
& FUTURE
FULFILLMENT:
THE
PROOF-TEXT
METHOD:
GODS
METHOD
Side BarRemember now, we are looking at what Satan is doing in phase 3 of the plan
of redemption to Gods people to prevent us from cooperating with Jesus in the Most
Holy Place; JESUS is blotting out or sins. I want my sins blotted out, how about you?
Satan
REFERENCE:
http://jesusmessiah.com/pret
erist/luis-dealcazar.html
Protestant Historicists,
the preterist view was
slow to gain
HUGO
acceptance outside the
GROTIUS
Roman Catholic Church.
Among Protestants, it
was first accepted by
Hugo Grotius, a Dutch
Protestant who was
eager to establish
COMMON GROUND
BETWEEN
PROTESTANTS AND THE
ROMAN CATHOLIC
CHURCH !!
(SOUNDS
LIKE
Side BarLui de Alcazar wrote the first systematic preterist
US, TO ME)!!
exposition of prophecy during the COUNTER REFORMATION which
was after Martin Luther had protested against the Roman Catholic
Church; Luther and other Protestants had learned that the Man Of
Sin/Anti-Christ in the Bible was/is the Pope/Papacy/Roman Catholic
Church/Satans Church. So the Roman Catholic Church was
counter-protesting in order to refute Luthers and other
protestants claims and thereby the light would be thrown off of
JON
PAULIE
N
Alternative Approaches: 1.
Preterism. A number of SDA
thinkers, particularly those
educated in religion and history,
have seen increasing light in the
preterist approach to biblical
apocalyptic. This approach, the
primary ones among
PROFESSIONAL BIBLICAL
SCHOLARS, treats books like Daniel
and Revelation as messages to
their original time and place, not
as divinely-ordained chains of
future historical events. According
to this approach, believers benefit
from these books not by seeing
where they stand in the course of
history, but by applying spiritual
principles drawn from the text to
later situations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Pa
ulien
SidebarNotice the language: The Primary Ones Among Professional Biblical Scholars.
The primary ones in Christs day were the Pharisees/ scribes; however, they didnt understand the
Sanctuary and thats why they crucified Christ. They had gone down to Alexandria in Greece to become
educated but they didnt know that Jesus was the MESSIAH nor did they know when and where HE was
to be born. Their education obtained from the Tree of Knowledge of good and evil is the WRONG
SOURCE OF EDUCATION! That is Worldly Wisdom not Godly Wisdom.
Now you can understand why our preachers are coming out of our colleges all messed up spiritually;
they have had this preterism theology put in their heads and theyre coming out of these schools
pastoring churches CRIPPLED, then they cripplle the members. And people are sitting back in carnal
security, on the pews of these churches, being fed garbage. THIS IS SERIOUS!!
Additionally, regarding preterism, if you look at the prophecies of Daniel and Revelation from a
preterist view, you will NOT see the Man of Sin as the Catholic Church; you can understand those
prophecies from a historicist point of view and thats as God intended.
Remember Eph. 6: 12 so we can only be angry at the devil, not man.
DESMOND FORD
10. WHAT DO ADVENTIST SCHOLARS SAY ABOUT THE BIBLE AND THE
ADVENTIST UNDERSTANDING OF DANIEL 8:14
10a. FORD SUMMARY STATEMENT:
Desmond Ford was a college teacher for many years within the Adventist
church. Here is a general statement by him about Adventist scholarship and
the supposed INVESTIGATIVE JUDGMENT of DANIEL 8:14: Many adventist
scholars have long held that Daniel 8:14 does not teach an Investigative
Judgment. Their view was rejected because it seems to contradict Ellen White.
It is well nigh certain that had Ellen White not endorsed the doctrine, it would
have been surrendered long ago. In practical terms, it has been surrendered.
Surrendered, not only by Adventist scholars in this country, but also around the
world, and by much of European Adventism. As a local example, belief in 1844
and the Investigative Judgment is not considered mandatory for baptism in
Germany.
www.investigativejudgment.info/ij/part7.htm
The investigative judgment teaching was the focus ofcontroversywithin the
denomination in 1980, when Adventist theologianDesmond Fordhad his
ministerial credentials withdrawn by the Church after openly criticizing the
doctrine. While the Adventist mainstream believe in the doctrine and the
church has reaffirmed its basic position on the doctrine since 1980, some of
those within the church's more liberalprogressive wingcontinue to be critical
of the teaching. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investigative_judgment
THE LAST & FINAL SCENE, (SCENE 5), IS COMING NEXT