8572570

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 32

Photo courtesy of Howard Johnson

Wytch Farm Field


Development Project
Friday 2nd of March 2012

TEAM B
Mohammed Alshawaf , Lanray Hammed Bakare,
Francsico J. Barroso Viseras, Aristeidis
Karamessinis,
Ha Nguyen and Shi Su
Introduction
Cultural information
Cultural information
Location Dorset, Wessex Basin (5069,-198)
44 km2, onshore and offshore
Environment outstanding beauty, tourism,
wild life
Geological overview
Geological overview
Reservoir Sherwood Sandstone
Sandstone.
Seal Mercia Mudstone
Source Lias Formation
Play type Tilted fault blocks

Field appraisal

Depth 1585 m
SourceUnderhill & Stoneley, 1988
Pressure 2400 psig P90 P50 P10
Producers
Oil column thickness 1X-02,39 m Wytch Farm Field
STOIIP
Seal
580
Reservoir 795 1040
1D-02
Areal extend 40 km2 (MMbbl)
API gravity 38.1 @ 15C Reserves
Appraisal wells
GOR
3 320 scf/stb (MMbbl)
215 290 385

3D seismic survey 11.8km

2
Google Earth, 2011
Aims and Objectives

Develop the geological model

Investigate viable development options

Assess associated static and dynamic

uncertainties

Propose a development and production plan

Justify additional data acquisition requirements


Wytch Farm - Development phase -
3
Team B
Drive mechanism
determination

Develop
Develop
model
model
Limitations of material balance
Aquifer and solution gas Solution gas and compaction drive

Investigate
2,500,000

options
1200

1000 2,000,000
f(x) = 0x + 644.55 f(x) = 276813886.4x + 340856.78
800
1,500,000

F/Eo600 N=645

Propose
[10^6 stb] F [rb]

plan
1,000,000
400 MMBbl N=300
500,000
MMBbl
200

0 0
0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 0.01 0.01

uncertainties
P/Eo [psi.stb/rb]

Assess
Eo + Ef [rb/stB]

Oil expansion and aquifer drive are the most


plausible

Justify data
acquisition
No assumptionWytch
can be validated
Farm - Development phase -
4
Team B
Recovery mechanism

Develop
Develop
model
model
Primary recovery
Low primary recovery: 4.6%

Investigate
options
=> secondary recovery methods
Secondary recovery

Propose
Water injection preferred

plan
Gas injection not advised: under-saturated oil
and low GOR

uncertainties
Assess
Possibility of using artificial lift

Justify data
acquisition
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
5
Team B
Building the simulation model

Develop
Develop
model
model
Main assumptions
Input Fine model (2.5M cells)
Upscaled properties , facies, Kh and Kv

Investigate
options
Fluid model Dead oil, relative permeabilities
Capillary pressure neglected for simplification purposes
Output coarse model (82,000 cells, 8 faults)

Propose
plan
uncertainties
Assess
Justify data
acquisition
Fine hor. permeability model - Sector
Coarse hor. permeability model - Sector
6
Coarse horizontalpermeability
Fine horizontal permeabilitymodel
modelwithin
withinFlooding
Floodingevent
event1 1
Upscaled model consistency

Develop
Develop
model
model
Geology
Volumetrics

Investigate
Static kh, kv

options
properties
Upscaled properties
Facies

Propose
plan
Cumulative production
Bottom-hole pressure

uncertainties
Oil saturations

Assess
Dynamic
Sweep efficiency
properties
Water cut
Coning water

Justify data
acquisition
Numerical diffusion
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
7
Team B
Coarse model consistency
(history match)

Develop
Develop
model
model
Oil rates: good match
Water rates: calibrate the model

Investigate
options
Propose
plan
uncertainties
Assess
Justify data
acquisition
Limits: well history, no flow control
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
8
Team B
Development strategy

Develop
model
Parameter Constraint Solution
25
Recovery factor

Investigate
Investigate
Number of wells producers /

options
options
vs economics
Drilling 10 injectors
strategy Schedule Rates and rigs 2 wells/m
Geology and oil

Propose
Propose
Well location Uniform

plan
plan
distribution
Maximise
3-year
Plateau recovery & 5%
plateau

uncertainties
Production recovery

Assess
strategy Pressure
Water injection After 15 m
maintenance
Production time Lease 25 years

Justify data
acquisition
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
9
Team B
Development strategy results

Develop
model
3-year plateau
Injection starts

Investigate
options
after 15 months
345 MMBbl
STOIIP 795

Propose
Propose
recoverable

plan
plan
MMBbl
Recovered 345
43% recovery MMBbl
factor based
Recover on

uncertainties
Assess
STOIIP Recov
P50
(MMBb
ed
ery
(MMBbl
l) factor
)
P9

Justify data
acquisition
580 239 41%
0
10
P5
795 345 43%
Sweep efficiency analysis

Develop
model
Injection after 15 months
89% sweep efficiency achievable over 25
years

Investigate
options
Propose
Propose
plan
plan
uncertainties
Assess
Water breakthrough
Start of water injection

Justify data
acquisition
11
Uncertainty analysis

Develop
model
Approach combines both Tornado Chart
static and dynamic Deviation basecase cumulative production (%)
-35% -25% -15% -5% 5% 15% 25% 35%

parameters

Investigate
GRV

options
Parameters considered Oil relative permeability

Horizontal permeability

Static Oil residual saturation

Propose
GRV

plan
properties
Connate water saturation
Porosity Vertical permeability
Sw Porosity

uncertainties
uncertainties
Dynamic
kH , k V

Assess
Assess
Water saturation
properties
Corey parameters Water relative permeability

Sor, Swc, Swcr


Faults transmissivity

Critical water saturation


Transmissibilities

Justify data
acquisition
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
12
Team B
Reducing uncertainties
-35% Deviation
-15% from base
5% case (%)
25%

Data acquisition plan

Develop
model
-25% -5% 15% 35%

GRV
Reprocess seismic Oil relative permeability

data

Investigate
Horizontal permeability

options
Coring of the first few Oil residual saturation

wells SCAL Connate water saturation

Vertical permeability
Logging

Propose
plan
Fluid analysis

uncertainties
Assessdata
acquisition
Justify data
acquisition
Justify
Conclusions

High recovery
Number of 25 producers / 10
wells injectors
factor Drilling
2 wells/m
schedule
High sweep Well location Uniform
Plateau 3-year plateau
efficiency Water injection After 15 m
Production
25 years
Only water time Recovered Recovery
(MMBbl) factor

injection used P90 239 41%


P50 345 43%
Good understanding P10 452 43%
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
14
Team B
Thank you

Any questions ?

Wytch Farm - Development phase -


15
Team B
Geology and upscaled
properties: facies

Develop
Develop
model
model
Fine grid Coarse grid

Investigate
options
Propose
plan
uncertainties
Assess
Justify data
acquisition
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
16
Team B
2.8%
Volumetrics QC

Team B
1.4%

Wytch Farm - Development phase -


0.8%

17

Justify data Assess Propose Investigate Develop


Develop
acquisition uncertainties plan options model
model
Fine grid

Team B
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
Upscaled properties: kh
Coarse grid

18

Justify data Assess Propose Investigate Develop


Develop
acquisition uncertainties plan options model
model
Upscaled properties:

Develop
Develop
model
model
Porosity distribution: Fine vs Coarse grid

Investigate
options
Propose
plan
%

uncertainties
Assess
Justify data
acquisition
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
19
Team B
Team B
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
Cumulative production

20
- Coarse grid
- Fine grid

Justify data Assess Propose Investigate Develop


Develop
acquisition uncertainties plan options model
model
Bottom-hole pressure

Develop
Develop
model
model
Investigate
- Coarse grid

options
- Fine grid

Propose
plan
uncertainties
Assess
Injectors Producer

Justify data
acquisition
s
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
21
Team B
Fine grid
Oil saturations

Team B
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
Coarse grid

22

Justify data Assess Propose Investigate Develop


Develop
acquisition uncertainties plan options model
model
Sweep efficiency
0.45

Develop
Develop
model
model
0.4

0.35

Investigate
options
0.3

0.25

Propose
plan
NpD (pore volume produced)
0.2
Coarse Fine One to One line

0.15

uncertainties
Assess
0.1

0.05

Justify data
acquisition
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
tD (pore volume injected)
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
23
Team B
Water cut

Team B
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
- Fine grid

24

Justify data Assess Propose Investigate Develop


Develop
- Coarse grid

acquisition uncertainties plan options model


model
Fine grid
Coning water

Team B
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
Coarse grid

25

Justify data Assess Propose Investigate Develop


Develop
acquisition uncertainties plan options model
model
Fine grid

Team B
Numerical diffusion

Wytch Farm - Development phase -


Coarse grid

26

Justify data Assess Propose Investigate Develop


Develop
acquisition uncertainties plan options model
model
Team B
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
History match per well

27

Justify data Assess Propose Investigate Develop


Develop
acquisition uncertainties plan options model
model
Drilling schedule
Priority based on rate and rig location (two rigs: E, W)

28

Justify data Assess Propose Investigate


Investigate Develop
acquisition uncertainties plan options
options model
Well location

Develop
Well positioning based on the geology and the properties (k h)

model
Investigate
Investigate
options
options
Propose
plan
uncertainties
Assess
Justify data
acquisition
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
29
Team B
Water injection strategy

Develop
Water injection after 15 months in order to ensure pressure

model
maintenance

Investigate
Investigate
options
options
Propose
Propose
plan
plan
uncertainties
Assess
Justify data
acquisition
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
30
Team B
Buckley-Leverett analysis
Fractional Flow Curve

Develop
model
Relative Permeability Graph 1.2
0.8 1
0.7 kr
0.6 0.8
w
0.5
fw 0.6

Investigate
fw
Kr 0.4

options
0.4
0.3
0.2 0.2
0.1
0
0 Sw 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 Sw
0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8
0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8

Propose
plan
NPD Against tD Sw against VD
1 0.8
One to One 0.75

uncertainties
uncertainties
Line 0.7
0.8

Assess
Assess
1-Swc-Sor 0.65
Buckley- 0.6
0.6 Leverett
NPD 0.55
Sw
Simulation 0.5
0.4 0.45
0.4
0.2 0.35

Justify data
acquisition
0.3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8tD 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 VD
Wytch Farm - Development phase -
31
Team B
Relative permeability analysis

Relative permeability

Develop
model
1

0.9

Investigate
0.8

options
0.7

0.6 Krw - Corey water:1.5


Krw - Corey water: 1.8

Propose
plan
Krw - Corey water:5
0.5
Kr Kro - Corey oil/water:2
Kro - Corey oil/water: 2.5
0.4
Kro - Corey oil/water:5.5

uncertainties
uncertainties
0.3

Assess
Assess
0.2

0.1

Justify data
acquisition
0
0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Wytch Farm Sw
- Development phase -
32
Team B

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy