Case Study Sap For Atlam: Group Member Name Matric No
Case Study Sap For Atlam: Group Member Name Matric No
Case Study Sap For Atlam: Group Member Name Matric No
ase Study
AP for ATLAM
Group Member Name
MATRIC NO.
PBS15111063
PBS15111117
LEE LIHAO
PBS15111104
NG YIN YONG
PBS1511984
PBS15111033
ZULFADZLI DRUS
PBS15111046
Company Background
Akademi Teknikal Laut Malaysia (ATLAM) was
established on 15 August 1981 to train and
prepare Malaysian for the maritime industry.
The academy is located in Melaka and
Terengganu, having 195 staffs by 2001 where
89 of them are in administration and 106 are
in training section.
IT infrastructure was in very poor state before
the privatization on 1 January
Obtained better IT facilities from their holding
company-PETRA Group Of Companies.
Case Summary
Before 2001, ATLAM relied on a customized singleuser system bought from vendor. The academys PC
was solely used to enter accounting entries and
cannot be used to produce financial statement.
ATLAM are set to upgrade their system into the
PETRA group-wide SAP system.
Because of the current economic crisis and the
complexity of SAP system, implementation plan have
to be made based on Its
-Tangible/Intangible aspect
-Impact on Accounting Notes
-Impact on Management and Share Holder
Tangible? Intangible?
SAP
Hardwar
e
Tangible
Softwar
e
Intangib
le
Functional
Analyst
User
Representative
Project
Manager
User Project
Manager
Staff capability
Less sophisticated users
Change in work
2. Impact on Accounting
Notes/Balance Sheet and Net
Income
Balance Sheet
Assets
Owners
Liabilities
Income Statement
Net income
= Revenues
Expenses
equity
++Equipment
--Revenue
--Net
+Operating
--Owners
Income
Equity
+
Cost
Cont.
Implementing SAP system is all about the
benefits to ATLAM.
Investment to make the company to
operate better and bring large benefit.
The ability of SAP to generate profit and
get a good and consistent cash flows for
the company shows that SAP is belonging
to asset.
Initial Investment
This is the investment that ATLAM has to make to introduce SAP in their accounting system .
Details
Initial Software (Including Project Expenses & PIFS
& MMM Modules)
1,000,000.00
The Hardware
2,000,000.00
Training Cost
1,271,550.00
Customization Work
Total Cost
RM
72,840.00
4,344,390.00
400,000
800,000
efficiency
Technical
expertise
cost
1,200,00 1,400,00
600,000
savings
0
0
Process and procedures cost
500,000
900,000
savings
1,200,00 1,500,00
Working capital savings
900,000
0
0
1,500,00 3,300,00 4,600,00
Total Savings
0
0
0
Average SAP licence cost
150,000
200,000
Cost to convert old data to new
100,000
160,000
180,000
data
Cost of overheads
300,000
420,000
490,000
Cost of system maintenance
60,000
120,000
130,000
and firewalls
Cost of hardware expansion
260,000
300,000
Cost of training
500,000
800,000
900,000
Total Costs
960,000
1,910,00
0
2,200,00
0
4
1,200,00
0
1,600,00
0
1,200,00
0
1,500,00
0
5,500,00
0
225,000
5
1,600,00
0
1,800,00
0
1,500,00
0
1,500,00
0
6,400,00
0
250,000
6
2,000,00
0
2,000,00
0
1,800,00
0
1,500,00
0
7,300,00
0
250,000
560,000
600,000
640,000
560,000
600,000
640,000
140,000
150,000
160,000
340,000
1,000,00
0
2,825,00
0
380,000
1,100,00
0
3,080,00
0
400,000
1,300,00
0
3,390,00
0
1
1,500,000
960,000
2
3,300,000
1,910,000
1,390,000.
00
(246,182.1
0)
1,143,817.
90
(285,954.4
8)
3
4,600,000
2,200,000
and
2,400,000.
540,000.00
00
(246,182.1
(246,182.1
0)
0)
2,153,817.
293,817.90
9
(73,454.48
(538,454.4
)
8)
1,615,363.
220,363.42 857,863.42
42
246,182.10 246,182.10 246,182.10
1,104,045. 1,861,545.
466,545.52
52
52
4
5,500,000
2,825,000
2,675,000.
00
(246,182.1
0)
2,428,817.
9
(607,204.4
8)
1,821,613.
42
246,182.10
2,067,795.
52
5
6,400,000
3,080,000
3,320,000.
00
(246,182.1
0)
3,073,817.
9
(768,454.4
8)
2,305,363.
42
246,182.10
2,551,545.
52
6
7,300,000
3,390,000
3,910,000.
00
(246,182.1
0)
3,663,817.
9
(915,954.4
8)
2,747,863.
42
246,182.10
2,994,045.
52
Payback Period
Payback period is a method that estimates the amount
of time required for the cash flows generated by the
investment to repay the cost of the investment.
Year
Cash Flow
1
2
3
4
5
6
RM
(4,344,390.00)
466,545.52
1,104,045.52
1,861,545.52
2,067,795.52
2,551,545.52
2,994,045.52
Cumulative Cash
Flow
RM
(4,344,390.00)
(3,877,844.48)
(2,773,798.96)
(912,253.44)
1,155,542.08
3,707,087.60
6,701,133.12
Payback Period
The initial outlay is RM 4,344,390.00. Up to year 3, the accumulated
cash flow is RM 3,432,136.56 (RM 466,545.52 + RM 1,104,045.52 +
RM 1,861,545.52). Hence, it requires RM 912,253.44 which is shown
at the calculation below to cover the rest of the initial investment.
To determine the remaining period:
Payback Period
4)
= 3 + (912,253.44 / 2,067,795.52)
= 3 + 0.44
Therefore, the payback period for the implementation of SAP is 3.44
years.
Present
Value
0.9091
0.8264
0.7513
Factor
Present
Value of
1,398,579.
Cash
424,136.53 912,383.22
15
Flows
Total PV
of Cash
7,421,796.55
Inflows
Initial
Investme (4,344,390.0
nt
0)
Net
=3,077,406.
Present
55
Value
2,067,795.
52
2,551,545.
52
2,994,045.
52
0.6830
0.6209
0.5645
1,412,304.
34
1,584,254.
61
1,690,138.
70
IRR
DR + 1
(DR + 1)^T
0.25
466,545.52
0.25
1.25
1.25
1,104,045.52
0.25
1.25
1.56
1,861,545.52
0.25
1.25
1.95
2,067,795.52
0.25
1.25
2.44
2,551,545.52
0.25
1.25
3.05
836,572.30
2,994,045.52
0.25
1.25
3.81
785,838.72
4,505,464.82
161,074.9
IRR
DR + 1
(DR +
1)^T
0.30
466,545.52
0.30
1.30
1.30
1,104,045.52
0.30
1.30
1.69
1,861,545.52
0.30
1.30
2.20
2,067,795.52
0.30
1.30
2.86
2,551,545.52
0.30
1.30
3.71
687,748.12
2,994,045.52
0.30
1.30
4.83
619,885.20
3,888,958.34
(455,431.66)
Cont.
Based on the calculation, the after-tax cash flow
are positive within 6 years period.
From the cumulative cash flow we can see that
the cash flows is negative firstly.
But in the period of year 3 to year 4, ALTAM can
get the all the payback
That is to say, after 3 year and 4 month, the
ATLAM will begin to make profit.
Cont.
Assets
Balance Sheet
= Liabilities
Income Statement
Net income = Revenues
Owners
equity
++Owners
Expenses
++Revenue
--Operating Cost
+Net
Equity
Income
So if the using time of SAP is far more than 6 years (like 10 or more long), company
ATLAM will make more profits
Recommendation
1. Project Schedule
Why?
Time constraint in implementation of SAP
system
Suggested solution
Develop Gantt Chart
Gantt Chart
Recommendation(cont)
1. Cost and facilities
Why?
High expenses in SAP implementation cost and
equipment
Suggested solution
Negotiate with SAP management representative
(software license and customize cost)
Request funding assistant from PETRA group
Training program conduct by expert staff of PETRA
group
Request sponsorship from PETRA to purchase new
equipment
3. Staff
resistance
Communication
between employee
and management
Thank you
for your
Attention!