8572570
8572570
8572570
TEAM B
Mohammed Alshawaf , Lanray Hammed Bakare,
Francsico J. Barroso Viseras, Aristeidis
Karamessinis,
Ha Nguyen and Shi Su
Introduction
Cultural information
Cultural information
Location Dorset, Wessex Basin (5069,-198)
44 km2, onshore and offshore
Environment outstanding beauty, tourism,
wild life
Geological overview
Geological overview
Reservoir Sherwood Sandstone
Sandstone.
Seal Mercia Mudstone
Source Lias Formation
Play type Tilted fault blocks
Field appraisal
Depth 1585 m
SourceUnderhill & Stoneley, 1988
Pressure 2400 psig P90 P50 P10
Producers
Oil column thickness 1X-02,39 m Wytch Farm Field
STOIIP
Seal
580
Reservoir 795 1040
1D-02
Areal extend 40 km2 (MMbbl)
API gravity 38.1 @ 15C Reserves
Appraisal wells
GOR
3 320 scf/stb (MMbbl)
215 290 385
2
Google Earth, 2011
Aims and Objectives
uncertainties
Develop
Develop
model
model
Limitations of material balance
Aquifer and solution gas Solution gas and compaction drive
Investigate
2,500,000
options
1200
1000 2,000,000
f(x) = 0x + 644.55 f(x) = 276813886.4x + 340856.78
800
1,500,000
F/Eo600 N=645
Propose
[10^6 stb] F [rb]
plan
1,000,000
400 MMBbl N=300
500,000
MMBbl
200
0 0
0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 0.01 0.01
uncertainties
P/Eo [psi.stb/rb]
Assess
Eo + Ef [rb/stB]
Justify data
acquisition
No assumptionWytch
can be validated
Farm - Development phase -
4
Team B
Recovery mechanism
Develop
Develop
model
model
Primary recovery
Low primary recovery: 4.6%
Investigate
options
=> secondary recovery methods
Secondary recovery
Propose
Water injection preferred
plan
Gas injection not advised: under-saturated oil
and low GOR
uncertainties
Assess
Possibility of using artificial lift
Justify data
acquisition
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
5
Team B
Building the simulation model
Develop
Develop
model
model
Main assumptions
Input Fine model (2.5M cells)
Upscaled properties , facies, Kh and Kv
Investigate
options
Fluid model Dead oil, relative permeabilities
Capillary pressure neglected for simplification purposes
Output coarse model (82,000 cells, 8 faults)
Propose
plan
uncertainties
Assess
Justify data
acquisition
Fine hor. permeability model - Sector
Coarse hor. permeability model - Sector
6
Coarse horizontalpermeability
Fine horizontal permeabilitymodel
modelwithin
withinFlooding
Floodingevent
event1 1
Upscaled model consistency
Develop
Develop
model
model
Geology
Volumetrics
Investigate
Static kh, kv
options
properties
Upscaled properties
Facies
Propose
plan
Cumulative production
Bottom-hole pressure
uncertainties
Oil saturations
Assess
Dynamic
Sweep efficiency
properties
Water cut
Coning water
Justify data
acquisition
Numerical diffusion
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
7
Team B
Coarse model consistency
(history match)
Develop
Develop
model
model
Oil rates: good match
Water rates: calibrate the model
Investigate
options
Propose
plan
uncertainties
Assess
Justify data
acquisition
Limits: well history, no flow control
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
8
Team B
Development strategy
Develop
model
Parameter Constraint Solution
25
Recovery factor
Investigate
Investigate
Number of wells producers /
options
options
vs economics
Drilling 10 injectors
strategy Schedule Rates and rigs 2 wells/m
Geology and oil
Propose
Propose
Well location Uniform
plan
plan
distribution
Maximise
3-year
Plateau recovery & 5%
plateau
uncertainties
Production recovery
Assess
strategy Pressure
Water injection After 15 m
maintenance
Production time Lease 25 years
Justify data
acquisition
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
9
Team B
Development strategy results
Develop
model
3-year plateau
Injection starts
Investigate
options
after 15 months
345 MMBbl
STOIIP 795
Propose
Propose
recoverable
plan
plan
MMBbl
Recovered 345
43% recovery MMBbl
factor based
Recover on
uncertainties
Assess
STOIIP Recov
P50
(MMBb
ed
ery
(MMBbl
l) factor
)
P9
Justify data
acquisition
580 239 41%
0
10
P5
795 345 43%
Sweep efficiency analysis
Develop
model
Injection after 15 months
89% sweep efficiency achievable over 25
years
Investigate
options
Propose
Propose
plan
plan
uncertainties
Assess
Water breakthrough
Start of water injection
Justify data
acquisition
11
Uncertainty analysis
Develop
model
Approach combines both Tornado Chart
static and dynamic Deviation basecase cumulative production (%)
-35% -25% -15% -5% 5% 15% 25% 35%
parameters
Investigate
GRV
options
Parameters considered Oil relative permeability
Horizontal permeability
Propose
GRV
plan
properties
Connate water saturation
Porosity Vertical permeability
Sw Porosity
uncertainties
uncertainties
Dynamic
kH , k V
Assess
Assess
Water saturation
properties
Corey parameters Water relative permeability
Justify data
acquisition
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
12
Team B
Reducing uncertainties
-35% Deviation
-15% from base
5% case (%)
25%
Develop
model
-25% -5% 15% 35%
GRV
Reprocess seismic Oil relative permeability
data
Investigate
Horizontal permeability
options
Coring of the first few Oil residual saturation
Vertical permeability
Logging
Propose
plan
Fluid analysis
uncertainties
Assessdata
acquisition
Justify data
acquisition
Justify
Conclusions
High recovery
Number of 25 producers / 10
wells injectors
factor Drilling
2 wells/m
schedule
High sweep Well location Uniform
Plateau 3-year plateau
efficiency Water injection After 15 m
Production
25 years
Only water time Recovered Recovery
(MMBbl) factor
Any questions ?
Develop
Develop
model
model
Fine grid Coarse grid
Investigate
options
Propose
plan
uncertainties
Assess
Justify data
acquisition
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
16
Team B
2.8%
Volumetrics QC
Team B
1.4%
17
Team B
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
Upscaled properties: kh
Coarse grid
18
Develop
Develop
model
model
Porosity distribution: Fine vs Coarse grid
Investigate
options
Propose
plan
%
uncertainties
Assess
Justify data
acquisition
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
19
Team B
Team B
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
Cumulative production
20
- Coarse grid
- Fine grid
Develop
Develop
model
model
Investigate
- Coarse grid
options
- Fine grid
Propose
plan
uncertainties
Assess
Injectors Producer
Justify data
acquisition
s
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
21
Team B
Fine grid
Oil saturations
Team B
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
Coarse grid
22
Develop
Develop
model
model
0.4
0.35
Investigate
options
0.3
0.25
Propose
plan
NpD (pore volume produced)
0.2
Coarse Fine One to One line
0.15
uncertainties
Assess
0.1
0.05
Justify data
acquisition
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
tD (pore volume injected)
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
23
Team B
Water cut
Team B
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
- Fine grid
24
Team B
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
Coarse grid
25
Team B
Numerical diffusion
26
27
28
Develop
Well positioning based on the geology and the properties (k h)
model
Investigate
Investigate
options
options
Propose
plan
uncertainties
Assess
Justify data
acquisition
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
29
Team B
Water injection strategy
Develop
Water injection after 15 months in order to ensure pressure
model
maintenance
Investigate
Investigate
options
options
Propose
Propose
plan
plan
uncertainties
Assess
Justify data
acquisition
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
30
Team B
Buckley-Leverett analysis
Fractional Flow Curve
Develop
model
Relative Permeability Graph 1.2
0.8 1
0.7 kr
0.6 0.8
w
0.5
fw 0.6
Investigate
fw
Kr 0.4
options
0.4
0.3
0.2 0.2
0.1
0
0 Sw 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 Sw
0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8
0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8
Propose
plan
NPD Against tD Sw against VD
1 0.8
One to One 0.75
uncertainties
uncertainties
Line 0.7
0.8
Assess
Assess
1-Swc-Sor 0.65
Buckley- 0.6
0.6 Leverett
NPD 0.55
Sw
Simulation 0.5
0.4 0.45
0.4
0.2 0.35
Justify data
acquisition
0.3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8tD 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 VD
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
31
Team B
Relative permeability analysis
Relative permeability
Develop
model
1
0.9
Investigate
0.8
options
0.7
Propose
plan
Krw - Corey water:5
0.5
Kr Kro - Corey oil/water:2
Kro - Corey oil/water: 2.5
0.4
Kro - Corey oil/water:5.5
uncertainties
uncertainties
0.3
Assess
Assess
0.2
0.1
Justify data
acquisition
0
0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Wytch Farm Sw
- Development phase -
32
Team B