The document discusses the colonial regimes established by the United States in the Philippine islands in the early 20th century. It describes how the US divided the population into "civilized" and "uncivilized" groups and established different systems of local governance for each. This included setting up a Bureau of Non-Christian Tribes to conduct research and regulate indigenous peoples, as well as establishing "township governments" and "special provinces" that gave American officials direct control over many areas and populations. The document provides details on these policies and their implementation under officials like Dean Worcester.
The document discusses the colonial regimes established by the United States in the Philippine islands in the early 20th century. It describes how the US divided the population into "civilized" and "uncivilized" groups and established different systems of local governance for each. This included setting up a Bureau of Non-Christian Tribes to conduct research and regulate indigenous peoples, as well as establishing "township governments" and "special provinces" that gave American officials direct control over many areas and populations. The document provides details on these policies and their implementation under officials like Dean Worcester.
The document discusses the colonial regimes established by the United States in the Philippine islands in the early 20th century. It describes how the US divided the population into "civilized" and "uncivilized" groups and established different systems of local governance for each. This included setting up a Bureau of Non-Christian Tribes to conduct research and regulate indigenous peoples, as well as establishing "township governments" and "special provinces" that gave American officials direct control over many areas and populations. The document provides details on these policies and their implementation under officials like Dean Worcester.
The document discusses the colonial regimes established by the United States in the Philippine islands in the early 20th century. It describes how the US divided the population into "civilized" and "uncivilized" groups and established different systems of local governance for each. This included setting up a Bureau of Non-Christian Tribes to conduct research and regulate indigenous peoples, as well as establishing "township governments" and "special provinces" that gave American officials direct control over many areas and populations. The document provides details on these policies and their implementation under officials like Dean Worcester.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 18
Foundations of Public
and Private Law
CHAPTERS XIII & XIV COLONIAL LEGACIES IN A FRAGILE REPUBLIC, 2011 EDITION BY: OWEN J. LYNCH, SJD (YALE)
REPORTED BY: ATTY. BRUNESON I. ALABASTRO, CPA
UST MASTER OF LAWS (LL.M.) OFF -SITE PROGRAM DISENFRANCHISEMENT QUA PATERNALISM: NON-CHRISTIAN FIEFDOM OF THE UNITED STATES IN THE PHITIPPINE ISLANDS CHAPTER XIII REGIME OF COLONIAL GENTRIFICATION ØDivision of “civilized” and “Christian” groups vs. “wild” or “pagan” tribes, namely: 1. Pure Indian 2. Mestizo 3. Negrito According to Taft: "The word 'tribe' gives an erroneous impression. There is no tribal relation among the Filipinos. There is racial solidarity among them, undoubtably. They are homogenous . . . To me all Filipinos are alike." REGIME OF COLONIAL GENTRIFICATION WILLIAM HOWARD TAFT DEAN WORCESTER REGIME OF COLONIAL GENTRIFICATION DAVID PRESCOTT BARROWS FERDINAND BLUMENTRITT BUREAUCRATIC BEGINNINGS The first Philippine (Schurman) Commission had grappled with various theories for ruling the Philippine peoples. The commissioners found merit in the British policies of indirect rule on the Malay Peninsula. They recommended that policies in the Philippines be limited to "semi-civilized and barbarous people." The recommendation also called for entering into agreements with the leaders of these peoples as had already been done with the Sultan of Sulu. BUREAUCRATIC BEGINNINGS President William McKinley's famous instructions of April 7, 1900 where he ordered the commissioners "to adopt the same course followed by Congress in permitting the tribes of our North American Indians to maintain their tribal organization and government." Less frequently quoted but ultimately more significant, was the ensuing sentence: "Such tribal government should, however, be subjected to wise and firm regulation and without undue or petty interference, constant and active effort should be exercised to prevent barbarous practices and introduce civilized customs." BUREAUCRATIC BEGINNINGS Bureau of Non-Christian Tribes – created on 10/2/1901 [Act No. 253] under the Department of Interior – which was headed by Commissioner Worcester Primary task: conduct ethnographic research among un-hispanized peoples including Muslim Mindanao to determine the most practicable means for bringing about their advancement in civilization and naming of the tribes On 8/24/1903 – BNCT was reconstituted into the “Ethnological Survey of the Philippine Islands.” [to conduct systematic scientific researches in anthropology and ethnology among all inhabitants of the Phils.] Reestablished under the Philippine Autonomy Act [Jones Law] on 8/29/1916 1904 Louisiana Purchase Centennial Exposition
According to Taft, the Exposition “offered an
invaluable opportunity … to give the American people and American capitalists a clear idea” of conditions in the archipelago.”
To make the villages seem real, it was
decided to fill them with live people, so over 1,000 Filipinos were shipped to St. Louis, Missouri U.S. INDIAN PRECEDENTS David Barrows [BNCT’s first director] inquired into the effectiveness of the General Allotment Act of 1887 since at that time the US SC described the tribes as “domestic dependent nations” and the US Gov’t had followed a policy of dealing with the Indians as tribes whose relation to the US “resembles that of a ward to his guardian” At this time, there was a longstanding legal doctrine of “aboriginal title” whereby Native Americans were recognized as holding undocumented but constitutionally protected property rights over their ancestral domains Barrows disagreed with this, and avoided any mention of such title under the pretext that “US Constitution did not extend to the Philippine Colony” HARBINGERS OF A POLICY Other than aboriginal titles, the most important policy issue concerning un- Hispanized populations was local government: Act No. 48 [11/22/1900] – law establishing the civil government in Benguet Province Act No. 49 – established the first provincial government under the US regime in Benguet [appointment of governor, secretary and inspector by the commission] Act Nos. 82 & 83 – the commission severely curtailed the electoral franchise for peoples it had officially deemed to be civilized or at least “Christian” Act No. 387 [4/9/1902] – establishment of local civil government of Nueva Vizcaya which brought about more disenfranchisement; among the policy recommendations: keep Ifugao in contact with Americans by drafting the men into the Philippine military on a 6-month rotational basis TOWNSHIP GOVERNMENTS & SPECIAL PROVINCES The Nueva Vizcaya model allowed Worcester an opportunity to secure his authoritarian grip over un-Hispanized populations outside of Moro provinces – reaching as far as Ilocos Sur, and Misamis to name a few; Act Nos. 1396 & 97 – established colony-wide policy for provincial and municipal governments in non-Christian areas north of Muslim Mindanao Special Provincial Government Act (SPGA) & Township Government Act (TGA): drafted by Worcester which repealed all previous legislation on local gov’ts in Non-Christian, non- Muslim areas and the act organizing the Moro Province Placed under the direct control of American officials at least 20% of colony’s population and over ½ of its natural resource base; there was a policy of tax exemption Why? “the wild nature of un-hispanized peoples required special forms of governance” so these laws allowed the SOI to appoint all local government heads TOWNSHIP GOVERNMENTS & SPECIAL PROVINCES Provincial Board decided that inhabitants of any township or settlement have advanced sufficiently in civilization and material prosperity to make such a course possible, it was authorized to remove existing tax exemptions but non-Christian tribes were not automatically exempted from all taxes So by 1908, 20,000 Ifugao men were paying their taxes by way of manual labor Act No. 1397 – eligible voters during that time could be disqualified for being delinquent in the payment of taxes Neither the SPGA nor the TGA made any provision for providing the process, let alone the compensation, to peoples unwillingly removed from their ancestral domains: no un-Hispanicized group was ever certified as having advanced sufficiently in civilization criteria for such a determination were purely subjective, and had it been made, Worcester's political control over the areas covered would have been put at risk. MORO PROVINCE: U.S. ARMY ENCLAVE Worcester envisioned that the BNCT would be his primary control mechanism over all un- hispanized peoples Initially, relations between Moros and U.S. Soldiers were friendly U.S. Brigadeer General John C. Bates entered into a formal written agreement with the Sultan of Sulu on 8/20/1899 where the Sultan agreed to sovereignty of the United States over the whole archipelago of Jolo in return for, among other things, monthly salaries payable to the Sultan and other Tausug leaders – but this was eventually abrogated by Roosevelt But on 10/30/1899 – Mindanao, Sulu Archipelago and Palawan were placed under a newly created Military District of Mindanao and Jolo which was re-designated as Dept. of Mindanao 6/15/1903 – Moro Province was established and existed concurrent with the military department [Act No. 787 and 1283] where it was under the direct supervision of the Civil Gov. MORO PROVINCE: U.S. ARMY ENCLAVE U.S. officials assumed that the indigenous populations within the Moro Province possessed a sufficient body of customary laws for resolving conflicts and otherwise preserving peace and order Thus, the Legislative Council was empowered to collect and codify customary laws of the Moros to be enforced in various parts of the Moro Province which shall apply in all civil and criminal actions arising between Moros. But in all civil and criminal actions arising between non-Christian tribes other than Moros, Act of Congress shall govern [Act No. 787] 10/6/1905 – the Legislative Council adopted General Wood’s observations that “Moros and other savage peoples have no laws,” which led to the establishment of Tribal Ward Courts 12/15/1913 – control over the Moro Province passed into the civilian hands and the following year it was reorganized as the Department of Mindanao and Sulu [Act No. 2408] WORCESTER: WHITE APO Secretary Worcester wanted to possess the same powers in Islamized areas that he exercised in other non- Christian territories He waged a vigorous campaign to at least expand his turf by establishing a special province in northcentral Mindanao. Act No. 1683 - during August 1907: the commission split the Bukidnon plateau off from the regular province of Misamis and incorporated it into the Special Province of Agusan Governor Gallman under the tutelage of Worcester was able to garner respect as the supreme leader and decision-maker in the province by developing a “highly personalized, loosely structured, two track legal system which utilized varying degrees of Ifugao and American Law.” INVISIBLE PEOPLES AND THE PUBLIC DOMAIN BUREAUCRACY CHAPTER XIV HIGHLIGHTS US Government was legally bound by the 1989 Paris Peace Treaty which declared that the Philippine cession cannot in any respect impair the property or rights which by law belong to the peaceful possession of property of all kinds, of provinces, public or private establishments, etc and other organizations capable of possessing such properties During this time, lands of the public domain predominantly existed Insular cases (May 1901) which held that the US Constitution did not extend to the Philippine Islands and its peoples Bureaucracies in land use, natural resources