Relationships: Melissa D.L. Jacobs
Relationships: Melissa D.L. Jacobs
Relationships: Melissa D.L. Jacobs
Unhealthy Relationships
&
Codependency
By
- “Baby” by Ashanti
Healthy v/s Unhealthy Relationships
Healthy Relationship: Unhealthy Relationship:
Supportive of each other Abandonment of self
No expectations to “fix” one another
Sense of freedom “individuality”
Low self-worth & self-esteem
Open Systems Boundary Issues
Strong sense of self-worth Control Issues
Team work to be a harmonious unit Fear of separation
Equality Closed System
Good communication Lack of trust & respect
Clear defined boundaries Violence or Abuse
Trust & Respect
Differentiation of self
Triangles
Nuclear family emotional system
Family projection process
Emotional cutoff
Multigenerational transmission process
Sibling position
Societal regression
Differentiation of Self in Relationships
Individuals with a well developed differentiated “self”:
Possess the ability to maintain their self, goals, values, and beliefs
despite pressure, opposition, or conflict from others.
Possess the ability to not let their emotions cloud their judgment or
behaviors.
are greatly impacted by “others” and rely on their acceptance and approval
(external validation)
spend most of their time focusing on and maintaining the relationships around them
- major life decisions are made to avoid conflict – they “lose themselves” in the
relationships
An individual who has unresolved cut-offs in their family of origin will try
to compensate in personal relationships.
Efforts are made to “fix” problems from the past relationships with the new
relationship.
Frequency of contact
Geographic proximity
Degree of openness (i.e. Do you talk with your
mother about personal thoughts or feelings?)
Involvement with the broader family
Responsible involvement with family events
and transitions
Why address Emotional Cut-Offs in therapy?
The “I” Position: to break the cycle of emotional reactivity by being less
confrontational in communication
A person who has let another person's behavior affect him/her and is obsessed
with controlling that person's behavior. (Melody Beattie)
OR
II. We accept others as they are, without trying to change them to meet our needs.
III. We are in touch with our feelings and attitudes about every aspect of our lives, including our sexuality.
IV. We cherish every aspect of ourselves: our personalities, our appearance, our beliefs and values, our bodies, our interests,
and our accomplishments. We validate ourselves rather than searching for relationships to give us a sense of self-worth.
V. Our self-esteem is great enough that we can enjoy being with others, especially men, who are fine just as they are. We do
not need to be needed in order to feel worthy.
VI. We allow ourselves to be open and trusting with appropriate people. We are not afraid to be known at a deeply personal
level, but also we do not expose ourselves to the exploitation of those who are not interested in our well-being.
VII. We learn to question, “Is this relationship good for me? Does it enable me to grow into all I am capable of being?”
VIII. When a relationship is destructive, we are able to let go of it without experiencing disabling depression. We have a circle
of supportive friends and healthy interests to see us through crisis.
IX. We value our own serenity above all else. All the struggles, drama, and chaos of the past have lost their appeal. We are
protective of ourselves, our health, and our well-being.
X. W e know that a relationship, in order to work, must be between partners who share similar values, interests, and goals,
and who each have a capacity for intimacy. We also know that we are worthy of the best that life has to offer.
-Robin Norwood
“Daily Mediations for Women who Love too much”
References
Adult Children Anonymous (2004). http://www.intrepidsoftware.com/rec/defines.php. Retrieved March 20, 2004.
Beattie, M. (1989). Beyond Codependency: And getting better all the time. New York: Hazelden.
Collins, B. (470). Reconstructing Co-dependency Using Self-in-Relation Theory: A feminist perspective. Social Work, 38(4), 470-476.
Covingtion, S. (1988). Leaving the Enchanted Forest: The path from relationship addiction to intimacy. New York: Harper San
Francisco.
Hewuttm R., Coak, H., & Smale, R. (2004). I love you-neither do I: Co-dependent and abusive relationships of women clients of the
addiction services. Mental Health Practice, 7(5), 30-32.
Katz, D. (2004). Checking the Health of Your Relationships. Lesbian News, 29(7), 51.
Lerner, H.(1990). The Dance of Intimacy: A women’s guide to courageous acts of change in key relationships. New York: Harper &
Row.
Norwood R. (1997). Daily meditations of women who love too much. New York: MJF Books.
Norwood, R. (1985). Women who love too much: When you keep wishing and hoping he’ll change. New York: St. Martins Press
Schaffer, B. (1987). Is it Love or is it Addiction: Falling into healthy love. New York: Hazelden.
Titeman, P. (2003). Emotional Cutoff: Bowen family systems theory perspectives. New York: Haworth.
Wegscheider-Cruse, S. (1985). Choice-making: For co-dependents, adult children, and spirituality seekers. Pompano Beach, Fla:
Health Communication.