The Auditorium Construction: 21 July 2016
The Auditorium Construction: 21 July 2016
The Auditorium Construction: 21 July 2016
21 July 2016
Case situation
Project- 25,000 seat stadium
Start from 1 January 2018, expected finish time:
1.5 years
Overhead expense of $5,000 per week for any
delay
Penalty of $25,000 per week of delay beyond next
1 July 2019.
Uncertainties: Strike and Weather in January.
1.) Possible labor strike in January.:
No Strike, P=50%;
Strike:+8 weeks , P=25%; +12 weeks ,
P=25%
Five proposals
1. Expedite the pouring of seat gallery supports
with extra cost $20,000 and cut 6 weeks
2. The same as proposal 1, but in addition,
expediting filling of the field with extra cost
$10,000 and cut 5 weeks
3. Expedite the roofing with extra cost $9,000 and
cut 6 weeks
4. Do nothing until Dec. 1. If it is cold, delay the
pouring or heating; If a strike occurs, expedite all
activities after strike over with extra cost $3000
per activity per week.
5. Do nothing until Dec. 1.
Precedence Network
8
16
30
BB
Subsurfac
Subsurfac
ee drainage
drainage
CC
Field
Field &
&
Truck
Truck
filling
filling
14
8
AA
clean
clean
site
site
16
12
EE
Excavatio
Excavatio
nn
12
16
FF
Pourin
Pourin
gg
concre
concre
te
te
footing
footing
30
42
D
D
Turf
Turf
installatio
installatio
nn
12
28
16
G
G
Pouring
Pouring
seat
seat
gallery
gallery
support
support
28 41
H
H
Pre
Pre
cast
cast
galleri
galleri
es
es
13
12
16
20
JJ
Installing
Installing
steel
steel
structure
structure
20 28
KK
Roof
Roof
erectio
erectio
nn
41
45
II
Pouring
Pouring
concrete
concrete
seats
seats
4
28
28
32
33
N
N
Light
Light
installation
installation
5
32
O
O
Scoreboard
Scoreboard &
&
facilities
facilities
48
M
M
Seat
Seat
paintin
paintin
gg
LL
Buildin
Buildin
gg
dressin
dressin
gg room
room
28
Critical Path: A E F G H I M
45
48
FINIS
FINIS
H
H
Proposal 1
8
16
30
BB
Subsurfac
Subsurfac
ee drainage
drainage
CC
Field
Field &
&
Truck
Truck
filling
filling
14
8
AA
clean
clean
site
site
16
12
EE
Excavatio
Excavatio
nn
12
16
FF
Pourin
Pourin
gg
concre
concre
te
te
footing
footing
42+X
D
D
Turf
Turf
installatio
installatio
nn
12
22
16
G
G
Pouring
Pouring
seat
seat
gallery
gallery
support
support
16
20
JJ
Installing
Installing
steel
steel
structure
structure
Actual Cost
No strike,
P=50%
No
heating
(P=67%
)
H
H
Pre
Pre
cast
cast
galleri
galleri
es
es
13
P(Strike)
22 35
Heatin
g
(P=33
%)
$20,000 $20,00
0
20 28
KK
Roof
Roof
erectio
erectio
nn
35
39
II
Pouring
Pouring Possible strike
concrete
concrete
39 42+X
seats
seats
M
M
4
28
Seat
Seat
paintin
paintin
gg
32
LL
Buildin
Buildin
gg
dressin
dressin
gg room
room
28
42+X
FINIS
FINIS
H
H
33
N
N
Light
Light
installation
installation
28
5
32
O
O
Scoreboard
Scoreboard &
&
facilities
facilities
4
$20,000[Expediting cost]+(42+1252) x ($15,000[Penalty]+
$500[Overhead]) =$51,000
Proposal 2
8
16
BB
Subsurfac
Subsurfac
ee drainage
drainage
12
EE
Excavatio
Excavatio
nn
25
C
C
Field
Field
&
&
Truck
Truck
filling
filling
AA
clean
clean
site
site
16
12
16
FF
Pourin
Pourin
gg
concre
concre
te
te
footing
footing
25
37
D
D
Turf
Turf
installatio
installatio
nn
12
22
16
G
G
Pouring
Pouring
seat
seat
gallery
gallery
support
support
16
20
JJ
Installing
Installing
steel
steel
structure
structure
Actual Cost
No strike,
P=50%
No
heating
(P=67%
)
H
H
Pre
Pre
cast
cast
galleri
galleri
es
es
13
P(Strike)
22 35
Heatin
g
(P=33
%)
$30,000 $30,00
0
20 28
KK
Roof
Roof
erectio
erectio
nn
35
39
II
Pouring
Pouring Possible strike
concrete
concrete
39 42+X
seats
seats
M
M
4
28
Seat
Seat
paintin
paintin
gg
32
LL
Buildin
Buildin
gg
dressin
dressin
gg room
room
28
42+X
FINIS
FINIS
H
H
33
N
N
Light
Light
installation
installation
28
5
32
O
O
Scoreboard
Scoreboard &
&
facilities
facilities
4
$30,000[Expediting cost] +(42+12-52)x
($15,000[Penalty]+$500[Overhead cost]) =
$61,000
Scenario of Proposal 3
Good weather
no heating
needed, done
within 48 weeks
No Strike
scenario
Strike
+8 weeks strike,
no heating
needed, done
within 56 weeks
+12 weeks strike,
no heating
needed, done
within 60 weeks
Proposal 3
8
16
30
BB
Subsurfac
Subsurfac
ee drainage
drainage
CC
Field
Field &
&
Truck
Truck
filling
filling
14
8
AA
clean
clean
site
site
16
12
EE
Excavatio
Excavatio
nn
12
16
FF
Pourin
Pourin
gg
concre
concre
te
te
footing
footing
42+X
D
D
Turf
Turf
installatio
installatio
nn
12
28
16
G
G
Pouring
Pouring
seat
seat
gallery
gallery
support
support
16
20
JJ
Installing
Installing
steel
steel
structure
structure
No
Heatin
heating
g
(P=67%) (P=33
%)
$9,000
H
H
Pre
Pre
cast
cast
galleri
galleri
es
es
4
22
$11,00
0
20 22
K
K
Roof
Roof
erecti
erecti
on
on
45+X
II
Pouring
Pouring
concrete
concrete
seats
seats
12
Actual Cost
No strike,
P=50%
41
28 41
13
P(Strike)
45+X48+X
M
M
Seat
Seat
paintin
paintin
gg
36
LL
Buildin
Buildin
gg
dressin
dressin
gg room
room
22
48+X
FINIS
FINIS
H
H
27
N
N
Light
Light
installation
installation
22
5
26
O
O
Scoreboard
Scoreboard &
&
facilities
facilities
4
$9,000[Expediting cost] +(48+12-52) x
($500[Overhead cost] + $15,000[Penalty])
=$133,000
Scenario of Proposal 4
Good weather,
no heating
needed, done
within 48 weeks
No Strike
scenario
Strike
+8 weeks strike,
Crash 4 weeks, no
heating needed,
done within 52
weeks
+12 weeks strike,
Crash 4 weeks , no
heating needed,
done within 56
weeks
Proposal 4
8
16
30
BB
Subsurfac
Subsurfac
ee drainage
drainage
CC
Field
Field &
&
Truck
Truck
filling
filling
14
8
AA
clean
clean
site
site
16
12
12
16
FF
Pourin
Pourin
gg
concre
concre
te
te
footing
footing
EE
Excavatio
Excavatio
nn
12
28
16
G
G
Pouring
Pouring
seat
seat
gallery
gallery
support
support
P(Strike)
No strike,
P=50%
H
H
Pre
Pre
cast
cast
galleri
galleri
es
es
16
20
JJ
Installing
Installing
steel
steel
structure
structure
4-2=2
28
32
20 28
K
K
Roof
Roof
erecti
erecti
on
on
No
Heatin
heating
g
(P=67%) (P=33
%)
$2,000
49+2
II 53+2
Pouring
Pouring
concrete
concrete
seats
seats
12
$0
41
28 41
13
Actual Cost
51 51+1
55M
M55+1
Seat
Seat
painti
painti
ng
ng
LL
Buildin
Buildin
gg
dressin
dressin
gg room
room
28
3-2=1
52
56
FINIS
FINIS
H
H
33
N
N
Light
Light
installation
installation
28
5
32
O
O
Scoreboard
Scoreboard &
&
facilities
facilities
4
$3,000[crash cost]x4 +(56-52) x
($500[Overhead cost] +
$15,000[Penalty]) = $74,000
Scenario of Proposal 5
Good weather,
no heating
needed, done
within 48 weeks
No Strike
scenario
Strike
+8 weeks strike,
no heating
needed, done
within 56 weeks
+12 weeks strike,
no heating
needed, done
within 60 weeks
Proposal 5
8
16
30
BB
Subsurfac
Subsurfac
ee drainage
drainage
CC
Field
Field &
&
Truck
Truck
filling
filling
14
8
AA
clean
clean
site
site
16
12
12
16
FF
Pourin
Pourin
gg
concre
concre
te
te
footing
footing
EE
Excavatio
Excavatio
nn
12
28
16
G
G
Pouring
Pouring
seat
seat
gallery
gallery
support
support
16
20
JJ
Installing
Installing
steel
steel
structure
structure
No
Heatin
heating
g
(P=67%) (P=33
%)
$0
H
H
Pre
Pre
cast
cast
galleri
galleri
es
es
$2,000
45+X48+X
M
M
Seat
Seat
painti
painti
ng
ng
4
28
32
20 28
K
K
Roof
Roof
erecti
erecti
on
on
45+X
II
Pouring
Pouring
concrete
concrete
seats
seats
12
Actual Cost
No strike,
P=50%
41+X
28 41
13
P(Strike)
LL
Buildin
Buildin
gg
dressin
dressin
gg room
room
28
48+X
FINIS
FINIS
H
H
33
N
N
Light
Light
installation
installation
28
5
32
O
O
Scoreboard
Scoreboard &
&
facilities
facilities
4
(48+8-52)x ($500[Overhead cost]+
$15,000[Penalty])= $62,000
Cost Analysis
No heating Scenario (67%)
Probability
Strike
Propos
al 1
No Strike50%
$20,000 $30,00
0
$9,000
$0
$0
+8 weeks35%
$20,000 $30,00
0
$71,00
0
$12,00
0
$62,00
0
$133,0
00
$74,00
0
$124,0
00
No Strike50%
$20,000 $30,00
0
$11,00
0
$2000
$2000
+8 weeks35%
$20,000 $30,00
0
$71,00
0
$12,00
0
$62,00
0
+12 weeks-
$51,000 $61,00
$133,0
$74,00
$124,0
Recommendation
based on Cost Analysis-EMV method
Choose proposal 4
Proposal 1 would be the second choice
Reason
Proposal 4 has the lowest EMV, and it can end
up with no extra cost.
Proposal 1 would be the second choice
because it has second lowest EMV and is
better than 2, 3 and 5 if a strike happens.
If the CEO is adverse to risk, then select
proposal 1 which has smaller loss range
(from $20,000 to $ 51,000)
Time Analysis
Probability
Strike
Propos
al 1
No Strike50%
42
42
48
48
48
+8 weeks35%
50
50
56
52
56
+12 weeks15%
54
54
60
56
60
Make span
46.6
46.6
52.6
50.6
52.6
Recommendation
based on Time Analysis
Take proposal 1
Proposal 4 would be the second choice
Reason
Proposal 1 & 2 has the shortest average
duration, but proposal 2 costs more.
Proposal 4 would be the second choice
because it has second shortest average
duration and is better than proposal 1 if the
cost-time ratio is considered.
If the CEO cares time the most, then select
proposal 1.
Other factors
Behavioral Employee morale and enthusiasm if
a strike occurs. Is this company brand oriented?
Organizational Will a strike and falling behind
schedule lead to layoffs or low morale? Does the
sub-contractor have the capacity to work in an
expedited scenario?
Political- Will local or state government become
involved in a labor dispute
Financial- how urgently does the firm need cash
flow? Will early completion lead to financial
benefits?
Cultural If labor force is mostly of the same
background, they may be more culturally or less
culturally likely to strike.