Classification of Speed and Feed Boxes
Classification of Speed and Feed Boxes
Classification of Speed and Feed Boxes
FEED BOXES
ADVANTAGES:
o Simple design
o Small axial dimension
o Cutting speed can be set
precisely with least deviation
between actual and desired rpm
values
o No interlocking devices are
required as it is impossible to
make faulty engagements.
DISADVANTAGES:
o The Relatively large time is required for changing
speed.
o Relatively large oil-leakage losses because the
speed box cover cannot be sealed.
• SPEED BOXES WITH SLIDING GEARS
The method of changing speeds with the help of
sliding gear blocks is most widely used in machine
tools, especially general purpose ones.
DISADVANTAGES:
o The speed can be changed only after braking or
stopping the machine tool, otherwise the gear teeth may
break.
o Interlocking devices are required to prevent engagement
of conflicting transmissions.
o Relatively large axial dimension.
o Only spur gears can be employed.
o Large force is required to shift the gear blocks, and
therefore, manual speed changing by this method can
not be used in heavy duty machine tools.
ADVANTAGES:
o Relatively small radial dimensions and ability to
transmit large torques and power.
o Relatively low wear because gears that do not
participate in a particular transmission remain
disengaged.
• SPEED BOXES WITH JAW CLUTCHES
o Jaw clutches require small axial movement for
engagement and disengagement. They can be
shifted with less physical effort and also permit the
use of helical and herringbone gears in the derive.
o Speed boxes with jaw
clutches are employed in
machine tool with a
combined structure to
engage the countershaft
transmission.
o They are employed in heavy duty machine tools
where manual speed changing using sliding gears is
not possible.
DISADVANTAGES:
o The machine tool must be
disengaged from the derive
before changing the speed
because if braking is applied on
one shaft of the coupling without
disengaging the other from the
derive, it may lead to breaking of
the jaw clutch; sometimes a
synchronizing device is employed
to reduce the speed difference
between the shafts.
o Gears in idle rotation are continuously meshing, thus
leading to unnecessary wear.
• SPEED BOXES WITH FRICTION CLUTCHES
Friction clutches permit changing of speed on a
running machine, and therefore, the speed changing
time is lower than in any other method. They also
permit the use of helical and herringbone gears.
DISADVANTAGES:
o Frictional losses and wear due to continuous
meshing of idle rotating gears.
o Limitations on the value of the transmitted torque as
otherwise the clutch face begins to slip resulting in
non uniform transmission.
o Increased heating of speed box.
o Large axial and radial dimensions of the clutch
elements, which restrict the use of more than two
transmission is a group.
• LATEST METHODOLGY BASED ON
SPEED CHANGING SPEED BOX
A recent development are electromagnetic clutches
in which ferromagnetic powder (carbonil iron with
0.7 – 0.8% carbon) is used instead of friction disks.
Speed changing by friction clutches is employed in
small and medium duty machine tool in which the
cutting time is characteristically low, e.g., capstan
and turret lathes. Electromagnetic clutches are
used in programmed controlled machine tools as
they are easily adaptable to remote and automatic
control. Friction and electromagnetic clutches are
often used in combination with sliding gear blocks.
CLASSIFICATION OF FEED BOXES
Feed boxes works at low
velocities and do not pose
vibrational problems. The
reduction ratios and number of
feed steps in feed boxes are
generally larger than in speed
boxes. There exist a large
number of feed boxes,
consistent with the vast range
of their functional
requirements (rotary or
translator feed motion,
continuous or intermittent feed
motion, etc).
CLASSIFICATION OF FEED BOXES
DISADVANTAGES
o The key may get stuck due to cocking.
o Low rigidity of the driven shaft due to long keyway.
o Poor location of gears on the shaft as they are thin.
o Inability to transmit large torques.
• FEED BOX WITH TUMBLER GEARS
DISADVANTAGES
o Insufficient rigidity and accuracy of meshing.
o Possibility of dirt penetration into the gear box through
slots in the housing.
o Poor lubrication.
• FEED BOX WITH BEVEL GEAR REVERSING
MECHANISM
The tumbler gear mechanism being a non-rigid
construction cannot be used in a modern heavy duty
lathe. The clutch operated bevel gear feed reversing
mechanism incorporated below the head stock or in
apron provides sufficient rigidity in construction.
• FEED BOX WITH MEANDER’S MECHANISM
Meander’s Mechanism consist of identical double cluster
gear blocks on shaft I and intermediate shaft II. Only the
first and second gear block on driving shaft I is rigidly
mounted, the rest of the gears on shaft I and shaft II are
mounted freely. Transmission to the driven shaft III takes
place through a tumbler gear Zt (Shown in disengaged
position) which is mounted on a pin in the arm. The arm
can rotate about shaft III and can also slide axially along
its spline as in Norton’s Mechanism. The feed rate
obtained at the output shaft form a geometric
progression.
MEANDER’S MECHANISM
Beginning with the extreme left gear of shaft II, the
transmission ratios which are obtained by successively
meshing the tumbler gear with gears of shaft II are:
Meander’s mechanism suffers the same shortcomings
as Norton’s Mechanism i.e. insufficient accuracy and
rigidity of meshing.
This difficulty is overcome in some feed boxes by
making gear Zd to mesh directly with the larger gears
of shaft II. This, however, reduces by half the number
of transmission ratios available at the output shaft.
Feed boxes with Meander’s mechanism are generally
employed in thread-cutting lathes.