Quality Audit
Quality Audit
Quality Audit
Audit Inspection
Inspection: Focuses on an “ACTION”
Audit: Focuses on “PROCESS”
Definition of Process
“a set of interrelated or interacting activities that
transforms inputs into outputs.”(ISO)
Inspection: “QUANTITATIVE”
Audit: “QUALITATIVE”
Inspection: “SIMPLE”
Audit: “COMPLEX”
Inspection: Creates “ACTIONS”
Audit: Creates “RECOMMENDATIONS”
Inspection: More “CONCURRENT”
Audit: More “RETROSPECTIVE”
Inspection: Focuses “WORKPLACE, WORK
EQUIPMENT OR WORK ACTIVITIES”
Audit: Focuses “MANGEMENT SYSTEM”
Inspection: “VISUAL/OBSERVATIONAL”
Audit: In addition “EVIDENCE
COLLECTION”
Inspection: May involve “LOCAL MANAGEMENT”
Audit: Independent of “LOCAL MANAGEMENT”
Inspection: WHO GMP details “REQUIREMENTS
AND FREQUENCY”
Chapter 9: Personnel
Key Personnel (9.14; the person approving batch for
market has to ensure that)
External Audit
Regulatory Audit
Also called “First Party Audit”
“An audit conducted by the organization itself of
its own management system and procedures”
Objective: To ensure compliance with
established criteria, performance reviews and
continual improvement
Also called “Second Party 'Audit”/ “Supplier’s Audit”
“An audit conducted by parties having an interest in the
organization”
Objective:
To perform assessment of suppliers by customers or by
any other party
To appraise performance of suppliers/customers
Capability verification
Also called “Third Party Audit”
“An audit conducted by independent auditing
organization for review or issuance of certificates”
Objective:
To verify organization’s compliance with requirements
of standard.
GUIDELINES FOR AUDITING
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
1-Scope
2-Normative references
3-Terms & definitions
4-Principles of auditing
5-Managing an audit program
6-Performing an audit
7-Competence & evaluation of auditors
Six principles to be followed:
1. Integrity
2. Fair Presentation
3. Due Professional Care
4. Confidentiality
5. Independence
6. Evidence Based Approach
1. Integrity: foundation of professionalism
2. Fair Presentation: the obligation to report
truthfully and accurately
Audit findings, audit conclusions and audit
reports should reflect truthfully and accurately
the audit activities.
Significant obstacles during audit and unresolved
diverging opinions between audit team & auditee
should be reported.
The communication should be truthful, accurate,
objective, timely, clear and complete
3. Due Professional Care: the application of
diligence and judgment
4. Confidentiality: security of information
5. Independence: the basis for impartiality of
audit and objectivity of the audit conclusion
6. Evidence based approach: the rational method
for reaching reliable and reproducible audit
conclusions in a systematic audit process
1. Auditors Pre-Audit
2. Procedures
3. Work Instructions 1. Audit Report
4. Records During Audit
Post Audit
To be performed prior to audit:
1. Establish initial contact with auditee
2. Document review
a. Review of manuals & procedures
b. Websites, pre audit reports etc
c. Audit plan
d. Audit checklist
e. Observations
f. Feasibility
3. Audit team formation (Roles & responsibilities)
To be performed during audit i.e; on audit site:
1. Meeting with top management
2. Conduct opening meeting
3. Collecting evidence
a. Interview
b. Observation
c. Document review
4. Generating audit evidence
5. Verification of audit evidence with criteria
6. Generating audit finding (CAR, OFI)
8. Closing meeting
To be performed after audit:
1. Audit report
2. Verification of activities by physical visit or
document review (Follow up audit)
3. Close out of audit findings
1. Establish initial contact with auditee:
a. Communication with auditee
b. Confirmation of authority to audit
c. Requesting information on audit scope, objectives, methods and
audit team
d. Request documentation & records
e. Proposed timings
f. Arrangements of auditing
g. Agree on attendance of observers
h. Any area of concern or interest
i. Any rules & regulations
Audit Scope:
“Extent & boundaries of audit”
It is defined in terms of physical location, organizational units,
activities & processes to be audited & time or duration of audit
Audit Criteria:
“Set of policies, procedures or requirements used as reference
against which audit evidence is compared”
DRAP regulations, FDA GMP, WHO GMP, ISO standards,
company policies, manuals, SOPs, specifications, work
instructions are examples of audit criteria
Audit team:
Should be selected based on skills & competence needed to
achieve audit objectives within the defined scope.
Members:
One or more auditors
Technical expert
Team leader
Team leader
Assigns duties & responsibilities to team members
Plans, directs & controls the activities of audit
In some cases he may alone perform all the activities
Auditor
Responsible to perform activities as assigned by team leader
Technical expert
Also called “Sector Expert” who has special experience & knowledge of
audit area
Interpreter
May be required where language or cultural difference are faced
Arbitrator
To resolve any dispute or issues during the audit due to conflict of interest
Guide
To assist or guide the auditor during audit
Observers
Trainee auditors from junior management or from audit organiation who
pursue their career in auditing
Audit Plan: To be developed by team leader
It should include or reference following items:
Audit objectives
Audit scope
Audit criteria & reference documents
Location
Total time duration
Audit team members
description of sites, activities and processes & allocation
of resources
Audit Plan: To be developed by team leader
It my also include:
Names of auditees
Audit language
Roles & responsibilities of team members
Audit report topics
Classification of CARs/NCRs
Logistics
Issues related to confidentiality
Any arrangements for audit follow-up actions
Audit Checklist
To be prepared by audit members
Series of questions on audit
An aid or guide during audit
Think “What to look at” & “What to look for”
Advantages of Checklist
Gives an aid or guide
Helps to control the pace of audit
Tool to record response of auditee
Helps maintain guided sequence
Nothing is forgotten
Sets priorities of questions
Reduces workload during audit
Reflects auditor’s professionalism
Provides space to write audit notes
Disadvantages of Checklist
Items/questions not written are left over
Confinement to checklist items
Prevents auditor from observations and open mindness
It may become a tick list
If it has many questions, it may irritate auditee
May stifle initiative and process analysis
Prepare a logically effective and efficient audit plan, showing
a documented list of activities that the team would perform
during on-site auditing, showing:
Areas/departments of company to be covered
All timings and activities of the audit team for duration of the
audit
The activities of the plant where the audit would commence
The progression from the first activity to the next, and so on, until
complete
Prepare an audit checklist and any other work
documents that you feel are necessary or
appropriate for use during the audit; use any of 3
chapters of WHO GMP as audit criteria. Prepare
maximum of 10 questions
Compose an audit team stating the roles of
members
1. Meeting with top management
Keep top management aware of the audit activities
Points to be audited for top management
Commitments of top management
Continual improvement
Implementation and communication of quality policy
Monitoring & measurement of quality objectives
Provision of resources
Compliance with legal & other requirements
KPIs monitoring
Commitment towards customer satisfaction
2. Opening Meeting
Objective:
Establishment of communication with auditee
Confirmation of agreement on audit
Confirmation of audit objectives
Explanation of audit plan
To be done by lead auditor
2. Opening Meeting
Activities:
Introduction of all participants
Attendance
Agenda distribution
Audit plan distribution
Open meeting by explaining the purpose of audit
Explanation of responsibilities of lead auditor,
auditor, observer & guide
Briefing auditee about audit
Confirm audit objectives
2. Opening Meeting
Activities:
Confirm scope of audit
Confirm audit criteria
Confirm audit language
Confirm availability of resources & facilities
Discuss professional conduct/confidentiality
Confirmation of auditing methods & strategies
Confirmation of time table
Solving auditee’s conflict/response
2. Opening Meeting
Activities:
Explanation of conditions where audit can be
terminated
Explanation of appeal system
Discussion on audit report
Audit follow-up actions
Confirmation of time of closing meeting
Give opportunity to auditee to ask any questions
3. Collecting evidences
What is audit evidence
“Records, statements of facts or other
information which are relevant to audit
criteria & verifiable” (ISO 19011)
“Pieces of information collected by auditor
to determine whether the system being
audited is in accordance with the
established audit criteria”
3. Collecting evidences
A variety of methods may be used:
Interviews
Observations
Review of documents & records
Interviews
Select the right person
Interview persons that manage, perform, and verify
activities with responsibility & authority for work
Conduct interviews at the agreed time & location
Explain the reason for interview
Record the response & important information
obtained for future reference
Explain the reason for interview
Interviews
Questioning techniques (5 Ws & one H)
Observations
Must be highly observant
Must keep eyes & ears open
Record any evidence collected by observation; it can
be used later by the audit team to report any non
conformance
Review documents & records
One of the best tool for collecting evidence
Check if document is approved, current , controlled
& relevant?
Check if records are properly maintained &
controlled?
Review documents & records
Examples of documents & records
Policies, objectives, manuals
SOPs. Work instructions
Soft & paper data
Purchase records
Storage & dispensing records
Manufacturing records
Cleaning records
Validations
Stability data etc etc
Audit trail
“Set of records, or activities that follow a particular
sequence or chronological order”
During interviews, observations & questioning auditor can
build an audit trail by asking questions which are interrelated
or in a sequence to identify any observation
Audit sampling
Samples are audited; it is not practical to observe
every function, area, process, documents or records
2 methods of audit sampling:
Judgment based sampling
Knowledge
Skill
experience
Statistical sampling
Statistical techniques e.g; probability, attributes based or
variable based sampling
Controlling the audit
Dos
Ask open ended questions
Be on time
Be prepared
Be impartial
Be composed
Listen
Talk to the right person
Remain focused
Controlling the audit
Dos
Build audit trail
Be honest, fair, professional
Be knowledgeable
Try not to be biased
Be polite & calm
Give compliments
Controlling the audit
Don’ts
Don’t panic
Don’t be rude
Don’t be aggressive
Don’t be timid
Don’t ask duplicate questions
Don’t rely on guides & auditee
Don’t rely on statements only
Controlling the audit
Don’ts
Don’t ask leading questions
Don’t ask close ended questions
Don’t nit-pick
Don’t trust on memory
Don’t be biased
Don’t compare with other sections or
companies
Controlling the audit
Don’ts
Don’t ask tricky question
Don’t assume or presume anything
Don’t shower too many questions
Don’t let auditee lead the audit
Don’t act superior
Don’t talk down
Don’t talk to irrelevant persons
Controlling the audit
Be mentally prepared for
Aggressive auditees
Timid auditees
Missing people
Missing documents
Missing keys
Prepared samples
Special cases
Local issues & cultural customs
Audit finding
“Result of evaluation of the collected audit
evidence against audit criteria” (ISO 19011:2011)
Audit finding may be non-conformity or conformity
Non-conformity: “The non-fulfillment of a requirement”
Non conformity and its objective evidence must be
recorded.
Writing statement of non-conformity
Brief overview of non-conformity
Failure in the system
Audit evidence
State the requirement (e.g; applicable GMP/ISO clause
and description)
“Management review meeting was no conducted last year as per
schedule No. 123. No evidence of conducting management review
meetings as per management review meeting schedule.
9.3. Management Review, the management shall review the
organization’s QMS at planned intervals
Corrective action report (CAR)/NCR
Major NCR where,
Total breakdown of a process or procedure which is
critical to QMS or product or service
Total absence of a requirement mentioned in standard .
A number of minor lapses in system, which when taken
together suggest a total or important breakdown in the
process
Corrective action request (CAR)/NCR
Minor NCR where,
A lack has been identified in a process, activity, product
or service in the operation of QMS but its severity is not
high
There is a minor non-compliance in a system which is
not affecting the process or quality.
Corrective action report (CAR)/NCR
*Opportunity for improvement (OFI) where,
Areas which are in compliance but may further be
improved
Concerns are not yet serious enough to issue NCR/CAR
Deficiencies are seen in which there is a doubt
Major NC:
Minor NC/Others:
Critical NC
A deficiency which has produced, or leads to a
significant risk of producing either a product which
is harmful to the human or veterinary patient or a
product which could result in a harmful residue in a
food producing animal.
Critical NC
A critical deficiency also occurs when it is observed
document review