Strategic HR Vs Traditional HR: Role of HR Is Evolving in Recent Years
Strategic HR Vs Traditional HR: Role of HR Is Evolving in Recent Years
Strategic HR Vs Traditional HR: Role of HR Is Evolving in Recent Years
Systems People
Operational focus
Strategic HR Vs Traditional HR
HR should deliver results that enrich the organization’s value to
its customers, its investors, and its employees.
This can be accomplished in four ways
1. HR becoming a partner with senior and line managers in
strategy execution
2. HR becoming an expert in the way that work is organized and
executed
3. HR becoming a champion for employees, working to increase
employee contribution and commitment to the organization
4. HR becoming an agent of continuous transformation that
shapes processes and culture to improve an organization’s
capacity for change.
Strategic HR Vs Traditional HR
• Strategic Partner Role:
• The first role involves becoming a partner in
strategic execution.
• HR is responsible for Organizational structure
• HR will conduct an audit to help managers
identify those components that need to be
changed to facilitate strategy execution
• These activities require HR executives to acquire
new skills and capabilities to allow HR to add
value for the executive team with confidence.
Strategic HR Vs Traditional HR
• Administrative Expert Role
• Rule-making policies while ensuring that the
required routine work still gets done
effectively and efficiently.
• This require improving or “rethinking” a
number of traditional HR functions, such as
benefits and selection, which now can be
automated using technology, and therefore be
more cost efficient.
Strategic HR Vs Traditional HR
• Employee Champion
• HR are accountable for ensuring that employees
are fully engaged in and committed to the
organization.
• Enhance employee morale and training line
managers to recognize and avoid the causes of
low morale, such as unclear goals, unfocused
priorities, and ambiguous performance
management.
• Represent your employees to SM, on specific
decision related to them directly
Strategic HR Vs Traditional HR
• As a Change Agent
• HR has to be able to build the organization’s
capacity to embrace and capitalize on new
situations, ensuring that change initiatives are
defined, developed, and delivered in a timely
manner.
• HR roles in Knowledge based economy
– Human capital steward
– Knowledge facilitator
– Relationship builder
– Rapid deployment specialist
Strategic HR Vs Traditional HR
Human capital steward
• It involves the creation of an environment and culture in
which employees voluntarily want to contribute their
skills, ideas, and energy
• A competitive advantage can be taken only when the
best employees are recruited, duly motivated, and
retained.
Knowledge facilitator Role
• it involves the procurement of the necessary employee
knowledge and skills sets that allow information to be
acquired, developed, and disseminated, providing a
competitive advantage.
• Employees teach and learn from each other and
knowledge sharing is valued and rewarded.
Strategic HR Vs Traditional HR
Relationship Builder
• It involves the development of structure, work
practices, and organizational culture that allow
individuals to work together, across departments and
functions
• To ensure competitiveness, networks need to be
developed that focus on the strategic objectives of
the organization and how synergies and team work
that lead to outstanding performance are valued and
rewarded.
Strategic HR Vs Traditional HR
Rapid deployment specialist:
Low High
Strategic
Value
Strategic HR Vs Traditional HR
• Lepak and snell’s employment models
• Characteristics of human capital using two
dimensions. Strategic Value and uniqueness
• Strategic Value:
• The extent of its potential to improve efficiency,
effectiveness, exploit market opportunities, or
neutralize potential threats
• Uniqueness
– the degree to which it is specialized and not
widely available
Strategic HR Vs Traditional HR
• Quadrant 1:
– Illustrate knowledge based employment, human capital
that is unique and has high strategic value to the
organization. Heavy investment in t&d, employee
autonomy and participation, employee security, and
compensation system
• Quadrant 2:
– Illustrate job-based employment, human capital that has
limited uniqueness but is of high strategic value to the
organization. Less investment will be made in employees
and the organization will seek to acquire individuals with
requisite skills rather provide training. Shorter time frame
will be established for performance and reward and jobs
will be more standardized.
Strategic HR Vs Traditional HR
• Quadrant 3:
– Illustrate contractual employment, human capital that is not unique
nor of strategic value to the organization. Compliance based, structure
and directions would be provided for employees and systems
established to ensure that employees comply with rules, and
procedures, little direction and training. Compensation would be
based on ensuring compliance with the set work structure
• Quadrant 4:
– Illustrate alliance/partnership employment, human capital that is
unique but out of limited strategic value to the organization.
Collaborative based human resource management, much of work
would be outsourced, organization would select alliance partner who
are committed to the relationship as well as the organization’s success
Strategic HR Vs Traditional HR
Traditional HR Strategic HR
Responsibility of HR Staff specialists Line manager