Crisis Management - Volkswagen Case Study
Crisis Management - Volkswagen Case Study
Crisis Management - Volkswagen Case Study
Unfortunately, the way the company handled the scandal made things even
worse. As the story continued to evolve, the company’s response was seen as
inconsistent and, at times, contradictory to previous statements. Executives
claimed they didn’t know about the cheating, only to reveal they did just a few
days later. Meanwhile, the company’s PR and social media teams struggled to
keep up.
As the company set out to recall millions of vehicles, officials promised to
reimburse some, but not all, customers for their troubles.
All the while, consumers reported that the company seemed to be handling the
crisis in a dishonest way by not fully “owning” its role in the scandal.
Pre-crisis
According to the EPA, Volkswagen
had insisted for a year before the
outbreak of the scandal that
discrepancies were mere technical
glitches. Volkswagen only fully
acknowledged that they had
manipulated the vehicle emission
tests after being confronted with
evidence regarding the "defeat
device".
Creditors
Employees
Message
action plan
Repercussions in India
As of 25 September 2015, the Indian government directed the Automotive
Research Association of India (ARAI) to investigate whether Volkswagen's
vehicles had circumvented Indian laws and regulations on vehicle emission
testing. On 22 September 2015 the Indian Foundation of Transport, Research
and Training (IFTRT) demanded a probe into Volkswagen's Confirmation of
Production process for vehicles sold in India. In October the Government of
India later extended its deadline for the test results to the end of October
2015. On 11 January 2017, ARAI's investigation into defeat devices was
published and revealed that Volkswagen India had installed a derivation of
the software used in the U.S. to defeat emission testing procedures in all of
the Volkswagen group's product range in India with EA 189 engine series. This
included 1.2-L, 1.5-L, 1.6-L and 2.0-L diesel engine variants across three
different brands - Audi, Skoda and Volkswagen. The report called the defeat
device "not a product failure but a clear case of cheating".
New orders, September 2015
As of October 2015, Sales of vehicles with EA 189 engines were halted
in some European countries, including Spain, Switzerland, Italy, the
Netherlands, Belgium and the UK.
In the United States, VW withdrew its application for emissions
certification for its 2016 diesel models, leaving thousands of
vehicles stranded at ports in October 2015, which the company said
contained software which should have been disclosed to and certified
by the EPA.EPA quarantined some 2016-models until it would become
clear that their catalysts perform the same on the road as they do in
tests.
Compensation, November 2015
● On 18 November 2015, VW said that approximately one quarter of the
affected vehicle owners had applied to the program, which was estimated
to cost at least $120 million in benefits.
● On 21 April 2016, the federal district court for the Northern District of
California, announced that Volkswagen would offer its US customers
"substantial compensation" and buyback nearly 500,000 2.0-litre
vehicles, as part of a settlement in North America.
Media
Mapping
Advertising, 2015