Lesson 1-2 CH4101 Intro, Inherent Safety
Lesson 1-2 CH4101 Intro, Inherent Safety
Lesson 1-2 CH4101 Intro, Inherent Safety
Plant Safety
Lecture-1&2 : Course Introduction,
Lessons from Disasters & Inherent
Safer Design
Introduction
Course lecturer :
- Balajee Raman
Email: RBalajee@ntu.edu.sg
2
Need for Safety course
•Technological advances more complex chemical
processes
•High pressures
•High and low temperatures
•High Velocities
•More reactive chemicals
•Exotic chemistry
•Need more complex safety technology.
•Chemical engineers need to have a more
fundamental understanding of safety and to be
constantly updated on new safety issues.
3
LECTURE PLAN- AY 2018-19 Sem 1
Date Lecture Topics
Week 1 17/8 1 Introduction
2 Disasters and Inherent Safety Principles
Week 2 24/8 3
Toxicology
4
Week 3 31/8 5
----
6
Week 4 7/9 7 Industrial hygiene
8
Week 5 14/9 9 Hazards Identification , Hazop Introduction and Techniques
10
Week 6 21/9 11 Hazop Exercise
12
Week 7 28/9 Source models
•Textbook :
- Available in library (Reserved and Open section)
- Covers most topics in this course.
6
Lecture 1&2 - contents
• Definitions /Acronyms - Safety
• What is Process Safety
• Engineering Ethics, Nature of Accident
Process
• Risk and its Measures.
• PSM Regulatory- OSHA / SS 506
• Sharing lessons from Disasters
• Inherent Safety Design Principles
Some Definitions
Term Definition
Hazard A chemical or physical condition that has the potential for causing damage to
people, property or the environment.
Incident The loss of containment of material or energy, not all events propagate into
incidents; not all incidents propagate into accidents.
Accident The occurrence of a sequence of events that produce unintended injury, death, or
property damage. “Accident” refers to the event, not the result of the event.
Scenario A description of the events that result in an accident or incident. The description
should contain information relevant to defining the root causes.
Likelihood A measure of the expected probability or frequency of occurrence of an event. This
may be expressed as a frequency.
Consequence A measure of the expected effects of the results of an incident.
Risk A measure of human injury, environmental damage, or economic loss in terms of
both the incident likelihood and the magnitude of the loss of injury.
Risk analysis The development of a quantitative estimate of risk based on an engineering
evaluation and mathematical techniques for combining estimates of incident
consequences and frequencies.
Risk assessment The process by which the results of a risk analysis are used to make decisions,
either through a relative ranking of risk reduction strategies or through
comparison with risk targets.
8
What is Process Safety?
11
What is Loss of Containment?
• Loss of containment (LOC) can result from:
– Overpressure
– Internal explosion
– Overheat
– Corrosion
– Brittle fracture
– Mechanical stress
– Inherent in material / system
– Inadequate protective systems to prevent LOC
– Others
12
Why is Process Safety Critical
13
Engineering Ethics
• Engineers are employed and paid by companies.
• Responsibilities of engineers:
• Providing a safe and secure environment for
the business and the people.
• Provide service to organizations to improve
profitability.
• Responsible to themselves, fellow workers,
family, community, and the engineering
profession.
14
Engineering Ethics
Fundamental principles of the American Institute of
Chemical Engineers (AIChE) Code of Professional
ethics:
Engineers shall uphold and advance the integrity,
honor, and dignity of the engineering profession by
1) Using their knowledge and skill for the
enhancement of human welfare.
2) Being honest and impartial and serving with fidelity
the public, their employers and clients.
3) Striving to increase the competence and prestige of
the engineering profession.
15
Engineering Ethics
Fundamental canons of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE)
Code of Professional Ethics:
1) Engineers shall hold paramount the safety, health and welfare of the
public in the performance of their professional duties.
2) Engineers shall perform services only in areas of their competence.
3) Engineers shall issue public statements only in an objective and truthful
manner.
4) Engineers shall act in professional matters for each employer or client as
faithful agents or trustees, and shall avoid conflicts of interest.
5) Engineers shall build their professional reputations on the merits of their
services.
6) Engineers shall continue their professional development throughout their
careers and shall provide opportunities for the professional development
of those engineers under their supervision.
16
Accident and Loss Statistics
Accident and loss statistics
• Important measures of the effectiveness of safety
programs.
• Valuable for determining whether a process is safe
or whether a safety procedure is working effectively.
• Must be used and interpreted carefully.
• Statistics are only averages and do not reflect the
potential for single episodes involving substantial
losses.
• No single method is capable of measuring all
required aspects.
17
Accident and Loss Statistics
Accident and loss statistics
• Statistics are indications only of past performance.
• Statistics do not indicate future performance.
• Incident rates are standardized (normalized) so that
meaningful comparisons between companies or
industries can be made.
• Rates are usually normalized by total number of
employees or total number of working hours.
18
Accident and Loss Statistics
Two Common Statistical Methods (Occupational and Process Safety)
22
Accident and loss statistics
Legislation covering workplace safety and health
24
Nature of the Accident Process
Accidents usually following a 3-step sequence
1) Initiation
• The event that starts the accident.
2) Propagation
• The event(s) that maintain or expand the
accident.
3) Termination
• The event(s) that stop the accident or diminish
it in size.
25
Nature of the Accident Process
An example of an accident:
1) Initiation
• A worker tripped.
2) Propagation
• Shearing of valve; ejection of liquid; resulting
explosion and growing fire.
3) Termination
• Consumption of all flammable materials.
26
Nature of the Accident Process
Videos
1) Storage Tank fire and explosion (Lamesa, Texas, USA
2009)
• Ignition: lightning?
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DECyAxDk88
U&hl=en-GB&gl=SG
• Video taken about 200 yards (~180 m) away.
27
Process Safety Management
• Process Safety Management is the risk management program
used to identify and control process safety hazards that could
have catastrophic consequences.
28
The Bhopal Incident
3 December 1984
Worst-ever industrial disaster
About 40 MT of methyl
isocyanate (MIC) released.
Nearly 10,000 fatalities, over
50,000 totally or partially
disabled, and 100,000 serious
injuries
Severe financial implication and
penalties for Union Carbide
29
The Bhopal Incident - background
Plant originally built in 1969 to make SEVIN
MIC used to make the insecticide SEVIN
Manufacturing of MIC started in 1979
Plant design based on the US plant
Union Carbide did not transfer all safety systems due to project cost
overruns
Initial leadership American with strong safety background
No LTI for 500,000 hrs
The Bhopal Plant - The Union Carbide Plant, Bhopal, India, site of a December,
1984 chemical gas leak which killed and injured thousands. 30
The Bhopal Incident - leading
events
By 1982, all work force localized, new plant manager had
accounting background
Low demand for SEVIN resulted from a severe drought in
India
To enhance profit, a cost-cutting drive was initiated by Union
Carbide Corporation,
HIGH-PURITY SCRUBBER
NITROGEN
REFRIGERATION
Opened to release
UNIT
high pressure
32
The Bhopal Incident -
leading events
On the night of the disaster, 2 December 1984,
several safety measures designed to prevent a leak
were either malfunctioning, shut down or otherwise
inadequate.
The refrigeration unit was turned off in order to
save $40 a day, which raised the MIC storage
temperature to 25 C instead of 0 C
The scrubber system was down since the plant
was not running, and the scrubber was grossly
under designed.
The flare system was under repair, and no spare
flare available
At 11:30 PM workers detected a MIC release, at
approximately 12:45 am workers observed a
rapid pressure increase in one of the MIC storage
tanks, which opened the safety relief valve.
The venting MIC passed out of the facility and
into the atmosphere.
33
FLIXBOROUGH INCIDENT
34
The Incident
• A 20 inch diameter temporary by-pass pipe Jack-
knifed and failed under thermal expansion stress.
35
Flixborough Flow sheet
Thermal Expansion Jack-
Knife
36
The Consequences
37
Events Leading To The Incident.
• Two months before the incident, R-5 was found to be
leaking.
• A 6 ft. long crack had developed.
• A water hose stream was directed to the crack to cool
and quench the small cyclohexane leak.
• The cooling water contained nitrates which encourage
stress corrosion of certain carbon steels.
• Thus, by trying to relieve the situation, the quenching
was actually acting as a promoter of corrosion.
• Ultimately, the reactor had to be removed from
service. 38
Events Cont’d
• As there was no experienced mechanical engineer on site, those
remaining decided to “fast track” or “scratch pad” a solution for
the intended by-pass.
• They sketched a full-scale by-pass line in chalk on the
maintenance floor.
• No stress analyses calculations were performed on the by-pass
connection.
• The by-pass line was quickly installed and the plant put into
start-up mode.
• Shortly after start-up, the by-pass line failed causing 40 tons of
cyclohexane to leak into the confined spaces of the reactor
support structure.
• Within two minutes, the vapor cloud exploded.
39
Lessons Learned
40
Inherent Safer Design
Various measures for prevention and mitigation
of major accidents may be thought of as “layers
of protection”.
• These layers serve to
1) Prevent an initiating event (such as loss of
cooling or overcharging of a material to a
reactor) from developing into an incident
(typically a release of a dangerous
substance)
2) Mitigate the consequences of an incident
41 once it occurs.
Inherent Safer Design
• In general, the safety of a process relies on
multiple layers of protection.
1) The first layer of protection is the process
design features.
2) Subsequent layers include control systems,
interlocks, safety shutdown systems, protective
systems, alarms and emergency response plan.
• Inherent safer design is especially directed toward
process design features.
• The best approach to prevent accidents is to add
process design features so as to prevent hazardous
situations.
42
Achieving Inherent Safer Design
Inherent Safer Design
Advantages of an inherently safer plant
• Relies on chemistry and physics to prevent
accidents rather than on control systems,
interlocks, SOP etc.
• More tolerant of operator errors and abnormal
conditions.
• Simpler, easier to operate, and more reliable.
• Often the most cost effective- Smaller
equipment operating at lower temperatures and
pressures have lower capital and operating
costs.
44
Inherent Safer Design
• The potential for major improvements in
safety is the greatest at the earliest stages of
process design, when process engineers
have the maximum degree of freedom in the
plant and process specifications.
45
Inherent Safer Design
Video
1) Inherent Safer Design 1
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqPMHWnJiXk
• All (9 min)
46
Inherent Safer Design- examples
Use a hazardous material under less hazardous
conditions.
Refrigeration to lower vapor pressure
Store chlorine, ammonia, ethylene under
refrigeration at lower pressure instead of room
temperature at higher pressure.
Operate under lower temperature and pressure (e.g.
use a catalyst).
Use larger particle size solids (or paste or liquid) to
minimize dust.
Dilution to lower vapor pressure.
47