Fluid Resuscitation - Dita Aditianingsih
Fluid Resuscitation - Dita Aditianingsih
Fluid Resuscitation - Dita Aditianingsih
Dita Aditianingsih MD
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
University of Indonesia - Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital
The Physiology of
Fluid Shifts
Physiological basics
Colloids
Glucose
Mg2+
Ca2+
HCO3Proteins
K+
PO42ClNa+
12
Capillary
membrane
40%
30
6
6
75 kg
BW
Cell membrane
36
9.4 L of
D5W
16
30
5 L of 0.9
NaCl
12
30
1 L of 6%
HES
30
0.6 L of 10%
HES
14.4
11.6
Body fluid
volume
C.H. Svensen et al. / Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology 23 (2009) 213224
Jacob M. et al: The endothelial glycocalix affords compatibility of starlings principle and high cardiac interstitial albumin level.
Cardiovasc Res 2007; 73:575-86
Albumin
synthesis
Fluid Infusion
Normal glycocalyx
endothelial gap
Albumin
synthesis
lymph
Metabolism
Urinary/ GIT loss
leakage
Plasma
Plasma
Interstitial
Plasma
Plasma
leakage
Fluid Infusion
lymph
Catabolism
Urinary/ GIT loss
Hemorrhage
Interstitial Edema
Normal condition
Tremblay LN, Rizoli SB, Brenneman FD. Advances in fluid resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock.
Can J Surg.2001;44(3):172-179
volumes
Managements :
Volume replacement
Fluid replacement
Electrolyte replacement or osmotherapy
Aim
Definition
Composition
Type of fluid
Volume Replacement
Colloids
Crystalloids
Fluid Replacement
Compensate or replace
ECFV loss due to
cutaneous, enteral or
renal fluid loss
Isotonic
Crystalloids
Electrolyte Replacement
and Osmotherapy
Restore electrolyte
imbalance and a
physiological total body
fluid volume (ECFV and
ICFV)
Hypertonic
Isotonic
H2O base
Nacl 3
Crystalloids
D5W
Case
Airway -Ventilation : O2
FM 6lt/min
Circulation : 2 large
bore IV, fluid
resuscitation 1-2 litres
Crystalloid or colloid ?
Transfusion ?
Lab findings
Crystalloids
Colloids
Blood transfusions
Fluid option
Blood and components
Crystalloid
Colloid
Hypertonic solution
Isotonic
crystalloids
Advantages
Cheap
Composition of IV
Crystalloid
Plasma
0.9%NS
Na
Cl
K
141 103 4-5
154 154 ----
Ca
5
----
LR
131 111 2
Buffer
Bicarb
---Lactat
e
pH
7.4
5.7
6.4
LR vs NS
Patients undergoing aortic aneurysm repair
NS
More volume (~1000-6000ml)
Hyperchloremic acidosis
Dilutional coagulopathy
LR vs NS
Conclusion
No mortality difference
LR
NS
Hyperchloremia acidosis
Dilutional coagulopathy
Colloids
Proposed Benefits
Smaller volume
Less pulmonary edema
Stays in the intravascular space
return to normal
Quicker
hemodynamics
Smaller package
and antinflammatory
Antioxidant
effects
Colloids
Disadvantages
Transmission of diseases
Increased bleeding
Hypersensitivity reactions
Renal failure
Accumulation
Taken up by RES
Dose limit (20-33mL/kg)
Cost
Hypertonic Saline
Rapid plasma volume expansion
of fluid to vascular space secondary to
Pull
increased concentration gradient
Decreases ICP
Military use
Weighs less
Hypertonic Saline
Adverse effects
Hyperosmolar coma
Hypernatremia
Seizures
arrhythmias
Tissue necrosis
Allergic reactions
Hypertonic Saline
Hypertonic saline
7.5% or 7.2%
Dextran 70 (RescueFlow) or HES (HyperHAES)
Osmolarity 2500 mOsm/liter
Na+: 1200 mmol/liter
Total volume 250ml
Natural Colloids :
Albumin
SAFE trial 2004 (N Engl J Med
2004)
Bio-physiology of Colloids
Crystalloid vs
colloid distribution
Fluids
Plasma
Alb5%
1000
Interstitial
Intracellular
Expafusin 6% 1000
Poligeline
700
300
Dextran 40
1600
-260
-340
Dextran 70
1300
-130
-170
NaCl 0.9%
200
800
NaCl 1.8%
320
1280
-600
NaCl 0.45%
141
567
292
RL
200
800
D5%
83
333
583
Transfusion trigger
Red blood
cells
Crystalloid +
colloid
Progressive laboratory assessment of hemoglobin level and
hemostasis
50%
Onset of
hemorrhage
100%
150%
200%
R. Phillip Dellinger, Mitchell M. Levy, Andrew Rhodes, Djillali Annane, Herwig Gerlach, Steven M. Opal,
Jonathan E. Sevransky, Charles L. Sprung, Ivor S. Douglas, Roman Jaeschke, Tiffany M. Osborn, Mark E.
Nunnally, Sean R. Townsend, Konrad Reinhart, Ruth M. Kleinpell, Derek C. Angus, Clifford S. Deutschman,
Flavia R. Machado, Gordon D. Rubenfeld, Steven A. Webb, Richard J. Beale, Jean-Louis Vincent, Rui
Moreno, and the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including the Pediatric Subgroup*
Critical Care Medicine 2013; 41(2):580-637
Microcirculation
target
ASSESMENT for
LOADING RL 2000
CC:
1. takikardia
2. MAP low
89/45 (60)
130
99
89/45
(60)
14
Laboratorium
100
ASSESMENT AFTER
500 CC colloid:
1. HR hampir normal
2. MAP = 65
3. CVP naik 8
99
110/55 (65)
(8)
14
110/57 (65)
NEXT STEP
37.4
CVP measurements are frequently used for the assessment of cardiac preload and volume status / Criticized
because CVP poorly predicts cardiac preload and volume status
CVP
< 0 mmHg
Low CVP
Low CVP
High CVP
High CVP
Volume
Normal
Hypovolemia
Hypervolemic
Hypervolemic
Normal
Normal
Normal
Very dynamic
heart
Normal
Decreased
Return Function
Cardiac
function
Assessment of Fluid
Responsiveness by ICV diameter
with ultrasound
IVC diameter index variation is an intermittent
measurement and help assessment of volume
by central venous pressure
In spontaneous breathing patient = IVC
colapsibility index
In controlled ventilation patient = IVC
distensibility index
IVC colapsibility index > 50% = fluid responsive, hypovolumefluid loading
IVC colapsibility index < 50% = fluid unresponsive,
IVC
distensibilityoverload
index > 18-20% = fluid unresponsive,
normovolumenormovolume-overload
IVC distensibility index < 18-20% = fluid responsive,
hipovolume- fluid loading
Complications of fluid
resuscitation
Allergic and transfusion reactions
(colloids and blood products)
Hemostasis coagulopathy
(hemodilution)
Conclusion
morbidity
Miller T, Gan TJ. Goal-directed fluid therapy. Clinical Fluid Therapy in the Perioperative Setting,2011
Thank You