Level of Significance

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 14

LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE

CRITICAL VALUE
TWO – TAILED AND ONE –
TAILED TEST OF HYPOTHESIS

STEPS IN HYPOTHESIS TESTING

Teacher: Mrs. JENY E. POBLETE


LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
Refers to the probability of
rejecting the null hypothesis when
in fact it is true. There is no single
standard or universal level of
significance for testing hypothesis.
In some instances, a 5 % level of
significance is used.
This implies that the maximum
probability of rejecting a true
null hypothesis is 5 %. This means
that we can accept 5 chances
in 100 that we would reject the
null hypothesis when it is true.
(i.e., we are willing to commit an
alpha error or type I error of 5 %)
A 5 % significance level,
thus implies that we are 95
% confident that we have
made the right decision of
not rejecting a true null
hypothesis. Published
research results often test
hypothesis at 1 % level of
significance.
It is possible to test
hypothesis at any level of
significance. The higher the
significance level we use
for testing a hypothesis, the
higher the probability of
rejecting a null hypothesis
when it is true.
CRITICAL VALUE
Thecritical value is the value
that separates the rejection
region from the non –
rejection region.
TWO – TAILED AND ONE – TAILED TEST OF
HYPOTHESIS

The statement of the


alternative hypothesis
dictates the use of one –
tailed test or two – tailed
test.
TWO – TAILED TEST
A two – tailed test of hypothesis
will reject the null hypothesis if the
sample mean is significantly
higher than or lower than the
hypothesized population mean.
Thus, in a two – tailed test, there
are two rejections.
ONE – TAILED TEST
When the decision maker or
statistician is interested only in
detecting departures from null
hypothesis in one direction, the
hypothesis – testing procedure
is one – tailed test.
STEPS IN HYPOTHESIS - TESTING
 The
procedures in hypothesis testing can be
summarized in the following steps.
Step 1. State the null ( ) and alternative
( ) hypothesis

Step 2: Set the level of significance ( ).

Step 3: Select the appropriate test


procedure.
Step 4: Determine the critical/ rejection
region.
Step 5: Compute the value of the test
statistic.
Step 6: State the statistical decision and
conclusion based on the following
guideline(decision rule)
CRITICAL VALUE APPROACH

(By comparing computed value /s


and critical values/s)
 Reject if the computed value
falls on the rejection region.
 Do not reject if the computed
value falls on the non – rejection
region.
USING P – VALUE APPROACH

 Reject if the p – value is less


than
 Do not reject if the p – value
is greater than or equal to
“If you are not willing to
learn no one can help
you but If you are willing
to Learn no one can stop
you.”

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy