Foreign Aid and Dev

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 16

FOREIGN AID AND

DEVELOPMENT
Lecture 5
2 Oct 2019
2K19
Foreign Aid

 It consists of all resources – physical goods, skills and technical


know-how, financial grants or loans transferred by donors to
recipients.
 Development Aid: Aid directed to poverty reduction, human
welfare and development.
 Development Assistance Committee: formed in 1960, 29
members. Coined ODA.
 Official Development Assistance: Government aid designed to
promote economic development and welfare of developing
countries. Pakistan, Nepal, Mongolia, Tanzania, Haiti, Brazil,
Botswana.
History of Foreign Aid

 The role of aid was a source of capital to trigger economic


growth through higher investment during 50s;
 Backward agri sector and modern industrial sector, not
sufficient for economic development;
 In the wake of the Second World War comprise the major
basis for the development of today’s aid machinery;
 1948: George Marshall, planned to aid the reconstruction of
war-torn Europe at end of WW II. Industrial centers were
ruined, agricultural production disrupted, infrastructure
destroyed. Aid given $13b for infrastructure development,
food supply, fuel and machinery.
 UN Charter: agreed in 1945, committed all countries to work for
promotion of higher living standards, full employment, economic
and social progress.
 Universal Declaration of Human Rights: 1948, everyone has a right
to food, clothing and shelter.
 Church initiated the delivery of social services.
 1950s: emergency relief aid was dominated by FAO; launched its
first ‘freedom from hunger’ campaign to sensitize the world.
 1960s: Multilateral and bilateral aid gained prominence. UN
proclaimed it as first Development Decade, formulating a strategy
for flow of capital to developing countries – 1% of national income.
 Success of Marshall Plan turned the focus to problems of
developing world.
 Assistance was given in 1970s during first oil crisis by IMF,
 In 1980s World Bank started structural adjustment loans;
 Unicef-financed study Adjustment with a Human Face argued
that adjustment policies neglected the poor and should be
redesigned;
 1990 W.B designed New Poverty Agenda of donor agencies
but initially resisted;
 Loans and grants,
 Aid is treated as a foreign policy instrument applied to help
achieve a range of political, strategic, economic, as well as
humanitarian objectives.
 Donors require conducive environment in recipient countries
as well as absorptive capacity;
 Evidence: U.S aid guided by strategic considerations, Japanese
aid by commercial objectives and Dutch and Nordic aid by
recipient needs.
 Pakistan has received $22.85 Billion from all donors in last five
yrs. G7 countries contributed $339 Million to higher education,
Does Foreign Aid Really Work?

 Mousetrap: Efficacy of aid remains a contested issue;


 Assessing impact of aid difficult, different factors are
at play in eco. and social development;
 Impact of development intervention will not
produce result in a short span;
 Positive impact of aid is heavily dependent on
ownership and commitment to the development
projects by the recipient.
Measuring Impact of Aid

 Since its inception, the impact has been disputed. Critics of aid
assert that it does not work but its supporters contend that it
does.
 Discrepancies: gaps in data, uncertainties in methods to assess
the relationship b/w aid and its outcomes, difference in
recording the amount of aid by donors and recipients, weak
governance of recipient countries, overall impact of aid is
difficult to calculate as it does not include private donations
and ignore humanitarian and emergency aid.
 For instance aid given for rescue and relief will be instant and
will give hardly any result if analyzed after a long period.
Africa

 Decades of foreign aid have done little in changing


the destinies of African countries. West has spent
$600 b on foreign aid to Africa, yet
underdevelopment is widespread.
 Aid creates dependency on external donation for
poverty alleviation and undermines ppl’s faith.
 Donors fail to tell African leaders where they are
wrong, no mutual accountability, no alignment of aid
with national development strategies, elite capture.
 ‘Aid is a double-edged sword’ where economic
and political environment is right it can be utilized
properly. E.g Botswana: Population of 1.9m it has
maintained the highest economic growth, moving
from poor country to middle-income country.
Although country is rich in minerals but viable and
self-reliant population moved the country towards
development.
Donors & Service Delivery

 In good country environments where there are genuine


reformers, donors should integrate their support in the
recipient’s development strategy.
 Donors should strengthen the critical relationships among
policymakers, providers, and clients.
 Donors should support recipient institutions by realigning
their financial assistance and knowledge transfers with the
recipient’s service delivery focusing more on outcomes and
results.
 Donors should adopt client feedback system.
 In Kenya a World Bank agricultural project paid
eight local staff between $3,000 and $6,000 a month,
many times the $250 available to a senior economist
in the civil service.
 Creates market distortions
 Donors tend to be generous with training. In
Malawi, training accounts for a staggering $4.5
million, or 10 percent of donor spending on health
care a year.
Promoting Voice

 Importance of voice in service reform attempts include


imposing conditions and setting performance criteria on
aid flows where voice is weak, providing direct support to
democratic governance and actively promoting
transparency and participatory processes.
 What works better is choosing recipients more carefully,
based on performance and setting conditions that reward
reforms completed.
 Poverty-reduction strategies seek to promote stronger
citizen voice, with an e¤ective link to public spending.
Impact Evaluation

 Large public sector organizations in both donor


and recipient countries focus on inputs rather than
outputs and outcomes.
 Broken feedback loop between taxpayers in the
donor country and beneficiaries in the recipient
country.
 Outcome-oriented international targets.
Reforming Aid

 Aid agencies want to be able to identify their own contributions, often


through distinct projects, to facilitate feedback to taxpayers and sustain
political support for aid flows. A new hospital is easier to showcase
than the outcome of policy reform or budget support.
 Politicians and policymakers in donor countries cannot dismiss the
interest groups that support them.
 Donors often are most comfortable with service delivery systems of the
type operating in their own country.
 If donors do not pay attention to what the other donors are doing, they
may concentrate too much on higher-priority sectors, leaving sectors
with a lower priority, such as rural roads in Zambia, short of funds.
There may be duplication.
 https://
www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-Q3zWv0Evw

 https://vimeo.com/34074760

 https://vimeo.com/16326490

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy